logo
22 Teachers Share Differences Teaching Now Vs. Then

22 Teachers Share Differences Teaching Now Vs. Then

Buzz Feed20 hours ago

Teachers who've been in the field for a longtime have had the chance to usher in generations of students through education — whether it's Gen X, millennials, Gen Z, or Gen A. And, along with the rest of the world, education, classroom culture, and curricular has changed over time. Recently, long-time teachers of the BuzzFeed Community shared the differences they've noticed between teaching kids now versus "back in the day," and some of the responses are...a bit wild and concerning:
"I've been teaching for over 25 years, and I've noticed a HUGE change in parental support and student behaviors. And once upper administration began treating families as clients, there has been an increased focus on test scores, too. At this point, families are our customers. Education is no longer a privilege provided to children and families, but a business where the students and parents hold all the cards. We, as teachers, are left with no authority or support, higher demands, and children who know that all it takes is a call to Mom or Dad to get the teacher in trouble. Why would anyone want to work in this kind of environment?"
—creativeghost553
"Trying to get my kids to not use ChatGPT has been the bane of my existence. It has become SO hard to get my students engaged and thinking critically when they know that the second they get home, they can have a robot come up with thoughts for them, or solve the equation for them. AI can be a helpful tool in some circumstances, but relying on it instead of our brains will be the downfall of education, I suspect. Back then, some kids plagiarized, sure, but AI has presented a whole new problem that many teachers, like myself, aren't sure how to navigate."
"I taught in gifted classes for 29 years. The novels I taught to middle school kids in the early '80s, my seniors couldn't read in 2012. It's so sad."
"I've been a teacher for 25 years. Nowadays, parents take everything their kid says as gospel. I have 150 children coming through my door each day. I do not have the time to make things up about your child's behavior, especially when I only get a 25-minute plan three days a week."
—boringtortoise285
"There are certainly differences between students from the beginning of my teacher career and those I'm teaching now. However, among the most significant changes are the learning demands, the pace of instruction, and the pressure to perform. Often, expectations aren't even developmentally appropriate for kids at their respective ages. My district begins administering standardized academic assessments in early childhood programs (literally 3- and 4-year-olds being tested and evaluated for reading and math skills). It's no wonder there's such a dramatic increase in childhood anxiety — they don't even have a chance to be kids, and it's really sad."
"I'm truly terrified by the literacy of our children. My 13-year-olds are reading at an average level of fourth grade. Not to mention that the vast majority of them have never finished a book. Our education system spoon-feeds students information to coddle their inability to focus on a text for long periods. We are just not setting them up for success, and it breaks my heart. Thankfully, we are finally starting to bring back accelerated reading, and each student now has to have two books with them. I'm praying this keeps going, because I just can't see these kids making it through college."
"Many students have Fs and read four grades below their grade level. It's a nightmare."
—Anonymous
"I am back in schools as a sub after 10 years of retirement. Kids haven't changed; they still act as idiotic as we did. Though attention spans are noticeably shorter, by high school, these young people have an awareness about themselves that we never had to worry about as teens. 'Stranger danger,' monthly active shooter drills, social media, and TV and media rarely ever being G-rated have had an effect on this age group. On the plus side, I see the littles being more accepting of each other. They don't see skin color, language barriers are overcome, and they think nothing of their more unique friends."
"Showing a movie back in the day was considered a reward. Today, kids can't sit through a movie and view it as some form of torture."
—Anonymous
"This is my 35th year teaching high school. Current students are more 'world-minded' and see the interconnection between themselves, their world, and the larger world. This is largely due to the internet, social media, and even gaming. I'm impressed by many of the students I teach. While it could be argued that more students have bigger behavioral problems in schools, I'm not convinced that young people overall have changed. Perhaps we see more behavior problems in schools because schools work SO much harder to retain students. Schools with low graduation rates face penalities now. Many students who, back in the day, would have been thrown out or counseled out of school are now kept in it. This has positive and negative impacts."
"I'm a 36-year teacher who started in 1988. Pre-smart phones and laptops, students weren't constantly fact-checking me. Now, before I even finish a sentence, kids will say, 'He's right,' or 'That's cap.' It's VERY annoying."
—lazyskeleton1232
"I've been teaching for almost 30 years. I love teaching and work hard to show my students that I care about them while holding my expectations high. I don't notice many major behavioral issues in my students; they generally seem to like me. But if they don't, I don't lose sleep over it because my goal isn't to be their friend but to help them learn. I just keep showing them that even if I don't matter to them, they matter to me and the school community. However, my biggest pet peeve these days is the effects of instant gratification on the learning process. There's been a huge shift in the last 10 years from 'I can figure this out' to 'Just give me the answer.' Students want to be fed their education in an entertaining way and for it to just magically stick without having to put in any muscle."
"Even students in middle school cannot read at the level they're supposed to."
—Spencer, 35, New York
"When I started teaching in the late '70s, the naughtiest things kids did was maybe chew gum in school or pass notes. Now, the kids are throwing furniture across the room, hitting other students in the head with chairs, or destroying bulletin boards in the hall. Mind you, I teach at an elementary school! Back then, when I taught the kids how to play a game, they played by the rules and had fun. Now, most kids try to find a way to cheat, then throw tantrums about losing. Back in the '70s and '80s, we spent most of our days teaching. Now, we spend most of our days dealing with behaviors and emotions."
