Government prepares for release of landmark review into ailing water sector
The review was commissioned by the UK and Welsh governments as part of their response to systemic industry failures, which include rising bills, record sewage spills and debt-ridden company finances, although ministers have ruled out nationalising companies.
The Government will respond to the recommendations in Parliament later on Monday.
The review reportedly includes proposals to establish a new system of regulation, which is currently split between Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate.
Sir Jon Cunliffe is leading the review (Leon Neal/PA)
Ministers will announce a consultation that could lead to axing Ofwat, which oversees how much water companies in England and Wales can charge for services, according to the Guardian.
Ofwat has faced intense criticism for overseeing water companies during the years that they paid shareholders and accrued large debts while ageing infrastructure crumbled and sewage spills skyrocketed.
In an interview with the Sunday Times, Environment Secretary Steve Reed suggested he was in favour of a new model where regional boards managed water in their areas, including representatives from water companies, local authorities and other organisations.
He said: 'I think the catchment-based model has a lot to commend it. Because if you can manage what's going into the water better, you can clean up the water faster.'
Asked on Friday if there were plans to scrap Ofwat as the regulator, Downing Street said the Government will wait for a final report.
A No 10 spokesman said: 'We are waiting for Sir Jon Cunliffe's final report next week, you can expect us to set out our response after that on what more we will do to turn the sector around.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'We are not going to comment on speculation.' Ofwat declined to comment.
Mr Reed is also expected to announce a new Government pledge to halve sewage pollution from water companies by the end of the decade, during broadcast interviews on Sunday.
He said: 'Families have watched their local rivers, coastlines and lakes suffer from record levels of pollution.
'My pledge to you: the Government will halve sewage pollution from water companies by the end of the decade.'
But in his Sunday Times interview, he acknowledged that bills were unlikely to fall from their current level, saying instead that an investment of £104 billion in the sector would 'avoid the need for any big bill hikes in the future'.
It comes after the Environment Agency on Friday said the number of serious pollution incidents caused by water companies across England rose by 60% in 2024 compared with the previous year.
The figures showed companies recorded a total of 2,801 pollution incidents, up from 2,174 in 2023.
Of these, 75 were categorised as posing 'serious or persistent' harm to wildlife and human health – up from 47 last year.
The Environment Agency said it is clear some companies are failing to meet the targets it has set on pollution, attributing failures to persistent underinvestment in new infrastructure, poor asset maintenance and reduced resilience because of the impacts of climate change.
Earlier on Friday, the Public Accounts Committee also released a report which called the level of pollution 'woeful' and recommended an overhaul of the regulation system.
Dovestone Reservoir on Saddleworth Moor as water companies have asked customers to conserve supplies (Peter Byrne/PA)
The cross-party group of MPs said the Government must act with urgency to strengthen oversight of the sector to rebuild trust and ensure its poor performance improves.
The Independent Water Commission published its interim report in June, which found the sector to be beset with 'deep-rooted, systemic' failures.
While the paper outlined the commission's direction of travel, it stopped short of providing detailed recommendations on policy, regulatory reform and corporate governance, which are now expected in the final report.
The interim review pointed to the need for better regulation of water companies but it did not recommend the wholesale scrapping of Ofwat, which some have urged.
Nationalisation, which some campaigners have also called for, was excluded from its terms of reference when commissioned by the Government.
Meanwhile, the Conservatives accused Labour of copying the previous government's policies and doing nothing to halt rises in water bills.
Shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said the Government should be 'transparent' about where the money to fix Britain's sewers was coming from, warning that consumers may have to stump up some of the cash.
