Murder trial hears from convicted killer's wife who led police to key evidence in sex worker homicide
The courtroom gallery was full as Christopher Dunlop's wife April, who was called by prosecutors Hyatt Mograbee and Greg Piper, took the stand on Thursday.
The 54-year-old was visibly upset and shaken at times throughout her testimony.
April made it clear after court she wasn't present in support of her former spouse and confirmed they are no longer together.
"Our hearts go out to the victims and their families," April said.
"This has been devastating for our whole family and we just want to heal and move forward."
In 2009, Dunlop fatally strangled Laura Furlan and then dumped her body in Fish Creek Park. He was released from prison in 2020 with his manslaughter sentence expiring in 2022, meaning he was no longer under court-ordered conditions.
In 2023, Dunlop is accused of picking up Judy Maerz for sex, taking her to the Deerfoot Athletic Park where prosecutors say he fatally stabbed her before setting her body on fire.
The Crown has already presented CCTV and cellphone evidence supporting its theory that Dunlop drove his truck to the Peter Lougheed hospital, switched into her RAV4, then picked up Maerz on the Forest Lawn prostitution stroll and took her to Deerfoot Athletic Park.
Calgary police crime analyst Mark Ruggieri presented video evidence showing a vehicle entering the park at 3:03 a.m. and leaving at 3:12 a.m.
April finds car open, purse inside
Prosecutors allege in those nine minutes, Dunlop fatally stabbed Maerz 79 times.
Dunlop is then accused of driving his wife's SUV back to the hospital and getting back into his truck.
Ruggieri then presented further CCTV footage that the Crown says shows Dunlop's truck being tracked from the hospital to the Deerfoot Athletic Park, arriving at 3:32 a.m.
During the two minutes the truck was at the park, another CCTV camera captured a large flash of light which the Crown alleges is Maerz's body being set on fire after it was doused in gasoline.
'It didn't make sense'
April testified that when she finished her shift at the hospital, she walked to her car to find the door ajar.
Then she noticed a purse on the dash and a bag of empty bottles in another bag on the passenger side floor.
April testified that she was panicked at first, trying to make sense of what she'd found.
There was no damage and nothing missing from her SUV. April said she believed she might have left her vehicle open and a homeless person may have used her car to sleep in.
"A lot of people come to the hospital to sleep when they're cold," April said.
"I felt pretty violated, pretty shook up … It didn't make sense that someone didn't rummage through, I couldn't make sense of it."
911 call played
April checked the purse and found a government-issued ID for a woman in her 50s, a bus pass and some Walmart gift cards. She also found a little bottle of THC.
She testified that she threw out the purse's contents but decided to keep the purse to donate. April said she tossed it into a donation pile in her garage.
Meanwhile, Dana Krupp was about to make a "horrific" discovery.
Justice Colin Feasby heard testimony from Krupp, earlier this week.
Krupp testified that around 10:30 a.m. on the morning of February 16, 2023, she arrived at the Deerfoot Athletic Park with three dogs.
'Tell me this isn't real'
Almost immediately she testified that she spotted Maerz's butchered, charred body.
"It was the most horrific thing I've ever seen," Krupp said. "It didn't look like a real person."
"Her face was burned, her hands were burned, her feet were burned … please somebody tell me this isn't real."
Krupp testified that she rounded up her dogs, got them back into her car and immediately called 911.
That call was played in court.
"I hope it's just a stunt," she told the operator. "I'm hoping it's a mannequin … I'm really hoping it's not a body."
'Here we go again'
Police arrived and began collecting evidence. Their smoking gun came back in the form of blood at the scene belonging to a man.
Within two weeks, the RCMP lab confirmed the blood belonged to Christopher Dunlop, whose DNA was in the system after his previous conviction for the manslaughter of Laura Furlan.
On March 1, 2023, the tactical team arrived, busting down Dunlop's door.
"The tac-team had come and tackled me," said April, crying.
She was handcuffed until homicide detectives showed up and removed the cuffs.
Retired homicide detective Reagan Hossack testified earlier this week that when police were in the former couple's home to execute the search and arrest warrants, she told April that her husband was a suspect in a murder investigation.
Hossack testified that April sat at her kitchen table and said, "Here we go again."
April answered detectives' questions, eventually telling them about the night of the suspected vehicle break-in. She told them about the purse. Then she took them to it.
Forensic testing later confirmed Maerz's DNA was on the purse.
