logo
'Stuck in limbo': Over 90% of X's Community Notes unpublished, study says

'Stuck in limbo': Over 90% of X's Community Notes unpublished, study says

Economic Times6 days ago
ETtech Washington, Jul 10, 2025 -More than 90% of X's Community Notes -- a crowd-sourced verification system popularised by Elon Musk's platform -- are never published, a study said Wednesday, highlighting major limits in its effectiveness as a debunking tool.
The study by the Digital Democracy Institute of the Americas (DDIA), which analysed the entire public dataset of 1.76 million notes published by X between January 2021 and March 2025, comes as the platform's CEO Linda Yaccarino resigned after two years at the helm.
The community-driven moderation model -- now embraced by major tech platforms including Facebook-owner Meta and TikTok -- allows volunteers to contribute notes that add context or corrections to posts. Other users then rate the proposed notes as "helpful" or "not helpful." If the notes get "helpful" ratings from enough users with diverse perspectives, they are published on X, appearing right below the challenged posts."The vast majority of submitted notes -- more than 90% -- never reach the public," DDIA's study said."For a program marketed as fast, scalable, and transparent, these figures should raise serious concerns."Among English notes, the publication rate dropped from 9.5% in 2023 to just 4.9% in early 2025, the study said.Spanish-language notes, however, showed some growth, with the publication rate rising from 3.6% to 7.1% over the same period, it added.A vast number of notes remain unpublished due to lack of consensus among users during rating.Thousands of notes also go unrated, possibly never seen and never assessed, according to the report."As the volume of notes submitted grows, the system's internal visibility bottleneck becomes more apparent -- especially in English," the study said."Despite a rising number of contributors submitting notes, many notes remain stuck in limbo, unseen and unevaluated by fellow contributors, a crucial step for notes to be published."
'Viral misinformation'
In a separate finding, DDIA's researchers identified not a human but a bot-like account -- dedicated to flagging crypto scams -- as the most prolific contributor to the program in English, submitting more than 43,000 notes between 2021 and March 2025. However, only 3.1% of those notes went live, suggesting most went unseen or failed to gain consensus, the report said.The study also noted that the time it takes for a note to go live had improved over the years, dropping from an average of more than 100 days in 2022 to 14 days in 2025."Even this faster timeline is far too slow for the reality of viral misinformation, timely toxic content, or simply errors about real-time events, which spread within hours, not weeks," DDIA's report said.
The findings are significant as tech platforms increasingly view the community-driven model as an alternative to professional fact-checking, which conservative advocates in countries such as the United States have long accused of a liberal bias.
Studies have shown Community Notes can work to dispel some falsehoods such as vaccine misinformation, but researchers have long cautioned that it works best for topics where there is broad consensus. Some researchers have also cautioned that Community Notes users can be motivated by partisan motives and tend to target their political opponents.X introduced Community Notes during the tenure of Yaccarino, who said on Wednesday that she had decided to step down after leading the company through a major transformation.No reason was given for her exit, but the resignation came as Musk's artificial intelligence chatbot Grok triggered an online firestorm over its anti-Semitic comments that praised Adolf Hitler and insulted Islam in separate posts on X. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Markets need to see more than profits from Oyo
Can Grasim's anti-competition charge against Asian Paints stand amid intense war
Engine fuel switches or something else? One month on, still no word on what crashed AI 171
Delhivery survived the Meesho curveball. Can it keep on delivering profits?
Stock Radar: Page Industries breaks out from Cup & Handle formation; stock hits fresh 52-week high
For risk-takers with ability to stay invested for the long term: 5 small-caps from different sectors with upside potential of 5 to 32%
Multibagger or IBC - Part 14: This auto ancillary with double-digit net margins is now getting EV-focused
These mid-cap stocks with 'Strong Buy' & 'Buy' recos can rally over 25%, according to analysts
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'See you at the charging station...': Anand Mahindra welcomes Elon Musk and Tesla to India
'See you at the charging station...': Anand Mahindra welcomes Elon Musk and Tesla to India

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'See you at the charging station...': Anand Mahindra welcomes Elon Musk and Tesla to India

