My wife and I were both managers. When we retired, we set 3 marriage rules so we wouldn't micromanage each other.
Then we retired — her first, then me. With both of us home and without the routine we'd become used to, there was no common enemy, and gradually, we began trying to micromanage each other.
As time went on, we grew concerned about how this tendency would affect our marriage. Being good managers, we derived a set of guidelines to protect our continued health as an organization.
No Lists
In our professions, we kept many lists. One such list was for things we'd bring up during performance reviews for those who worked under us.
Out of habit, we continued to make lists after retirement.
In the back of our minds, each of us kept a list of things the other person did poorly or not at all around the house. I might point out to my wife a more efficient system for keeping our saltshakers full. Rather than thanking me for my wise observation, she'd tell me how I could improve the way I park in the garage. I'd bring up the fact that air conditioning doesn't work if one leaves the windows open, and she'd ask why some people feel the need to leave three pairs of shoes abandoned in the living room.
These stored-up complaints would spew out onto our kitchen table during discussions, leaving hurt feelings and unpleasant evenings in their wake. Every issue was trivial, but long lists of trivial things make a heavy load for a marriage to carry.
So we decided, no lists. Neither of us was an employer or underling. If she did something that annoyed me, I had to bring it up immediately, or the objection was waived. The same applied to her.
Frequently, I'd let the time for making a complaint pass and regret that I didn't say something, but then later, when I was less hungry or tired, I'd wonder why something so trivial ever even bothered me. Our home life improved immediately. Maybe my professional life would've been better had I banished similar lists about things my direct reports did, too.
No shoulds
My wife and I were both kind and helpful managers who guided others through professional difficulties.
As retirees, when we both relax in our respective La-Z-Boys listening to NPR, it's inevitable that one of us will have a suggestion about how the other person could be happier, such as by joining a bridge club, volunteering at the local animal shelter, or learning to play the harmonica. The temptation is to then start a conversation with the sentence, "You should."
This is a mistake. The spouse receiving the suggestion, being a lifelong manager, already knows what needs to be done, and nobody likes unsolicited advice. It comes off as bossy and condescending.
When I have an idea to improve my wife's life, I've decided I must lead by example rather than using "you should." If I rise from my La-Z-Boy and exercise or join a bridge club, surely she'll see the joy the activity brings me and go into action herself.
I can't say the lead-by-example strategy has ever spurred her to change her behavior, but it has been a great success in avoiding arguments.
Our marriage has improved significantly by expelling "you should" from the house. We're also working on getting rid of other accusatory sentence starters, like "You always," and "Why are you doing that?"
No supervising
I know how to dice an onion. My method is safe, efficient, and produces perfectly uniform dice. If my wife dices an onion, I have to leave the room.
I dislike the way she does it. Seeing her waste an extra 45 seconds of our valuable retirement with her slower chopping, only to get a less uniform dice, causes me physical pain. My choices are to suffer pain, violate the previous rule about sentences that begin with "you should," or leave the room.
The right choice is to leave the room. It's not easy. The urge to ensure things get done according to my own liking didn't instantly disappear when I left the workplace.
Vacuuming isn't one of my ordinary household duties. As I toiled to vacuum one day, inventing new techniques as I went, I looked over at my wife. On her face was the same pain I felt watching her cut onions. I love her and don't want her to suffer. I no longer vacuum while she's around to see me do it.
As my wife and I have grown older, health problems have arisen, and at times, each of us has been called on to do housework that's ordinarily done by the other. When that occurs, we must complete those jobs in solitude, in a place where the other cannot see. Doing this makes the days pass more smoothly for both of us.
Today, my wife and I have a peaceful retirement and a strong marriage
Despite the challenges of aging and failing health, my wife and I are getting along well in retirement, in part thanks to banishing the tenets we lived by as managers.
