Hidden Cost Of 'Free' Apps: How Your Data And Decisions Are Monetized
Let's be honest: 'Free' apps such as Robinhood and TikTok are everywhere, shouting out that you can get wealthy or be entertained without spending a nickel. These slick devices and mood-altering effects have fixed tens of millions of people in their shadow. But here's the truth about free stuff: nothing is free. They also profit from your data, push you towards riskier bets and costing people thousands of dollars in losses and nothing to show for it.
Whether you chalk it up to gamified trading and influencer hype, or the endless email promotions, the price of these platforms is finally sinking into the consumer psyche. Robinhood had burst on the scene in 2013, with a sales pitch about commission-free trading and a mission to 'democratize' wealth. The infinite scroll of short, addictive videos on TikTok made it a global phenomenon. Both apps are free to download and use and do not require a subscription. But if you are not paying, then you are the product.
Robinhood made $331 million in 2021 from 'payment for order flow,' a way that market makers pay to process your trades, in order to nudge you to trade more, whether or not it's a bad call. ByteDance, the Chinese company that owns TikTok, has been accused of sharing user data with advertisers that could be used to employ supremely targeted ads. A 2023 report by the Center for Digital Democracy put TikTok's data driven ad revenue above $15 billion a year.
These apps don't just accumulate information; they drown you in it. Robinhood's app is designed to feel like a game, complete with bursts of confetti when you make a trade and push notifications that encourage you to keep up with the Joneses. It's no wonder many of its users were participating in dangerous options trading as of 2022, according to FINRA, and the vast majority having zero investing experience or knowledge.
TikTok's algorithm also ensures you keep scrolling by serving up more of what hooks you, be that videos that tout 'meme stocks' such as GameStop or AMC. Social influencers are pushing these stocks which results in a buying frenzy. That was also true in 2021, when investor hype on Reddit and TikTok sent the share price of GameStop soaring before the price tumbled and retail investors got 'left holding the bag.'
The problem: real people are the ones paying the price. According to a 2021 CNBC article, Dogecoin's 26,000% surge in six months was driven partly by teens and young adults on TikTok and Reddit, many of whom used apps like Robinhood to trade. The article highlighted that inexperienced investors, often in their late teens to early twenties, were drawn to the 'get rich quick' scheme, with some losing significant sums when the market corrected.
It's important for investors to understand that the algorithms on these platforms privilege what benefits them, not what's best for you. The S.E.C. fined Robinhood $70 million in 2023 for confusingly documenting risks to users. TikTok's been sued over privacy problems, but both just keep getting bigger.
Key Takeaway: "Free" apps come with a catch. They profit from your data, attention, and sometimes your finances. Be cautious and always conduct thorough, independent research before investing, and don't let app nudges or influencer hype drive your decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sterling bounces off two-year low on euro, soft on dollar
LONDON (Reuters) -The pound briefly hit a two-year low versus the euro on Monday, before rebounding, and dipped on the dollar, though its moves were largely a function of those elsewhere as investors digested the announcement of an EU-U.S. trade deal. The pound was last down 0.2% on the dollar at $1.34185, its lowest in a week, having struggled late last week because of soft British retail sales and business activity data. The pound was more volatile against the euro, which rose as high as 87.69 pence in early Asia trade, its highest since May 2023, as its gains last week were extended in a kneejerk bounce after the announcement of the trade deal. The common currency then reversed course, both broadly, and on the pound, as investors speculated that U.S. trade deals, in aggregate, would boost the dollar and so the euro's gains at its expense would cease. [FRX/] On the pound the euro was last down 0.5% at 86.99 pence. Investors are divided on sterling, partly due to disagreement on whether the Bank of England will step up the pace of its rate cuts later this year, something that would weigh on the currency. Inflation in Britain has proven sticky, meaning policymakers are loath to cut rates too quickly unless they are forced to, and recent data - soft but not terrible - has not yet definitively answered that question. "Another round of only modestly weaker data than expected were enough to push sterling to fresh lows versus the euro," said Barclays analysts in a note. "In our view, the pound's weakness is overdone and due a correction," they said, anticipating that the euro will fall to around 85 pence, which would be consistent with the gap between British and euro zone interest rates. Others expect that more BoE cuts, while the ECB now appears to be on hold, would hurt the pound against the euro. Nomura analysts see the euro rising to 89.75 pence. Little British economic data is due this week. The BoE meets next week, and markets are all but fully pricing in a 25 basis point rate cut, one of only two more they expect this year. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Fast Company
42 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Why Elon Musk's ‘Baby Grok' has child safety advocates alarmed
