logo
‘Slap in the face' blast shoppers after being BANNED from UK retail giant for ‘returning too many items'

‘Slap in the face' blast shoppers after being BANNED from UK retail giant for ‘returning too many items'

Scottish Sun2 days ago

Shoppers have reported being "cut off" by customer service when complaining about the ban
POINT OF NO RETURN 'Slap in the face' blast shoppers after being BANNED from UK retail giant for 'returning too many items'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
SHOPPERS have shared their fury after being banned from shopping at a UK retail giant for returning too many items of clothing.
Thousands of fashion fans have received emails stating that their accounts have been closed with "immediate effect" for breaking the Fair Use Policy.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
Shoppers have shared their fury after being banned from shopping at a retail giant
Credit: PA
3
ASOS is cracking down on customers who often return items of clothing
Credit: Alamy
3
Shoppers have reported that their accounts have been closed as they have returned too many items
Credit: Asos
ASOS last year enraged customers by charging a £3.95 fee to those who return items frequently, and keep less than £40 worth of items.
And now the fast-fashion giant has sparked fury again, with customers describing the strict policy as a "slap in the face".
ASOS said: "We recently closed the accounts of a small group of customers whose shopping activity has consistently fallen outside our Fair Use policy.
"This helps us maintain our commitment to offering free returns to all customers across all core markets."
ASOS' Fair Use Policy states that customers may have their accounts shut down if they carry out "unusual or suspicious activity", such as "unusual patterns of returns activity", and returning items that look like they have been worn.
Lucy Britnell, from Teeside, has been paying for a premium ASOS account for seven years, but has now been banned from using the fast-fashion website.
The self-confessed "shopaholic" said that she spends around £100 a month at ASOS and spent a whopping £500 on a haul for her latest holiday.
She revealed that when buying large hauls, she often buys multiple sizes, as she claims ASOS' sizing is "often unpredictable".
However, last Thursday, Lucy received an email stating that her account would be closed within 30 days.
"After reviewing your recent return activity, we've noticed that it no longer aligns with our current policy", the email read.
I've found the perfect spring wedding guest dress - it's from ASOS & people say it's so nice I'd even upstage the bride
Lucy was left shocked by the email telling the BBC: "It was a real slap in the face - I thought it was a joke at first.
"Even if they did reinstate my account, I'd take my money elsewhere.
"It's really left a bad taste in my mouth."
Other customers have revealed that they have tried to appeal the ban, but were "cut off" by customer service.
Can your account be closed for making too many returns?
By Laura McGuire, Consumer Reporter
WHEN shopping online it is important to be clued up on what your rights are - especially when it comes to making a return.
H&M, Boohoo and Zara are among the countless fashion retailers which make customers pay for sending products back.
And brands such as ASOS and Pretty Little Thing now ban customers who return items frequently.
Retailers can impose these stricter rules as part of their own returns policies.
Some stores may assess shoppers return behaviour on a case-by-case basis, while others may have a strict blanket policy.
Amazon customers in the US have claimed the retail giant has closed accounts without warning more making too many returns.
Louise Gowrie, from Glasgow said: "I tried again and asked how to complain regarding this and they told me the decision was final - and cut me off again with no reasoning."
Frankie Allen from London, was also told by customer service that nothing could be done about the ban, and slammed "robotic comms" for "alienating" customers.
However, she added that she does understand why ASOS has decided to crack down.
"I've received ripped jeans and clothes with make-up on them before from ASOS, so I know there are some people who abuse the policy - like they wear the clothes once, keep the labels on, then return them for a refund," she said.
Explaining why ASOS introduced the severe measures, retail expert Medi Parry-Williams said: "Managing high volumes of returns simply isn't a sustainable model.
"In many cases, a return fee of £3.95 doesn't come close to covering these costs."
And ASOS is not the only online store to crack down on customers who make frequent returns.
H&M, Boohoo, Pretty Little Thing, and Zara are among stores which now charge customers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We must ensure Scotland doesn't miss this moment
We must ensure Scotland doesn't miss this moment

