
Residents ‘living in fear' as UK flight paths set for overhaul
The Department for Transport (DfT) says the plans to modernise UK airspace will deliver quicker, quieter flights and promote growth in the aviation sector.
However, campaign groups say that the changes could create more noise pollution for communities near airports, including areas that do not currently fall beneath existing flight paths.
Here is everything we know about the proposed 'skyways', including how they could impact holidaymakers and residents.
Why are flight paths being redrawn?
Britain's air corridors date back to a time when aircraft navigated the skies using ground-based beacons.
In the 1960s, Britain's air traffic grew from one million to 15 million passengers per year, meaning airports had to establish set arrival and departure routes. Many of these are still in place today, meaning flight routes designed for Comets are now being flown by Airbus A380s and Boeing 787s.
Some of the problems in UK airspace include a requirement for aircraft to ascend in steps after take-off, complex routing, and pilots having to delay descents to manage the workload of their air traffic control colleagues on the ground.
Announcing plans to overhaul the UK's air corridors, Mike Kane, the Aviation Minister, said: 'Redesigned 'skyways' will turbocharge growth in the aviation industry, not least by boosting airport expansion plans and supporting job creation, driving millions into the UK economy as part of the Plan for Change.
'Modernising our airspace is also one of the simplest ways to help reduce pollution from flying and will set the industry up for a long-term, sustainable future.'
What will this mean for holidaymakers?
If delivered as promised, a modernised airspace system will equate to fewer delays and quicker flight times.
It is also potentially good news for passengers with an eye on their carbon footprint. The DfT says that allowing aircraft to use modern navigation technologies will boost efficiency and reduce the need for pilots to enter holding patterns before getting permission to land on busy runways.
In September 2024, easyJet released a report on the ineffectiveness of the UK's airspace systems. The airline said that seven of its 10 least efficient routes occur inbound into London Gatwick, and that its UK operations had the 'greatest inefficiencies' of anywhere in Europe.
In total, easyJet predicts that airspace inefficiencies across Europe increased CO2 emissions by 663,710 tonnes per year.
Martin Rolfe, CEO of NATS (National Air Traffic Services), said: 'The UK's airspace network is one of the busiest and most complex in the world. We handle a quarter of Europe's traffic despite having only 11 per cent of its airspace, with one of the best safety and delay records anywhere. However, we have to modernise airspace if we are to maintain this level of performance as traffic grows towards 3 million flights per year.'
Could my local area be negatively impacted?
It is unknown how the new 'skyways' will be drawn. One possibility is that aircraft approaching airports could be channelled into new, relatively narrow highways in the sky. If this is the case, some communities near airports might see a greater number of planes flying overhead.
But groups close to the process say hard information is thin on the ground.
A spokesperson for Stop Heathrow Expansion told The Telegraph: 'The only documents we have seen recently relate to the outcome of the consultation on a UK airspace design service, which appear to be concerned with the way changes will be made, rather than the changes themselves.'
Sally Pavey, the chair of the campaign group Campaign Against Gatwick Noise Emissions (CAGNE), says: 'There is a real lack of transparency in this process. Residents currently overflown, and those not, are totally unaware of the motorways being designed above their homes that will purely benefit aviation as no compensation being offered with this process.'
'Residents must live in fear of what is being planned for above their heads and homes,' she added.
Paul Becker, Policy Director at Heathrow Noise Action Plan (HACAN) says: 'This announcement means even longer periods of uncertainty before overflown communities receive any clarity on what changes will take place to flight paths.
'The development of new flight paths will mean communities across London and the South East [will be] adversely impacted by aircraft noise for the first time. It is also possible that currently overflown communities experience an increase in the intensity of noise they endure as well as more frequent noise disturbances, particularly if expansion at Heathrow goes ahead.'
All airports taking part in the airspace change process are following a process which includes stakeholder input and public consultation, details of which are published on the Civil Aviation Authority's website.
When will the airspace redesign happen?
The latest announcement (made on June 2, 2025) confirms that the DfT will develop a UK Airspace Design Service (UKADS) alongside the CAA, to be managed by the UK's air traffic management service NATS. This is expected to be operational by the end of 2025.