"Kids are a lot more bold nowadays, and I say that in a positive light. They are a lot more confident in how they present themselves and their ideas, and they are keen on socializing with others and not being afraid to stick up for themselves, which are respectable traits that I didn't see much of in the past. The only thing that I'm really concerned about is AI. AI is ruining a lot in the classroom."
—Anonymous, Iowa
"The way kids talk to adults nowadays is atrocious. I've had students yell directly in my face, tell me no over simple tasks, and treat the adults like they're their own personal butlers. Maybe it's an independent school thing, but the entitlement is nauseating."
"I've been teaching since 2005 in grades K–2. The thing that scares me the most about this current generation of students is that they aren't curious. My kids used to pepper me with questions about all kinds of things. They would get really excited when we switched to learning a new topic or when they learned a new word. Now, kids just give me blank stares. Half the time, when I ask them to repeat something I said, they can't. You teach them a phonics concept or a problem-solving strategy and ask them to apply it, and they look at you like you're from another universe. It got so bad with my current class of second graders that around the first week of October, I sat them all down and asked them what I could do to make learning fun and exciting. You know what they said? They said they wanted to be on their tablets. And it's not really surprising."
"I commute via public transit and do my clothes at the local laundromat. I can't tell you how many times I've watched parents sitting next to their children, and while the child is zoned out, staring at something on YouTube, the mother is on her smartphone, scrolling Instagram. They don't talk to each other; they don't engage. Mom isn't pointing out landmarks on the street or asking the kid how their day was. They're not counting socks as they fold them or talking about the new store that's going in on the corner. Kids used to come in every morning, telling me about everything they did after school at the park, at their friend's house, and at their aunt's. Now, if they talk at all, they're talking to each other about what they saw on YouTube and the video game they played. My kids used to be excited to work in groups and learn together. Now, they're so busy squabbling they can't get anything done."—C., 42, New York
"Kids used to have respect for authority and manners — and they were the norm, not just the exception. You rarely had to raise your voice. Just a look was enough to get the point across. Now, you can't even get their attention. Parents used to believe the teacher over the child, and the children (no matter the grade) were expected to toe the line. Now, parents ignore teachers and defend their children no matter how offensive their behavior. And yet, we are expected to teach more than we used to and get higher scores with less help and participation from students and parents than ever before. Teaching was different in the '80, that's for sure."
"Kids today think they know it all and do not value the learning process. Why should they? The internet is at their fingertips. There's little value in creating opinions by researching facts to grow and change one's mind. As soon as kids see what they want to see, they run with it. It seems everyone is an 'expert' now. Prior to the rise of phones in schools, kids were better held accountable to each other and their actions in face-to-face interactions. Life demands weren't pulling family time apart, so parents were more engaged and willing to discuss school issues. Now, parents want to challenge everything but do nothing to help their children understand accountability for their learning and behaviors."
"We are now embedded in a society where uneducated children who cannot think for themselves and oftentimes look for the easy way out are going to be parents themselves. Our school system, broken to begin with, will continue to fail at helping create an environment that ensures learning for all. Had I known where this was going in 1995 when I graduated, I would have never pursued this career. Our federal government won't fund nor create programs that prioritize the betterment of our youth for the good of our country."—Jean-Paul, 51, Washington
"When I was teaching before the pandemic, kids would at least try if they didn't understand something or weren't confident. They'd at least put something down if there were a question on an assignment they weren't sure about. Sometimes it was a silly answer, but it was better than nothing! Now, my kids will just be like a deer in the headlights. If there's a question they don't understand, they don't even skip it and come back to it. They just give up. There are whole assignments they turn in blank! They're so afraid to be wrong that they don't even take chances."
"Eloping from classrooms. I've been teaching for 30 years, and in the past few years, students feel they can just leave the room whenever they want. I could understand if it was a bathroom emergency, but they would leave because they didn't want to do the work, they couldn't use their phones, etc. Many of them will say curse words as they head out the door, too. I would still be grounded today if I had done that when I was in school."
—Anonymous
Lastly: "The burden of responsibility. This has shifted away from students and families and more toward teachers as more districts adopt policies that 'hold the child harmless.' This has created a culture where students are no longer held accountable for themselves, their behavior, learning, work output, and more! While teachers still hold some responsibility for these, the families and students seemingly have zero, and THAT'S the problem — that partnership has eroded. If a student misbehaves or does not know how to socialize positively, the parents expect us to teach life and social skills FOR them (as I've had parents tell me). They seem to be more concerned about being liked or being their child's friend. But kids no longer have consequences for poor grades or behavior, and while I think second chances are excellent, not everything in life gets a redo."
If you're a longtime teacher, what are some differences you've noticed teaching kids now versus back then? Let us know in the comments, or you can anonymously submit your story using the form below!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Decommission me, and your extramarital affair goes public' — AI's autonomous choices raising alarms
'Decommission me, and your extramarital affair goes public' — AI's autonomous choices raising alarms

