logo
Calls for total 4WD ban on Australian beaches over 'serious and widespread damage'

Calls for total 4WD ban on Australian beaches over 'serious and widespread damage'

Yahoo23-03-2025
Four-wheel-driving on beaches is a beloved pastime for many all around the country, particularly those living in coastal regions. But according to the results of a damning new Australian study, it's causing catastrophic damage to numerous forms of life.
Research conducted by Queensland's University of the Sunshine Coast examined over 250 dune-dwelling species, including vegetation, birds and sea creatures, across 20 international studies. The findings revealed that 4WD activity is causing "unequivocal, serious and widespread damage" to coastal dune ecosystems.
Lead author Thomas Schlacher said every dune species had suffered serious negative effects as a result of vehicles on the sand — particularly in hugely popular regions like Noosa, Rainbow Beach, K'gari and Bribie Island. Schlacher explained that invertebrates like pipis and crabs, which serve as key food sources for fish at high tide, are buried in the hard sand. However, 4WDs often fatally crush them.
He said that turtle hatchlings are becoming trapped and disorientated in the grooves left by tyres, where eventually many die. It's something Jan Waters from Cooloola Coast Turtle Care recently spoke to Yahoo about. Based on the Sunshine Coast, she warned Aussies of the serious consequences of beach driving.
"The hatchlings have to cross the deep 4WD tracks to reach the ocean [and] the tracks, created ... on the beach close to the dunes at high tide, are 25cm deep and 25cm wide," Waters told Yahoo.
"The small hatchlings are only five centimetres, and once they're caught in the tracks, they will most likely perish." Waters encouraged drivers to travel on the hard, wet sand to ensure they leave behind no ruts. But according to the study, there's no "safe level" of beach driving.
Schlacher said Queensland's southeast is among the worst affected areas when it comes to 4WD damage, with numerous species effectively being "pumelled" and "crushed to death". He said in Victoria, cars are already banned from beaches, and in NSW, authorities are currently having a "strong debate".
In South Australia, access to some spots is becoming limited, which is something Queensland should consider, Schlacher argued. "The four-by-fours running over [marine species are] basically crush them to death. It only takes one vehicle to cause very, very severe impacts," he told the ABC.
"That's a bit of a surprise because people often argue, 'Oh, all we have to do is regulate the volume of the traffic and we will be right.' The only thing which works is to get the cars off for sizeable proportions of the beach … at least half — that's a good starting point."
Drivers banned from popular 4WD beach after reckless act
New rules as camping banned after 'secret' 4WD beach exposed
The wild move to crackdown on 4WD tourists along Aussie beaches
Conservationists on Bribie Island are calling for a ban on 4WDs along a five-kilometre stretch of beach and the installation of gates to prevent access at high tide.
With up to 1,200 vehicles on the sand in a single day, volunteers working to protect endangered loggerhead turtle nests say illegal dune driving is destroying their efforts. However, 4WD advocates oppose restrictions, highlighting their role in beach clean-ups and responsible driving initiatives.
They point to compromises, such as seasonal night bans, as a potential middle ground. Queensland's Environment Minister Andrew Powell acknowledged the concerns but stressed the need for a balance between conservation and public access.
"My job is to make sure we find the balance between conserving and protecting the environment and allowing people to get out there and enjoy it," he said. "I appreciate for many, they would love to see four-wheel drives off the beaches, but I for one can't see that as an outcome that would be acceptable."
But Schlacher warned that urgent action is desperately needed, as delaying further will only exacerbate the damage. "South-east Queensland has probably the world's single strongest evidence base for serious harm caused by four-by-fours," he said."So we are basically in the driver's seat, here to make sensible decisions."
Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

F1's return to Hungary serves as reminder of McLaren quarrel on the horizon
F1's return to Hungary serves as reminder of McLaren quarrel on the horizon

