Caravan maker Jayco sued over off-road claims
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) filed the legal suit in the Federal Court on Thursday.
The ACCC alleges certain Jayco ads depict recreational vehicles being used off-road and on 4WD-only tracks when the caravans are not designed for such rough and tumble conditions. Jayco's warranties for the particular caravans also expressly exclude using the recreational vehicles on 4WD-only tracks.
'We allege Jayco misled consumers by advertising the RVs (recreational vehicles) in terrain in which they were not designed to be used and were not covered by its warranty,' ACCC deputy chair Mick Keogh said in a statement.
'When a product is depicted in advertisements in a particular setting, or claims are made about it, consumers have a right to expect such images and words reflect the intended use of the product.'
NewsWire has contacted Jayco for comment. Jayco is Australia's largest RV manufacturer, founded in Victoria in 1975.
The ACCC is seeking a full suite of penalties, injunctions, publication orders, legal costs and a declaration of wrongdoing from Jayco.
The caravan models the ACCC is concerned with are in Jayco's Outback and Adventure ranges, with models ranging in price from $19,000 to $113,000.
Advertisements for the Crosstrak model show the caravan being towed by a 4WD through water that is halfway up the caravan tyres and lapping at the bottom of the 4WD's passenger doors. Other ads for the Crosstrak show the caravan being towed through Queensland's Kinkuna National Park, which is restricted to only 4WDs.
The ACCC says since January 2020, Jayco has promoted RVs with phrases such as 'purpose-built off-road hybrid RV', 'built with off-road travel at the forefront', 'all terrain', and 'designed specifically for off-road adventures'.
But the RV warranties from Jayco did not cover damage from water crossings, damage from use on corrugated and uneven surfaces or any damage from use on 4WD-only tracks, the ACCC filing said.
Mr Keogh said RVs were expensive purchases and buyers were misled.
'We are concerned that consumers were deprived of the ability to make informed purchasing decisions which might have led them to buy a different RV that was more suitable for their needs,' Mr Keogh said.
'RVs are a significant purchase for consumers, and as a result of Jayco's ads, consumers may have paid a premium over and above the cost of other standard model RVs based on the alleged misrepresentation that they could be used 'off road'.'
Following a similar 2017 case, Jayco was ordered to pay a $75,000 fine in May 2021.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
32 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Two towns face jobless wave as miner warns it may halt operations
North Queensland locals have been left on edge as Swiss miner Glencore reveals it is considering shutting down two operations, placing thousands of jobs in jeopardy. The Mount Isa copper smelter and Townsville copper refinery directly employ 550 people, with 500 jobs also threatened at Dyno Nobel's Phosphate Hill operations, but lobby group Townsville Enterprise estimates 17,000 jobs are connected to the downstream copper assets. Without government assistance, the company will have to place the Mount Isa and Townsville operations into care and maintenance, according to an internal memo to staff from Glencore's interim chief operating officer on Wednesday morning. Roland Lobegeiger, a field services manager for Isadraulics, which services hydraulic component systems, told the move would be a 'significant loss' not just for his company, but the town of Mount Isa. 'Without it, the town's not going to be here,' Mr Lobegeiger said. 'There are other mines – there would be other work in the area, but would the town recover? It's hard to say. 'It would be a significant change for a lot of businesses, homes, house prices – you name it. 'It's definitely a bit of a dark cloud over the area. Everyone's still optimistic that they won't shut it down, but no one knows.' Mr Wilson's internal memo painted a grim picture of the company's position in North Queensland. 'To date Glencore has been absorbing losses hopeful that a viable solution could be found,' he wrote, according to the Townsville Bulletin. 'However, we are fast reaching the point at which Glencore cannot continue to absorb these losses. 'We need to know in the coming weeks whether there is a viable solution on the table from governments. 'Glencore is genuinely disappointed at the prospect of placing the smelter and refinery into care and maintenance if we do not receive adequate government support.' Talks between Glencore and the Queensland and federal governments have yet to reach a solution, with the miner on track to lose billions of dollars from the two operations over the next seven years. Senior Glencore executive Suresh Vadnagra said the company remained open to taxpayers taking a big equity stake in the refinery and smelter. 'Time is running out,' Mr Vadnagre told The Australian. 'We have been engaging with government for the past five months. 'We need to know in the coming weeks whether there is a viable solution on the table from governments or whether we start to planning to transition the copper smelter and refinery into care and maintenance.' It comes as smelters and refineries are struggling to operate across Australia. The country's biggest aluminium producer, the Rio Tinto-owned Tomago, has requested billions of dollars from the federal and NSW governments amid high power prices and competition with China. The Labor government has held out the possibility of providing loans and taxpayer funds to prop up Australian smelters. 'The truth is, if these facilities didn't exist, governments would be trying to build them,' Industry Minister Tim Ayres told The Australian Financial Review.
