vivo X Fold5 will have unprecedented dust and water resistance for a foldable
We're talking about IP5X dust resistance, which beats Samsung's IP4X, as well as a trio of water resistance ratings: IPX8, IPX9, and IPX9+. IP5X means the phone will not entirely prevent ingress of dust, but "it must not enter in sufficient quantity to interfere with the safe operation", according to the IP code definitions. vivo X Fold5 teaser image
Regarding IPX9+, vivo says you'll be able to fold and unfold the X Fold5 in water 1m deep 1,000 times, which is certainly impressive, even though we're not sure what the use case for that would be in the real world.
Finally, no other foldable so far has received an IPX9 certification, which is all about protection from water jets (IPX8 is about immersion into water).
The X Fold5 is also teased to be the lightest book-style foldable ever, and will be offered in green as you can see from the glimpse in the shot above.
Source (in Chinese)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GSM Arena
2 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Honor X9c launches in India next week
The Honor X9c, unveiled last November, is set to debut in India on July 7. Honor hasn't revealed the X9c's Indian pricing yet, but it revealed that the smartphone will be available in the country starting July 12 exclusively through in a single 8GB/256GB configuration. The Honor X9c's specs sheet includes the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SoC, a 6.78" 120Hz 1,224p AMOLED display, and a 6,600 mAh Si/C battery with 66W charging support. The smartphone is IP65 dust and water-resistant and can withstand drops of up to 2m. Honor X9c's features The Honor X9c's camera department comprises a 108MP primary (OIS), a 5MP ultrawide, and a 16MP selfie camera. The smartphone also features an in-display fingerprint scanner, and its Indian model will run Android 15-based MagicOS 9.0 out of the box. Honor X9c
Phone Arena
4 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Apple's perfectionism is setting up the long-awaited first foldable iPhone for failure
While perfectionism is definitely a good quality to have in an artistic field like painting, sculpture, or even creative writing, trying too hard to get a product just right before releasing it to the masses can be a fatal mistake in the overcrowded and ultra-competitive tech industry. Is there such a thing as a flawless smartphone? Not that I know of, and I'm sure both the most hardcore iPhone fans and the most devoted Android enthusiasts around will be quick to agree with me and point to the "obvious" weaknesses of the best devices from the other camp as proof. But if Apple hasn't been able to design the perfect iPhone after 18 years of uninterrupted refinement work, why does the Cupertino-based tech giant insist on endlessly polishing its rookie foldable effort behind closed doors? Okay, I admit I might be exaggerating there just a teensy bit, although it's hard to deny that foldable phones are in trouble around the world after an explosive start only a few years ago. Back in 2022, for instance, global shipments jumped from 9 million units the year before to a 16 million talfly, with the number then expected to rise to 26 million the following year. But instead of that big increase, the thriving market segment only ended up posting an uptick to around 18 million unit sales in 2023. Weirdly enough, I can't find a reliable global figure for 2024, which makes me fairly certain that those 25 million analyst predictions at the beginning of the year haven't panned out. This is just one of many iPhone Fold concepts floating around the interwebs these last couple of years. | Image Credit -- Apple Insider What I can find are a few different reports anticipating a 2025 decline in foldable smartphone demand, which is clearly not what companies like Samsung, Huawei, Motorola, Honor, Oppo, Vivo, and Google had expected to happen at this stage in the market's evolution. I'm willing to bet that this trend isn't making Apple happy either, as it could put a lot of pressure on the first-gen " iPhone Fold " to save the foldable landscape from ruin. We all know that's not going to happen at the flick of a switch, but at the same time, Cupertino simply cannot afford to waste much more time and risk entering the market when no one cares about or believes in foldables anymore. In an ideal world, Apple would swoop in, blow all our minds with the invisible crease, stunning overall design, and cutting-edge specifications of its first-ever foldable iPhone, thus forcing Samsung to instantly up its game too and roll out a massively upgraded Galaxy Z Fold 8. Everyone from Huawei to Google would then follow suit with incredible advancements of their own, making us all buy a high-end foldable by 2027. Unfortunately, that's where you need to stop dreaming with your eyes open and envision such utopian scenes because the truth is the iPhone Fold will probably not blow many minds no matter how much time Apple spends preparing the device for its already long overdue launch. The flawed but undeniably great Galaxy Z Fold 6 is proof that Samsung has come a long way since 2019. | Image Credit -- PhoneArena And that's perfectly fine by me because I understand how first-gen products work. Remember 2019's disastrous original Galaxy Fold? Granted, times are different now, and the level of expectations is much higher, but... Apple only has itself to blame for that. Even in 2025, the company could have released a foldable iPhone that would have probably been relatively well-received as long as it didn't break after the first few days of use. I honestly hope that will remain the case next year, and for the sake of the entire foldable market, I really hope Apple won't delay this launch beyond 2026. I know that this is not the "Apple way" or whatever, but the company has to throw its hat in the ring ASAP regardless of production challenges or quality issues. Obviously, I'm not saying that the iPhone Fold should be released without due diligence, but as long as it turns on, doesn't break very easily, and it does all the things a "conventional" iPhone can do in a sleek new package, Apple should probably pull the trigger before it's too late... and start working on a refined sequel. Otherwise, this project could end up suffering the same fate as the AirPods Max or, even worse, the Vision Pro, neither of which have received a sequel or blown many minds after spending years and years in development hell. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase This offer is not available in your area.
