Holly Willoughby's media company given further chance to avoid being wound up
A hearing at the Insolvency and Companies Court in April heard that the firm owed £377,000 in tax, which had been reduced from an unknown amount.
The case was adjourned for 12 weeks to allow the debt to be paid.
At a hearing on Wednesday, Charlotte Cooke, for HMRC, told the court that the company was seeking to take the case to a tax tribunal, with no details given over whether the debt had been paid partially or in full.
She said: 'I understand the company has submitted an application for a late appeal to be heard.
'Our position is that that is opposed.'
She continued: 'This has gone on long enough.'
Michael Collins, representing the company, confirmed it was taking the case to a tax tribunal, but no details were given in court as to what the challenge concerned.
Mr Collins continued that the company was waiting for a date for the tribunal appeal to be heard.
Insolvency and Companies Court Judge Sally Barber adjourned the case until August 20.
Willoughby set up the company with her husband to specialise in managing media clients.
Records on Companies House indicate that she was appointed as a director of the company in 2014, and Mr Baldwin in 2008.
The presenter is best known for previously fronting ITV daytime show This Morning and Dancing On Ice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Accountants were paid to place clients into loan charge schemes targeted by HMRC
Victims of the loan charge received advice from professional accountants who were being paid to place them into tax avoidance schemes. Sky News has seen evidence of chartered accountants advising their clients to enter loan arrangements, run by companies that were paying them a commission. These schemes were later targeted by HMRC, and workers were hit with giant tax bills, sometimes hundreds of thousands of pounds. In some cases, the tax demands have been crippling. It's a campaign that has driven people to the brink of bankruptcy, devastated families and has been linked to 10 suicides. MPs are now calling for a public investigation into the role of accountants and other professional bodies in the proliferation of these schemes. An independent review of the loan charge is currently under way, but it is limited in its scope. What is the loan charge scandal? It is the latest revelation in a scandal that has caused untold misery for tens of thousands of people, who were enrolled into tax avoidance schemes, often against their knowledge. They included contractors who were urged to avoid setting up limited companies and to instead receive payment through the schemes, which were meant to handle their pay and taxes. 1:42 They worked by paying workers what were technically loans, instead of a salary. This allowed them to circumvent paying income tax. What many assumed were tax deductions on their payslips were, in fact, fees going towards the promoters of the schemes. Tax avoidance is not illegal, but HMRC has successfully challenged tax avoidance schemes in the courts, and workers have subsequently been asked to pay the missing tax. There is no suggestion that these accountants broke the law. Richard's story For Richard Clancey, HMRC's handling of the loan charge feels like "state-sponsored bullying". After being offered a contract role in 2010, Mr Clancey, now a retired computer services professional, contacted a chartered accountant in Kent to help him set up a limited company. The accountant encouraged him to enrol in a payment scheme instead. "He gave us an hour's presentation on the benefits of the scheme and how it worked," Mr Clancey said. "This included how they would handle all administration, pay all tax that was due, was IR35 and tax law compliant, had a lower risk than using a limited company, had been approved by a tax QC and was currently used by several people who were working for HMRC. "The presentation was very elaborate and complicated and I cannot claim that I understood it all, but I wanted to ensure I was legal and compliant, so I trusted the advice of a chartered accountant that use of this scheme was the right thing to do." The accountant told him that he was receiving an introductory fee, but not that he would receive ongoing payment. In 2014, Mr Clancey received an email from his accountant outlining that the previous year he had received £257 in commission. However, he did not receive statements for the previous two years. "Although you were notified of this commission before, we are also required to declare the amount of commission to you according to the guidance of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales," the email read. "This commission has not cost you anything," it added. The company's former website page clearly stated that it offered accountants commission, boasting that the rates had been raised. At this point, Mr Clancey was already on the radar of HMRC. In 2012, tax authorities wrote to him to explain that he had been in a tax avoidance scheme that "HMRC believes does not work". He was subsequently asked to pay more than £100,000. "Over the next seven years, I received multiple penalties and threats from HMRC who said I had been a tax avoider who should settle their debts now or face worse consequences later," he said. "There hasn't been a single day when I haven't been consumed by the frustration and anger of my situation and how it arose... Since my involvement with [the scheme] and the subsequent hounding from HMRC and government, a lot of that has changed. This state-sponsored bullying has caused me to suffer some mental health issues. "My personal stress levels were through the roof. I dreaded the next brown envelope coming through the post box with outrageous, unsubstantiated demands. My poor wife would apologise and burst into tears as she brought these to me." HMRC said it takes the wellbeing of all taxpayers seriously. "We are committed to identifying and supporting customers who need extra help with their tax affairs and have made significant improvements to this service over the last few years." Like others in his position, Mr Clancey is frustrated by the blunt