Trump Administration Terminates Education Grant That Has Helped Fund PBS Kids Content
The CPB said that it was informed by the Department of Education on Friday that the 2020-25 Ready to Learn grant was being canceled, forcing it to inform PBS and 44 public media stations to pause the long-running program.
More from Deadline
'Nearly every parent has raised their kids on public broadcasting's children's content,' Patricia Harrison, president and CEO of the corporation. 'For the past 30 years, Ready To Learn-funded PBS Kids content has produced measurable, real-world impacts on children's learning. Ready To Learn has received strong bipartisan support from Congress and every Administration for the last 30 years because of the programs' proven educational value in advancing early learning skills for all children. We will work with Congress and the Administration to preserve funding for this essential program.'
A spokesperson for the Department of Education did not immediately return a request for comment.
The grants have helped fund such shows as Molly of Denali, Work It Out Wombats! and Lyla in the Loop. Ready to Learn was established to improve education for preschool and early elementary students, with goals of reaching those in low-income communities.
The Ready to Learn grant was authorized as a 1992 amendment to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting and PBS have received grants each five year cycle, with the latest expiring on Sept. 30. According to the Education Department, CPB and PBS were expected to receive a total of $105 million under the program for the past five years.
The grants are separate from the congressional appropriation to the CPB, which has been $535 million.
Last week, Trump signed an executive order ordering the CPB to end federal funding to PBS and NPR. But the CPB and those networks have challenged the president's authority to do so, as Congress directly authorized and funded CPB to be a private nonprofit corporation wholly independent of the federal government.' Trump also ordered other federal agencies to end funding to public media.
Best of Deadline
Sign up for Deadline's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP Rep's Response To Donald Trump's Slam Of ‘Weaklings' Base Is Just… Wow
Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) brushed off President Donald Trump's harsh words for his own supporters on Wednesday with a comment that's been mocked online as sycophantic and surreal. Trump lashed out at those of his MAGA base who are furious with the Justice Department's refusal to release any more documents related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, calling them 'stupid.' Asked for his response to Trump's slamming of his own supporters, Burchett spun: 'President Trump has his own opinions, but honestly, man, he wins.' CNN: What's your response to President Trump calling his own supporters weaklings? Burchett: He has a strategy in all this and I suspect it will play out because he wins every time. — Acyn (@Acyn) July 17, 2025 Trump 'has a strategy in all this and I suspect that's gonna play out because, dad-gummit, he wins every dad-gum time,' the Republican added, playing into the MAGA notion that Trump always knows exactly what he's doing at any given time because he's playing 4D chess. 'It's uncanny that he ends up on top,' Burchett added. 'And I suspect on this case he will do as well.' The Tennessee lawmaker's defense sparked swift backlash on social media: Are we back to the 4D chess trope? — The Dr. - ❤️'s Educated Women (@gatesisthedevil) July 17, 2025 Such a weaklings' answer! — Evaristus Odinikaeze (@odinikaeze) July 17, 2025 Sycophant's gotta sycophant. — Bill Schmidt (@BaByBoY12216) July 17, 2025 Panic and rant is a strategy? — Chimes of Freedom (@throbbingvicar) July 17, 2025 Narrator: in fact, the convicted felon fails most of the time and then declares victory anyway. Because liar. — Guy Cole (@guycole) July 17, 2025 Related... Fox News Star Stuns With Unreal Take On 'Nazis' And 'The Blacks' OOPS! Trump Taunts AOC And Crockett, Then Undermines Himself In Next Breath Paul Krugman Exposes The Flaw At The Heart Of Trump's Cruelest Policy
Boston Globe
9 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Polygraph tests are scientifically unreliable. Here's why the Trump administration is using them anyway.