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

We must ensure Scotland doesn't miss this moment

The Small Modular Reactor (SMR) concept is elegantly simple: take proven reactor designs, standardise components, and fabricate them on a smaller scale in factories before assembling them on-site. This innovative method eliminates the complexity and immense cost of previous nuclear plants, dramatically reducing commercial risks. Though still emerging, the leap from prototype to commercial viability are considerably reduced for Rolls Royce, the UK firm chosen by the government to build a demonstration SMR. With a heritage dating back to the 1950s at Dounreay and the launch of their first naval reactor in 1966, Rolls Royce is uniquely placed to position Britain as a global leader in SMR technology. Read More: But why do we need nuclear and particularly SMRs? Holyrood often insists nuclear power might suit England but is unnecessary in Scotland, given our exceptional renewable resources. Yet this argument conveniently overlooks our current reliance on Torness and the undeniable truth: renewables alone can't consistently provide baseload power. The wind doesn't always blow; the sun doesn't always shine. Scotland needs reliable, round-the-clock energy sources. Joani Reid (Image: PA) The Scottish Government promotes floating tidal power as their preferred alternative, despite it being unproven and vastly more expensive than established solutions. Without major technological leaps, floating generation—tidal or solar—remains economically unrealistic, likely never drawing the necessary investment. Traditional nuclear has long been vital, but SMRs offer something revolutionary. Consider hyperscale computing. Future data centres could demand around 400 megawatts—the equivalent of Glasgow's entire electricity needs and nearly matching Rolls Royce's 440 MW SMR target. These colossal data hubs powering AI, streaming services, and cloud computing require extraordinary reliability—so-called "seven nines" availability, with downtime restricted to just three seconds a year. Recent blackouts, such as Spain's near day-long outage, highlight that reliance solely on public grids is precarious. Currently, companies rely on costly, polluting diesel generators for backup. SMRs elegantly sidestep this problem, providing continuous clean electricity with built-in redundancy. Surplus power can even create green hydrogen or feed back into the national grid. Beyond computing, SMRs could transform district heating and cut transmission costs in remote areas through localised power generation. Yet, under the SNP's entrenched anti-nuclear stance, Scotland risks forfeiting these advantages, wasting its natural benefits like available development land. Missing this opportunity would be a profound error and demonstrates why a change at Holyrood is essential. Anas Sarwar has unequivocally stated nuclear energy will form part of Scotland's clean energy future under his leadership. Even if a ban persists, Scotland can still prosper through its existing clusters of engineering and technical expertise in areas such as Greater Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Faslane, and Dounreay, supporting the nuclear supply chain even if direct nuclear projects remain blocked by the SNP. As someone without commercial interests in nuclear power, it's essential to acknowledge potential challenges. Safety is always paramount, but modern nuclear designs, including SMRs, no longer produce weapons-grade material, leading to better fuel efficiency and reduced waste. Secondly, innovative designs must demonstrate commercial scalability. Previous UK nuclear innovations often failed commercially, proving costly in maintenance. We cannot afford a repeat. However, Rolls Royce's SMRs, based on proven global PWR designs, significantly reduce risks while offering enormous opportunities to spearhead global industrial innovation. Scotland stands on the brink of something transformative. High-quality jobs and a cleaner, sustainable future are within our grasp. We must ensure we don't miss the moment. Joani Reid is the Labour MP for East Kilbride and Strathaven

High street giant to shut UK store TODAY after announcing 33 shop closures with hundreds of jobs at risk
High street giant to shut UK store TODAY after announcing 33 shop closures with hundreds of jobs at risk

Scottish Sun

timean hour ago

  • Scottish Sun

High street giant to shut UK store TODAY after announcing 33 shop closures with hundreds of jobs at risk

Find out if your local shop is affected SHOP DROPPED High street giant to shut UK store TODAY after announcing 33 shop closures with hundreds of jobs at risk Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MAJOR clothing retailer is set to shut down a branch today - ahead of 33 more store closures. It comes as part of a proposed restructuring plan that aims to save the company from insolvency. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 River Island is set to shut 33 stores as part of a proposed redevelopment plan Credit: Getty River Island in Banbury, Oxfordshire is set to close on June 28, as shoppers will now have to travel to Rugby or Oxford to visit a brick-and-mortar shop. It's part of a wider plan to close 33 branches across the UK, affecting hundreds of jobs. River Island also wants its landlords to cut rent at an additional 71 stores that are struggling. The restructuring plan, developed with PricewaterhouseCoopers, will be put to creditors in August. A restructuring plan should help keep the company afloat and avoid insolvency. The decision was due to a shift in customers shopping online, as well as increased running costs. Ben Lewis, chief executive of River Island said: "River Island is a much-loved retailer, with a decades-long history on the British high street. "However the well-documented migration of shoppers from the high street to online has left the business with a large portfolio of stores that is no longer aligned to our customers' needs. "The sharp rise in the cost of doing business over the last few years has only added to the financial burden. 'We have a clear strategy to transform the business to ensure its long-term viability. "Recent improvements in our fashion offer and in-store shopping experience are already showing very positive results, but it is only with a restructuring plan that we will be able to see this strategy through and secure River Island's future as a profitable retail business. River Island confirms which 33 stores are shutting as a further 70 at risk in huge shake-up – is your local going? "We regret any job losses as a result of store closures, and we will try to keep these to a minimum.' River Island was founded in 1948 by Bernard Lewis and currently operates in around 230 stores, employing 5,500 people. It suffered losses of £33.2 million in 2023 after sales fell 19% according to the most recent set of accounts. The proposals will not affect trade creditors, employees at unaffected stores, or customers. Staff will be redeployed where possible to reduce job losses. The majority of the closures will come in January 2026. It comes as several major retailers struggle to survive on the high street. Popular clothing retailer New Look has already closed ten stores this year, with another two set to close in the coming weeks. Several banks have also undergone major restructuring plans - as NatWest is closing 55 stores this year, and Santander closes 95. After Poundland sold for £1 earlier this month, the company announced an upcoming 68 store closures. River Island Store Closures - January 2026 Aylesbury Bangor Bloomfield Barnstaple Beckton Brighton Burton-Upon-Trent Cumbernauld Didcot Edinburgh Princes Street Falkirk Gloucester Great Yarmouth Grimsby Hanley Hartlepool Hereford Kilmarnock Kirkcaldy Leeds Birstall Park Lisburn Northwich Norwich Oxford Perth Poole St Helens Stockton on Tees Surrey Quays Sutton Coldfield Taunton Rochdale Workington Wrexham

