Contributor: Cracks in the Trump coalition? They won't matter
Consider the contradictions: fast-food fanatics hanging out with juice-cleanse truthers chanting 'Make America Healthy Again' between ivermectin doses, immigration hardliners mixing with business elites who are 'tough on the border' until they need someone to clean their toilets or pick their strawberries, and hawkish interventionists spooning with America Firsters.
Dogs and cats living together — mass hysteria — you know the bit.
Navigating these differences was always going to be tricky. But in recent days — particularly following Israel's bombing of Iran, an operation widely believed to have been greenlit by Trump — the tension has reached new highs.
Signs of strain were already emerging earlier this year. We got early hints of discord during the 'Liberation Day' tariff fiasco — where Trump declared an 'emergency' and imposed steep tariffs, only to suspend them after they riled markets and spooked his business-friendly backers.
The tariff blunder was a harbinger of things to come. But it was the House's passage of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' — a budgetary monstrosity that self-respecting Freedom Caucus deficit hawks should've torched on principle — that truly exposed the rift.
Enter Elon Musk, the billionaire tech bro and MAGA ally, who publicly trashed both the bill and Trump in a flurry of posts. He even referenced Trump's name reportedly appearing in Jeffrey Epstein's files — a claim that, though unverified, was tantamount to 'going nuclear.'
But before there was enough time to say 'Republican civil war,' Musk deleted his mean tweets, adding to the evidence that this is still Trump's party; that modern Republicans view deficits the way the rest of us view library late fees — technically real, but nothing to lose sleep over; and that ketamine is a hell of a drug.
The next internecine squabble was over immigration. Trump proudly ran on rounding 'em all up. Mass deportations! Load up the buses! But then it turned out that his rich buddies in Big Ag and Big Hospitality weren't so keen on losing some of their best employees.
So Trump floated a carve out to protect some 'very good, long time workers' in those particular industries.
It even started to look like some exemptions were coming — until his Department of Homeland Security said 'no mas.' (The raids will presumably continue until the next time a farmer or hotelier complains to Trump in a meeting.)
But the real fissure involves some prominent America First non-interventionists who thought Trump was elected to end the 'forever wars.'
In case you missed it, Israel has been going after Iran's nuclear capabilities with the same gusto that Trump aide Stephen Miller applies to deporting Guatemalan landscapers, and Trump is all in, calling for an 'unconditional surrender' of the Iranian regime (and then deploying bombs on Saturday).
This didn't sit well with everyone in the MAGA coalition.
'I think we're going to see the end of American empire,' warned Tucker Carlson on Steve Bannon's War Room podcast. 'But it's also going to end, I believe, Trump's presidency — effectively end it — and so that's why I'm saying this.'
And Carlson (co-founder of the Daily Caller, where I worked) didn't stop there. 'The real divide isn't between people who support Israel and those who support Iran or the Palestinians,' he tweeted. 'It's between warmongers and peacemakers.'
Then he named names, alleging that Fox's Sean Hannity, radio firebrand Mark Levin, media titan Rupert Murdoch and billionaire Trump donors Ike Perlmutter and Miriam Adelson were among the warmongers.
Trump hit back, calling Tucker 'kooky' and repeating his new mantra: 'IRAN CAN NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON.'
It's tempting to see this spat as the beginning of a schism — a break that might finally yield a coherent Trump Doctrine, at least, as it pertains to foreign policy (possibly returning the GOP to a more Reaganite or internationalist party). But that misunderstands the nature of Trump and his coalition.
These coalitional disagreements over public policy are real and important. But they mostly exist at the elite level. The actual Trump voter base? They care about only one thing: Donald Trump.
And Trump resists ideological straitjackets.
If Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu rubs him the wrong way next week (as he did by congratulating Joe Biden in 2020), or if Israel's military campaign starts slipping in the polls, Trump could flip faster than a gymnast on Red Bull.
There is no coherent philosophy. No durable ideology. What we're watching is a guy making it up as he goes along — often basing decisions on his 'gut' or the opinion of the last guy who bent his ear.
So if you're looking for a Trump Doctrine to explain it all — keep looking. There isn't one.
There's only Trump.
Matt K. Lewis is the author of 'Filthy Rich Politicians' and 'Too Dumb to Fail.'