Tesla has officially entered the market with the opening of its first Experience Centre in Mumbai's upscale Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) in a landmark move for India's electric vehicle (EV) landscape. This strategic location marks more than just a showroom; it represents Tesla's commitment to testing Indian waters and reshaping consumer expectations in a growing EV market. While production is yet to begin locally, the debut of the Tesla Model Y has created a ripple across the auto industry. Famous icons like Anand Mahindra have welcomed the competition, signalling the start of a new era in India's journey toward sustainable mobility. Tesla unveiled its first official showroom, named the Tesla Experience Centre, at Maker Maxity Mall, located in Mumbai's bustling BKC. The showroom offers a direct look at Tesla's futuristic technology, clean design, and innovation-driven ethos. Currently, the Tesla Model Y is the primary highlight: Rear-Wheel Drive (RWD): Rs 59.89 lakh (on-road) Long-Range Rear-Wheel Drive: Rs 67.89 lakh (on-road) Anand Mahindra welcomes Tesla 's entry into Indian market with open arms Mahindra Group Chairman Anand Mahindra shared his enthusiastic support for Tesla's arrival. Taking to X (formerly Twitter), he posted: 'Welcome to India, @elonmusk and @Tesla. One of the world's largest EV opportunities just got more exciting. Competition drives innovation.' He also revisited a humorous exchange with Elon Musk from 2016, where he had invited Tesla to join India's EV journey rather than leave the field to Mahindra Electric alone. His message: 'The more the merrier—and greener.' Maharashtra aims to become global EV hub with Tesla's arrival Maharashtra government threw its weight behind Tesla's entry. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, present at the Experience Centre launch, expressed confidence in the state's capacity to support Tesla's research, development, and manufacturing. Fadnavis emphasised: Maharashtra's readiness with charging infrastructure and EV policies His 2015 Tesla experience in the US, adding emotional weight to the launch. The government's aim to transform India into a global EV hub. He added: 'Tesla is more than just a car company. It's about design, sustainability, and innovation.' No 'Made in India' Teslas yet as import duties double car prices Although Tesla has begun sales and service operations, the cars are currently imported, likely from its Shanghai Gigafactory. A 24,000 sq. ft. warehouse at Lodha Logistics Park in Mumbai will support storage and spare parts. Tesla has received a trade certificate from Mumbai's Andheri RTO, enabling test drives and demo sales. Union Heavy Industries Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy confirmed Tesla has no manufacturing plans in India—yet. Despite the excitement, India's import tariffs remain a challenge. Tesla's prices here are almost double compared to those in Europe and the US due to steep customs duties. Elon Musk has previously: Asked for a 70% duty cut for EVs under $40,000 Requested a complete waiver for more premium models However, India's government declined, with Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal reiterating that EV policy will stay open and not favour any one automaker. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump criticized potential India-based manufacturing as potentially 'unfair' to American jobs. Inside Tesla's Mumbai showroom : Premium design meets EV innovation The Mumbai showroom design reflects Tesla's sleek international branding, with: White walls and minimal layouts Lightboxes showcasing Tesla tech Indian touches curated by architect Neeta Sharada Tesla's message in India is clear: "Experience our cars, feel the future, and drive the change." While Tesla's launch in India has undoubtedly stirred excitement, the absence of a local production facility keeps prices high and scalability limited. But as demand grows and policies evolve, many believe Tesla may soon explore Made-in-India production. Until then, the EV race is heating up. And as Anand Mahindra aptly said, there's 'plenty of road ahead.' Also Read | Simpsons prediction of Labubu doll goes viral: Video sparks fear about creepy toy's dark origins

Rogue bots? AI firms must pay up
Rogue bots? AI firms must pay up

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Rogue bots? AI firms must pay up