ABC News
32 minutes ago
- ABC News
Land and Environment Court dismisses Martins Creek Quarry expansion appeal
The Land and Environment Court has dismissed an appeal to expand a controversial hard rock quarry in the New South Wales Hunter Valley which residents hope will be the end of a decade-long fight. In 2022 resources company Daracon lodged plans to expand the Martins Creek Quarry, north-west of Newcastle, to allow it to extract more than a million tonnes of rock materials, like gravel, each year. It was expected the expansion would generate up to 160 truck movements a day through several Hunter Valley towns, including the historic Paterson village and Bolwarra. In February 2023, the NSW Independent Planning Commission (IPC) refused the expansion finding it would have "unreasonable" and "unacceptable" impacts for communities on the haulage route. Daracon appealed the decision, arguing it would benefit the workforce and provide materials for local infrastructure projects in the construction and roads industries, but that appeal was knocked back again by the Land and Environment Court on Wednesday. In the court's judgement, Commissioner Peter Walsh and Acting Commissioner Michael Young said negative consequences of the project outweighed the positives. "The beneficial impacts of the [application] relate principally to the supply of the quarry's product for the construction sector and particularly for infrastructure projects of public significance," the commissioners said. "The negative consequences are particularly in relation to adverse traffic and pedestrian safety implications, and social and amenity-related impacts in the local area. The Martins Creek Quarry Action Group have lobbied against the expansion of the quarry for more than a decade. Its president, Luke Barker, told ABC Newcastle Drive the majority of the community would be "in high spirits" hearing the news. He said the main reason many in the community had been against expanding the quarry was due to safety concerns and the impact on small roads in the area. "It's fantastic that the commissioner has seen what that impact has been and what that impact would be for not only this current generation of people but the generations to come," Mr Barker said. "There's people moving through the township all the time, crossing roads between the post office, the chemist, the local eateries, the pubs, supermarket. "Then we have a very high tourism aspect. It's a great stopover spot for people coming through. "It's just the impacts on the community were just too much to bear." He said the group was not against the quarry remaining operational into the future at its current size and scope. In a statement a Daracon spokesperson told the ABC the company was disappointed by the IPC's decision. "For more than a decade Daracon has led a rigorous process of environmental studies and stakeholder engagement which has seen the application amended a multitude of times to create compromises, resulting in a recommendation for approval by the then-NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure in 2022," the spokesperson said. "It is disappointing that today's decision does not uphold that. The spokesperson said the company was disappointed it would not be able to supply construction materials from the site to local infrastructure projects. "We will now take time to assess the future of the quarry," the spokesperson said.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
ATO reversed its own decision to bill former PM Paul Keating's company nearly $1m after three-year battle
The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) wrote off almost $1 million in interest and penalties owed by one of Paul Keating's companies in 2015, in an abrupt about face after negotiations with the former prime minister and his financial advisers. This was unusual because for most taxpayers, formally challenging such a decision would require them to contest the matter in the Federal Court. In this case, the payment notice was cancelled after a negotiation, raising questions about the treatment of powerful people by Australia's chief revenue collection agency. It also raises questions about a lack of transparency in how the tax office conducts confidential settlements. Four Corners does not suggest any wrongdoing by Mr Keating or his advisers in seeking to have the debt cancelled. Four Corners first contacted Mr Keating two weeks ago to request an interview about how this settlement came about, but he declined. The interest and penalties bill was issued after the ATO discovered in 2012 that Mr Keating's company, Brenlex Pty Ltd, had