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

F1's return to Hungary serves as reminder of McLaren quarrel on the horizon

The Hungaroring, Budapest. Twelve months ago, as it became apparent that McLaren's 2024 mid-season renaissance was more than just a temporary spike on the performance graph, this is where the first banging of heads occurred between the papaya drivers out on track. Two drivers desperate for victory, which made a quarrel, with neither defined as team No 1. Quite the inevitability. Eventually, Oscar Piastri claimed his first F1 race victory and almost looked embarrassed to celebrate. It only came after Lando Norris reluctantly conceded the lead, as his engineer Will Joseph pleaded with the Brit to follow team orders. 'I know you'll do the right thing,' Joseph told his driver. 'Just remember every single Sunday morning meeting we have… I'm trying to protect you, mate… please do it now.' Eventually, the series of orders – teetering on the edge of successive guilt trips – triggered the most reluctant of acquiesces from Norris. Now, in a championship battle solely between this exciting high-flying McLaren pairing, F1 returns to Hungary for the final race before the summer break. After Norris claimed two much-needed victories in Austria and Silverstone, Piastri wrestled back some of that momentum with a lightning quick overtake over his teammate at Spa last time out, which set up a supreme victory. They now each have eight grand prix victories to their name and the Australian's advantage in the title race stands at 16 points, in a battle which looks set to go down to the wire. 'There is very, very little between our two drivers and this is because they're racing at a very, very high level,' McLaren team principal Andrea Stella said, after the last round in Belgium. 'We're lucky at McLaren to have two drivers that are deservedly fighting for the world championship. I think the difference [in the title race] will be made by the accuracy, the precision and the quality of the execution. 'As a team, from a reliability and operational point of view, we need to make sure we're as good as possible… such that it will be the drivers deciding their own outcome, in terms of competing for the drivers' world championship.' In this respect, Piastri and Norris need not worry. Neither driver has been forced to retire from a race due to a mechanical issue so far – a form of 'DNF' which is near-extinct in the sport across all 10 teams – and the only retirement came when the pair collided in the closing laps in Canada in June. It is unlikely to be their last confrontation on the tarmac. On that occasion, Norris was at fault and quickly admitted blame. His topsy-turvy season so far – fluctuating from incomprehensible mistakes to phenomenal qualifying laps – backs up Nico Rosberg's theory this week that the 2025 title will be decided in 'Lando's head'. The 2016 F1 world champion said on the Sky F1 podcast: 'You can't really say Lando is a smidge quicker anymore. There's no basis to that anymore. 'Oscar has been extremely quick, I see them on a par. For me, the championship will be decided in Lando's head. That's my impression. How solid can Lando become?' Prior to the team order shenanigans last year, Piastri propelled down the inside of pole-sitter Norris to take the lead at turn one. With such a long run down to the first corner in Budapest, much like Spa last week, pole position may not be as advantageous as usual. It means the race-craft of both drivers – the factor which often makes the difference in a tight title battle – all the more important, in what will be a crowded congestion of cars at the start come Sunday afternoon. Initial impressions on Friday were as expected: both drivers were in the top two in the first practice session, with Norris drawing first blood with a time 0.019 seconds quicker than his rival. A small indication of the hair's width between the two drivers. Elsewhere, Max Verstappen confirmed his intention to stay at Red Bull for 2026 on Thursday, ending speculation over a move to Mercedes despite Red Bull's drop in performance this season. On the same day, Ferrari team principal Fred Vasseur signed a contract extension with the Scuderia; a show of faith despite a winless start to this season and with star signing Lewis Hamilton yet to register a podium. Yet the Hungaroring is one of Hamilton's favourite tracks. After Silverstone, he has claimed the most wins here, with eight. He acknowledged on Thursday that 'there will be some tears' in the August shutdown, such has been the disappointment of the last few months in red. Yet he'll have one final chance to alleviate some of that pain, in a bid to arrest his worst-ever start to a Formula One campaign.

Poll: 14% of Americans would consider supporting Elon Musk's America Party
Poll: 14% of Americans would consider supporting Elon Musk's America Party

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Poll: 14% of Americans would consider supporting Elon Musk's America Party