On Thursday afternoon, prosecutors Mograbee and Piper finished calling evidence. Defence lawyer Allan Fay told Justice Colin Feasby he would not be calling any witnesses.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
8 hours ago
- Global News
Shoplifting on the rise in B.C., but one group says stores have given up reporting
A citizen group advocating for the reduction of street disorder in B.C. says federal crime statistics do not paint the whole picture of what is happening in the province. The agency attributed much of the overall decline in the crime severity index in 2024 to a six-per cent drop in non-violent crime, which includes such crimes as property and drug offences. Story continues below advertisement Save Our Streets in B.C. told Global News that stats show a decrease in certain crimes but that is because many people and businesses have given up reporting to authorities. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'It's driving some companies out of business, losing jobs in certain communities as a result,' Jess Ketchum, co-founder of Save Our Streets, said. It appears, however, that shoplifting is up, with a 66-per cent increase Canada-wide in incidents of shoplifting under $5,000. In B.C., Statistics Canada reports that in the last four years, shoplifting violations have increased nearly 80 per cent. 'We've had particular reports from the Kootenays that would indicate that people have just given up on reporting these crimes because they know the police just don't have the resources to do everything we're asking them to do,' Ketchum added. 2:14 City of Vancouver launches shoplifting and retail theft task force The head of London Drugs says shoplifting often leads to violence against staff. Story continues below advertisement 'Physical assault, death threats are routine, the production of needles, pipes, hammers, weapons that could cause permanent and life-altering harm to employees are routine,' Clint Mahlman, president and COO of London Drugs, said. Mahlman says that increased security measures for his downtown Vancouver stores have been making a difference, along with an extra police presence. B.C. stats show 20,486 incidents in 2020, and 36,851 incidents in 2024, which is an increase of 79.8 per cent, according to Statistics Canada. Last year only 4,040 people were charged and it is not known how many charges led to convictions.
Calgary Herald
11 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Everything you need to know about restraining orders in Alberta
Article content According to Daniel Wilson, senior associate lawyer at Calgary-based Mincher Koeman, the main difference between applying for a restraining order and for an EPO to deal with family-related violence is whether the situation is urgent enough to necessitate an order without giving the defendant advance notice. Article content A no-contact order, according to Niv, is a condition that can be encompassed in either a restraining or an EPO. 'Either a judge will decide or the parties, most likely, will agree on (mutual no-contact),' he said. 'Technically that's a restraining order on both people, but it's limited to a no-contact condition.' Article content A restraining order, according to Wilson, can 'apply to an infinite number of situations'. Article content Article content 'There has to be some kind of offending conduct, like an invasion of privacy, stalking, harassment, unwelcome communication,' he said. Article content The court would have to determine if the person seeking the restraining order has a 'sincere, subjective basis for believing the offending conduct is going to continue … and that the belief is objectively reasonable,' he added. Article content The evidence would have to be specific, not speculative. 'It's not enough to say that if I don't get a restraining order, this person might engage in this unwelcome behaviour,' he said. 'The claimant would have to show that there's a likelihood that it will continue based on faces, not based on belief or dislike for someone.' Article content To qualify for an EPO, the judge has to be satisfied that it is an emergency with three determinations, according to Wilson. Article content 'The first is that family violence has occurred,' he said, whether that be physical violence, damage to property or threats of violence to a family member. Article content Article content 'Then the claimant or alleged victim has to believe that the respondent will continue or resume carrying out the family violence. Third, by reason of seriousness or urgency, the order should be granted for the immediate protection of the claimant and other family members. Article content 'So EPOs are supposed to be reserved for situations of urgency.' Article content How is a restraining order or an EPO obtained? Article content In the case of a restraining order, the person filing the application would have to give the defendant — whom the application is being filed against — 20 days notice, to allow time to make a defence. Article content 'The default principle our justice system normally works on is one of fairness and the other side is to be given an opportunity to respond to the case that is made against them before the court makes an order that will affect their rights,' Wilson said. Article content However, the court can allow for wiggle room to shorten the period of notice, whereby the defendant is instead served with 10 days notice and on the 10th day, the claimant can ask the court to shorten the notice period. Article content The court can also grant an interim or a 'without prejudice restraining order' until the hearing to approve or reject a full restraining order or EPO. 'It's just to create or preserve status quo without deciding against anyone because there hasn't been a fair hearing as yet,' he said. Article content For a client concerned about violence during the interim period, Wilson said he would first discuss the possibility of applying without serving notice. 'No harm in doing that, if you lose, you just have to make the application again,' Wilson said. Article content However, the respondent should know that any criminal acts conducted during that period could be used as evidence against them at the hearing for the order, especially actions in the nature of conduct that led to the restraining order being applied for. Article content However, an emergency protection order is a much simpler, expedited matter. As it caters to situations of emergency, a claimant seeking an order can go to a courthouse and fill out an application for the order. An available staff lawyer who will make the application to the judge for them and the claimant would have to give a brief oral evidence on the stand. The judge would then make the order or refuse to make the order, he said, the whole process of which would only take up to a half hour. Article content Article content If court isn't sitting, then a claimant can make the application via a phone call to a justice of peace. Article content Hiring a lawyer isn't necessary to obtain