Review: Chipotle's New Adobo Ranch Dip Spices Things Up In The Best Way Possible
Ranch dressing, which amazingly was indeed invented by a cowboy on a ranch, is a wildly popular condiment in America, and is poured on everything from salads to chicken wings and even pizza. If it works so well on all those all-American vittles, then why not on top of the beloved Mexican-inspired entrees one can order up at Chipotle ... but with a twist of heat?
Food Republic was lucky enough to catch a sneak peek taste test of the new Adobo Ranch, and dipped, poured, and spread it all over an array of Chipotle menu items. So, is this new sauce something you should be hip to, or totally skip? Saddle up dear readers, as the truth can now be told in this chew and review.
Read more: 8 Sandwiches At Jersey Mike's, Ranked
Adobo Ranch is a new, chilled dipping sauce being introduced by Chipotle in the summer of 2025. It's the newest dip to grace the menu since the launch of Queso Blanco, which replaced the previous queso in 2020, and still remains on menus today. Ranch is a popular condiment in America, and Chipotle is jumping in on the trend. It describes its new product as "a smoky, spicy twist on America's beloved dipping sauce." When not put directly into an entree, it is placed in the standard plastic portion cup that houses Chipotle's regular sized guacamole, queso, or any topping asked for on the side.
In a press release, Chris Brandt, president and chief brand officer noted, "Ranch has become a cultural phenomenon, especially among Gen Z, who are finding creative ways to enjoy it beyond the traditional salad." He added, "Our new Adobo Ranch taps into this passion, giving fans a craveworthy way to customize their Chipotle order with a completely new flavor." Nevielle Panthaky, vice president of culinary at Chipotle, recommends ordering up a Quesadilla or tortilla chips to best taste the new Adobo Ranch.
Adobo Ranch dipping sauce is a limited time offering that will be available, while supplies last, at participating Chipotle locations in the United States and Canada. It will join the menu on Tuesday, June 17, and anyone who is a Chipotle Rewards member can score a free dose of it on launch day. For those who aren't, and on every other day it's available, it costs $.75. Price and availability may vary per location, and may possibly be higher when ordered for delivery.
Adobo Ranch can be ordered at an additional cost atop any entree, like a burrito, salad, bowl, taco, with a bag of chips, or as an a la carte side. The dip can be found under the Chips & Dips and Single Sides submenu. Order it in-store, through the usual make line, or if available, at the drive-thru Chipot-lanes. Like anything on Chipotle's menu, it can be ordered in advance for in-store dining-in, pick-up, or delivery via the chain's app or website. Both allow the option to order digital exclusives like quesadillas and lifestyle bowls.
Adobe Ranch dip is made up of the following disclosed ingredients: adobo, sour cream, salt, dehydrated garlic, dehydrated onion, black pepper, parsley, and citrus juice. With the inclusion of sour cream, it contains the allergen milk.
A single serving of the Adobo Ranch is 60 grams. It nets a dipper 110 calories, 9 grams of fat, 6 grams of saturated fat, 35 milligrams of cholesterol, 460 milligrams of sodium, 4 grams of carbohydrates, 2 grams of total sugars, and 2 grams of protein. It also contains 10 milligrams of calcium, .3 of iron, 60 milligrams of potassium, and 1 milligram of vitamin C.
In the ubiquitous Chipotle plastic cup, laid a peachy-orange substance, swimming with what seemed like an endless array of green, black, and red seasoned flecks. This sight was my introduction with the chain's new Adobo Ranch dip. I popped off the top lid, and about ⅔ of the cup filled with this new concoction. I placed a spoon and stirred it around to gauge its consistency. It was more creamy than runny, but was still fluid in its movement.
While touch doesn't really come into play for a dip, my fingers were struck by how coolly chilled it was, sitting in that plastic cup. Next I leaned in for a whiff, and it had a beautiful, rich smell, as if taco seasoning had been dumped into a ranch dip. The cold temperature of the dip helped to intensify its alluring aroma.
Tasting it by itself, the Adobo Ranch revealed itself in a sort of three-tiered wave of delivery. In its opening salvo, again, the cold temperature made itself known, adding a perky chill to the mouth. Next, the texture of the seasoning flakes mixed in, added a bit of coarseness to contrast the smoothness of the sour cream, as well as add a savory pep to the overall flavor. Then the adobo spice kicked in at the end, adding a poppy zest that my mouth was rapidly entranced by. The spice was initially potent, but not overly pushy, and as it casually eased its grip, it allowed my mouth a moment to recover, and get ready to enjoy it all over again.
