Government prepares for release of landmark review into ailing water sector
The Government will respond to the recommendations in Parliament later on Monday.
The review reportedly includes proposals to establish a new system of regulation, which is currently split between Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate.
Sir Jon Cunliffe is leading the review (Leon Neal/PA)
Ministers will announce a consultation that could lead to axing Ofwat, which oversees how much water companies in England and Wales can charge for services, according to the Guardian.
Ofwat has faced intense criticism for overseeing water companies during the years that they paid shareholders and accrued large debts while ageing infrastructure crumbled and sewage spills skyrocketed.
In an interview with the Sunday Times, Environment Secretary Steve Reed suggested he was in favour of a new model where regional boards managed water in their areas, including representatives from water companies, local authorities and other organisations.
He said: 'I think the catchment-based model has a lot to commend it. Because if you can manage what's going into the water better, you can clean up the water faster.'
Asked on Friday if there were plans to scrap Ofwat as the regulator, Downing Street said the Government will wait for a final report.
A No 10 spokesman said: 'We are waiting for Sir Jon Cunliffe's final report next week, you can expect us to set out our response after that on what more we will do to turn the sector around.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'We are not going to comment on speculation.' Ofwat declined to comment.
Mr Reed is also expected to announce a new Government pledge to halve sewage pollution from water companies by the end of the decade, during broadcast interviews on Sunday.
He said: 'Families have watched their local rivers, coastlines and lakes suffer from record levels of pollution.
'My pledge to you: the Government will halve sewage pollution from water companies by the end of the decade.'
But in his Sunday Times interview, he acknowledged that bills were unlikely to fall from their current level, saying instead that an investment of £104 billion in the sector would 'avoid the need for any big bill hikes in the future'.
It comes after the Environment Agency on Friday said the number of serious pollution incidents caused by water companies across England rose by 60% in 2024 compared with the previous year.
The figures showed companies recorded a total of 2,801 pollution incidents, up from 2,174 in 2023.
Of these, 75 were categorised as posing 'serious or persistent' harm to wildlife and human health – up from 47 last year.
The Environment Agency said it is clear some companies are failing to meet the targets it has set on pollution, attributing failures to persistent underinvestment in new infrastructure, poor asset maintenance and reduced resilience because of the impacts of climate change.
Earlier on Friday, the Public Accounts Committee also released a report which called the level of pollution 'woeful' and recommended an overhaul of the regulation system.
Dovestone Reservoir on Saddleworth Moor as water companies have asked customers to conserve supplies (Peter Byrne/PA)
The cross-party group of MPs said the Government must act with urgency to strengthen oversight of the sector to rebuild trust and ensure its poor performance improves.
The Independent Water Commission published its interim report in June, which found the sector to be beset with 'deep-rooted, systemic' failures.
While the paper outlined the commission's direction of travel, it stopped short of providing detailed recommendations on policy, regulatory reform and corporate governance, which are now expected in the final report.
The interim review pointed to the need for better regulation of water companies but it did not recommend the wholesale scrapping of Ofwat, which some have urged.
Nationalisation, which some campaigners have also called for, was excluded from its terms of reference when commissioned by the Government.
Meanwhile, the Conservatives accused Labour of copying the previous government's policies and doing nothing to halt rises in water bills.
Shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said the Government should be 'transparent' about where the money to fix Britain's sewers was coming from, warning that consumers may have to stump up some of the cash.
She added: 'Labour's water plans must also include credible proposals to improve the water system's resilience to droughts, without placing an additional burden on bill payers and taxpayers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Business news live: FTSE 100 to open near record high and latest bitcoin price after fall
The FTSE 100 rose to new highs once again last week, tipping the scales well above 9,100 points after a particularly strong day on Thursday which saw the likes of BT Group rise ten per cent. The British companies index is up more than 11 per cent this year, outpacing the key US benchmarks. Meanwhile, key upcoming UK economy data this week includes mortgage approvals and the Nationwide House Price Index. Additionally, there is likely to be more news emerging on how the government may tackle pension reform, amid debate over what age the state pension should be and whether the tax relief rate on pension contributions may be altered. In other markets, bitcoin fell towards the end of last week, from the highs above $123,000 down to around $115,000, with gold also retreating as investors took a risk-on approach once more.