She added: 'Labour's water plans must also include credible proposals to improve the water system's resilience to droughts, without placing an additional burden on bill payers and taxpayers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
9 minutes ago
- Reuters
Italy to add 15,000 prison places to ease overcrowding
ROME, July 23 (Reuters) - Italy's government has pledged to expand prison capacity by up 15,000 places and facilitate the transfer of inmates with addiction problems to treatment centres to tackle a long-standing overcrowding crisis. The plight of prisoners has attracted more attention in Italy following a record number of suicides last year and complaints about soaring summer temperatures in detention facilities that are not air-conditioned. As of July 15, the country had 62,986 inmates, and an effective capacity in prisons of 47,289, justice ministry data showed. This gives Italy an occupancy rate of around 133%, one of the worst in Europe. According to the World Prison Brief database, only Cyprus and France fare worse. Last year the Italian parliament approved a law to improve jail conditions, but it had little practical effect. "We believe that a just state should adjust the capacity of prisons to the number of people that need to serve their sentences," Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said in a statement late on Tuesday. Her government presented a 758-million-euro ($890 million) plan to expand prison capacity by almost 10,000 by 2027, and a separate initiative for which it gave no budget to create an additional 5,000 places within five years. It also adopted a draft law - which will need parliamentary approval - to allow a sizeable portion of inmates with alcohol or drug addictions to leave prison and serve their sentences in rehab centres. "These are people who need treatment rather than criminals who need punishment," Justice Minister Carlo Nordio said, noting that inmates with addiction issues make up almost a third of the prison population. Nordio also referred to last week's announcement that up to around 10,000 inmates nearing the end of their sentencing could be eligible for house arrest or probation. His ministry has set up a taskforce to speed up the assessment of these cases. The early release of prisoners is set to be gradual, however, partly due to the political sensitivity of the move for a right-wing government such as Meloni's, known for its tough approach on law and order. ($1 = 0.8513 euros)
Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
UniCredit posts surprise profit jump, ups guidance after dropping Banco BPM bid
MILAN, July 22 (Reuters) - UniCredit on Wednesday posted a much higher than expected quarterly profit an raised its 2025 outlook, a day after ditching a takeover bid for rival Banco BPM which had led Italy's second biggest bank to clash with the government. UniCredit ( opens new tab late on Tuesday said it was withdrawing the offer, blaming government meddling for altering the process and depriving Banco BPM shareholders, as well as Italy's economy, of a good opportunity. UniCredit said net profit in the three months through June totalled 2.9 billion euros net of one-off items and 3.3 billion euros when including those. That is well above a 2.5 billion euro ($2.9 billion) forecast in a company-gathered analyst consensus, and up from 2.7 billion euros a year ago. UniCredit forecast a net profit in the full year of around 10.5 billion euros, improving on a previous guidance for a net profit above 9.3 billion euros. ($1 = 0.8522 euros)
Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's great rail revival has already hit the buffers
Labour came to power with a pledge to improve Britain's creaking railways, spearheaded by a headline-grabbing commitment to renationalisation. But a year on, the Government stands accused of blocking the resurrection of dozens of routes across England, most of them mothballed since the Beeching cuts of the 1960s. The decision to relaunch just one defunct train line out of dozens was announced by the Government earlier this month. In doing so, it has sparked anger in communities across the country, many of which were given hope by ministers who pledged to reconsider a fleet of reopenings, despite scrapping Boris Johnson's Restoring Your Railway programme last year. In the event, the Bristol to Portishead line was the only new service to feature on a list of more than 50 rail and road upgrades unveiled on July 8, touted by the Government as 'the biggest boost to England's transport infrastructure in a generation'. When asked about future reopenings last week, Lord Hendy, the rail minister, said that the projects would have to compete with other upgrades and would get no special treatment Douglas McClay, a campaigner for the restoration of passenger services on the 31-mile, freight-only Ivanhoe Line between Leicester and Burton-on-Trent, says its exclusion from the department's to-do list was a severe disappointment. Named after the historical novel by Sir Walter Scott, which was set partly in the area, the line would have provided the Midlands with a new east-west corridor and restored passenger trains to towns including Coalville, Swadlincote and Ashby de la Zouch, costing £100m in the process. 'I simply don't understand' The route was one of hundreds of branch lines and low-footfall services that fell victim to Dr Richard Beeching's infamous 1960s savings plan, as the former British Railways chairman oversaw the closure of around 5,000 miles of track and almost 2,500 stations. 'We were still holding out despite what had happened with the Restoring Your Railway fund and the message from one of the MPs on our line was that things were coming along, don't worry too much at the moment,' says McClay. 