Advertisement The executive order precipitated immense pushback, both from members of Reagen's Cabinet and from members of Congress. Then-Secretary of State George Shultz I led Advertisement Polygraph tests measure autonomic nervous system reactions and how anxious a person is in response to a set of structured questions. Undermining the entire purpose of the tests is that a person's anxiety is not directly associated with their truthfulness. There is no unique psychophysical reaction associated with deception. Our OTA conclusions have stood the test of time and have been corroborated by subsequent comprehensive analyses, including Although the administration scaled back its ambitions regarding use of the tests in the wake of the 1983 controversy, government agencies have continued to use the tests. One example of the danger of relying on polygraph testing appears in the case of Aldrich Ames. A CIA agent, Ames was arrested in 1994 for selling information to the Soviets that comprised the entire US intelligence operation in the Soviet Union. He passed several polygraph tests. But if polygraph tests are not accurate, why are they still used? Perhaps the key reason for their continued use is to make a powerful statement about the government's concern with how information is handled by those with access to classified information or, in some cases, information that would be politically inconvenient to be made public. Even if polygraph tests are not accurate, the threat of a test can serve as a deterrent or as an interrogation tool to elicit admissions. The danger, however, is that the government fails to detect lies that damage national security and it opens the door to misidentifying truthful individuals whose anxiety is provoked by the test. Advertisement All of us, inside and outside of government, know far more about the flaws of polygraph testing today than we did in 1983, but no one in government seems to care. That the Trump administration, which has expressed hostility to the scientific community, should embrace a technology that is regarded by reputable researchers as pseudo-scientific at best is not surprising. Congress has diminished capacity to understand and evaluate technology. As well, we do not have a figure such as Shultz, ready to put his job on the line to defend the integrity and professionalism of his federal employees and their critical work. The loss is not just for government workers, but for all of us who care about the work of government.
CBS News
10 minutes ago
- CBS News
Senate approves $9 billion in cuts to foreign aid, public media funding
Washington — The Senate passed President Trump's request to rescind $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting funding early Thursday, culminating an hours-long "vote-a-rama" and sending it back to the House ahead of a Friday deadline. In a 51-48 vote, Republicans Susan Collins, of Maine, and Lisa Murkowski, of Alaska, joined all Democrats in opposing the package. Vice President JD Vance, who cast two tie-breaking votes Tuesday for the measure to clear procedural hurdles, was not needed for final passage. Democratic Sen. Tina Smith of Minnesota was hospitalized and missed the vote. Both chambers need to approve the request before it expires at the end of the week, or the funds will have to be spent as lawmakers previously intended. The House approved the original $9.4 billion rescissions request last month, but it has faced pushback in the Senate, where some Republicans opposed slashing global health assistance and funding for local radio and television stations. The Senate held a lengthy vote series beginning Wednesday afternoon, rejecting dozens of amendments on retaining international aid and sparing public broadcasting from cuts. The Senate's version targets roughly $8 billion for foreign assistance programs, including the United States Agency for International Development, or USAID. The package also includes about $1 billion in cuts for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supports public radio and television stations, including NPR and PBS. Senate Republicans met with Mr. Trump's budget director, Russell Vought, on Tuesday as GOP leaders worked to get holdouts on board ahead of the procedural votes later in the day. Vought left the meeting saying there would be a substitute amendment that would eliminate $400 million in cuts to an AIDS prevention program, one of the main concerns of Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, said he hoped the House would accept the "small modification." When asked about the $400 million change, House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, told reporters, "we wanted them to pass it unaltered like we did." "We need to claw back funding, and we'll do as much as we're able," Johnson added. But the change did not satisfy Collins and Murkowski. The holdouts said the administration's request lacks details about how the cuts will be implemented. "To carry out our Constitutional responsibility, we should know exactly what programs are affected and the consequences of rescissions," Collins said in a statement Tuesday. In a floor speech ahead of the procedural votes, Murkowski also said Congress should not give up its budget oversight. "I don't want us to go from one reconciliation bill to a rescissions package to another rescissions package to a reconciliation package to a continuing resolution," she said. "We're lawmakers. We should be legislating. What we're getting now is a direction from the White House and being told, 'This is the priority, we want you to execute on it, we'll be back with you with another round.' I don't accept that." Cuts to local radio and television stations, especially in rural areas where they are critical for communicating emergency messages, was another point of contention in the Senate. Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota, who had concerns about the cuts, said funding would be reallocated from climate funds to keep stations in tribal areas operating "without interruption." Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who voted for the package, said he expected that Congress would later have to try to fix some of the cuts once they determine the impacts. "I suspect we're going to find out there are some things that we're going to regret," he said Wednesday on the Senate floor. "I suspect that when we do we'll have to come back and fix it, similar to what I'm trying to do with the bill I voted against a couple of weeks ago — the so-called big, beautiful bill, that I think we're going to have to go back and work on."