Let's now examine how Adobo Ranch works with many familiar Chipotle favorites. Tortilla chips obviously work well as a dipping tool. The room temperature triangles allowed the coolness of the Adobo Ranch to remain cool, and the lime and salt were a nice additive to the already arresting flavor profile of the ranch. For the two entrees I had at my eating disposal, the Adobo Ranch worked wonders in different ways. The Quesadilla is an even better dipper than the chips are, with its crisp and crunchy shell, and warmth meeting the dip's cold one to make a fun exchange of temperatures. Inside my burrito, it worked well against all the ingredients, including the lettuce and fajita veggies. With that in mind, although I didn't have a Chipotle salad or bowl on hand, I can already tell Adobo Ranch will be a go to dressing for those. See you later Honey Vinaigrette.
The ranch is also a flavor enhancer to its sister sides Guacamole and Queso Blanco. Mix a healthy dollop Ranch into the guac, and now you have an even better one, with a flaming bite. Same is true with the queso, where a few dabs gives the missing punch it's always needed, creating an ambrosia-like paste that I will now happily smother on anything.
With my Quesadilla, there was a side portion of loose corn niblets, and I stirred the Adobo Ranch in with the corn. The corn pieces were now easier to scoop up with a spoon, and the resulting taste was an elote-like street corn that Chipotle could easily sell as a potential side item.
Chipotle is a fast casual chain that has long been overloaded in rich and flavorful toppings. It's almost hard to imagine that any flavors are actually missing from the metal tins that reside along the make line. Now that Adobo Ranch is saddling up for a limited time, slinging a wickedly cool heat, it's actually hard to imagine how we all were able to eat at Chipotle without it. Whether you use Adobo Ranch as a dip, or as a sauce to smother or fill an entree with, it will instantly make whatever you're eating taste more amazing. Its zest is truly the best. Also, at a mere $.75, it's a no-brainer add-on.
I'm already worried that time is moving too fast and this limited time only offering has its days numbered. I want this to always be a part of my Chipotle order going forward, and I am confident that you, my fellow eaters, will agree. The chain will have no choice but to make Adobo Ranch a permanent spoonful sight on the make line. And from there? Why not bottle it up, and sell them in stores to rival Popeyes and Chick-fil-A's own retail ranches? I'm also hoping for more cooled dips, dressings, and sides being whipped up in Chipotle's test kitchen, and then being tested, uh, in my own mouth.
In advance of Adobo Ranch's nationwide launch, the fine folks over at Chipotle sent over a handful of dip cups, as well as other menu items to test its bona fides on and with. The food arrived warm, and the Adobo Ranch, chilled. Everything was eaten shortly after it arrived, starting with the dip itself, and then with the other food items, in no particular order.
The taste test was conducted by myself, and with one other eater, who joined in on the yum. While the opinion of my dining companion was noted (they found it spiced-up far more than I did), ultimately, this chew and review is based on my own tastes, past experiences with Chipotle, and present experience with Adobo Ranch.
The criteria used to draw my final conclusion on Adobo Ranch included taste, texture, aroma, appearance, value, Chipotle-ness, ranchocity, overall lovability, and likelihood I would order it again. The simple answer is — yes! I even used the leftover dip I had on the eggs I made for breakfast the next morning. The result? My smile was as wide as the one on the top image that headlines this article.
Want more food knowledge? Sign up to our free newsletter where we're helping thousands of foodies, like you, become culinary masters, one email at a time.