a protection order. But Niv said he's often called by clients who find the process too complex, lengthy and/or are too victimized to be able to write the affidavit and serve the person whom the order is taken out against. Article content 'Unless you hire third parties to do some of these tasks for you, you're going to have some interaction with the person want to last deal with,' he said. Article content It depends on the nature of the order. Article content Conditions set out in a protection order can vary widely, depending on the parties involved. For some, it may mean that one party is not allowed to set foot within a certain distance of the other or have limited contact through specific means or no contact at all. It may mean that both parties are prohibited from contacting each other or talking about each other. Article content Article content 'It can impact the defendant severely,' according to Wilson, by preventing them from returning home, visiting their neighbourhood, church, their place of employment, family members, visiting their children or discussing children with another parent. Article content 'It can prevent them from coordinating a visit where a third party brings kids to the visit just because the order might be worded in an unfortunate way,' he added. Article content The wording of an order can sometimes have unintended adverse consequences for both parties. For example, if the parties are spouses going through a separation, an order may force them to only communicate through their lawyers, instead of texting — 'which is very expensive.' Article content It could also preclude the claimant from visiting places where the respondent might be. 'It makes things practically very difficult and expensive and slow,' he said. Article content What happens if an order is defied? Article content It depends on how the order was customized. 'Because civil restraining orders and emergency protective orders are more party-driven, it's up to the private individuals to decide what they're asking for and they can negotiate that with the other individual,' Wilson said. Article content An order, for example, can include police enforcement clauses. 'If a breach is reported, the police or any peace officer can arrest the party in breach' and bring them to a judge to be held in a contempt hearing, Wilson said. Article content Because it is a civil order, breaching it is not a criminal offense, but it can result in a fine or imprisonment, Wilson said. Article content In Niv's experience, most of the time, the person served with the order stays away. Article content 'The fact that one has been filed is usually enough to tell people who are doing the problem to stop,' he said. Article content Article content However, both Niv and Wilson emphasize that it does not guarantee a person's safety against an alleged perpetrator. Article content 'An EPO or a restraining order will at best create civil or criminal consequences for a respondent who breaches it,' Wilson said. 'But it will not protect a person from an assault or an attempt on the claimant's life. It's a piece of paper, so the only thing that will do that is incarceration of the respondent.' Article content However, by filing and obtaining an order, the hope is that it would keep the person whom the order is taken out against, from breaching conditions to avoid criminal charges or civil sanctions. Article content 'They won't want to be charged with an offence. They won't want to be charged with contempt. They won't want their behaviour to reflect poorly on them if there is a parenting dispute,' he said. Article content Article content When it does happen, it's usually because someone attempted communication with a former spouse via a family member to encourage them to drop the restraining order, he said. 'Or not respecting a condition of staying away 100 m or 50 m,' he added. Article content A 'blatant, wilful' disobedience of the order would result in 'immediate consequences' as the claimant would presumably call the police. 'And if they show they won't comply with court orders, especially if they have criminal charges against them, then they're going to have their judicial interim release revoked and they might be waiting in remand until their charges are dealt with,' he said. Article content
Edmonton Journal
11 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
'Public narrative was one-sided': Hockey Canada sex assault defence lawyers respond to verdict
Five former Canadian world junior hockey players were found not guilty in a high-profile sexual assault trial related to a 2018 incident in London, Ont. The case had sparked a national reckoning over hockey culture, and what is and what isn't considered consent. Here's how the lawyers for Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dube and Callan Foote reacted to Ontario Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia's verdict, which was delivered in a London courtroom on Thursday. Article content Article content Article content Mr. McLeod will not be speaking to the media, and I understand the other players will not be speaking to the media. I will not be taking questions and other counsel who come to address you, they will not be taking any questions. Article content Mr. McLeod had confidence in the Justice process, and he welcomes Justice Carrocia's decision, confirming that he and his co defendants are not guilty of sexual assault. Justice Carrocia's carefully reasoned decision represents a resounding vindication for Mr. McLeod and for his co defendants. Justice Carrocia's found that the complainant's testimony was incredible and was unreliable. Article content For years, public perception was shaped by a one-sided narrative from a civil lawsuit that went unchallenged. In large part because hockey Canada settled the claim without first informing or consulting the players. The decision was made unilaterally, and the players were only told of the lawsuit and the settlement after the fact. Had they been consulted, they would have refused to settle, and they would have vigorously contested EM's allegations. Article content Article content That version of events dominated headlines and created a lasting and, a false, a false impression of guilt. It was only through this criminal trial that the allegations were fully and finally tested. The court compared the complainant's 2018 statements to the police, which rightly resulted in no charges with the later conflicting civil claim. Key elements of EM's story were contradicted by the evidence, exposing serious falsehood and leading to today's clear and just verdict of not guilty. Justice Carrocia rejected EM's claims of fear and her claims of non consent. That should be the takeaway from today's judgment. Article content Article content The damage to Mr. McLeod's reputation and his career has been significant. But today's decision begins to restore what was very unfairly taken away from him. Mr. McLeod is deeply grateful to his family, friends, his agent, and everybody who stood by him.