Phone Arena
4 hours ago
- Phone Arena
This Galaxy Watch gave Samsung an edge over Apple, and it's coming back
Galaxy Watch 8 There's nothing quite like the Galaxy Watch Classic out there Should Samsung bring back the Galaxy Watch Classic for good? Yes – it's Samsung's most iconic and stylish smartwatc Maybe – only if it gets the latest sensors and features I prefer the sporty base models like the regular Watch 8 I'm more into rugged designs like the Watch Ultra No – the rotating bezel feels outdated to me now Yes – it's Samsung's most iconic and stylish smartwatc 0% Maybe – only if it gets the latest sensors and features 0% I prefer the sporty base models like the regular Watch 8 0% I'm more into rugged designs like the Watch Ultra 0% No – the rotating bezel feels outdated to me now 0% The rumored Galaxy Watch 8 Classic gets the formula right Galaxy Watch 8 The Galaxy Watch Classic fills a real gap, and Apple doesn't have an answer The Galaxy Watch Classic is the one design that stuck, the model that gave Samsung a distinct presence. And in many ways, it's Samsung's best shot at rivaling Apple's dominance in the smartwatch to launch at the next Unpacked event on July 9 , theClassic could be the comeback moment the Galaxy Watch lineup has Galaxy Watch Classic is Samsung's most distinct watch design, built around a mechanical rotating bezel that sets it apart from nearly every other smartwatch on the market. It's tactile, intuitive, and — more importantly — it looks like a regular watch. In contrast, Apple's watches stick out like a sore thumb, and can hardly pass for anything more than a 'casual' look. Google's Pixel Watch looks a bit better and more low-key than what Apple offers, but it lacks when it comes to features and year, Samsung decided to replace the rotating bezel for a touch sensitive one with the Galaxy Watch 7 , but the experience didn't quite measure up. Even with upgrades like the new Energy Score and dual-band GPS, the Watch 7 felt a bit too plain, too safe — missing the charm that made the Classic stand Galaxy Watch Ultra, on the other hand, was a daring attempt from Samsung — one that it did in its effort to rival Apple's popular Apple Watch Ultra. This new model brought some welcome firsts to the Galaxy Watch lineup, like a titanium build, a 3,000-nit display, a large battery, and the much more powerful Exynos W1000 chip. But it felt more like an Apple copy than an original product imbued with Samsung's spirit of innovation and why the return of the Classic matters. It's a statement that Samsung remembers what made its watches recognizable and to leaked renders and reports, theClassic is coming back with all the right ingredients: a stainless steel body, a 46mm size, a large battery, and that iconic mechanical bezel. It's expected to carry the same sensor array as the standard Watch 8 — including ECG, skin temperature, and SpO2 — and it will likely ship with One UI Watch 8 atop Wear OS also means it should support all of Samsung's newest AI tools, like smarter workout suggestions, sleep coaching, and even more advanced tracking in the future. Vascular load and blood glucose monitoring are both rumored to be in the Classic isn't meant to be the fitness-first model — and that's exactly the point. The standard Watch 8, with its thinner aluminum case and lighter design, is arguably better suited for a more active lifestyle. The Classic, on the other hand, is for those who want their smartwatch to look and feel like a real watch — not just a screen that counts when I say 'real watch,' I am referring to a design rooted in dive watches and tool chronometers — all built for with a specific purpose. The rotating bezel wasn't just for show, it helped divers track time or pilots measure intervals. On the Classic, that same bezel becomes a smart and satisfying way to scroll through apps, menus, and of what makes the Apple Watch so successful is its unwavering consistency. The shape, buttons, and user experience remain largely the same year after year, making it instantly recognizable and universally understood. Samsung, on the other hand, has wavered. I'd say the Galaxy Watch lineup really doesn't know what it wants to be right the Galaxy Watch Classic is the one design that stuck, and with the Watch 8 Classic reportedly making a comeback, Samsung has the chance to re-anchor its identity around something truly its own.I'd even say that the Classic shouldn't be a side option. Samsung should make it the face of its smartwatch brand. It has the hardware, the distinct design, and the practical advantage of a rotating bezel. It also offers something neither the Ultra nor the base Watch 8 can: a premium smartwatch that looks doesn't really compete in that space. Its watches are either sleek and square, or bulky and rugged — and always unmistakably 'smart.' They stick out like a sore thumb and look out of place when paired with anything besides casual. That gives Samsung a real shot to own a smartwatch category Apple hasn't tapped into.
