Hamas Ready to Cooperate with ICRC If Israel Opens Humanitarian Corridors in Gaza
Hamas statements came in response to the harsh criticism from Western leaders after releasing videos showing Israeli hostages in a visibly emaciated and fragile state. Hostage Videos
On Thursday, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad released video of Rom Braslavski, in which he appeared thin and crying due to lack of food and water. Then, on Saturday, Hamas published video of emaciated Evyatar David, digging a hole 'for his own grave,' reported Reuters.
The videos sparked fierce reaction from Israel and Western leaders. Israel accused Hamas of starving hostages, with the Israeli Foreign Ministry announcing that the UN Security Council will hold a special session on Tuesday morning to discuss the situation of the hostages in Gaza.
Moreover, countries such as France, Germany, the UK and the US condemned the videos, with French President, Emmanuel Macron, calling them 'unbearable' and German Chancellor, Friedrich Merz, arguing that the images 'show that Hamas should have no role in Gaza's future.'
The ICRC in Israel and the Occupied Territories also said it was 'appalled' by the videos, urging that the 'dire situation must come to an end.' An Appeal to ICRC
Israeli officials believe that Hamas is holding 50 hostages in Gaza, only 20 of whom are still alive. The Palestinian group has banned humanitarian organizations' access to the hostages and their families have no information about their condition.
After the release of the videos, the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, spoke with the ICRC's regional head on Sunday, requesting 'his involvement in the immediate provision of food and medical care for the hostages,' reported CNN citing Netanyahu's office.
The office also reiterated denial of starvation in Gaza, despite the UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) warning that the 'worst-case scenario of famine' is 'now unfolding' in Gaza. Hamas Conditions
In response, Hamas said it was ready to 'deal positively' with the ICRC but on the condition that Israel opens humanitarian corridors into Gaza on a regular and permanent basis and halts airstrikes during the distribution of aid.
Furthermore, the Palestinian movement said that the emaciated state of the hostages reflected the worsening conditions in the Strip.
In the light of this, the spokesperson of al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas' military wing, Abu Obeida, said that Hamas does not intentionally starve the hostages, adding that they eat the same food that the general Gaza population and the group's fighters eat. 'They will not receive any special privileges amid the crime of starvation and siege,' he noted. Hunger Crisis
Gaza is enduring a worsening starvation crisis, with malnutrition-related deaths spiking in July. The World Health Organization (WHO) warned last week that malnutrition rates in the enclave reached 'alarming levels,' with more than 5,000 children under five admitted for outpatient treatment of malnutrition in just the first two weeks of July.
According to Gaza's Health Ministry, starvation and malnutrition inflicted by the war have claimed the lives of 175 Palestinians in the enclave, including 93 children, as of Sunday, August 3, 2025. Meanwhile, the war's death toll has exceeded 60,800.
Moreover, 1,487 Palestinian aid seekers have been killed by Israeli gunfire while trying to collect food supplies from aid distribution sites and more than 10,500 others have been injured. Gaza Ceasefire Stalemate
Ceasefire talks to end the war in Gaza have reached a deadlock, after the US and Israel pulled their negotiating teams from Doha, saying they would consider alternatives. Israel has put Hamas' disarmament as one of the key conditions to reach a ceasefire in Gaza, but the Palestinian movement firmly rejects that demand.
During a recent visit to Israel, the US Special Envoy, Steve Witkoff, told the hostage families that Washington was working with the Israeli government on a plan to end the war in Gaza, saying Hamas expressed it willingness to abandon its arms.
However, Hamas dismissed Witkoff's claims, insisting that it would not abandon 'armed resistance' unless an 'independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital' was established.
Meanwhile, Hamas has emphasized its commitment to ceasefire and hostage release talks, but on the condition that the humanitarian situation in Gaza improves.