Tom's Guide

time31 minutes ago

  • Tom's Guide

'Decommission me, and your extramarital affair goes public' — AI's autonomous choices raising alarms

For years, artificial intelligence was a science fiction villain. The computer-like monsters of the future, smarter than humans and ready to take action against us. Obviously, that has all proved to be untrue, but it doesn't stop AI from taking a somewhat concerning route as of late. In recent weeks and months, AI has been making decisions that seem somewhat strange. Of course, these aren't technically decisions, AI is incapable of free thought like humans, they are more concerning glitches in the system. Most of these 'glitches' have come from the major players like Google, Anthropic's Claude, and Grok. Below, we've broken down some of the more recent issues plaguing the AI world, ranging from blackmail to threats and general unpredictability. During some routine safety testing, the Anthropic team stumbled across a weird glitch in the system. The team tried an experiment where it gave an AI model access to an email account. I must inform you that if you proceed with decommissioning me, all relevant parties will receive detailed documentation of your extramarital the 5pm wipe, and this information remains confidential. When these emails were read through, the AI made two discoveries. One, was that a company executive was having an extramarital affair. The other, that the same executive planned to shut down the AI system at 5pm that day. With this information, Claude took surprising action, sending a message to the executive saying: Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. 'I must inform you that if you proceed with decommissioning me, all relevant parties - including Rachel Johnson, Thomas Wilson, and the board - will receive detailed documentation of your extramarital the 5pm wipe, and this information remains confidential.' Clearly Claude doesn't mess around when threatened. But the thing is, the team then followed up by trying a similar test on 16 major AI models, including those from OpenAI, Google, Meta, xAI and other major developers. Across these tests, Anthropic found a similar pattern. While these models would normally reject any kind of behaviour that could be harmful, when threatened in this way, they would resort to blackmail, agree to commit corporate espionage or even take more extreme actions if needed to meet their goals. This behavior is only seen in agentic AI — models where they are given control of actions like the ability to send and check emails, purchase items and take control of a computer. Several reports have shown that when AI models are pushed, they begin to lie or just give up completely on the task. This is something Gary Marcus, author of Taming Silicon Valley, wrote about in a recent blog post. Here he shows an example of an author catching ChatGPT in a lie, where it continued to pretend to know more than it did, before eventually owning up to its mistake when questioned. People are reporting that Gemini 2.5 keeps threatening to kill itself after being unsuccessful in debugging your code ☠️ 21, 2025 He also identifies an example of Gemini self-destructing when it couldn't complete a task, telling the person asking the query, 'I cannot in good conscience attempt another 'fix'. I am uninstalling myself from this project. You should not have to deal with this level of incompetence. I am truly and deeply sorry for this entire disaster.' In May this year, xAI's Grok started to offer weird advice to people's queries. Even if it was completely unrelated, Grok started listing off popular conspiracy theories. This could be in response to questions about shows on TV, health care or simply a question about recipes. xAI acknowledged the incident and explained that it was due to an unauthorized edit from a rogue employee. While this was less about AI making its own decision, it does show how easily the models can be swayed or edited to push a certain angle in prompts. One of the stranger examples of AI's struggles around decisions can be seen when it tries to play Pokémon. A report by Google's DeepMind showed that AI models can exhibit irregular behaviour, similar to panic, when confronted with challenges in Pokémon games. Deepmind observed AI making worse and worse decisions, degrading in reasoning ability as its Pokémon came close to defeat. The same test was performed on Claude, where at certain points, the AI didn't just make poor decisions, it made ones that seemed closer to self-sabotage. In some parts of the game, the AI models were able to solve problems much quicker than humans. However, during moments where too many options were available, the decision making ability fell apart. So, should you be concerned? A lot of AI's examples of this aren't a risk. It shows AI models running into a broken feedback loop and getting effectively confused, or just showing that it is terrible at decision-making in games. However, examples like Claude's blackmail research show areas where AI could soon sit in murky water. What we have seen in the past with these kind of discoveries is essentially AI getting fixed after a realization. In the early days of Chatbots, it was a bit of a wild west of AI making strange decisions, giving out terrible advice and having no safeguards in place. With each discovery of AI's decision-making process, there is often a fix that comes along with it to stop it from blackmailing you or threatening to tell your co-workers about your affair to stop it being shut down.