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Radical tax and retirement proposal that could affect every Aussie: What you need to know
Public servants within Anthony Albanese 's own government have suggested access to the age pension needs to be wound back for wealthy baby boomers because it's too costly. The Department of Social Services - in an incoming brief to new Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek - suggested lower-income Australians were paying for the lifestyles of the rich, who were living off the age pension under existing rules exempting the family home from the assets test. 'Low-and-middle income taxpayers are subsidising the retirement incomes of seniors with significant wealth in addition to their homes,' it said. The departmental brief, prepared independently of the new Labor minister's office, noted couples could still receive the age pension even as they continued to earn six-figure annual incomes from their investments. 'Age pension continues to be payable to couples with income of almost $100,000 a year or assets of almost $1.05million, in addition to their principal home of unlimited value,' it said. The department said this was unfair compared with the treatment of the unemployed, who had to wait 13 weeks to receive JobSeeker if they had more than $11,500 in the bank. A spokeswoman for Ms Plibersek said the government had no plans to impose a stricter assets test for the age pension. 'The government appreciates independent, frank and fearless advice from its agencies,' she told Daily Mail Australia. The Department of Social Services - in an incoming brief to new Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek (pictured) - suggested lower-income Australians were paying for the lifestyles of the rich, living off the age pension under existing rules exempting the family home from the assets test 'The government has no plans to include the family home in the pension assets test.' This is despite Treasury forecasting an 'expected increase in the number of age pension recipients as the Australian population ages'. More than $109billion is set to be spent on aged care in 2025-26 as government spending as a proportion of the economy hits the highest level since 1986 outside of Covid. Capital gains tax discount Ahead of the government's Economic Reform Roundtable next month, Westpac chief economist Luci Ellis has suggested scrapping the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount, introduced in 1999, because it fuelled property market speculation and made houses unaffordable. 'There is a lot of prior work pointing out the incentives to speculate in property created by discounted CGT,' she told Daily Mail Australia. 'The issue is that discounting CGT, as currently, means that people would rather have capital gains than cash income from an investment. 'So it means people are better off from a tax perspective buying an existing property than investing in a business or some other productivity-enhancing investment.' Ms Ellis, a former assistant governor at the Reserve Bank of Australia, has proposed replacing the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount with indexation fixed at 2.5 per cent, or the mid-point of the RBA's two to three per cent inflation target. 'This is easier to calculate and doesn't require people to know the history of inflation to calculate their tax liability,' she said. 'My proposal to instead charge full marginal tax rate on CGT will eliminate the incentive to favour capital-gains-producing investments over productivity-boosting ones.' Ms Ellis' call to axe the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount, on behalf of Westpac Economics, is shared by grassroots group Labor for Housing and the Greens. She put that view last week to teal MP Allegra Spender's tax roundtable in Canberra, but Labor had ruled out that option in Opposition after losing the 2016 and 2019 elections with that policy. Her call on the capital gains tax is not the view of the Westpac Banking Group, which is this week putting in a separate submission to the government's Economic Reform Roundtable. With only deficits forecast in coming years, the Department of Social Services noted funding welfare for the elderly would be a financial challenge, with the proportion of Australians older than 65 increasing by 31 per cent since 2000. Almost two-thirds, or 65 per cent, of people aged 65 and over receive income support payments, with 92 per cent of them getting the age pension. Australians can access the age pension at 67. 'Australia's demographics are evolving and will have broader implications for fiscal and social policy and demands for services,' the department said. 'Life expectancy is rising, and fertility rates are declining, reducing the working age population and influencing family composition and structures.' The department also suggested Australia would continue relying on high immigration so there was tax revenue from a working age population to support older Australians. 'Overseas migration is expected to continue to support population growth, offsetting demographic and economic challenges to some extent, as higher immigration correlates with higher tax revenue and increases in working-age population,' it said. Unaffordable housing was likely to see younger generations become increasingly reliant on their parents for housing. 'Concerns of intergenerational inequalities are growing, and young people's circumstances are falling short of their expectations,' the Department of Social Services said. 'As more rely on family for financial support and/or housing well into adulthood, they experience delayed milestones including education, employment, family, and home ownership. 'Many also struggle with compounding and competing responsibilities of paid employment and unpaid care. 'This has implications on household incomes, workforce participation, gender equality, and may have greater social, economic, and intergenerational ramifications.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