'It is essential to improve the catastrophic humanitarian situation significantly and to obtain a written response from the enemy regarding our response. This is a condition to go back to negotiations,' Basem Naim, a senior Hamas political official, told CNN
Short link :
Post Views: 70
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
28 minutes ago
- Arab News
Germany should consider Israel sanctions, senior lawmaker says after trip
BERLIN: A senior lawmaker in German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's coalition on Monday said Berlin should consider sanctions on Israel including a partial suspension of weapons exports or the suspension of a European Union-wide political agreement. The call by Siemtje Moeller, the deputy leader of the Social Democrats (SPD) parliamentary faction, reflects a sharpening of rhetoric from Berlin against Israel which has yet to yield any major policy changes however. Moeller, whose SPD joined a coalition with Merz's conservatives this year, wrote a letter to SPD lawmakers after returning from a trip to Israel with Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul last week. 'My assessment is that the Israeli government will move little without pressure. If such concrete improvements fail to materialize in the near future, there must be consequences,' she said in the letter, seen by Reuters. Recognition of a Palestinian state should not be 'taboo,' she said, adding that Israeli statements that there were no restrictions on aid to Gaza were not convincing. At the same time, Moeller demanded the immediate and unconditional release of the hostages held by Hamas. She said Hamas must no longer play a role in a political future in Gaza. 'It must be disarmed, its reign of terror must end.' Western nations have intensified efforts to exert pressure on Israel, with Britain, Canada and France signalling their readiness to recognize a Palestinian state in Israeli-occupied territory at the United Nations General Assembly this September. Israel has criticized France, Britain and Canada, saying their decision will reward Hamas. Critics argue that Germany's response remains overly cautious, shaped by an enduring sense of historical guilt for the Holocaust and reinforced by pro-Israel sentiment in influential media circles, weakening the West's collective ability to apply meaningful pressure on Israel. The Gaza war began when Hamas killed more than 1,200 people and took 251 hostage in a cross-border attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, according to Israeli figures. Israel's air and ground war in densely populated Gaza has since killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, according to enclave health officials. A growing number of civilians are dying from starvation and malnutrition, Gaza health authorities say, with images of starving children shocking the world and intensifying criticism of Israel over its curbs on aid into the enclave. Israel blames Hamas for the suffering in Gaza but, in response to a rising international outcry, it announced steps last week to let more aid reach the population, including pausing fighting for part of the day in some areas, approving air drops and announcing protected routes for aid convoys.
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Why the delay in judging Israeli war crimes?
The Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem released a comprehensive report on July 27 describing the Israeli war on Gaza as genocide. However, the delay in publishing such an indictment is troubling and adds to an existing problem of politically motivated decision-making processes that have, in their own right, prolonged Israeli war crimes. The report accused Israel of committing genocide, a conclusion reached after a detailed analysis of the military campaign's intent, the systematic destruction of civilian life, and the government-engineered famine. This finding is significant because it adds to the massive body of legal and testimonial evidence affirming the Palestinian position that Israel's actions in Gaza constitute a genocide. Moreover, the fact that B'Tselem is an Israeli organization is doubly important. It represents an insider's indictment of the horrific massacres and the government-engineered famine in Gaza, directly challenging the baseless argument that accusing Israel of genocide is an act of antisemitism. Western media were particularly interested in this finding, even though numerous firsthand Palestinian reports and investigations are often ignored or downplayed. This double standard continues to feed into a chronic media problem in its perception of Palestine and Israel. Claims by Palestinians of Israeli war crimes have historically been ignored by mainstream media or academia. Whether the Zionist militia's massacre of Tantura in 1948, the actual number of Palestinians and Lebanese killed in the massacres of Sabra and Shatila in Lebanon in 1982, or the events resulting in the Jenin massacre in the West Bank in 2002, the media has frequently ignored the Palestinian account. It often gains a degree of validation only if it is backed by Israeli or Western voices. The latest B'Tselem report is no exception. But another question must be asked: Why did it take almost two years for B'Tselem to reach such an obvious conclusion? Israeli rights groups, in particular, have far greater access to the conduct of the Israeli army, the statements of politicians, and Hebrew media coverage than any other entity. Such a conclusion, therefore, should have been reached in a matter of two months, not two years. This kind of intentional delay has so far defined the position of many international institutions, organizations, and individuals whose moral authority would have helped Palestinians establish the facts of the genocide globally much earlier. For example, despite the International Court of Justice's historic ruling on Jan. 26, 2024, that determined there are