ASOS bans shoppers for making too many returns
ASOS bans shoppers for making too many returns

Daily Mirror

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

ASOS bans shoppers for making too many returns

ASOS hit the press this week with the news that it is shutting accounts of people who return too many items Online shopping has transformed the way we buy goods and services. But we are paying a heavy price for the convenience of having our shopping dropped off at the door? The online retailers have come to dominate the market, decimating the high street in the process. But now that they have taken over, they are starting to change the rules to their own advantage. ‌ Many retailers are beginning to charge for returning goods. While none of the major online shops is charging for each return, many have suggested they are going to do so, only to backtrack after much outrage in the press. ‌ Retailers make these announcements to "soften us up" – in effect scarring us with the prospect of charges that they aren't going to apply just yet, so we are more willing to accept "some" charges. And these are already occurring. ASOS hit the press this week with the news that it is shutting accounts of people who return too many items. This is off the back of the £3.95 charge the retailer has already introduced for people who are returning more goods than they would like. While ASOS has received lots of publicity around these rule changes, they are certainly not the only business that is charging and barring people. So what's going on here? And what can you do about it? Get the best deals and tips from Mirror Money WHATSAPP GROUP: Get money news and top deals straight to your phone by joining our Money WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Why is ASOS in the news? It's been reported in the press this week that some ASOS customers have received emails telling them that their accounts are being closed. This is because the shoppers have apparently breached the retailer's "fair use" policy. Retailers can reserve the right to ditch you if they feel that you are misusing their services. This might include returning items that you've ordered, photographed yourself in on Instagram or TikTok then sent back. ‌ There are a few isolated incidents where people have tried it on and had a night out in a nice frock with the tags on then shipped the clothes back! *Spoilers* retailers will know you've done this. But this is pretty rare. Looking at returns policies for the main online retailers, a cardinal sin is 'returning too many items'. ASOS hit the headlines last year when it began charging a £3.95 return fee per parcel when people returned an excessive number of items. ‌ It has now confirmed that a small number of customers have had their accounts closed for breaching this policy where there has been "unusual or suspicious activity". The ASOS website sets out their fair use policy in which it explains: For the small group of customers who consistently take actions that make providing them with free returns unsustainable, we deduct and retain £3.95 per returned parcel from their refund to help cover the cost of getting the goods back to us. When deciding whether to make this deduction from your future refunds, we apply an objective formula based on your shopping behaviour, taking into account whether you have made particularly excessive returns well beyond the average ASOS customer's returns, as well as the number and value of orders made by you. ‌ If you fall into this group, you will still enjoy free returns when: You keep £40 or more of any order and are a non-Premier customer; or You keep £15 or more of any order and are a Premier customer. Can retailers charge me or bar me if I return too many items? Yes they can. No business can be compelled to have you as a customer. As long as they are not discriminating against you because of a 'protected characteristic' then they are not breaking the law. ‌ The problem with these policies is they very rarely explain how many returns is too many - or how this is being quantified. For example, if you order an item of clothing in three sizes to see which one fits best, you'll regularly be returning two items even if you decide to keep one. If you do this once a month, that's a minimum of 24 returns over a year. Will that mark your card as a prolific returner? We simply don't know. There's no ombudsman or dispute resolution scheme for the entire retail industry, so the courts are the only option for people who feel they've been unfairly treated. In the vast majority of cases, this is not an effective solution for most people. ‌ What about damaged or faulty goods? Your legal rights remain the same when it comes to faulty or misrepresented goods that you buy online. You have 30 days to return these items and you are entitled to a full refund – including postage costs – under these circumstances. If the goods break or turn out to be faulty within the first six months, you must give the retailer one opportunity to repair or replace the item, then if there's still a problem you can have a full refund. I've noticed that some online retailers are making it very difficult to return items within the six month timeframe – including one very big online retailer indeed. Don't give up if you need to send back faulty goods. The law is on your side. ‌ Most of the retailer's terms of use say they will not penalise you for returning broken or damaged goods. Is this fair? The reason why returning items and charging or barring people is so contentious is because we have to send back large numbers of clothes we buy online because we can't try them on before purchase. Online retailers created this 'try and return' market, killing off some of the leading high street retailers in the process. They were able to operate with vastly reduced costs because they didn't have the bills that come with running an actual shop in towns and cities across the land. ‌ So their only losses came from the cost of postage and returning outfits. So it seems deeply unfair that these retailers – who have profiteered at the expense of the high street shops – are now wanting to charge us for returns after driving countless businesses out of business. In addition, I'm infuriated that many online retailers don't even have customer service telephone lines for you to contact if something goes wrong. So I'd encourage anyone who is unhappy with these charges and lack of customer service to ditch the worst offenders and return to the high street. After all, you don't get charged for leaving items that don't fit in a changing room!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store