logo
What you need to know ahead of the OCDSB's final vote on its elementary review

What you need to know ahead of the OCDSB's final vote on its elementary review

CBC13-05-2025
Social Sharing
Trustees on the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board (OCDSB) will take a final vote Tuesday evening on a controversial overhaul of elementary programs that has been years in the making.
Leading into that meeting, the plan remains to phase out alternative schools and middle French immersion, while aiming to dual-track more schools — though not all — to provide both English and French immersion.
Many aspects of the plan have shifted significantly in the months since details were made public. That's in large part due to the more than 12,000 people who have weighed in since the beginning of the year.
Here's a guide to help you get up to speed.
Why is the OCDSB doing this revamp?
Director of education Pino Buffone says an overhaul of elementary programs was a priority on his desk in 2010 when he became a superintendent. Board chair Lynn Scott, who has been a trustee for 30 years, said past boards have made attempts, and she hopes this time it will finally get done.
The issues date back to the late 1990s when the Ottawa and Carleton boards merged and the OCDSB inherited schools with a variety of grade configurations and offerings.
The big goal, Buffone says, is to now give all students access to the same programs in their community school. In essence, that means aiming to dual-track schools to offer both French immersion and English, while phasing out middle French immersion and alternative schools.
Specifically, the board wanted to bring French immersion to 15 single-track English schools to correct socio-economic inequities. The board's data shows its English program teaches a disproportionate number of children from low-income households whose first language isn't English, or who have special education needs.
In addition to resolving inequities, the director of education has also said the restructuring at the elementary level will allow the board to operate more efficiently.
"We have plenty of data ... that we are stagnating as an organization, that we are spreading ourselves too thin, that we need to streamline our programs to two offerings, enhanced English and French immersion," Buffone told trustees at a meeting May 6.
"This organization is entirely distracted from what we need to do for our students."
How are school boundaries changing?
In the end, changes to boundaries and grade configurations for individual schools will not be nearly as significant as originally laid out on Feb. 28.
In order to put French immersion and English in each school, while maintaining enough students to have workable classrooms, staff originally laid out some situations that confounded and upset many parents.
Some schools remained significantly over- or under-capacity. Some schools would have seen cohorts go to one school for junior kindergarten to Grade 3, and then move to another school for grades 4-8.
When the maps were released in late February, parents pointed to siblings who would be separated, children who would have to travel to a school farther away, disruption of after-school child care, the breakup of school communities and more.
Some schools with toilets for small children would be converted to middle schools with lockers.
By April 3, board staff had gone back to the drawing board and removed those proposed J.K.-3 and grades 4-8 schools. In doing so, five English-only schools remained: Arch Street, Dunlop, Convent Glen, Hawthorne and North Gower/Marlborough.
That frustrated trustees Nili Kaplan-Myrth and Lyra Evans, especially. They argued those able to protest and organize saw changes, yet the OCDSB was willing to leave systemic barriers in low-income areas.
Evans tabled a motion May 6 to bring French immersion to English-only schools, but it failed in a 9-3 vote. Staff said doing so would mean reintroducing the contentious J.K-3 and 4-8 configurations.
Not all was resolved for some parents who gave delegations on April 22, either. They worry some schools won't be able to sustain all grades of English or French immersion with the new school catchments.
How does this affect special education?
All specialized classes for children with complex needs will remain, despite a plan presented in January to phase out 39 of them.
The OCDSB has 142 classes to meet the needs of children who have autism, need behavioural intervention, are hard of hearing, have developmental delays, are gifted and more.
Board staff point out that the OCDSB offers classes other districts do not, and they do cost more. Moreover, staff point to a philosophy of including children in mainstream classes wherever possible, and meeting their needs there.
Unions and parents were unconvinced children in community schools would get the educational assistants and support they need at a time of cost cutting.
By early April, staff said they had listened to feedback and would keep 13 classes. Trustees vote May 6 to spare the rest.
What is the future for alternative schools?
Going into the final May 13 vote, the OCDSB still intends to phase out its decades-old alternative program — students who enrol this September in J.K. will be the final alternative Grade 8 graduates in the 2034-2035 school year.
That's despite intense protest and lobbying to preserve those five schools for future students.
At protests and delegation nights, parents described how their children enjoy going to alternative schools because of their child-centred approach in the alternative stream. They pushed back against arguments that students must be transported farther from home or don't do well on standardized tests, and instead urged the board to do a fulsome study and consultation.
"This program is not a boutique option, it's a front-line equity intervention," agreed Trustee Amanda Pressley, who has personal experience in the program and a child currently enrolled.
She has signalled she will seek to pause the elementary program review until further research is done on the alternative program.
How is this review related to the OCDSB's deficits?
Buffone says finances are not driving this reorganization, but he also says everything in some way links back to the annual budget.
Indeed, in Scott's letter to the education minister at the outset of this elementary review more than a year ago, she indicated changes "would not resolve the board's funding challenges ... but they would go some way towards making more effective use of the funding we do receive."
The OCDSB's finances are under provincial scrutiny.
After using up reserves in the pandemic, in part by subsidizing special education when provincial grants didn't cover all costs, the district must now avoid a fifth deficit. The education minister has launched an investigation into these deficits, which could lead to a recommendation that the government temporarily take control.
Buffone told trustees last week that the ministry has for years spoken to the OCDSB about its structural issues and the "impossible reality" of running four programs at the elementary level. Most other districts under the provincial funding formulas offer only English with a few French immersion schools, he noted.
When will students move?
Once approved, the changes are to take effect in September 2026. The board anticipates about 1,500 more students will move than in a typical school year.
The board is also setting out a policy whereby parents and caregivers can apply to exempt their child so they can stay at their current school. According to a motion approved May 6, there has to be space and the grades have to remain viable at both the sending and receiving school.
In the year to come, fewer renovations will be required now that the board has walked back some grade configurations, but there will still be many staff on the move and changes to transportation that must be worked out.
Even after the changes take effect, the board will have to eye enrolment. If it's low in some schools, the board might need to make further changes.
Finally, the elementary review is just the first of four stages. The OCDSB plans to review early years and child care,
grades 9-12, and adult and continuing education in the years to come.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anand counting on Israel to allow Ottawa's trucks of humanitarian aid into Gaza
Anand counting on Israel to allow Ottawa's trucks of humanitarian aid into Gaza