If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Most Americans think Trump megabill will benefit wealthy people: Survey
Nearly two-thirds of Americans think the 'big, beautiful bill' will do more to help wealthy people, according to a new AP-NORC poll. That includes 48 percent of Republicans, 60 percent of independents, and 83 percent of Democrats, according to the poll, which was released on Friday. The bill extends many of the tax cuts passed by Republicans in 2017 during President Trump's first term, alongside significant reductions to welfare services. Democrats have assailed the law as a historic transfer of wealth to the rich from the poor. Sixty-one percent of Americans also said the law would do more to hurt low-income people. However, the two parties were divided on the question of low-income Americans. Less than a third of Republicans said the bill would do more to harm low-income people, compared to 90 percent of Democrats. Democrats are hoping to use the bill's cuts to Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and other government support programs as key messaging during the upcoming 2026 midterms. The bill's effects on low-income Americans, however, could take several years to show. The bill's deepest funding cuts to Medicaid, which could result in millions losing their insurance in the next 10 years, will not kick in until 2028, although work requirements could begin by the end of 2026. Changes to SNAP will also not go into effect until 2028. The bill has also garnered criticism for its long-term additions to the national debt, estimated to be in the trillions. Many economists have expressed concerns about its cost at a time when government spending was already thought to be unsustainable in the long run. In the poll released Friday, approval of Trump's handling of government spending was down to 38 percent, compared to 46 percent from an AP-NORC poll in March. About two-thirds of Americans think the government is spending too much, with Republicans and Democrats in agreement, according to the poll. The poll surveyed 1,437 adults between July 10 and July 14, with a margin of error of 3.6 percentage points.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A Clear Sign Just Emerged That Tesla Is Panicking
Tesla sales are so abysmal in Canada that Elon Musk has made the drastic choice to dramatically lower the price of the new Model Y as it attempts to climb out of the hole. As Electrek reports, a Model Y in Canada now costs $65,ooo CAD ($47,465 USD), which is a cool $20,000 CAD cheaper than it was just a few days prior. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The Insurance Savings You Expect Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You We'll get into the hows and whys in a second, but first some backstory. Earlier this year, after Trump raised the specter of tariffs against its northern neighbor, Canada moved to impose its own 25 percent counter-tariff on all American cars, as retribution to the second-time president, who's also agitated the Canadian public by claiming he wants to annex the country, straining the historical allyship between the neighbor nations and causing that country's residents to view the US as an "enemy." Caught in the middle of this foolhardy trade and culture war was Tesla, which raised the price of the Model Y in Canada to $84,990 CAD from $64,990. As Electrek notes, that price hike brought the cost of the car up to the equivalent of about $61,500 USD, a figure $20,000 USD higher than the long-range all-wheel drive version in the states. As one might guess, nobody in the Great White North wanted to spend that much on a vehicle that had been cheaper ahead of the tariffs, and that's without getting into Musk's then-bromance with Trump — and thus, Tesla's sales cratered. In late March, Electrek reported that company sales dropped a whopping 87 percent in the province of Quebec, which theretofore had been considered an important market for the electric vehicle-maker. Given all that context, it undoubtedly came as a shock for Canadians to learn that Tesla had slashed the Model Y price so significantly. It appears that the cost drop stems from the company sourcing its Canadian Model Y deliveries from its German Gigafactory — but as Gizmodo flagged, that model is the only one that's seen any price reductions in Canada so far. Looking through Tesla's pricing on its Canadian website, one can now see that the Model 3, conventionally its cheapest vehicle, now runs for just under $71,000 CAD — nearly $6,000 more than the larger Model Y costs under the new pricing scheme. This is likely due to those cars still being shipped from the US, which makes them subject to Canadian counter-tariffs. Reading between the lines, this dramatic new sales gambit suggests that Tesla is not only aware of how bad things are for the company in Canada, but also that it's willing to do something crazy to try to turn the ship around. Given that Musk recently tweeted that "Canada is not a real country," it seems downright preposterous that he's chosen to switch it up this much — but then again, global Tesla sales have declined so significantly thanks to Musk's asinine politics that it's no wonder it wants to recoup. More on Tesla sales: Tesla Is in Serious Trouble in China Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Epstein, Trump, a birthday letter and a lawsuit: Everything you need to know
Six years after his death, disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein is again in the spotlight, this one cast by President Donald Trump's unrelenting MAGA base. Epstein was arrested in 2019 and found dead in his cell at a jail in New York City just five weeks later. Investigators concluded that he killed himself while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, but there have long been whispers that something more nefarious occurred. Many of the president's most ardent red hat-wearing supporters have cried conspiracy in the years since, suggesting that Epstein was actually murdered in a bid to protect wealthy and prominent people involved in his alleged crimes. The theory further suggests the existence of a 'client list' within the government's trove of documents dubbed the 'Epstein files.' The notion plays on Trump's vows to dismantle the 'deep state,' which refers to an alleged secret network of powerful people manipulating government decisions behind the scenes. However, members of the Make America Great Again movement have found their trust