The AI companion space will soon see another new entrant. Elon Musk, the owner of xAI and social media platform X, announced recently, 'We're going to make Baby Grok @xAI, an app dedicated to kid-friendly content.' The decision to enter the AI chatbot and companion market seems logical for X: Around three in every four U.S. teens have already used AI companions, and the platform will naturally want to build brand loyalty early. However, experts in child protection and social media use are raising concerns. Musk, xAI, and child-focused apps may not be a good combination, they warn. 'The concern is that if X or xAI are going to try to get into the children products zone, clearly they just have a terrible track record with prioritizing child safety,' says Haley McNamara, SVP of strategic initiatives and programs at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE). 'They've just proven themselves to not really care, so I think that they should stay away from kids.' McNamara is not alone in her concerns. The apprehension is shared internationally. 'Elon Musk's plans to launch a child-focused version of Grok will cause alarm across civil society, with growing evidence about the risks posed by persuasive design choices in AI chatbots, a lack of effective safeguarding in most major industry models, and no clear strategy to prevent hallucinations,' says Andy Burrows, CEO of the Molly Rose Foundation, an organization founded by the parents of U.K. teenager Molly Russell, a 14-year-old who died by suicide after being exposed to harmful content on social media. Beyond the fact that 'Baby Grok' would come from the same organization that developed 'Ani,' a sexualized AI chatbot that users have quickly coerced into explicit conversations, and 'Bad Rudi,' a red panda chatbot that defaults to insults, experts see broader dangers. Burrows is particularly worried about introducing AI chatbots to children since they may easily form emotional attachments to such technology. 'Chatbots can simulate deep and emotional relationships with child users, and there are evident risks that children may use chatbots to seek mental health support or advice in ways that may ultimately prove harmful,' Burrows says. Even adults have formed inappropriate emotional bonds with AI chatbots, struggling to differentiate between artificial and real relationships. For more impressionable children, these connections could take hold more quickly, with potential long-term effects on their mental health. McNamara says companies have an obligation to consider how their platforms affect kids and to take steps to protect them—something she believes a Grok-bot for children fails to do. (Neither xAI nor Musk responded to Fast Company 's request for comment.) NCOSE also raises concerns about whether Musk's platforms can adequately protect young users. McNamara notes that after Musk acquired what was then Twitter, many child safety staff were let go. 'X also allows pornography on its platform, which does not require any kind of stringent age or consent verification for those videos,' she says, contending that such 'lax policies have led to a widespread presence of abusive material,' and so far there's been little sign that the company is taking meaningful action to address these issues. Burrows, for his part, points to the U.K.'s new Online Safety Act as one layer of oversight that would apply to Baby Grok, though he notes that X has been slow to meet the requirements of the legislation. His larger concern is global. In many countries, he warns, 'the lack of regulation will mean the rollout of badly designed products will go effectively unchecked.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why Tesla's valuation is hard to read as Musk's EV empire falters
Prickly billionaire Elon Musk is at a crossroads with Tesla (TSLA) — and investors are shouldering the outsized risk. "I think we are in the transition phase, so it's a very critical phase for Tesla at the moment," Gradient Investments' Lisa Schreiber said on Yahoo Finance's Opening Bid (watch above). On July 23, Tesla reported much weaker second quarter earnings compared to a year ago. During the earnings call, Musk cautioned about headwinds and shared that ride-hailing and autonomous features will be a key focus for the company going forward. Shares fell directly after the earnings announcement and closed down 8.2% on Thursday. Tesla remains an innovator, with robots and AI in its portfolio. Its EV business, however, is sharply declining as competition rises and backlash grows against Musk's politics. The expiration of a $7,500 federal credit for EVs won't help matters, either. "When we look at valuation, investors do not know exactly how to value [Tesla]. Is it an EV maker? Is it more than that? The thing is, it's not just an EV play anymore," Schrieber said. "But it's also not a robotaxi [and] robot company already. So we have struggles here." To Schrieber's point, Tesla's stock trades more like a hot tech player trying to take on juggernauts like Nvidia (NVDA). Shares trade at 161 times the estimated forward price to earnings. (Nvidia, with much stronger growth, trades around 55 times.) Ford (F), a pure-play automaker, trades at 9.6 times. Meanwhile, some perceive Tesla as a company that isn't sure what it wants to be when it grows up. The innovation around autonomous driving is noteworthy, but the waiting can make even the most patient investor antsy. "Especially with Tesla, we have to be a little bit careful," Schreiber said, noting that Musk has a history of huge promises but delayed launches. The robotaxi, for instance, launched this past June in Austin, Texas. William Blair analysts Jed Dorsheimer and Mark Shooter, who rate Tesla's stock at Market Perform, noted that rival company Google's (GOOG) Waymo robotaxi "represents a six-year head start." "We think the training wheels will get taken off quickly and the pace at which robotaxi scales will surprise the upside," the pair wrote. "Although maybe not to half of Americans by the end of the year." During Tesla's earnings call, Musk also discussed humanoid robots, AI, and their integration into the vehicle fleet, calling the company's cars "essentially a four-wheeled robot." "Optimus is a robot with arms and legs," he said. "So the same principles that apply to optimizing AI inference of the car applied to Optimus because they're both really robots in different forms." If Musk and Co. can deliver, investors like Schreiber will likely be among the first in line to celebrate, but for the time being, they are content to watch and wait. "I think we have to be a little bit careful here," she said. "For us to be able to be a buyer here, we would need to see some foot on the ground and we would need to see some realization first."Grace Williams is a writer for Yahoo Finance. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
