
How mortgage market changes could help first-time buyers onto the property ladder
The Independent Money channel is brought to you by Trading 212.
First-time buyers may be set for a leg-up onto the property ladder thanks to changing attitudes from the financial regulator - but there are risks to the changing landscape.
Getting on the property ladder has been made harder in recent years by record high house prices that have outpaced wage growth.
Additionally, stamp duty thresholds dropped for first-time buyers in April from £425,000 to £300,000 and from £250,000 to £125,000, adding to the upfront costs of buying a property.
First-time buyers may still benefit from the stamp duty exemption across most of the country where properties are worth below £300,000, though the average property price in London is £567,000, making it hard to buy in the capital.
Even if you can find a property, many buyers have been restricted by tough mortgage regulations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) introduced tougher lending rules in 2014 under the mortgage market review to stop a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis, where many borrowers were left with loans they couldn't afford.
That has meant buyers have to pass tough affordability assessments and interest rate stress tests.
One silver lining is that mortgage rates have been falling in recent months, although they remain higher than historical standards.
This all makes getting on the property ladder more complex and expensive - but it may be about to get easier.
How is the mortgage market changing
Ultimately, a housing market without people buying homes means less money is spent in the economy on activities such as estate agencies, legal services and removals, plus the Treasury takes less tax.
This is part of the reason why Chancellor Rachel Reeves has called on regulators to be more inventive to help stimulate economic growth.
The FCA launched a discussion paper last month seeking ideas on changes to encourage home ownership and economic growth.
Outcomes include more flexibility on stress tests, letting past payment of rent alone prove affordability and lending to first time borrowers based on their expected career trajectories.
David Geale, executive director for payments and digital finance, said: 'We want to evolve our mortgage rules to help more people access sustainable home ownership. Having achieved higher standards in the market, now is the time to consider allowing more flexibility in a trusted market.
"Changing our mortgage rules could make it easier for people to get onto the property ladder and manage mortgages into retirement.
'We can't solve all the issues related to home ownership. But we're playing our part in helping people better use the mortgage market to navigate their financial lives and to encourage a dynamic, innovative and competitive market.'
Changes already in effect
The FCA has already made some changes by altering rules around loan-to-income (LTI) ratios.
The ratio caps the number of new residential mortgage loans that can be made at an LTI of 4.5 times or more to 15 per cent of their total number of new mortgage loans per year.
Since 11 July 2025, the limit has applied to lenders who approve loans with a total value of above £150 million a year, rather than the current £100m threshold that was set in 2014.
This will ultimately help smaller mortgages approve more loans.
Rachel Geddes, strategic lender relationships director at the Mortgage Advice Bureau, said lenders, brokers and customers have been crying out for an update for some time.
She added: 'The caps for lenders have been so rigid as they've tried to be risk averse, so it's actually become a hindrance in limiting the customer's ability to buy.
'We need to help people become homeowners, and this is one of the ways of doing it - as long as it's done in a very responsible way.'
Santander then became one of the first lenders to relax their stress test rules, with others following.
There are signs that the sentiment from the FCA is being reflected among mortgage lenders.
Average mortgage rates are close to a three-year low, according to Moneyfacts, while product choice has also increased overall to 6,908 options - the highest level since October 2007.
Nationwide has already said it will increase its lending limits.
Many mortgage brokers remain cautious though, with memories of the 2008 financial crash still on many people's minds, when homeowners got stuck in negative equity as house prices crashed and the value of their property fell below what their loan was worth.
Riz Malik, director of R3 Wealth, said: 'First-time buyers need help but not at any costs. Lending them more today might get them on the ladder but it is not helpful if that mortgage then becomes a noose and you end up living to pay your mortgage if rates rise in the future.
'Just because a lender may give you a large mortgage doesn't mean you should take every penny they are prepared to lend and inexperienced borrowers need to be made aware of this.'
Responsibility remains key for both lenders and borrowers, as well as regulators.
Rob Peters, principal at Simple Fast Mortgage, added: 'Relaxing rules could open the door for many who currently can't get on the property ladder, but we must tread carefully.
'Greater flexibility in lending can encourage innovation and expand options, but it also brings risks if we don't keep affordability and long-term sustainability at the forefront. The key is balancing innovation with responsible lending, ensuring people don't overcommit and face financial hardship down the road.'