'But this seems to close the door. I can't see anything else that's likely to appear. The irony is that our business case had been scrutinised and was, we gather, at the top of the list for reopenings and sitting on the minister's desk to be signed off when the election was called.' Rebecca Smith, the Conservative MP for South West Devon, says the Government's assessment of the value created by reopening railway lines is flawed. Appearing before the House of Commons transport committee last Wednesday, Lord Hendy said proposals were considered according to their estimated impact on economic growth, employment and homes. However, Smith told the meeting that another of the rejected lines, from Plymouth to Tavistock, would have helped address chronic transport in an area set to receive £4.4bn of defence investment that the Government says will create 25,000 jobs. 'They say everything has been done with a focus on jobs, growth on housing,' she says. 'But if that is the case, the rural lines are exactly what they should be investing in. 'The lines already exist or the trackbed is there, so to not even give the money to assess a business case, I simply don't understand. They seem to find the money for the things they want to spend it on, like the pay rises for the train drivers. 'It has always felt to me like quite a political decision. There are a few things that were just scrapped because the Conservatives thought of it first.' Smith says the Tavistock Line would have linked Plymouth with places as far as Dartmoor and 'followed the money' being ploughed into the city's naval base. 'If you want to invest in these areas because they're useful to the country, in our case for defence, you've got to think about how the people you want to house in these areas are going to get to these jobs,' she says. 'And when you've got the beginnings of some projects that could be explored, you've got to put your money where your mouth is. Other countries throw up railways and stations way cheaper and quicker than we do. We're told it will cost a fortune and nobody questions it.' She cited the success of the nearby Dartmoor Line between Exeter to Okehampton, which attracted a higher-than-expected 500,000 passengers in the two years after it reopened in 2021, as evidence of the potentially huge returns from restoring defunct routes. McClay adds that the Ivanhoe Line would also have served 'huge housing developments' along the route that will now have to rely on single-carriageway A roads. 'We've been disenfranchised' The Restoring Your Railway programme, launched in 2020 with a £500m budget, attracted more than 150 applications, with around 20 earmarked for development. However, only the Dartmoor Line and the Northumberland Line, linking Newcastle upon Tyne with Ashington, Bedlington and Blyth, were given the go-ahead before Rachel Reeves scrapped the scheme last July, with just £50m spent in one of her first acts as Chancellor. The 100-mile East West Rail project between Oxford and Cambridge, which involves reopening tracks on the former Varsity Line, closed in 1968, and received £2.5bn in funding from Reeves last month, was not part of the scheme. Scotland, by contrast, has added several new lines and around 70 new stations in recent years, including Britain's highest-profile reopening to date – the £350m, 35-mile Border Railway south of Edinburgh on the site of the former Waverley route to Carlisle. Lord Hendy said that proposals previously financed under Restoring Your Railway should be regarded as 'unfunded' rather than cancelled. He said: 'When the prospect comes round of future funding, they'll have to be considered alongside [other projects]. What I can't say, of course, is what other demands would come up.' However, Smith says the Government should provide 'direct answers' as to which schemes have a chance of being taken up rather than give 'false hope' to rural towns and communities. McClay says the prospects for reopenings have also been hurt by the creation of a two-tier system where areas under a mayoral authority get money to finance local projects while others 'have their transport priorities dictated by Westminster'. He says that the Portishead route appeared to have been one such beneficiary, with the West of England mayoralty stepping in to provide financial backing for the line alongside the Government and local councils. The Northumberland route also fell within the remit of the North East metro mayor. Since the Ivanhoe Line straddles Staffordshire, Derbyshire (part of the East Midlands mayoralty), Leicestershire and the City of Leicester, it lacks a single cheerleader. McClay said: 'We are spread thinly across those authorities and we are not top of the agenda for any one of them. The great joy of the Restoring Your Railways scheme was that it treated all applications equally and did not require a local authority to sponsor them. 'Really, we've been disenfranchised. We're going to keep the home fires burning and we're not going to give up, but we have to be realistic.' Smith said she suspects that rail reopenings have slipped down the government agenda in part because they tend to provide links to market towns, when Labour is intent on directing spending at largely urban areas where its core supporters are concentrated. 'It depends how cynical you are,' she says. 'I think that might play a part. It feels like if it's not in the big city, they're not interested.' The DfT said that while £10bn is being spent on rail improvements across England and Wales overall, including three stations proposed under the Restoring Your Railway scheme, it has not been possible to fund every reopening scheme. A spokesman said: 'We have had to take difficult decisions given the difficult financial situation, but we continue to keep future funding under review.'