Read the original article on Food Republic.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
3 hours ago
- Fast Company
Trump rollback on clean energy subsidies stalls major solar, wind projects and manufacturing plans
Singapore-based solar panel manufacturer Bila Solar is suspending plans to double capacity at its new factory in Indianapolis. Canadian rival Heliene's plans for a solar cell facility in Minnesota are under review. Norwegian solar wafer maker NorSun is evaluating whether to move forward with a planned factory in Tulsa, Oklahoma. And two fully permitted offshore wind farms in the U.S. Northeast may never get built. These are among the major clean energy investments now in question after Republicans agreed earlier this month to quickly end U.S. subsidies for solar and wind power as part of their budget megabill, and as the White House directed agencies to tighten the rules on who can claim the incentives that remain. This marks a policy U-turn since President Donald Trump's return to office that project developers, manufacturers and analysts say will slash installations of renewable energy over the coming decade, kill investment and jobs in the clean energy manufacturing sector supporting them, and worsen a looming U.S. power supply crunch as energy-hungry AI infrastructure expands. Solar and wind installations could be 17% and 20% lower than previously forecast over the next decade because of the moves, according to research firm Wood Mackenzie, which warned that a dearth of new supplies could slow the expansion of data centers needed to support AI technology. Energy researcher Rhodium, meanwhile, said the law puts at risk $263 billion of wind, solar, and storage facilities and $110 billion of announced manufacturing investment supporting them. It will also increase industrial energy costs by up to $11 billion in 2035, it said. 'One of the administration's stated goals was to bring costs down, and as we demonstrated, this bill doesn't do that,' said Ben King, a director in Rhodium's energy and climate practice. He added the policy 'is not a recipe for continued dominance of the U.S. AI industry.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. The Trump administration has defended its moves to end support for clean energy by arguing the rapid adoption of solar and wind power has created instability in the grid and raised consumer prices – assertions that are contested by the industry and which do not bear out in renewables-heavy power grids, like Texas' ERCOT. Power industry representatives, however, have said all new generation projects need to be encouraged to meet rising U.S. demand, including both those driven by renewables and fossil fuels. Consulting firm ICF projects that U.S. electricity demand will grow by 25% by 2030, driven by increased AI and cloud computing – a major challenge for the power industry after decades of stagnation. The REPEAT Project, a collaboration between Princeton University and Evolved Energy Research, projects a 2% annual increase in electricity demand. With a restricted pipeline of renewables, tighter electricity supplies stemming from the policy shift could increase household electricity costs by $280 a year in 2035, according to the REPEAT Project. The key provision in the new law is the accelerated phase-out of 30% tax credits for wind and solar projects: it requires projects to begin construction within a year or enter service by the end of 2027 to qualify for the credits. Previously the credits were available through 2032. Now some project developers are scrambling to get projects done while the U.S. incentives are still accessible. But even that strategy has become risky, developers said. Days after signing the law, Trump directed the Treasury Department to review the definition of 'beginning of construction.' A revision to those rules could overturn a long-standing practice giving developers four years to claim tax credits after spending just 5% of project costs. Treasury was given 45 days to draft new rules. 'With so many moving parts, financing of projects, financing of manufacturing is difficult, if not impossible,' said Martin Pochtaruk, CEO of Heliene. 'You are looking to see what is the next baseball bat that's going to hit you on the head.' About face Heliene's planned cell factory, which could cost as much as $350 million, depending on the capacity, and employ more than 600 workers, is also in limbo, Pochtaruk said in an interview earlier this month. The company needs more clarity on both what the new law will mean for U.S. demand, and how Trump's trade policy will impact the solar industry. 'We have a building that is anxiously waiting for us to make a decision,' Pochtaruk said. Similarly, Mick McDaniel, general manager of Bila Solar, said 'a troubling level of uncertainty' has put on hold its $20 million expansion at an Indianapolis factory it opened this year that would create an additional 75 jobs. 'NorSun is still digesting the new legislation and recent executive order to determine the impact to the overall domestic solar manufacturing landscape,' said Todd Templeton, director of the company's U.S. division that is reviewing plans for its $620 million solar wafer facility in Tulsa. Five solar manufacturing companies – T1 Energy, Imperial Star Solar, SEG Solar, Solx and ES Foundry – said they are also concerned about the new law's impact on future demand, but that they have not changed their investment plans. The policy changes have also injected fresh doubt about the fate of the nation's pipeline of offshore wind projects, which depend heavily on tax credits to bring down costs. According to Wood Mackenzie, projects that have yet to start construction or make final investment decisions are unlikely to proceed. Two such projects, which are fully permitted, include a 300-megawatt project by developer US Wind off the coast of Maryland and Iberdrola's 791 MW New England Wind off the coast of Massachusetts. Neither company responded to requests for comment. 'They are effectively ready to begin construction and are now trapped in a timeline that will make it that much harder to be able to take advantage of the remaining days of the tax credits,' said Hillary Bright, executive director of offshore wind advocacy group Turn Forward.