not reported profits from an earlier share sale. This followed a 2010 agreement by Mr Keating to settle tax liabilities of more than $3 million involving another of his companies, Verenna Pty Ltd. At the time, Mr Keating was questioned about his other companies, including Brenlex, and his advisers confirmed it had paid a significant amount of tax relating to the sale of shares and was up to date with its tax liabilities. Mr Keating agreed he would ensure his tax affairs were in order henceforth. However, the ATO later discovered that Brenlex owed $446,000 in tax from the sale of shares years earlier in Lake Technology, an audio engineering company Mr Keating had advised. Brenlex agreed to pay the tax debt, but the ATO demanded more than $600,000 in interest and penalties which had accrued in the years since Mr Keating sold the shares. These are known as a general interest charge (GIC) and late lodgement penalties. Mr Keating's advisers fought to avoid the interest and penalties, asking the tax office to write them off entirely via an ATO rule known as a "Commissioner's discretion". The argument went back and forth through 2013 and 2014. By October 2014, the debt had grown to $904,000, at which point the ATO sent a formal notice to not waive the interest and penalties charge. "Your request has been fully considered and it has been decided that on this occasion the circumstances detailed do not warrant remission of the GIC," the notice said. "There is a clear acknowledgement that the Company should have accounted for the disposal of shares in the relevant financial years returns and did not." In April the next year, the ATO issued Brenlex a formal creditor's statutory demand to pay the debt within 21 days, which had now grown to $953,396. Mr Keating then became involved in the correspondence as part of efforts by his advisers to persuade the ATO to waive the bill because, they said, it was an honest mistake. Mr Keating's advisers told the tax office the former prime minister had mistakenly believed his company Brenlex had paid the tax. They argued he had "inadvertently failed to advise his directors" of the sale, despite filing a substantial shareholder notice reporting the disposal of the Lake Technology shares. Mr Keating's advisers argued "the lodgement and payment of the Company returns were overlooked" but the tax office said "This is not a valid justification". The ATO was told Mr Keating had truly, though incorrectly, believed that all tax matters with Brenlex were up to date. The tax office refused to alter its position. In July 2015, a last-ditch letter from Brenlex was sent to the ATO requesting a meeting. Ten days later, the tax office made a backflip. In a four-line email it wrote off the almost $1 million debt. "I am able to confirm that the GIC and Late Lodgement Penalties … have been remitted in full," the email said. "Consequently the balance of the account has been reduced to nil and the amount payable as stated in the Creditors Statutory Demand is no longer owed." The email gave no reason for the sudden change of heart. The ATO's reversal of its decision, having issued the October 2014 notice, was unusual. Just how unusual can be seen from a joint submission to a Senate committee this year by five accounting bodies. They said it was unfair that the only recourse available to taxpayers to challenge this kind of decision was an appeal to the Federal Court, which was a "lengthy and complex process that is out of reach of most taxpayers". They complained that these decisions were "not subject to an internal ATO review. The only recourse available to the taxpayer is to appeal the ATO's decision in the Federal Court". In a reminder published on its website last month, the ATO said: "Taxpayers should be aware that remission requests are carefully assessed to ensure a level playing field for those taxpayers who pay on time." These revelations come at a time when the ATO's handling of this issue is under review. The Tax Ombudsman is scrutinising the management of general interest charges, to ensure "decisions are fair and reasonable and are made consistently for taxpayers in like circumstances". Typically, the ATO does not comment on the tax affairs of specific taxpayers due to confidentiality obligations. It told Four Corners in a statement that "inadvertently overlooking" the need to pay tax was generally not valid grounds on which to cancel GIC. "However, there may be instances where GIC is remitted when a taxpayer inadvertently overlooks the requirement to lodge a form or make a payment, depending on the individual circumstances of the taxpayer," the ATO said.