CTV News

time33 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Anand counting on Israel to allow Ottawa's trucks of humanitarian aid into Gaza

Minister of Foreign Affairs Anita Anand speaks to reporters in The Hague, Netherlands on Tuesday, June 24, 2025. OTTAWA — Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand says Ottawa has trucks of aid ready to reach desperate Palestinians in Gaza, and is counting on Israel to allow them through. Anand says Jordan, which borders Israel and the West Bank, has allowed Canada to pre-position aid, until Israel allows it to enter the Gaza Strip. She says she spoke with her Israeli counterpart Friday 'to seek assurances that trucks carrying Canadian aid would be allowed to enter Gaza.' Please see my statement on the announcement of temporary humanitarian corridors in Gaza: — Anita Anand (@AnitaAnandMP) July 27, 2025 Since then, Israel has said it would allow for some humanitarian corridors to be established, so that United Nations groups can deliver aid, as well as possible airdrops. The decision came after months of experts warning that Israel's tight restrictions on aid risk creating a famine, and after hundreds of Palestinians have been killed while trying to seek food at sites established by Israel. Israel has downplayed reports by numerous humanitarian groups operating on the ground of starvation deaths, and claims the UN has failed to distribute aid, though UN agencies say Israel still isn't allowing in enough food and fuel. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 27, 2025. Dylan Robertson, The Canadian Press