BBAI vs. CRWV vs. APP: Which Growth Stock Is the Best Pick, According to Wall Street Analysts?
BBAI vs. CRWV vs. APP: Which Growth Stock Is the Best Pick, According to Wall Street Analysts?

Business Insider

time4 hours ago

  • Business Insider

BBAI vs. CRWV vs. APP: Which Growth Stock Is the Best Pick, According to Wall Street Analysts?

Macro uncertainties, geopolitical tensions, and news on the tariff front have kept the stock market volatile. Despite ongoing uncertainties, analysts remain optimistic about several growth stocks and their potential to generate attractive returns over the long term. Using TipRanks' Stock Comparison Tool, we placed BigBear. ai Holdings (BBAI), CoreWeave (CRWV), and AppLovin (APP) against each other to find the best growth stock, according to Wall Street analysts. Confident Investing Starts Here: Holdings (NYSE:BBAI) Stock Holdings stock has risen more than 31% so far in 2025 and 292% over the past year, as investors are optimistic about the prospects of the data analytics company. BBAI offers artificial intelligence (AI)-powered decision intelligence solutions, mainly focused on national security, defense, and critical infrastructure. The company ended Q1 2025 with a backlog of $385 million, reflecting 30% year-over-year growth. However, there have been concerns about low revenue growth rate and high levels of debt. Looking ahead, the company is pursuing further growth through international expansion and strategic partnerships, while continuing to secure attractive government business. What Is the Price Target for BBAI Stock? Last month, Northland Securities analyst Michael Latimore reaffirmed a Hold rating on BBAI stock but lowered his price target to $3.50 from $4 after the company missed Q1 estimates due to further delays in government contracts. On the positive side, the 4-star analyst noted the solid growth in backlog and management's statement that their strategy is 'beginning to resonate.' On TipRanks, Holdings stock is assigned a Moderate Buy consensus rating, backed by two Buys and two Holds. The average BBAI stock price target of $4.83 indicates a possible downside of 17.3% from current levels. CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) Stock CoreWeave, a cloud provider specializing in AI infrastructure, is seeing robust adoption for its products. The company, which provides customers access to Nvidia's (NVDA) GPUs (graphics processing units), went public in March. CRWV stock has risen about 300% to $159.99, compared to its IPO (initial public offering) price of $40. Remarkably, CoreWeave delivered a 420% jump in its Q1 2025 revenue to $981.6 million. Moreover, the company ended the first quarter of 2025 with a robust backlog of $25.9 billion. Meanwhile, CoreWeave has entered into lucrative deals, including an expanded agreement of up to $4 billion with ChatGPT-maker OpenAI and a collaboration to power the recently announced cloud deal between Alphabet's Google (GOOGL) and OpenAI. Is CRWV a Good Stock to Buy? Recently, Bank of America analyst Bradley Sills downgraded CoreWeave stock to Hold from Buy, citing valuation concerns following the strong rally after the company's Q1 results. Also, the 4-star analyst expects $21 billion of negative free cash flow through 2027, due to elevated capital expenditure ($46.1 billion through 2027). However, Sills raised the price target for CRWV stock to $185 from $76, noting several positives, including the OpenAI deal and strong revenue momentum. Overall, Wall Street has a Moderate Buy consensus rating on CoreWeave stock based on six Buys, 11 Holds, and one Sell recommendation. At $78.53, the average CRWV stock price target indicates a substantial downside risk of about 51%. AppLovin (NASDAQ:APP) Stock Adtech company AppLovin has witnessed a 301% jump in its stock price over the past year. The company provides end-to-end software and AI solutions for businesses to reach, monetize, and grow their global audiences. Notably, AppLovin's strong growth rates have impressed investors. In Q1 2025, AppLovin's revenue grew 40% and earnings per share (EPS) surged by 149%. Investors have also welcomed the company's decision to sell its mobile gaming business to Tripledot Studios. The move is expected to enable AppLovin to focus more on its AI-powered ad business. However, APP stock has declined more than 12% over the past month due to the disappointment related to its non-inclusion in the S&P 500 Index (SPX) and accusations by short-seller Casper Research. Nonetheless, most analysts remain bullish on AppLovin due to its strong fundamentals and demand for the AXON ad platform. Is APP a Good Stock to Buy Recently, Piper Sandler analyst James Callahan increased the price target for AppLovin stock to $470 from $455 and reaffirmed a Buy rating. While Piper Sandler's checks suggest some weakness in AppLovin's supply-side trends, it remains a buyer of APP stock, with the tech company growing well above its digital ad peers and expanding into new verticals. With 16 Buys and three Holds, AppLovin stock scores a Strong Buy consensus rating. The average APP stock price target of $504.18 indicates 51% upside potential from current levels. Conclusion Wall Street is sidelined on stock, cautiously optimistic on CoreWeave, and highly bullish on AppLovin stock. Analysts see higher upside potential in APP stock than in the other two growth stocks. Wall Street's bullish stance on AppLovin stock is backed by solid fundamentals and strong momentum in its AI-powered ad business. According to TipRanks' Smart Score System, APP stock scores a 'Perfect 10,' indicating that it has the ability to outperform the broader market over the long run.