UN probes Scots judge-led body's 'breach' of international law
Now the Scottish Government will be expected to give answers to a UN committee about the complaint as part of a UK response over compliance. Scotland has since 2011, been found to be in breach of Article 9 of the Aarhus Convention, a binding piece of international legislation that guarantees the right to a healthy environment and enshrines people's rights to defend it in a court of law. The United Nations council which adopted the convention in 1998 gave the Scottish Government a deadline of October 1, 2024 for a plan of action to remove or cut the cost of access to justice as legal cases can often run into tens of thousands of pounds. The ERCS says that makes access to justice to protect the environment unaffordable and while there is a 'loser pays' rule, litigants are liable to pay their opponents fees if they lose their case. The Scottish Government asked the Scottish Civil Justice Council (SCJC) - a public body comprising predominantly senior judges and other members of the judiciary and legal profession which is responsible for keeping the civil justice system under scrutiny - to review the rules on the costs of court actions. Lord Pentland is at the centre of access to justice row (Image: NQ) But despite the review, a UK progress report at the end of last year confirmed the nation has not removed the cost barriers to justice despite the SCJC intervention. They say it continues to breach the convention as they "only made minor changes and no concrete commitments for future reform". In its formal complaint to the UN's Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, ERCS argued that the SCJC's review has breached Article 8 of the Convention, which requires public bodies to consult the public when making certain laws that can significantly affect the environment. READ MORE: What is the senior judge-led group accused of international law breach? 50 Scots councils seek ministers summit on green energy 'wild west' 'Scots nature in crisis' as one in nine species at risk of extinction It argues that that means there was no say in ensuring that international law was met and that the legal system was affordable. They say the consultation would have required the SCJC to consider and respond to representations from the public. Now the Herald has learnt that the compliance committee has decided that the complaint has been found admissible on a preliminary basis for further investigation despite official opposition. Dr Ben Christman, ERCS's legal director said: 'The way we make decisions matters. Public participation is a critical part of creating fair and functional environmental laws. The Scottish Civil Justice Council failed to consult the public and, predictably, went on to produce legal expenses rules that do not comply with the Aarhus Convention's requirements. Former co-convener of the Scottish Greens, Maggie Chapman has criticised ministers over law breaches over access to justice (Image: NQ) 'We were glad to see that the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee saw through bad faith attempts to knock out our complaint. We hope that the Scottish Government will now respond to our concerns seriously.' The SCJC has denied that there has been a breach. And Scots community safety minister Siobhian Brown has said in a response to a question about the case: "The Scottish Government has every confidence in the work of the Scottish Civil Justice Council." The council is responsible for overseeing civil justice fairness and effectiveness and provides advice on rule changes and recommends improvements while keeping the system under constant review. It is typically made up of between 14 and 20 members and are appointed by its chairman, the most senior judge in Scotland and Lord President of the Court of Session and Lord Justice General, Lord Pentland or Scottish ministers. They are predominantly entrenched in Scottish law either as judges, sheriffs, advocates, solicitors or heading up administration. At least four are members of the judiciary including at least one judge from the Court of Session and a sheriff, as well as at least two practising advocates. Other senior judges include on the council are Lady Carmichael, who was appointed as a Senator of the College of Justice in 2016 and Lord Ericht, who became a judge of the Supreme Courts in 2016. The group further includes Malcolm Graham, chief executive of the Scottish Courts and Tribunal Services, Colin Lancaster, the