plausible grounds for South Africa's accusation of Israel of committing genocide, the court is still unable, or unwilling, to produce a conclusive ruling. A definitive ruling would have put significant pressure on Israel to end its mass killing in Gaza. Instead, for now, the ICJ expects Israel to investigate itself — a highly unrealistic expectation at a time when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promises his extremist ministers that Israel will encourage the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. The same indictment of intentional and politicized delays can be attributed to the International Criminal Court. While it issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant on Nov. 21, 2024, no concrete action has been taken. Instead, it is Karim Khan, the ICC's chief prosecutor, who finds himself attacked by the US government and media for having the courage to follow through on the investigation. Individuals, too, especially those who have been associated with 'revolutionary' politics — the likes of Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders, among others — have been reluctant to act. On March 22, 2024, Ocasio-Cortez refused to use the term genocide in Gaza, going as far as claiming that while she saw an 'unfolding genocide,' she was not yet ready to use the term herself. Sanders, on the other hand, who has spoken out repeatedly and strongly against Netanyahu, describing him in an interview with CNN on July 31 as a 'disgusting liar,' has had repeated moral lapses since the start of the war. When the term genocide was used by many far less 'radical' politicians, Sanders doubled down during a lecture at a university in Ireland. He said that the word genocide 'makes him queasy,' and he urged people to be 'careful about it.' Delays born of political calculation and fear of retribution have given Israel the critical space it needed to carry out its genocide. Dr. Ramzy Baroud These are not simply lost opportunities or instances of moral equivocation; they have had a profound and direct impact on Israel's behavior. The timely intervention of governments, international institutions, high courts, media, and human rights groups would have fundamentally changed the dynamics of the war. Such collective pressure could have forced Israel and its allies to end the war, potentially saving thousands of lives. Delays born of political calculation and fear of retribution have given Israel the critical space it needed to carry out its genocide. Israel is actively exploiting this lack of legal and moral clarity to persist in its mass slaughter of Palestinians. This must change. The Palestinian perspective, their suffering, and their truths must be respected and honored without needing validation from Israeli or other sources. The Palestinian voice and their rights must be truly centered, not as an academic cliche or political jargon, but as an undeniable, everyday reality. As for those who have delayed their verdict regarding the Israeli genocide, no rationale can possibly absolve them. They will be judged by history, and by the desperate pleas of Gaza's mothers and fathers, who tried and failed to save their children from the Israeli killing machine and the world's collective silence or inaction.
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
US states must reject Israel boycotts to receive federal emergency funding
US states and cities that boycott Israeli companies will be denied federal aid for natural disaster preparedness, the Trump administration has announced, tying routine federal funding to its political stance. The Federal Emergency Management Agency stated in grant notices posted on Friday that states must follow its 'terms and conditions.' Those conditions require they certify they will not sever 'commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies' to qualify for funding. The requirement applies to at least $1.9 billion that states rely on to cover search-and-rescue equipment, emergency manager salaries and backup power systems among other expenses, according to 11 agency grant notices reviewed by Reuters. The requirement is the Trump administration's latest effort to use federal funding to promote its views on Israel. The Department of Homeland Security, the agency that oversees FEMA, in April said that boycotting Israel is prohibited for states and cities receiving its grant funds. FEMA separately said in July that US states will be required to spend part of their federal terrorism prevention funds on helping the government arrest migrants, an administration priority. The Israel requirement takes aim at BDS, the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement designed to put economic pressure on Israel to end its occupation of Palestinian territories. The campaign's supporters grew more vocal in 2023, after Hamas attacked southern Israel and Israel invaded Gaza in response. 'DHS will enforce all antidiscrimination laws and policies, including as it relates to the BDS movement, which is expressly grounded in antisemitism,' a spokesperson for Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem said in a statement. The requirement is largely symbolic. At least 34 states already have anti-BDS laws or policies, according to a University of Pennsylvania law journal. The BDS Movement did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The American Jewish Committee supports the Trump administration's policy, said Holly Huffnagle, the group's director of antisemitism policy. The AJC is an advocacy group that supports Israel. Under one of the grant notices posted on Friday, FEMA will require major cities to agree to the Israel policy to receive a cut of $553.5 million set aside to prevent terrorism in dense areas. New York is due to receive $92.2 million from the program, the most of all the recipients. Allocations are based on the agency's analysis of 'relative risk of terrorism,' according to the notice.