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
Tesla's stock is tumbling after Elon Musk failure to shift the narrative
Elon Musk's big promises apparently no longer seem to be enough for many Tesla investors. Shares of Tesla (TSLA) fell 9% on Thursday following another dismal earnings report, released after the bell Wednesday. Tesla's earnings and revenue both fell by double-digit percentages following the biggest sales drop in the company's history. The automaker also faces a number of financial headwinds, including the loss of a $7,500 tax credit for US EV buyers starting in October, and the vanishing market for regulatory credit sales, which has earned Tesla $11 billion since 2019. But Tesla CEO Elon Musk barely talked about that on the earnings call Wednesday, although he did acknowledge the company 'probably could have a few rough quarters.' Instead, he talked about his grand vision for the future, including Tesla's long-promised robotaxi service; and its humanoid robot, Optimus, which is still in development. The lack of details about the company's plans to solve problems in the near term disappointed some investors and analysts. 'Investors have been very forgiving of Tesla for several quarters now, despite obvious headwinds to their business,' Garrett Nelson, analyst at CFRA Research, told CNN Thursday. 'But I think its investors are taking a more realistic view of the story at this point. Some of his brilliance has been his ability to keep investors focused on the long term and ignoring the near term and intermediate term. Now, headwinds are difficult to ignore.' Nelson downgraded the company's stock to a neutral rating in April. But even some of the Tesla bulls on Wall Street are saying that the time for Musk to take action is running out. 'The street is losing some patience,' Wedbush Securities tech analyst Dan Ives told CNN Thursday, although he said he still believes in the autonomous vehicle and artificial intelligence vision laid out by Musk and Tesla. Musk has made big promises about his robotaxi service, including that it would be in service within a year as early as 2019. Tesla's robotaxis finally rolled out in June this year, albeit in a limited portion of Austin, Texas, to friends and fans of the company, and with an employee sitting beside the empty driver's seat. However, that limited rollout wasn't enough to stop Musk from making extraordinary claims on Wednesday that the service would be available to half the nation's population by year's end. To achieve that, Tesla will need to get regulatory permission to operate in two states per week through the rest of the year, including New York, which does not allow autonomous vehicles on its roads. Morningstar analyst Seth Goldstein said that while he does believe Tesla will eventually be successful in its robotaxi venture, 'the software will require further testing' and he does not expect a full robotaxi product until 2028. But Musk has a history of making grand promises that do not pan out. Like the Cybertruck – the only new vehicle Tesla has offered in the last six years. Musk said Tesla was supposed to be delivering 250,000 vehicles annually by this year. But full-year sales of the Cybertruck and Tesla's two other expensive models were less than 80,000. Sales of the three plunged 52% in the most recent quarter. Tesla also started the year forecasting it would achieve higher sales following its first annual sales drop in its history in 2024. But after two quarters of record sales declines, most investors now assume that it will not meet that goal either. And with Musk himself barely mentioning car sales during an hour-long conference call, it doesn't appear that is enough for shareholders any longer. 'We are mixed on Tesla's ability to meet its robotaxi timelines, cost targets, and scale,' wrote Ben Kallo, an analyst for Baird, in a note to clients late Wednesday. 'So far Tesla has received a pass due to how ambitious/revolutionary these products are, but we think continued sluggishness in the auto business could cause more focus on the near term.'
