Homeowners could be fined £20k for cutting garden trees
As more Brits dust off the tools and tidy up their gardens this spring, experts say thousands may unknowingly be breaking the law simply by cutting back or removing trees in their own backyard.
According to home experts at My Home Improvements, many people don't realise that trees in residential gardens may be protected by Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs).
It means that if you cut down, lop, damage, or destroy a protected tree without permission, it could result in criminal prosecution and a fine of up to £20,000 in a magistrates' court.
Mr Fielding, 51, didn't realise that certain trees – even if its in your garden – can be protected.
'It was blocking the light in the conservatory and leaning over the fence,' he explained.
'So I gave it a proper cut.'
But soon after he received a letter from the local council telling him the tree was protected and that he may have breached the order by cutting back too much.
'I didn't even know such a thing existed. I thought trees in your own garden were your responsibility,' Mr Fielding continued.
'I was shocked to learn I could be fined thousands.'
A Tree Preservation Order (TPO) is a legal protection issued by your local council to prevent important trees from being cut, pruned, damaged or removed without consent.
These orders apply to trees that have environmental, historical or aesthetic value and yes, even if they're on your private property.
Failing to get approval before carrying out work on a protected tree is a criminal offence.
'The trouble is, most homeowners have no idea their tree is protected,' says Sophie Willoughby, a gardening expert who was contacted by My Home Improvements.
'It's easy to think you're just doing routine garden work, but one snip too many and you could face a hefty fine,' Sophie explains.
'Councils take it very seriously and so they should, because mature trees are crucial for wildlife and air quality.'
To help homeowners avoid legal trouble this gardening season, My Home Improvements has shared some simple but important advice to keep things safe and legal in your garden.
Recommended reading:
Can you paint over algae on a fence? How to remove it
Dog owners warned of fatal plants that could endanger pets
Common garden tasks that could lead to hefty £26k fines
A spokesperson from My Home Improvements, added: 'Before you pick up the saw or shears, take a moment to check your tree isn't protected.
"Councils don't issue TPOs lightly and breaching one can land you in legal trouble.
'Whether you're trimming, pruning or removing, always ask first, as it's a simple step that could save you £20,000 and a trip to court.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Live
12 hours ago
- North Wales Live
Householders urged to think twice before disposing of this banned item
Householders are being urged to think twice before tossing garden waste into their green waste bins. Experts reveal one common mistake could be disrupting recycling systems across the UK. A growing number of households are unknowingly contaminating their green waste collections with soil, according to My Home Improvements. It's a material which many assume is safe but is actually banned by most local authorities. It might seem harmless but soil is too heavy, difficult to process, and often full of pests or diseases that can ruin entire batches of compost," reports the Express. 'It's one of the most common mistakes we see,' a spokesperson from My Home Improvements said. "Soil might look natural, but it causes major issues for councils trying to turn garden waste into compost. Even a little bit can ruin a whole batch." Such contaminated collections often have to be sent to landfill instead, increasing costs for councils and harming the environment. The warning comes as summer gardening peaks, with many gardeners clearing flower beds, repotting plants, or redesigning their outdoor spaces. So residents are advised to check what can and can't go in their green waste bin via their local council's website and to dispose of soil through proper channels such as household waste recycling centres. In Conwy for example, residents are advised that their kerbside garden waste collection is for "grass cuttings, leaves, small plants and twigs and non-invasive weeds." But they are also reminded on the Conwy County Borough Council website that it doesn't collect "soil, rubble, large branches, compost bags, pots or other rubbish and animal waste, garden furniture or tools or invasive weeds such as Japanese Knotweed or Giant Hog". Conwy's service is managed by Bryson Recycling for the council. The Express goes on to say that throwing any of these items into your garden bin could result in householders' waste being left uncollected, or worse, a fine. So experts recommend checking your council's garden waste guide, as every local authority has different rules. The My Home Improvements spokesperson added: "Garden bins are not a catch-all for anything green. What feels natural to toss may be harmful to the environment, your community, or the composting process. "If you're unsure, always double-check before you throw something away. The five minutes it takes to look it up could save you a fine and a big headache down the line."
Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
Major update in Brazil plane crash as ‘pilot reported malfunction' the day before tragedy, ex-employee reveals a year on
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MAJOR update has been revealed in last year's Brazil plane crash, with the pilot said to have reported a malfunction a day before the tragedy. It comes almost a year of the aircraft spiralled down to the ground and exploded in a huge fireball - tragically killing all 62 people on board. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 8 The plane was seen in a 'death spiral' as it plummeted towards the ground - killing all 62 on board Credit: GLOBO NEWS/UNPIXS 8 Wreckage from a plane that crashed by a home in Vinhedo, Sao Paulo state, Brazil, last August Credit: AP A former employee said they witnessed the final maintenance of the ATR 72-500 before it took off for Cascavel on August 9, 2024. He told g1 the pilot who operated the plane the night prior to the crash reported to the maintenance team that he had experienced problems with the aircraft's de-icing system. The failure was allegedly omitted from the technical logbook and ignored by management - when it reportedly should have prevented the plane from taking off. The ex-employee said how staff were pressured by company management to avoid aircraft downtime for maintenance, adding that there was also little time to assess the condition of aircraft. He told g1: "The leader himself asked: 'Well, if he didn't report it in the log, there's no problem with the aircraft.' "That was the company's legacy: if the captain reports it, there's maintenance action; if he doesn't report it, they won't waste time with anything he says." The Aeronautical Accident Investigation and Prevention Center suggested in the preliminary report that the plane's blackbox captured a conversation between the pilots in which they mentioned a failure in the de-icing system. De-icing systems are crucial in aviation as ice can negatively affect aerodynamic performance - potentially increasing the aircraft's weight and impairing its speed and lift. The former employee believes that had this problem been reported to the logbook, the tragic crash would have been avoided. The Voepass Airlines plane was previously labelled an "old wreck" and was only in service for weeks before the deadly plunge. Horrified Brits watch as TUI plane tyre EXPLODES during take-off in Corfu Passengers and their families complained about the aircraft just 24 hours before it spiralled down to the ground and exploded in a huge fireball last week. The plane smashed into a residential area of the city of Vinhedo, with neighbours filming it dropping and crashing. The Voepass flight had left Cascavel, in the Parana state, and was bound for Guarulhos, in Sao Paulo. Valinhos City Hall later confirmed all on board were dead and that no residents on the ground were injured or killed. One grieving mother said that Friday's crash "wasn't a fatality, it was a crime" after the plane horrifically dropped out of the sky in a death spiral. Maria de Fátima Albuquerque lost her daughter Arianne Albuquerque Risso in the crash, who was a resident doctor in oncology at the Cascavel Cancer Hospital. An emotional Mrs Albuquerque told Globo G1 at the time: 'It wasn't a fatality, anyone who was on that plane would have died, because it was an old wreck. "It wasn't a fatality, it was a crime. Who can ease my pain? You'll see me fighting every day." 8 The debris at the site where an air plane crashed with 62 people on board Credit: AP 8 Authorities are now investigating the cause of the crash Credit: Claudia Vitorino 8 The aircraft was labelled 'an old wreck' by passengers and their families Credit: Reproduction/TV Globo A tragic passenger on the fatal flight had also sent messages to her family saying she was 'scared' of the 'old' plane. Rosana Santos Xavier, 23, had expressed her concern about the ATR 72-500 aircraft in the family chat group shortly after boarding. She wrote: 'I'm so scared of this flight, I swear, it's an old plane. 'There's a broken seat, it's chaos.' The 23-year-old's mum, Rosemeire dos Santos Xavier, told her to read a Psalm to calm her nerves. But she says deep down, she had a bad feeling. A short while later, Rosemeire saw on the news that a plane had crashed. Rosemeire told local media: 'I panicked. I started running around the house screaming.' Rosana was heading back to her home in Franco da Rocha near São Paulo, Brazil, after a work trip. All flights grounded at multiple major UK airports over 'radar failure' as holidaymakers are left 'stranded' The plane had also been undergoing a series of maintenance shutdowns, Brazilian news programme Fantastico has found. In March, the Voepass aircraft experienced a hydraulic problem and abnormal contact with the runway that caused "structural damage", leaving the aircraft out of operation for four months. And just a day before Friday's horror crash, passengers on board the same plane reported suffering from the sweltering heat due to faulty air conditioning. During the flight, passengers reported that they faced extreme heat due to the malfunctioning air conditioning, with one of them saying the temperature was "unbearable". People were trying to cool down as best they could, with one man even taking off his shirt because of the sweltering heat. Voepass said in a statement that the safety has always been the company's priority, adding it "has always acted in compliance with the strict requirements that guarantee the safety of its air operations". 8 Arianne Albuquerque Risso, who died after a plane crash in Vinhedo, Sao Paulo 8 Lawyer Laiana Vasatta, pictured with her husband Fábio Bigolin, was another victim of the horror crash Credit: Jam Press
Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
'My neighbours made a petition to get rid of my dogs so kids can play in my garden'
A man has shared his disbelief after his neighbour demanded he get rid of his two dogs, who had been living with his parents, because her child got poo on his hands When house hunting, you'll likely have a checklist of must-haves, nice-to-haves, and negotiables. However, one aspect you might overlook until it's too late is the neighbours. A couple were left rather taken aback by their new neighbours, who initially offered friendly greetings but later began dictating what they could and couldn't do on their own property. A 36-year-old man took to Reddit to share how he and his wife had recently purchased their first home, specifically chosen for its "huge back garden". Initially, their new neighbours politely asked if their children could continue using the expansive back garden, but then things took an unexpected turn. It comes after Brits are told to never put one banned item in garden bins as you could face punishment. The man explained: "The previous owners of our place were an elderly childless couple who were well known in the area for basically being grandparents to everyone and the husband had built multiple tree houses and bridges in the trees for kids to play in. The property is fully fenced but has three swinging gates into it. "When we first moved in we were approached by the next-door neighbour who very politely asked if her kids could keep using the backyard to play in. We agreed that it was OK so long as she understood that if her kids got hurt it wasn't our problem and we wouldn't be supervising kids playing or anything. "She was fine with that and seemed very appreciative and brought over biscuits and juice when she came over to watch her kids. Word went around and eventually we had around a dozen kids coming by each week, some supervised, some in groups of two or three, but everyone was polite and tidy so we didn't really care." However, after Christmas, things took a turn when the man's parents moved into a retirement home and could no longer look after their two dogs - an 11-year-old Belgian shepherd and a 12-year-old German shepherd cross Belgian. The man decided to adopt the dogs, which were adored by the children, until one day an irate neighbour stormed over to complain about them - insisting they get rid of them. He continued: "The problem started when a lady we didn't know showed up at our house and started screaming at my wife, apparently her six-year-old had come home with his friends and they had dog poo smeared all over their hands. She basically told my wife that if she didn't get rid of the dogs then her kids wouldn't come over anymore and she'd press charges for endangerment. "My wife basically told her to eff off and that it wouldn't have happened if she'd been supervising her child. The woman left and came back with a petition and around six signatures for us to get rid of the dogs. We told her to do one and that kids were now no longer welcome. We locked the gates and put signs up explaining and left it at that. "Several of the nice neighbours have come by to beg us to change our minds but we don't want to risk it and we don't have the time to supervise the kids so the gates stay locked. We are now arguing with a couple of people who feel it's unfair that the entire neighbourhood is tarred because of one person's actions." Nevertheless, the man was left questioning whether he'd been too harsh by shutting off the garden completely. "There is something seriously wrong with people who think it's OK to sign a petition telling other people to get rid of their well-behaved, confined, senior dogs. Like beyond simple entitlement wrong", someone raged. "I would just explain to your good neighbours that it's a decision you had to make to protect yourselves and your dogs and it would cause way too much trouble if you let some children in and not others. Honestly just telling the parents you aren't liable if their kids hurt themselves may not be enough to protect you, if you do choose to allow children in again, [I recommend] talking to an attorney first." Another fumed: "I would choose my dogs over any human - especially children. I'm child-free and love dogs more than anything. Make sure to tell them which lady it was".