in Trump beginning to waver in recent weeks, particularly over of his handling of the files. The president's hesitation to release them has also sparked questions about his relationship with Epstein. Trump has already appeared in legal documents concerning the late billionaire, but never in a way that implicates him in any crime. Here's what you need to know about the ongoing saga: —The controversy During the 2024 presidential campaign, when asked on Fox News if he would declassify the Epstein files, Trump said, 'Yeah, yeah I would.' His attorney general, Pam Bondi, seemingly supported the notion in February, intimating in a separate Fox News interview that the files were 'sitting on (her) desk right now to review.' Shortly thereafter, the Justice Department released some government documents regarding the case, but there were no new revelations. Then, earlier this month the Trump administration appeared to perform its first pivot on the matter with a memo saying Epstein had in fact committed suicide. It also declared, after a lengthy review of all available evidence, that there is 'no incriminating client list' or proof the financier blackmailed prominent people as part of his alleged actions. The Justice Department further noted that no more files related to the case — other than a video meant to prove that Epstein killed himself — would be made public. Amid the subsequent backlash from his supporters, Trump took to his platform, Truth Social, in a bid to quell his base, accusing former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, as well as former FBI Director James Comey, of making up such documents. 'What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?'' Trump wrote last weekend. 'They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening.' On Wednesday, he blasted Democrats for creating a 'new SCAM' that 'we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax,' while deriding some of his own loyalists for demanding he order the release of the files. —The firing of Maurene Comey Also on Wednesday, the Justice Department fired Maurene Comey from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, where she most recently led the prosecution of Sean 'Diddy' Combs. He was found guilty on two counts of transporting people to engage in prostitution, but acquitted on the more serious charges of racketeering and sex trafficking. Comey — the daughter of former FBI director James Comey — also successfully prosecuted Ghislaine Maxwell, who was found guilty of sex trafficking in 2021 for helping Epstein recruit and abuse underage girls. Comey's cases also included the one against Epstein himself, but he died before he could stand trial. Asked about the prosecutor's firing on Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, 'This was a decision made by the Department of Justice.' No further details were provided, but some have speculated that Comey's family tree might have something to do with her sudden dismissal. The president's relationship with her father was strained from the start, with Trump firing him amid an investigation into potential ties between Russia and his presidential campaign. In a note to her colleagues on Thursday, Comey said that her firing should fuel 'a fire of righteous indignation at abuses of power.' She also encouraged 'dedication to truth above all else.' 'If a career prosecutor can be fired without reason, fear may seep into the decisions of those who remain,' Comey said. 'Do not let that happen. Fear is the tool of a tyrant, wielded to suppress independent thought.' —Trump's birthday letter A day after Comey's firing, The Wall Street Journal reported on a collection of letters gifted to Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003, one of them allegedly written by Trump. The note apparently included a drawing of a naked woman with his signature written across her waist in a way that appeared to mimic pubic hair. 'A pal is a wonderful thing,' Trump wrote to Epstein, per the WSJ. 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.' In a phone interview with the Journal ahead of the exposé, Trump denied writing the letter or drawing the picture, saying, 'I don't draw pictures of women. It's not my language. It's not my words.' He also told the Journal he would prepare a lawsuit if the 'fake' story was published. Vice President JD Vance also rushed to Trump's defense, calling the Journal's reporting 'complete and utter bulls–t' before questioning the legitimacy of the letter. 'Where is this letter?' he wrote on social media. 'Would you be shocked to learn they never showed it to us before publishing it? Does anyone honestly believe this sounds like Donald Trump?' —Motion to release jury records Following the publication of the Journal's story, Trump said he would tell Bondi to release some files from Epstein's criminal case — though not the full court records. 'I have asked the Justice Department to release all grand jury testimony with respect to Jeffrey Epstein, subject only to court approval,' he announced. 'With that being said, and even if the court gave its full and unwavering approval, nothing will be good enough for the troublemakers and radical left lunatics making the request. It will always be more, more, more.' The Department of Justice on Friday obliged and filed a motion for the grand jury files related to Epstein's 2019 indictment to be unsealed, 'subject to appropriate redactions of victim-related and other personal identifying information.' However, the transcripts will likely do little to quell the questions bubbling up from Trump's base, as he has still yet to order the release of the DOJ files pertaining to Epstein. —Trump sues the Wall Street Journal for billions Within hours of the Justice Department filing its motion, Trump followed through on his threats to sue The Wall Street Journal, filing a defamation suit in Miami federal court. It lists Dow Jones & Company, News Corp, owner Rupert Murdoch and reporters Khadeeja Safdar and Joseph Palazzolo as the plaintiffs. Trump is seeking billions of dollars in damages. 'Despite the glaring failures in journalistic ethics and standards of accurate reporting, Defendants Dow Jones and News Corp — at the direction of Defendants Murdoch and (CEO Robert) Thomson — published to the world the false, defamatory and malignant statements authored by Defendants,' the lawsuit reads. Trump has previously sued several prominent news outlets, including The Des Moines Register, ABC News and CBS.