True sovereignty
True sovereignty

CBC

time2 hours ago

  • CBC

True sovereignty

Amidst all the buzz about the future of the Canadian Arctic, some Nunavummiut believe there's one voice missing — the young generation of Inuit who call this land home. Your browser does not support the video tag. Pause By Samuel Wat Jul. 27, 2025 Gazing at the land and water surrounding Apex Beach, Iqaluit's Manu Kunuk reflects on how his home in the Arctic has become a focal point for geopolitical tensions. There's a lot of uncertainty around the world right now, but if there's one thing he's sure about, that's the need for Inuit — and especially youth — to be at the heart of Arctic policy. 'We're the future of the land — we're going to be the next leaders,' he said. Like many Nunavummiut, Kunuk is still trying to learn about the true meaning of Arctic sovereignty, but he believes it starts with protecting the land and the people living on it. From a colonial perspective, sovereignty in Canada's North is often tied to military exercises, major infrastructure projects and defence spending — actions the government takes to show its control of the vast region. Less commonly explored is how Nunavut's communities and the people who live there are already at the heart of Arctic sovereignty. Nolan Qamanirq, from Arctic Bay, doesn't believe there is a word in Inuktitut that truly describes sovereignty, and it's hard to talk about land ownership because his ancestors didn't believe in that. 'The way the term is used today, especially in Ottawa and in places in Iqaluit, it really feels hollow. It's about military presence, mining approvals, transportation corridors. It's really not about what Inuit and communities prioritize,' he said. images expandAlassua Hanson set out on a Students on Ice expedition in the Arctic in 2016. This is one of several avenues she believes helps empower youth to become future leaders. The way the Canadian government is currently trying to reaffirm its borders in the Arctic makes Iqaluit's Alassua Hanson think back to the country's colonial history. 'I find the federal government does control Arctic sovereignty, in a way, because they did try to claim Nunavut before with the missionaries. And Inuit in general were trying to stay on their own land,' she said. These days, Hanson sees an increasing number of meetings, forums and summits about Arctic sovereignty. She believes some of those discussions should also happen inside the classroom and in youth groups. 'I think a lot of youth should be present or should be knowledgeable about ongoing things for Arctic sovereignty. And I don't think a lot of it is taught in school at all,' she said. Giving back to the community Three of Canada's main parties made military announcements in Iqaluit as part of their election campaign blitz earlier this year, but not all of those pledges involved consultation with local leaders. Nunavut's Premier, P.J. Akeeagok said he only learned about the Conservatives' Arctic announcement the day of, and he stressed the importance of consultations. Part of the Liberal government's own announcement in March was to establish three new military hubs in the North, with Iqaluit set to be home to one of them. At the time, the Department of National Defence said the hubs will consist of airstrips, logistics facilities and equipment and are intended to support military aircraft operations and also serve as storage for equipment and spare parts. 'Sovereignty isn't proven by planting a flag or opening a port. It's proven by a community's ability to feed itself, govern itself, and pass on knowledge without interference.' Nolan Qamanirq To many Canadian leaders, Iqaluit is a strategic location for missions in the Arctic. It has a functional airport and seaport that can accommodate both the navy and air force, for example, and it is also home to one of Canada's forward operating locations, which supports temporary missions. Yet Kunuk says he often struggles to find information about Arctic sovereignty and updates to what's happening in the territory. If the Canadian government is serious about sovereignty initiatives, he would like to see more information publicly shared about security developments. 