Banishing lists, shoulds, and supervision has left our humble home in relative peace. In my working life, I used these methods because I was taught them by the managers who trained me. Looking back, I can't help but wonder if those were the best approaches to management.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Boys & Girls Club programs threatened by Trump grant freeze serve thousands of families
EAST PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP) — After driving through a downpour to take her son to day camp, Darleen Reyes told camp administrators the rain would have kept her away but her son insisted on going. As she marked her son's name present on a clipboard at the Boys & Girls Club camp, she laughed about braving a flash flood warning to get there. Before kissing his mother goodbye, Aiden Cazares, 8, explained to a reporter, 'I wanted to see my friends and not just sit at home.' Then he ran off to play. Aiden's one of 1.4 million children and teenagers around the country who have been attending after-school and summer programming at a Boys & Girls Club, the YMCA or a public school for free thanks to federal taxpayers. Congress set aside money for the programs to provide academic support, enrichment and child care to mostly low-income families, but President Donald Trump's administration recently froze the funding. The money for the 21st Century Community Learning Centers is among more than $6 billion in federal education grants Trump's Republican administration has withheld, saying it wants to ensure recipients' programs align with the president's priorities. After-school programs for the fall are in jeopardy In Rhode Island, the state stepped in with funding to keep the summer programs running, according to the Boys & Girls Club of East Providence. Other Boys & Girls Clubs supported by the grants have found ways to keep open their summer programs, said Sara Leutzinger, vice president for communications for the Boys & Girls Club of America. But there isn't the same hope for the after-school programming for the fall. Some of the 926 Boys & Girls Clubs nationwide that run 21st Century Community Learning summer and after-school programs stand to close if the Trump administration doesn't release the money in the next three to five weeks, Leutzinger said. The YMCA and Save the Children say many of the centers they run are also at risk of shuttering. 'Time is of the essence,' said Christy Gleason, executive director of Save the Children Action Network, which provides after-school programming for 41 schools in rural areas in Washington state and across the South, where school will begin as soon as August. 'It's not too late to make a decision so the kids who really need this still have it.' Schools in Republican-led areas are particularly affected by the freeze in federal education grants. Ninety-one of the 100 school districts that receive the most money from four frozen grant programs are in Republican congressional districts, according to an analysis from New America, a left-leaning think tank. Of those top 100 school districts, half are in four states: California, West Virginia, Florida and Georgia. New America's analysis used funding levels reported in 2022 in 46 states. Republican officials have been among the educators criticizing the grant freeze. 'I deeply believe in fiscal responsibility, which means evaluating the use of funds and seeking out efficiencies, but also means being responsible — releasing funds already approved by Congress and signed by President Trump," said Georgia schools superintendent Richard Woods, an elected Republican. 'In Georgia, we're getting ready to start the school year, so I call on federal funds to be released so we can ensure the success of our students.' The Office of Management and Budget said some grants supported left-wing causes, pointing to services for immigrants in the country illegally or LGBTQ+ inclusion efforts. Summer clubs provide instruction for children At the East Providence summer camp, Aiden, a rising third grader, played tag, built structures with magnetic tiles, played a fast-paced game with the other kids to review addition and subtraction, learned about pollination, watched a nature video and ate club-provided chicken nuggets. Veteran teachers from his school corrected him when he spoke without raising his hand and offered common-sense advice when a boy in his group said something inappropriate. 'When someone says something inappropriate, you don't repeat it,' teacher Kayla Creighton told the boys between answering their questions about horseflies and honeybees. Indeed, it's hard to find a more middle-of-the road organization in this country than the Boys & Girls Club. Just last month, a Republican and a Democrat sponsored a resolution in the U.S. House celebrating the 165-year-old organization as a 'beacon of hope and opportunity.' The Defense Department awarded the club $3 million in 1991 to support children left behind when their parents deployed for the Persian Gulf. And ever since, the Boys & Girls Club has created clubs on military installations to support the children of service members. Military families can sign up their kids for free. 'I suspect they will realize that most of those grants are fine and will release them,' said Mike Petrilli, president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a conservative education policy think tank, speaking of the Trump administration's review of the 21st Century Community Learning Center grants. But not everyone is so sure. Families see few affordable child care alternatives Aiden's mother has started looking into afternoon child care for September when kids return to school in Rhode Island. 'It costs $220 a week,' Reyes said, her eyes expanding. 'I can't afford that.' The single mother and state worker said she'll probably ask her 14-year-old son to stay home and watch Aiden. That will mean he would have to forgo getting a job when he turns 15 in the fall and couldn't play basketball and football. 'I don't have any other option,' she said. At home, Aiden would likely stay inside on a screen. That would be heartbreaking since he's thrived getting tutoring and 'learning about healthy boundaries' from the Boys & Girls Club program, Reyes said. Fernande Berard learned about the funding freeze and possible closure from a reporter after dropping off her three young boys for summer camp. 'I would be really devastated if this goes away,' said the nurse. 'I honestly don't know what I would do.' Her husband drives an Uber much of the day, and picking up the kids early would eat into his earnings. It's money they need to pay the mortgage and everything else. If her boss approves, she'd likely have to pick up her children from school and take them to the rehabilitation center where she oversees a team of nurses. The children would have to stay until her work day ends. 'It's hard to imagine,' she said. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
New York Times
05-07-2025
- New York Times
Where Are the Men in Boys' Lives?