When Elon Musk's xAI was forced to apologise this week after its Grok chatbot spewed antisemitic content and white nationalist talking points, the response felt depressingly familiar: suspend the service, issue an apology and promise to do better. Rinse and isn't the first time we've seen this playbook. Microsoft's Tay chatbot disaster in 2016 followed a similar pattern. The fact that we're here again, nearly a decade later, suggests the AI industry has learnt remarkably little from its mistakes. But the world is no longer willing to accept 'sorry' as sufficient. This is because AI has become a force multiplier for content generation and dissemination, and the time-to-impact has shrunk. Thus, liability and punitive actions are being discussed. The Grok incident revealed a troubling aspect of how AI companies approach accountability. According to xAI, the problematic behaviour emerged after they tweaked their system to allow more 'politically incorrect' responses - a decision that seems reckless. When the inevitable happened, they blamed deprecated code that should have been removed. If you're building systems capable of reaching millions of users, shouldn't you know what code is running in production?The real problem isn't technical - it's philosophical. Too many AI companies treat bias and harmful content as unfortunate side effects to be addressed after deployment, rather than fundamental risks to be prevented beforehand. This reactive approach worked when the stakes were lower, but AI systems now operate at unprecedented scale and influence. When a chatbot generates hate speech, it's not embarrassing - it's dangerous, legitimising and amplifying extremist ideologies to vast legal landscape is shifting rapidly, and AI companies ignoring these changes do so at their peril. The EU's AI Act, which came into force in February, represents a shift from reactive regulation to proactive governance. Companies can no longer apologise their way out of AI failures - they must demonstrate they've implemented robust safeguards before AB 316, introduced last January, takes an even more direct approach by prohibiting the 'the AI did it' defence in civil cases. This legislation recognises what should be obvious: companies that develop and deploy AI systems bear responsibility for their outputs, regardless of whether those outputs were 'intended'.India's approach may prove more punitive than the EU's regulatory framework and more immediate than the US litigation-based system, focusing on swift enforcement of existing criminal laws rather than waiting for new AI-specific legislation. India doesn't yet have AI-specific legislation, but if Grok's antisemitic incident had occurred with Indian users, then steps like immediate blocking of the AI service, a criminal case against xAI under IPC 153A, and a demand for content removal from the X platform would have been Grok incident may mark a turning point. Regulators worldwide are demanding proactive measures rather than reactive damage control, and courts are increasingly willing to hold companies directly liable for their systems' shift is long overdue. AI systems aren't just software - they're powerful tools that shape public discourse, influence decision-making and can cause real-world harm. The companies that build these systems must be held to higher standards than traditional software developers, with corresponding legal and ethical question facing the AI industry isn't whether to embrace this new reality - it's whether to do so voluntarily or have it imposed by regulators and courts. Companies that continue to rely on the old playbook of post-incident apologies will find themselves increasingly isolated in a world demanding AI industry's true maturity will show not in flashy demos or sky-high valuations, but in its commitment to safety over speed, rigour over shortcuts, and real accountability over empty apologies. In this game, 'sorry' won't cut it - only responsibility writer is a commentator ondigital policy issues (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Rumblings at the top of Ola Electric The hybrid vs. EV rivalry: Why Maruti and Mahindra pull in different directions. What's best? How Safexpress bootstrapped its way to build India's largest PTL Express business Zee promoters have a new challenge to navigate. And it's not about funding or Sebi probe. Newton vs. industry: Inside new norms that want your car to be more fuel-efficient Stock Radar: UltraTech Cements hit a fresh record high in July; what should investors do – book profits or buy the dip? F&O Radar | Deploy Bear Put Spread in Nifty to gain from index correction Weekly Top Picks: These stocks scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus

After Rs. 800 Crore salary to Trapit Bansal, now Mark Zuckerberg gives Rs 16000000000 to…, compete in race with Apple, OpenAI and…
After Rs. 800 Crore salary to Trapit Bansal, now Mark Zuckerberg gives Rs 16000000000 to…, compete in race with Apple, OpenAI and…

India.com

time2 hours ago

  • India.com

After Rs. 800 Crore salary to Trapit Bansal, now Mark Zuckerberg gives Rs 16000000000 to…, compete in race with Apple, OpenAI and…

In a current AI race, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is going to hire a team of artificial intelligence experts for the company's newly formed Super Intelligence Lab. Reports now suggest that Meta is offering massive salary packages ranging from Rs 800 crore to Rs 1,600 crore to top researchers from Apple, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic. Mark Zuckerberg's Rs 1,600 Crore Salary Offer To Apple's Employee According to reports, Meta has offered Rs 1,600 crore in total compensation to Ruoming Pan who is a leading AI researcher from Apple and will join the Super Intelligence Lab. After hiring Trapit Bansal, a former OpenAI scientist, who was reportedly paid a Rs 800 crore package. Though Meta has not officially confirmed these massive offers, media reports citing insiders suggest the compensation includes signing bonuses, restricted stock units (RSUs), and long-term vesting plans, exceeding the packages of global banking CEOs. Meta's Push Into AI Zuckerberg's strategy to attract the best AI minds is part of a big restructuring and re-commitment to AI within Meta. The Super Intelligence Lab, formed earlier this year, is led by Nat Friedman (former GitHub CEO) and Alexandr Wang (ex-Scale AI CEO), both well-known names in tech and AI circles. In recent months, Meta has hired at least 11 high-profile AI scientists, like Lucas Beyer, Xiaohua Zhai, Jack Rae and Johan Schalkwyk These names are primarily from Google and DeepMind, shows Meta's intent to pull talent directly from rival companies. Mark Zuckerberg Building AI Powerhouse Mark Zuckerberg also recently announced that Meta is constructing a massive AI infrastructure, like multi-gigawatt data clusters. Some of these data centers are being temporarily built in tents, inspired by Elon Musk's 'tent factory' model used during Tesla's Model 3 ramp-up. These shift facilities have prefabricated cooling systems which can speed up deployment and AI model testing. Additionally, Meta has invested $14 billion in Scale AI to secure high-quality training data, a critical element in building next-gen AI systems.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store