When investing, your capital is at risk and you may get back less than invested. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
36 minutes ago
- BBC News
Selling former Hambleton District Council offices is a 'win'
The sale of former council offices to a care home operator is a "win, win, win" situation, a senior councillor has Yorkshire Council's executive committee has agreed to dispose of the civic centre at Stone Cross in Northallerton, the former headquarters of Hambleton District building would be sold for an undisclosed fee which was described as "significant" by council authority decided the offices were not needed following the abolition of Hambleton District Council and the launch of the unitary North Yorkshire Council in 2023. Customer service facilities have also been transferred from the building to the Treadmills site in the town voted unanimously to progress the sale of the building to an unnamed care home operator at a meeting on Tuesday, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS).The authority's deputy leader Gareth Dadd said the sale was the "first major capital" disposal by the unitary authority."It is providing not just a strong capital receipt but, once we take into account the new costs from the new location of the customer service centre, we're looking at net £150,000 to £200,000 I would suggest, in revenue savings through us moving out of that particular building," he said."It's also provided a better customer service experience, as well as underpinning the new Treadmills site with increased footfall."Dadd said all-in-all it was a "win, win, win" and said the council "should not be hesitant in approving the disposal of that particular asset". Mark Crane, executive member for open to business, also spoke in favour of the sale."As a unitary authority, it's clearly wrong that we've got two large offices in the same town," he said."This is a good news story whichever way you look at it."The back-office services which previously operated from Stone Cross have been mainly relocated to County Hall in Northallerton, officials building was put up for sale earlier this year with the negotiations led by the council's property consultancy, Align Property sale will not affect the adjacent leisure centre or the former caretaker's property which are located next to the disused building. Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North


The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Europe gives Iran deadline to contain nuclear programme or see sanctions reinstated
The EU will start the process of reinstating UN sanctions on Iran from 29 August if Tehran has made no progress by then on containing its nuclear programme, the bloc has announced. Speaking at a meeting of his EU counterparts, the French foreign minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, said: 'France and its partners are … justified in reapplying global embargos on arms, banks and nuclear equipment that were lifted 10 years ago. Without a firm, tangible and verifiable commitment from Iran, we will do so by the end of August at the latest.' Europeans have been largely elbowed aside from the Iranian nuclear issue by Donald Trump, who ordered the bombing of Iran's nuclear sites last month, and this intervention can be seen as an attempt to reassert Europe's influence. The end of August deadline starts a process that could see an armoury of sanctions reimposed by 15 October, giving European signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal – the UK, France and Germany – a continuing lever in negotiations with Iran. The European powers want to see the return of the UN nuclear inspectorate to Iran in part to prevent Iran trying to reconfigure its nuclear programme after the damage inflicted by the US strikes in June. The way in which the 2015 nuclear deal was negotiated does not allow the other signatories, China or Russia, to veto the sanctions snapback, but the European states can defer the imposition of snapback beyond October to allow time for further consultation. The US, after leaving the nuclear deal in 2018, also cannot veto the UK or French move. The sanctions snapback would be triggered under chapter V11 of the UN charter, making the reinstatement of six UN resolutions mandatory, including one that requires Iran to suspend all activities related to uranium enrichment and reprocessing, including at the research and development level. Another reimposed resolution would require all UN member states to prevent the transfer of any items, materials or technologies that could serve these activities or Iran's missile programme. Iranian sanctions experts claim the reinstated resolutions would not automatically halt all Iranian oil exports, cut off Iran's access to international financial systems, or cut off general trade communications. But all countries and international financial institutions would have to refrain from providing financial assistance, new commitments, or preferential loans to the Iranian government, except for humanitarian and development purposes. Abbas Araghchi, the Iranian foreign minister, has said recently the activation of snapback 'will mean the end of Europe's role in the Iranian nuclear issue and may be the darkest point in the history of Iran's relations with the three European countries; a point that may never be repaired.' He said: 'It would mark the end of Europe's role as a mediator between Iran and the US.' He told diplomats at the weekend 'One of the big mistakes of the Europeans is that they think that the 'snapback' tool in their hands gives them the power to act on the Iranian nuclear issue; while this is a completely wrong perception. If these countries move towards snapback, they will make the resolution of the Iranian nuclear issue even more complicated and difficult.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Watchdogs insist reducing regulation will not increase risk of financial crisis
Financial watchdogs have insisted that the risk of a financial crisis will not increase as a result of measures announced by the Chancellor to cut regulation in a bid to deliver growth. Under questioning by the Commons Business and Trade Committee, a senior civil servant also confirmed the target to cut red tape by 25% will be measured in terms of costs to firms of current requirements, with a baseline set to be confirmed in 18 months. Rachel Reeves has unveiled a package of reforms to the UK's financial system aimed at boosting the economy and spurring on retail investing. The changes include reforming the bank ring-fencing regime and reducing burdensome regulation in the City in order to reintroduce 'informed risk-taking' into the financial system, the Government said. The Chancellor said the 'Leeds reforms', unveiled in the West Yorkshire city, 'represent the widest set of reforms to financial services for more than a decade'. Liam Byrne, Labour chairman of the Business and Trade Committee and a former chief secretary to the Treasury, said evidence suggests liberalisation of regulation is 'often accompanied by lending booms that end badly'. He asked senior officials tasked with implementing the changes whether the announcements made by the Chancellor would increase the risk of a financial turmoil. David Bailey, executive director at the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), said the organisation had 'built overall resilience in the system' since the financial crash in 2008. He added: 'The risk of a financial crisis, from the PRA's perspective in banking insurance, has not gone up because we have maintained the same level of reliance.' Sarah Pritchard, deputy chief executive at the Financial Conduct Authority, said there should be a public debate about 'where should the risk appetite be set' if, for example, greater access to mortgages leads to an increase in repossessions in the event of an economic downturn. When pressed on how measures announced today are different to previous 'liberalisation' implemented before previous financial crises, she added: 'There is nothing in today's set of announcements that causes me any different concern to that that David has set out.' When questioned on whether the measures will lead to a rise in asset prices if lending increases, Ms Pritchard added: 'There are a range of different factors at play. 'I think regulation is one aspect, but the general environment in which we all operate, in particular the UK being a global connected system, there is no one point that I would refer to in terms of that package today that is saying that will cause any different market risk or volatility.' Mr Byrne later pressed Chris Carr, director at the Department of Business and Trade, on how the target to reduce the administrative burden of regulation by 25% will be set. He confirmed the target is to reduce the burden to the planned level over the course of this Parliament and said the cost in pounds to businesses caused by red tape will be the measure. Mr Carr added: 'We have to agree and publish a baseline of the administrative burden and then strive to reduce it by 25%.' When asked how long it is expected to take for the baseline to be set, competition and markets minister Justin Madders said: 'We think it is going to take about 18 months, which is akin to the timescale it took under the last Labour government's similar exercise.'