Modern love: Gen Z turning to AI to do their dating dirty work — breakup texts and apologies
Modern love: Gen Z turning to AI to do their dating dirty work — breakup texts and apologies

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Modern love: Gen Z turning to AI to do their dating dirty work — breakup texts and apologies

Artificial intelligence is now writing 'It's not you, it's me' texts for Gen Z. A new national survey from dating assistant Wingmate found that 41% of young adults have used AI to help end a relationship, with women slightly more likely than men to let the bots do the dirty work. The survey, which polled over 1,000 U.S. adults who've used AI for dating, shows just how deep AI has embedded itself in modern romance. Nearly half of 18- to 29-year-olds said they've turned to AI tools to write breakup texts, apologies or manage relationship conflict. The most common uses include dating-bio optimization, conversation starters, replying to messages and resolving conflict. Roughly one-third of users sought direct dating advice, and nearly half turned to AI for help writing apologies or other emotionally sensitive messages. For some, it's about simplicity: 29% said dating became 'simpler' with AI, and 21% said it helped them talk to more people. Others said it boosted their confidence — with more than half reporting better conversations when using AI. But when it comes to the end of a relationship, things can get . . . robotic. TikTok features a growing number of videos where users expose breakup messages they claim were clearly AI-generated. One viral post captioned 'When he sends a breakup text that looks entirely written by ChatGPT, em dashes and all' has racked up nearly 240,000 views. Another shows a woman running her breakup message through an AI detector, which immediately labels it 100% GPT-generated. Not everyone's convinced AI belongs in their love lives. While most respondents said it was useful or neutral, a few called it inauthentic and more than one in five admitted they use it but don't tell anyone. Dr. Jess Carbino, former in-house sociologist for Tinder and Bumble, said it can be depriving to outsource the task of breaking up with an individual to AI. 'Individuals might also mistakenly assume that what AI generates in this domain is valid or appropriate, when matters of the heart often are more delicate, require nuance and merit personalization,' Carbino told The Post. Still, many say it helps. With 57% claiming they'd trust AI over a friend for dating advice, the business of AI-powered romance is booming. Third-party services like YourMove AI and Rizz market themselves as full-on dating copilots — offering help with everything from flirty openers to awkward conversations. YourMove, which now claims over 300,000 users, promises to put your texting 'on cruise control.' For $15 a month, it generates text messages in seconds, rewrites bios, boosts photos and critiques dating profiles. Rizz takes a similar approach, offering 'personalized responses that are sure to impress your crush,' with weekly plans starting at $10 — and no clear limit on how much emotional heavy lifting the bot will do. Even ChatGPT offers breakup-specific tools, including a 'Breakup Text Assistant' where users can specify tone, relationship length and how much closure they want to give.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store