The importance of role models for girls seems irrefutable. Efforts since the 1990s to provide female role models have had great success opening doors for girls and young women, who now outpace boys in education, outnumber men in law and medical schools and excel in male-dominated fields like tech and politics. At the same time, boys have many fewer male role models in their daily lives. While men still fill most positions of power across American society, the people who interact with children are largely women. Occupations like pediatrics have switched to mostly being done by women, while those that were always female-dominated, like teaching, have become more so. Most of the Adults in Children's Lives Are Women The share of women and men in each role: Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey, Pew Research Center, University of Michigan National Poll on Healthy Aging, Scouting America, National Congregations Study, American Board of Pediatrics By The New York Times At a crucial time in their lives, boys are increasingly cared for by women, especially the many boys whose fathers aren't a regular presence. This lack of male role models, say researchers, parents, young men and those who work with them, is contributing to their struggles in school and employment — and the overall feeling that they're adrift. Working with children has long been considered women's work, and as a result, has been undervalued, with low pay and a stigma against men doing it. The share of professional men in children's lives has decreased even more in recent decades. Over roughly the same period, single-mother households became more common. Mentorship groups say they struggle to find as many male volunteers as there are boys who need them. And as families have become more insular — participation in community groups and churches has declined, and children spend less time playing outside with neighbors — children get to know fewer adults. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Miami Herald
01-07-2025
- Miami Herald
Homelessness declined last year in Hollywood and Venice, but not Skid Row, new Rand study finds
LOS ANGELES - Homeless encampments were markedly reduced in Hollywood and Venice last year, but the number of people sleeping "rough" without a tent, vehicle or makeshift shelter held steady, raising the likelihood that the gains will be harder to sustain in the future, a new Rand report concluded. The total number of unsheltered homeless people was down 15% overall in the three areas Rand studies, the first decrease since the project began in 2021. But the declines - 49% in Hollywood and 22% in Venice were partially offset by a 9% increase in Skid Row. The report authors pointed to a likely positive effect of public policies that have increased permanent and interim housing, particularly Mayor Karen Bass' Inside Safe program, but found that those left behind pose a greater challenge. "Rough" sleeping represented about 40% of the total unsheltered population in the count, taken in December 2024. "Tent dwelling is no longer the typical modality of homeless life in Los Angeles," said lead author Louis Abramson. "We are seeing this picture where there does seem to be real progress in bringing people off the street but the people who are still on the street are the most vulnerable," Abramson said. "The acuity indicators are not trending in the same way as the numbers. People's level of health, well being and connectivity is not improving and is in some ways deteriorating." The report is the third released annually by the Los Angeles Longitudinal Enumeration and Demographic Survey (LA LEADS), conducted by Rand's Center on Housing and Homelessness. The findings are consistent with preliminary results for the 2025 point-in-time count released in March by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. Based on raw counts, the agency projected a countywide decline of between 5% and 10% in unsheltered homelessness. LAHSA announced Monday that it will release its final results of the count July 14. Rand's report represents a more intensive examination of three areas considered homelessness hot spots. Researchers return every two months to track changes over time. They count individual tents, vehicles, makeshift shelters and people sleeping unsheltered. Using a methodology similar to LAHSA's, they estimate the number of people occupying each type of shelter to calculate total populations. The report found "good reason" to link Hollywood's dramatic decline to a series of Inside Safe operations conducted there last year, but the record was less clear in Venice, which also saw a decline without having any Inside Safe operations. The effects of enforcement under the city's section 41.18 anti-camping ordinance were less clear. The report found that an estimated 12% of Skid Row's unsheltered population had been cited under the ordinance yet the area's homeless population increased. "Thus, crediting changes in unsheltered homelessness to specific programs-or understanding the relationship of those changes to new inflows of people-requires more study," the authors wrote. Another factor in Hollywood's dramatic improvement could be the efforts of a Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health pilot project called Hollywood 2.0, which helped bring county mental health services to the area, coordinated outreach and was a force behind the opening of two new housing projects, a 50-bed interim shelter and 90-bed board and care home. "I think Hollywood 2.0 was a strong contributor to the decrease in usheltered homelessnes," said Brittney Weissman. executive director of Hollywood 4WRD, a nonprofit that conducts community engagement for the project. A demographic survey accompanying the count found disconcerting trends related to the growth of "rough" sleeping. Respondents reported staying in the same location for shorter amounts. That finding was consistent with "increases in sanitation and other encampment resolution efforts-most common in Hollywood-that either move unsheltered people indoors or periodically displace them, leaving a more transient, mobile, and dynamic population," the report said. Overall, 91% of respondents in all three areas expressed interest in being housed, but only 38% reported being on a wait list. Only 13% reported being offered supportive housing, while 39% were offered group shelter. Fewer than 50% accepted. People ages 62 and older and those earning less than $99 per month were significantly less likely to be searching for housing than younger people or those with higher incomes. The report highlighted differences between the three areas. Those in Venice reported slightly higher levels of education rates of Social Security and disability benefits and income, and were more likely to be employed. Skid Row's unsheltered population skews older and more female and Black compared to the other areas. They reported being less likely to be working, more likely to report mental health, physical health, and substance use disorders, more likely to stay in the same location for three years or longer and less likely to be forced to move by law enforcement or housed residents. Of the remaining tent encampments, 80% were in Skid Row. The authors made two recommendations: To sustain the positive trend, policymakers should continue to prioritize and streamline the creation of permanent housing. And, they need new strategies for the changing demographics. The trend to rough sleeping will likely further strain service providers and outreach teams as their clients become more mobile and vulnerable, and encampment-based housing initiatives will become less effective. Though rough sleeping remained steady last year, it had inched upward over the three years of the study. "There are strategies that are bringing people successfully off the street," Abramson said. "But for these other populations it looks like we are going to need to develop specific strategies that are not in our toolkit right now." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