'Hopefully community consultations, maybe even more training [if there is] supposed to be a military base here,' he said. Bringing Inuit into the conversation Despite all the talk, Hanson doesn't see much of a military presence in Nunavut. And when there is, she said she often doesn't see Inuit involved. She said she knows very little about what happens up in Alert, Nunavut, for example — the location of Canada's northernmost military outpost. She knows of a few people who head up there occasionally for work, but very few of them are Inuit. When there are members of the military in town, or people visiting for some Arctic security conference, she hasn't seen those visitors engaging much with the community. 'They could be more involved. They could provide food hampers, they could do a workshop on the meeting and what they're doing here. They could be present in the community rather than holding five day long meetings or get an opportunity to hear from the locals,' she said. She adds that youth should get the opportunity to hear about the results of the work these travellers are doing in the community. Creating global citizens Empowering Canada's future leaders has been a lifelong passion for Geoff Green. He founded Students on Ice (SOI) 25 years ago, which organizes educational expeditions — combining science and traditional knowledge — for youth to learn more about the Arctic. Talking about military spending and nation-building infrastructure projects is all well and good, he said, but he wonders where the investment is for youth. 'You're building a house of cards if you're not also investing in youth … they're going to be the ones we need for an upskilled workforce, and the leadership that's needed,' he said. In his view, a big part of youth empowerment comes from investments in education, plus programs to connect with the land and other youth around the world. He said there are more opportunities for youth nowadays compared to when he first founded SOI, but it's imperative that Canada builds on that. 'So engaging with youth from other parts of the world, seeing their worldviews, their knowledge bases, and having those friendships and relationships formed [early] are critical. We need global youth addressing global issues together,' he said. 'It's an investment in experiential education, which is truly one of the most proven and most powerful forms of education.' Kunuk echoes that sentiment, having been a delegate to international forums in the past, including to the Arctic Circle Assembly in Iceland last year. 'It really opens the doors for me, especially being here in Nunavut, in an isolated community and territory,' he said. images expandFor Manu Kunuk, Arctic sovereignty means ensuring the people living in the region are healthy and well. No flag or port can replace true sovereignty Ultimately, Qamanirq believes Arctic sovereignty can only exist if Canada recognizes the true priorities of northern communities. 'Sovereignty isn't proven by planting a flag or opening a port," he said. 'It's proven by a community's ability to feed itself, govern itself, and pass on knowledge without interference.' 'I don't think we need more youth leadership programs that teach us how to behave like bureaucrats. We need more programs that teach us our rights in our language, that explain what was negotiated in the land claims and what was left out," he added. Qamanirq also calls on Canada to be more open to partnerships with other countries in the circumpolar world, who share similar interests and challenges. 'If there was a serious attitude about sovereignty in the Arctic, [Canada] would let Inuit strengthen ties across the Arctic without forcing national policy filters. These connections are older than the borders and we shouldn't have to ask permission to remember them.' About the Author Footer Links My Account Profile CBC Gem Newsletters Connect with CBC Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram Mobile RSS Podcasts Contact CBC Submit Feedback Help Centre Audience Relations, CBC P.O. Box 500 Station A Toronto, ON Canada, M5W 1E6 Toll-free (Canada only): 1-866-306-4636 TTY/Teletype writer: 1-866-220-6045 About CBC Corporate Info Sitemap Reuse & Permission Terms of Use Privacy Jobs Our Unions Independent Producers Political Ads Registry AdChoices Services Ombudsman Public Appearances Commercial Services CBC Shop Doing Business with Us Renting Facilities Accessibility It is a priority for CBC to create a website that is accessible to all Canadians including people with visual, hearing, motor and cognitive challenges. Closed Captioning and Described Video is available for many CBC shows offered on CBC Gem. About CBC Accessibility Accessibility Feedback © 2025 CBC/Radio-Canada. All rights reserved. Visitez