chief executive of the Scottish Legal Aid Board (SLAB) It comes amidst growing concern about local democracy being overridden as some of Scotland's most scenic areas face up to hundreds of live renewable projects. A "once in a generation" convention of 53 community councils have been demanding a summit with energy ministers in a fight to pause infrastructure projects. There were over 700 live applications in the Highland Council area alone, ranging from wind and hydro projects to energy storage and transmission grid plans. Councils convention chairman Helen Crawford at Balblair substation near Beauly (Image: Helen Crawford) Calls have been made for the Scottish Government to undertake an inquiry to address the cumulative impact of all major renewable energy infrastructure developments on the communities and landscape fearing projects "may hasten depopulation in some areas". Conservation charity John Muir Trust has previously spoken out of its concerns about the rights to justice after its attempt to challenge a windfarm development eight years ago led to it facing a near £700,000 bill, although this was eventually negotiated down to £275,000. The Trust settled out of court with the Perth-based energy company SSE and the Scottish government after its attempt to block a wind farm through a judicial review near Loch Ness failed. The dispute was over a wind farm at Stronelairg, which is in wild land in the Monadhliath mountains near Loch Ness. Consisting of 67 wind turbines, it was proposed by SSE in 2012 and granted by the Scottish government in June 2014. Glasgow had to exploit a loophole to bring the action in the name of a member who would qualify for legal aid. ERCS said it has had to resorting to questions under the Freedom of Information act on the SCJC process and any proposed new court costs rules. In response to an FOI request, the SCJC indicated in January 2023 that they intended to hold a public consultation on the new costs rules to inform decision-making "later in 2023". But in response to a chaser FOI request in October 2023, the SCJC decided against a consultation "to avoid undue resource impacts for potential respondents". And the ERCS say when the revised rules on Protective Expenses Orders - which limit a liability for costs in certain types of legal cases - came into force at the end of last year it was without public consultation and they say that they remain non-compliant with the Aarhus Convention. The Scottish Environment LINK (SEL) coalition of more than 30 leading charities said the SCJC failure was a "disappointing development which further damages accountability and the quality of environmental decision-making in Scotland". The SCJC has said that the latest amendments to the PEO rules was the first step in a process and that the review on costs as it relates to the sheriff court remains ongoing with a public consultation due to take place this year. Dr Shivali Fifield, ERCS's chief officer, said: "We submitted this complaint to uphold our right to participate in environmental decision-making. Scotland has been in breach of the Aarhus Convention's access to justice requirements since 2014. This is the third time the Scottish Civil Justice Council has reviewed rules on legal expenses and yet it remains prohibitively expensive to defend the environment in court. "Access to justice is not a favour, it is integral to our environmental human rights. We know that there is support for environmental justice across the political parties - and we will continue to hold the Scottish Government accountable until we see the barriers to justice removed." An analysis backed by Scotland's nature agency found wildlife is "in crisis" in 2023 with one in nine animals and plants being at risk of becoming extinct north of the border. A State of Nature Scotland analysis, backed by the [[Scottish Government]]'s [[Nature]]Scot agency and published by a partnership of over 50 nature and conservation organisations, warned the risk of extinction among some groups, such as vertebrates, is much higher at more than a third (36.5%). The most notable declines were with familiar birds such as swifts, curlews and lapwings which have declined by more than 60%. Kestrels have declined by more than 70%. A spokesperson for the Scottish Civil Justice Council said: 'The Scottish Civil Justice Council has approved its work programme for 2025/26, which has now been published. "As part of this , a priority for the coming year is to hold a public consultation on the extension of Protective Expenses Orders to the Sheriff Court. These orders allow litigants to limit the legal costs they might incur in the event they lose the case. The consultation is currently being finalised and we expect it to begin in the near future.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee is looking into a complaint, which says that the Scottish Civil Justice Council failed to ask the public for their views before changing rules about legal costs in environmental cas'The committee has decided the complaint is worth investigating further, but this is just a preliminary decision. They still need to follow more steps before making a final decision on whether to fully investigate. It would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage.'