It is understood that changes to London's airspace are unlikely to be complete until the 2030s, although new 'skyways' around airports outside of the capital could be in operation before the end of the decade.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
13 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Scotland's 'best city for graduates' crowned and it's not Glasgow or Edinburgh
It was singled out for its high salaries and low rent. Scotland's top cities for graduates in 2025 have been revealed. Two cities were named as part of a new UK-wide list - but it might not be the ones you were expecting. With approximately 17 million graduates in the UK this year, and many employers reducing hires, the job market is becoming increasingly competitive. As living costs continue to rise, it is very important to choose a good place to live after graduating from university. The Home Insurance team at Compare the Market have shared a roundup of the UK's top 10 cities for graduates in 2025. The experts considered a range of factors, such as average salaries, job availability, rent, utilities, and dining costs. Topping the list for Scotland as the best city for graduates in the country is Dundee. The Scottish city also placed at number two on the UK-wide list. Dundee is the fourth-largest city in Scotland, home to a population of approximately 148,000 people. The coastal city is situated along the north bank of the Firth of Tay in the east of the country. According to Compare the Market, graduates in Dundee earn an average of £28,000. Meanwhile, rent in the city was found to be £477 on average per month for a one-bedroom flat, which is "one of the lowest figures in the UK". The experts also discovered that the average monthly cost of utilities in Dundee is £104, while the average price of a meal out and a beer were found to be £15 and £4.20 respectively. Dundee also received a 'quality of life score' of 89 out of 100. The other Scottish city to appear on Compare the Market's list of the top destinations for graduates is Aberdeen. The city also placed at number six on the overall UK roundup. Aberdeen is the third most populous city in Scotland, with around 224,190 people calling it home. Also known as the 'Granite City' thanks to its high number of buildings constructed from granite, Aberdeen is a port city located in the northeast of the country. The experts found that, in Aberdeen, the average salary for graduates is £29,000. On the other hand, rent in the city is £564 for a one-bed flat and utilities cost £115 on average per month. In terms of other living costs, the average price of dinner out and a beer in Aberdeen are £16 and £4 respectively according to Compare the Market. The city also received a quality of life score of 85 out of 100. Meanwhile, topping the overall list as the best city in the UK for graduates in 2025 is Coventry. The English city was found to offer a strong combination of high salaries (£29,000), affordable rent (£756), and high quality of life (94 out of 100). Elsewhere, rounding out the top five cities in the UK for graduates according to Compare the Market are Bradford, Sheffield, and Derby. Other destinations featured on the list include Leicester, Luton, London, and Leeds. See below for the full list of the UK's top 10 cities for graduates in 2025. For more information, visit the Compare the Market website. UK's top 10 cities for graduates in 2025 Coventry, England Dundee, Scotland Bradford, England Sheffield, England Derby, England Aberdeen, Scotland Leicester, England Luton, England London, England Leeds, England


Fashion United
22 minutes ago
- Fashion United
FitFlop sponsors Haringey Girls Academy to 'empower' young women
UK-based brand FitFlop, known for its ergonomic and wellness footwear, has become the official sponsor of Haringey Girls Academy, an all-girls football academy based in North London, as it looks to inspire the 'next generation of young women'. Through the sponsorship, FitFlop aims to empower young women in football by supporting Haringey Girls Academy's programme, which builds self-confidence and encourages personal growth through elite training, leadership and development. Gianni Georgiades, chief executive at Fitflop, said in a statement: 'At FitFlop, we believe that movement has the power to inspire progress, confidence, and connection. 'Our partnership with Haringey Girls Academy is an exciting opportunity to help empower the next generation of young women, celebrating their individuality, encouraging active lifestyles, and supporting their ambitions on and off the pitch. Rooted in the local community, the initiative aims to nurture the future talent of Haringey Girls Academy, using football as a pathway to help players achieve their future dreams and ambitions. Adem Ali, club director at Haringey Girls Academy, added: 'We are thrilled to partner with FitFlop, a brand that shares our passion for empowering young women through sport. This sponsorship will provide valuable support to our players and allow us to continue investing in our programme for the next generation of Haringey Girls Academy athletes. 'Together we're not just shaping football players, we're nurturing future leaders and role models in the community.'


Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Supermarkets dragged into Gaza row as activists demand Israel boycott
The weekly shop is hardly a political act. Yet when customers went to their local supermarkets this weekend, some were confronted with campaigners urging them to consider the plight of Gaza while they filled their baskets. 'We're telling people to just look at where their food is coming from – because corporations are complicit in what is happening in the Middle East,' said Luca Salice, 68, who took part in a protest outside of Sainsbury's on Wilton Road, London Victoria last Saturday. 'We're trying to pressure companies to behave in a more ethical way, similar to what has happened on fossil fuels.' All across the country, activists took part in a 'day of action' targeting supermarkets and calling for a boycott of Israeli food. On Wilton Road, activists in Palestinian keffiyehs urged those walking into the supermarket to 'stop bombing Gaza'. 'What we're doing here is telling people, if you are concerned about what is happening to the Palestinians, there is something you can do,' said Salice as he taped a large Palestine Solidarity Campaign banner to the front of the supermarket. Nearby was a stall with pictures showing which brands to boycott. Palestine Solidarity Campaign, which organised 20 events in towns and cities over the weekend, said it wanted to raise awareness over the amount of Israeli food being sold in supermarkets and demand retailers boycott the country when sourcing supplies. Grocers must stop 'profiting from Israel's colonisation and military occupation of Palestinian land', the group said. It has put supermarkets in an uncomfortable position. While pro-Palestinian protesters target their stores, Jewish groups have demanded executives ignore demands to remove Israeli stock, arguing any boycott would be anti-Semitic. A survey carried out by Campaign Against Antisemitism suggested that more than four-fifths of British Jews believe that boycotts of Israeli businesses selling Israeli products constitutes intimidation. Supermarket chiefs have no good options. Stop stocking certain items and they risk being accused of anti-Semitism by Jewish customers. But ignoring the boycott calls risks making shops a target for protesters. In the past few weeks, campaigners have picketed local branches of Sainsbury's, Tesco, Waitrose and Morrisons. In some cases, activists have gone further, venturing into stores to strip shelves of avocados, hummus and dates from Israel. At Tesco's annual shareholder meeting last month, security was forced to escort out a group of campaigners with the Palestine Solidarity Campaign after they disrupted the event with chants of 'free Palestine'. Although campaigners have argued for a boycott of Israeli products for years, the topic has rocketed up the agenda following the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East over the last year. The pro-Palestinian BDS movement – which stands for boycott, divestment and sanctions – has been stepping up pressure across a range of sectors, with supermarkets a high-profile target. A decision by Co-op last month to remove Israeli produce has only increased scrutiny of the sector. It followed a vote by members to boycott Israeli goods. While the vote was non-binding, Co-op is owned by its members and management ultimately yielded to their will. Co-op claimed the move was part of a wider effort to 'stop sourcing relationships with countries where there are internationally recognised community-wide human rights abuses and violations of international law'. It included Russia alongside Israel on its list of countries it wouldn't deal with. While Co-op members may be happy, the move enraged supporters of Israel. Dame Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, called on the supermarket to apologise for equating Israel with Russia, while the Board of Deputies of British Jews said it was 'extremely disappointed' by the decision, which it said was 'based on factually inaccurate and questionable claims – a matter we have raised with the organisation'. Israeli products on supermarket shelves range from harissa paste and couscous to carrots or even Coca-Cola produced under licence there. The country has become an increasingly significant source of fresh produce following years where Britain's farmers have struggled to meet demand because of unseasonal weather. Israeli food imports to the UK rose by almost two thirds to £174m between 2018 and 2024. The majority were fruit and vegetables, which accounted for £140m worth of imports in 2024, up from £84m in 2018. Israel currently supplies everything from avocados to potatoes. While supermarkets could choose to source from other countries, the politicisation of the issue has paralysed many executives. 'If we were to make a decision on boycotting a certain country, the fear is that as many people would be upset by it as [those who] would be pleased by it,' says one senior grocery leader. A study cited by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign suggests 50pc of shoppers support supermarkets no longer stocking any goods produced in Israel. However, in that same study, 16pc opposed the idea and 20pc were neutral. 'The preference of any supermarket chain, if it was going to make decisions of that sort, would be to remain as low key and uncommunicative about it as possible,' says the grocery chief. For now, it is only Co-op that has formally and publicly boycotted Israel. Other supermarkets say they review their sourcing regularly and respect the rights of shoppers to not buy certain items. Adam Bass, the founder of Providence Deli, sources some of his range of sauces, dips and relishes from Israel and is stocked in Tesco. However, talks with another major supermarket have stalled, something he puts down to the Israeli link. Bass, who employs 127 Palestinian workers at his factory in Israel, regrets that the topic has become 'very black and white'. 'There are millions of people living in Israel who exist like everywhere [else], who don't have a stance and who want to get on with their lives,' he says. 'I've got no objection to people making choices, but they should be able to make those decisions both ways. Why should a retailer stop somebody from saying, 'I want to support Israel'? It's unfair on those people who actually do want to support Israel. It's assuming that nobody does.' Bass could simply scrub the name Israel from his products, but he believes this is a slippery slope. 'Legally, we don't have to say it's made in Israel,' he says. 'But my view is, why should we fear having that nation's name on our product?' Leaders of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign argue that supermarkets are already making political decisions by doing things like deciding to buy fair trade products or boycotting Russian goods. 'This shows that supermarkets have moral agency,' says Lewis Backon, of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. 'They can decide whether to do business with companies that are engaged in grave violations of international law.' In the middle of it all are customers. 'If people want to boycott it, then they can,' said Bernard, one of those visiting the Sainsbury's near Victoria during the protest on Saturday. 'It's up to the customer whether to buy it or not.' He said he already chooses not to buy Israeli produce. Daniel, another shopper, agrees it should be up to customers rather than dictated from above. 'Do I agree with boycotting the goods? Yeah.' But he adds: 'If you don't want to get involved, then fine. As long as you know what's going on, then it's free will.'