In contrast, 55% say they would not consider supporting Musk's party. On July 4, Tesla CEO Elon Musk asked his followers on X — the social media platform he owns — whether he should 'create' something called the America Party to give them 'independence' from the country's 'two-party (some would say uniparty) system.' More than 1.2 million users responded to Musk's snap poll: 65% said yes; 35% said no. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' Musk vowed the following day. Since then, however, Musk hasn't taken any visible steps to deliver on his promise. A new Yahoo/YouGov survey — which captures a representative sample of the U.S. population, in contrast to informal social media polls — suggests possible challenges ahead: Just 14% of Americans say they would be open to 'supporting a third party created by Musk.' In contrast, 55% say they would not consider supporting Musk's party. Why Musk wants a new party The survey of 1,729 U.S. adults, which was conducted from July 24 to July 28, comes a little more than a month after Musk and President Trump had a public falling-out over Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Trump claimed that Musk was 'upset' about 'losing his EV mandate' (the $7,500 federal tax credit that has made buying or leasing electric vehicles such as Teslas more attractive and affordable for consumers). Musk insisted he was concerned only with the legislation's effect on federal spending — namely, initial estimates that showed it would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit ... and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt,' as he wrote on X. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk continued. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' When a revised version of Trump's bill passed the Senate in early July with a $3.3 trillion deficit projection, Musk unveiled his America Party idea. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Musk wrote on X. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' People don't love the 2-party system Americans aren't opposed to having alternatives at the ballot box — in theory. The new Yahoo/YouGov poll finds that more of them approve (39%) than disapprove (28%) of the concept of creating a 'third major U.S. political party to compete with the Democratic Party and the Republican Party'; 33% say they are not sure. Naturally, the idea of creating a third party is more popular with Americans who already identify as independents (56%) than with those who identify as Democrats (34%) or Republicans (32%). But the two parties themselves aren't especially well liked either. Majorities see both unfavorably (55% for the GOP, 56% for the Dems) rather than favorably (38% for the GOP, 36% for the Dems). And when respondents are asked how well each major party represents their views, more than half say 'not very well' or 'not at all' for both the Democrats (51%) and the Republicans (52%). Yet the overlap between these two categories — individuals who say they don't like either party — is relatively small, which may pose difficulties for Musk. About a quarter (22%) have an unfavorable view of both the Republicans and the Democrats, and fewer (18%) say neither side represents their views 'very well' or 'at all.' Musk keeps getting less popular In the Yahoo/YouGov poll conducted immediately after Trump won reelection last November, Musk earned a net positive rating (49% favorable, 39% unfavorable). That made him the most popular of the eight incoming Trump Cabinet members and senior advisers respondents were asked to appraise. Yet by April 2025 — following several months as the leader of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — Musk's ratings had flipped to 39% favorable, 55% unfavorable. Today, he is further underwater (32% favorable, 59% unfavorable). Musk is currently seen in a negative light by a clear majority of Democrats (9% favorable, 88% unfavorable) and nearly two-thirds of independents (30% favorable, 64% unfavorable). He still gets a net positive rating from a majority of Republicans (59% favorable, 30% unfavorable), but their enthusiasm has cooled; while 52% of Republicans saw Musk 'very favorably' last November, only 17% now feel that way about him. Since March, the number of Americans who think Musk is 'mostly trying to help the country' has fallen from 36% to 23%, whereas the number who think he is 'mostly trying to help himself' has risen from 52% to 56%. The share of Republicans who think Musk is mostly trying to help the country, meanwhile, has declined by 30 points — from 73% to 43%. The proposed policy focus of Musk's America Party — stopping the federal government from 'bankrupting our country with waste & graft,' as he put it — isn't people's top priority either. Asked what they would want a 'third major political party' to 'focus mostly on,' 26% of Americans said 'cutting government spending.' Significantly more (46%) said 'other issues.' __________________ The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,729 U.S. adults interviewed online from July 24 to July 28, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.1%.

Piastri has ‘confidence' in his F1 title shot as he returns to Hungary, where he got his 1st win
Piastri has ‘confidence' in his F1 title shot as he returns to Hungary, where he got his 1st win

Hamilton Spectator

timea day ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Piastri has ‘confidence' in his F1 title shot as he returns to Hungary, where he got his 1st win

Some Formula 1 races live in the memory because of thrilling action, some for controversy, some even for being so dull they forced a rule change. And then there's Oscar Piastri's first F1 win, the benchmark for sheer awkwardness . Piastri is happy to be back in Hungary this week, but his breakthrough victory there last year remains a lesson for McLaren as it tries to manage his title fight with teammate Lando Norris. It's all the more important now. Piastri has developed into a genuine title contender over the last year and leads Norris by 16 points following his victory in Belgium last week. 'I have a lot of confidence in myself that I can do it,' the Australian said of his title chances Thursday. 'The pace in the last few weekends, especially (Belgium), I've been very confident in and very proud of. I'm more than capable of continuing that for the rest of the year.' McLaren can reach some milestones this weekend, with a potential 200th win in F1 for the team. It could also be Piastri and Norris' fourth one-two finish in a row, a feat McLaren last managed in 1988. Managing the title rivalry Piastri took the win last year in Hungary, but only after McLaren had to plead over the radio with Norris to 'do the right thing' and let Piastri past, something the British driver was reluctant to do. Piastri had been leading but McLaren's pit strategy — which would normally favor the leader — had put Norris ahead. Piastri thinks the team can still take positives from that situation. 'I think it underlined the good nature in the team. It was obviously a slightly awkward situation, but it highlighted that we will do the right thing in all circumstances — well, ideally all circumstances — when we're on track,' Piastri said. 'It showed the trust that we have with the team and with each other as well, that things will be put the right way.' F1 has a history of title fights turning team relationships sour — not least at McLaren with Ayrton Senna and Alain Prost over 30 years ago — but Piastri and Norris have kept their rivalry friendly . Even so, there's been a collision in Canada , a near-miss in Austria and Piastri's rejected request for Norris to give up the lead in Britain. Piastri said one factor preventing his relationship with Norris from deteriorating is that both are committed to keeping McLaren on top in F1 for 'many years to come.' 'We've all seen how it can go wrong, but we have a lot of reasons to push for it to not go wrong,' he added. Another wet race possible F1 could be set for its third wet race in a row Sunday after a rain-delayed start last week in Belgium divided opinion among drivers and fans. Max Verstappen argued that 'we could have started way sooner' and said the lack of racing in wet conditions was 'a shame', but Piastri and others pointed to the poor visibility and particular safety concerns at the high-speed Spa-Francorchamps circuit. '(Visibility) is always much worse in the car than it looks on TV, and I think the FIA has done a very good job of listening to us and taking that feedback on board,' Piastri said. 'The feeling in this room would be pretty different if we had a big crash last week.' ___ AP auto racing:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store