Financial crime loopholes in U.S. stablecoin law offer a cautionary tale for Canada
Financial crime loopholes in U.S. stablecoin law offer a cautionary tale for Canada

Globe and Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

Financial crime loopholes in U.S. stablecoin law offer a cautionary tale for Canada

Hoopla over America's new stablecoin law is fuelling fears that Canada is missing out on the latest cryptocurrency boom. The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, or the Genius Act, was signed into law by President Donald Trump last week, creating a regulatory framework for stablecoins pegged to the U.S. dollar. (Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies that have values tied to another form of currency or financial asset to maintain steady prices.) A related bill, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, advanced to the U.S. Senate. The Clarity Act for short, it proposes to divvy up regulatory oversight for virtual assets between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The crypto irony: Trump's new laws for stablecoins will only reinforce U.S. dollar dominance At first blush, the U.S. government's 'crypto week' was a resounding success because those two pieces of legislation are helping digital assets go mainstream south of the border. But anti-corruption groups, including Transparency International U.S., are warning the Genius Act and the Clarity Act include loopholes for money laundering and sanctions evasion, a forewarning for other countries, including Canada, as they vie for leadership in the US$5.7-billion global digital asset economy. 'To other countries, I would encourage lawmakers to actually take a risk-based approach and take into consideration that we have a global economy,' said Gary Kalman, executive director of Transparency International U.S., in an interview on Thursday. As Mr. Kalman points out, crypto is not a typical brick-and-mortar business and it carries a higher risk for illicit finance. That's because it is relatively easy to set up offshore crypto-issuing companies that sell into other countries without having a physical presence in those jurisdictions, he said. 'That is the type of risk analysis we would urge other countries to consider when moving forward with legislation,' he added. Transparency International U.S., the Free Russia Foundation, the Financial Accountability and Corporate Transparency Coalition and the Hudson Institute's Kleptocracy Initiative offer a sobering analysis of America's signature stablecoin legislation. 'The risks are real and urgent. Iran, North Korea and Russia have turned to cryptocurrency and stablecoins to bypass international sanctions and move illicit funds,' the anti-corruption groups state in a joint letter to top U.S. congressional leaders, including the Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson. 'If the U.S. does not close the loopholes that can be exploited by these actors, the financial architecture advanced in GENIUS and CLARITY will further accelerate the growth of opaque and lawless financial networks.' Specifically, the groups outlined four key problems with the two pieces of legislation. The first involves the Genius Act's differential treatment of stablecoin issuers registered in the United States versus those based in foreign or offshore jurisdictions. Under the law, foreign stablecoin issuers, such as Tether, the world's largest stablecoin, are able to participate in U.S. markets via decentralized exchanges and peer-to-peer transfers even if they don't register, the groups say. The U.S. Treasury, meanwhile, has the latitude to provide exemptions to foreign issuers, allowing them to participate in centralized exchanges after the expiration of a three-year grace period. As a result, foreign issuers will not receive proper regulatory oversight. A second problem involves the Genius Act's failure to impose anti-money-laundering (AML) and anti-terrorist-financing obligations on secondary-market participants, including digital asset exchanges, custodians and brokers. 'The result is a bill that affirms the status quo while ignoring how kleptocrats, terrorists and other criminal actors access and move digital assets,' states the letter. 'Further, GENIUS weakens compliance by stating that issuers must follow AML rules, only 'as applicable' – a vague and unenforceable standard.' A third weakness involves glaring gaps in sanctions enforcement. Notably, the Genius Act does not apply to anonymizing technologies, such as mixers, and other intermediaries that obscure funding sources, the groups say. The Clarity Act, meanwhile, overlooks sanctions evasion entirely even though digital assets have become a favoured tool of criminals to sidestep economic restrictions. Lastly, exemptions for decentralized services and platforms under the Genius Act, coupled with the Clarity Act's failure to require ownership disclosures from all market participants, will frustrate enforcement of those laws, according to the groups. We won't let Americans buy our biggest bank. Why let them buy our biggest crypto firm? Canada, meanwhile, is facing mounting calls to create its own comprehensive national strategy for crypto, including stablecoins. 'Stablecoins are reshaping global finance, but Canada is still on the sidelines,' states a new report by Western University's Ivey Business School. 'While other countries use them to strengthen payments and attract investment, Canada lacks a homegrown alternative tied to its currency.' The report rightly urges Canada to create a 'unified regulatory framework' for digital assets, noting oversight is currently split among regulators including the Canada Revenue Agency, the Canadian Securities Administrators, the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada and provincial agencies. Creating a national regulatory framework should indeed be a priority because businesses need a consistent set of rules. But in doing so, the federal government must draw lessons from America's legislative missteps on financial crime. Canada is already being marketed abroad as a secrecy jurisdiction that can be readily exploited by kleptocrats, money launderers, sanctions evaders and other crooks. In the rush to catch up on crypto, Ottawa cannot afford to replicate Washington's mistakes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store