approach of the tax authority and the lack of accountability from other parties. "I have been increasingly concerned that my chartered accountant led me into the hands of a scam organisation," he said. "HMRC continues to persecute victims." Government reaction The government has now launched an independent review into the loan charge, and HMRC is pausing its activity until that review is complete - but its focus is on helping people to reach a settlement. The review will not look at the historical role of accountants, promoters and recruitment agencies, even though they propped up the schemes. Politicians and campaigners have called for a broader investigation. Greg Smith, MP and co-chair of the Loan Charge and Taxpayer Fairness APPG, said: "It's clear that many chartered accountants were directly involved in the promotion of loan schemes. "People trusted accountants and had the right to rely on this advice, and yet, instead, are facing life-ruining bills. There needs to be a proper investigation into this as part of an independent inquiry into the loan charge scandal," he said. "Either HMRC warned accountants not to recommend these schemes, in which case the accountants were giving reckless and potentially fraudulent advice; or HMRC didn't tell accountants not to do this, in which case HMRC themselves were seriously at fault. "Either way, it is quite wrong that the current government continues to only pursue those who took and followed professional advice and not those who gave it, whilst profiting from doing so." The experience has damaged Mr Clancey's faith in the sector. "I will never again trust professional financial advice," he said. "If the advice of a chartered accountant can cause this much damage without culpability, then there is something very wrong. It is a failure on the part of the entire tax industry that accredited professionals can, through their advice, destroy the lives of the individuals that they advise." A spokesperson for the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, an industry body, said: "We expect chartered accountants to adhere to the highest standards in all of their work, including tax. "Robust rules for members performing tax work are contained in standards which have been developed and strengthened to prevent the involvement of members in aggressive tax avoidance." The organisation strengthened its standards in 2017, after the loan charge legislation was announced, adding that "members must not create, encourage or promote tax planning arrangements or structures that set out to achieve results that are contrary to the clear intention of parliament in enacting relevant legislation and/or are highly artificial or highly contrived and seek to exploit shortcomings within the relevant legislation".
Rhyl Journal
12 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Fewer people claimed non-dom tax status in UK ahead of Government crackdown
There were about 73,700 people claiming non-domiciled tax status in the year ending in April last year, according to estimates from HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC). This was 400 fewer than the 2022-23 tax year, or a dip of about 0.5%. The number of non-doms, according to self-assessment tax returns, stood 3,900 below that in the tax year ending 2020. It indicates a slowdown in the number of people claiming the tax status following a post-pandemic resurgence. Non-domiciled means UK residents whose permanent home, or their 'domicile' for tax purposes, is outside the UK. The regime meant that so-called non-doms paid tax in the UK only on income generated in the UK – meaning any income earned overseas was exempt from British taxation. However, the Labour Government abolished the non-dom tax status in April following backlash that wealthy residents could enjoy the benefits of living in the UK without paying as much tax. Previous chancellor Jeremy Hunt estimated that scrapping the regime would raise about £2.7 billion for the Treasury by 2028-29. Recent data showed the UK saw the biggest fall in billionaires on record amid the Government non-dom clampdown. The Sunday Times Rich List said there were fewer of the world's 'super rich' coming to live in Britain. HMRC's data published on Thursday showed that some £9 billion was raised from non-doms paying income tax, capital gains tax and national insurance last year. This was a £107 million increase on the prior year, despite the dip in the number of individuals.
South Wales Guardian
14 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Fewer people claimed non-dom tax status in UK ahead of Government crackdown
There were about 73,700 people claiming non-domiciled tax status in the year ending in April last year, according to estimates from HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC). This was 400 fewer than the 2022-23 tax year, or a dip of about 0.5%. The number of non-doms, according to self-assessment tax returns, stood 3,900 below that in the tax year ending 2020. It indicates a slowdown in the number of people claiming the tax status following a post-pandemic resurgence. Non-domiciled means UK residents whose permanent home, or their 'domicile' for tax purposes, is outside the UK. The regime meant that so-called non-doms paid tax in the UK only on income generated in the UK – meaning any income earned overseas was exempt from British taxation. However, the Labour Government abolished the non-dom tax status in April following backlash that wealthy residents could enjoy the benefits of living in the UK without paying as much tax. Previous chancellor Jeremy Hunt estimated that scrapping the regime would raise about £2.7 billion for the Treasury by 2028-29. Recent data showed the UK saw the biggest fall in billionaires on record amid the Government non-dom clampdown. The Sunday Times Rich List said there were fewer of the world's 'super rich' coming to live in Britain. HMRC's data published on Thursday showed that some £9 billion was raised from non-doms paying income tax, capital gains tax and national insurance last year. This was a £107 million increase on the prior year, despite the dip in the number of individuals.