Entrepreneur
3 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
4 Signs It's Time to Abandon Your Patent
How to make smart, strategic calls on when to abandon patents — and why doing so is essential to long-term innovation and budget health Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Patents are often filed early, before a startup knows what the market really wants. That's smart, but it comes with a challenge: Not every idea turns out to be worth protecting. Markets shift. Products pivot. And eventually, founders ask: Should we keep paying for this patent or cut our losses? It's a tough call. Abandoning a patent midway can feel like giving up. But continuing just because you've already spent money? That's the sunk cost trap, and it quietly drains your budget. Many startups keep prosecuting every idea, paying rejections, annuities and attorney fees. But a smart IP strategy means knowing what to keep and what to walk away from. Here's how to make that call strategically. Related: How to Identify the Patent-Worthy Innovations in Your Business Built-in checkpoints in patent lifecycle — use them Roughly, you can split a patent's entire lifecycle cost into three parts. The first third goes to drafting the application, another third is for arguing the patent through issuance, and the final third covers patent maintenance fees for the next 20+ years. In a way, these financial checkpoints are decision checkpoints, too. When drafting, consider whether the invention aligns with your core business or is just a side experiment that may never get to market. During prosecution, evaluate whether it's still worth the legal wrangling, as each round of argument is costly. And when renewal fees come due, ask if the patent still supports your product, blocks competitors or adds leverage against others in the market. Unfortunately, many startups treat these pivotal stages as administrative formalities. Instead of evaluating whether continued investment is justified at each stage, many companies default to pushing forward — whether by extending prosecution unnecessarily, filing continuations without a clear purpose, or simply paying maintenance fees — without assessing strategic alignment. That's how portfolios get bloated with low-impact patents. The only solution here is patent pruning: Abandon some patent filings at the right checkpoints. Related: Don't Let Patent Costs Crush Your Startup — Here's How to Protect Your IP Without Breaking the Bank What are the signs that it's time to abandon a patent? Every dollar spent defending or maintaining a weak patent is a dollar not spent protecting something truly valuable. Therefore, you must look for the signs at different checkpoints to spot a patent to discard. Here are some signs to look for: 1. No market validation A patent is only valuable if the protected product actually sells. If your invention fails to gain customer traction, the patent will be a failure. Experts emphasize focusing on "high-impact" problems with real demand. Without that market pull, even a granted patent is a dead weight. For example, Google Glass — once hyped as the future of AR eyewear — never found a viable consumer market. It was pulled from sale in 2015 (and again in 2023) due to poor adoption, illustrating how patents tied to unvalidated products offer no return. 2. Shifting industry direction Industries evolve, and a patent can lose value if the tech horizon moves on. In practice, companies are advised to ask whether their invention still aligns with "the target industry and market." If adjacent innovations eclipse your solution (for example, cloud services replacing old networking hardware), the patent's relevance vanishes. In that scenario, it makes little sense to keep paying maintenance fees. Better to refocus on protections for innovations that fit the new direction of your field. 3. Prior art kills the novelty Sometimes, what initially feels like a breakthrough ends up being something others have already attempted or fully disclosed. If prior art eclipses your claims, the chances of securing meaningful protection drop significantly. At that point, even if you receive a patent, it may be so narrow that it offers little real-world value. Continuing to prosecute a case like this can quickly become a drain on time and legal budget. 4. Weak business use case Every patent in your portfolio should earn its keep through business impact or the potential to do so on your current roadmap. If it's not protecting a revenue-generating product, blocking a competitor or supporting licensing efforts, its value is questionable. Startups often hang on to patents without a clear path to monetization or strategic use. But unless a patent strengthens your market position or serves a legal or commercial purpose, it's just another expense on the books. To actively prune your patent portfolio, just looking for signs isn't enough. As the portfolio grows, you need a deliberate, repeatable process for patent abandonment assessment. Build a patent pruning system: Health checks and ranking framework An effective patent pruning system should take two things into consideration: 1) lifecycle stage and 2) multiple perspectives. For the first one, you want to start by ranking each patent across key lifecycle stages: At the idea stage : Is this innovation aligned with your product roadmap or market differentiation? Post-filing : Has the landscape shifted? Is the application still strategically relevant? Pre-renewal: Is the granted patent still supporting revenue, blocking competitors or enhancing leverage? The higher a patent scores at a certain stage, the more you want to invest in it. Please note that not only your legal counsel team but also others, such as product, technology, marketing and finance, must contribute to this ranking system, as pruning cannot be undone. The goal is to ensure that patents are evaluated through a business lens, not just a legal one. Consider using patent management tools that provide full portfolio visibility and enable seamless collaboration as part of your patent pruning process. Related: 4 Surprising Patent Myths That Could Cost You Big — What You Need to Know Now Pruning a patent portfolio isn't just about saving money; it's about fueling what's next with the reclaimed budget. In 2020, IBM stepped back from chasing patent volume. "We're no longer pursuing patent leadership," they said. "We're being more selective." The result? Fewer filings, stronger focus and more investment in high-growth areas like AI and quantum computing. That's the lesson: Pruning isn't cutting back. It's reallocating toward where your business is growing. Because IP should follow your future, not fund your past.
