New director for Guernsey's airport appointed
Guernsey Ports said the new role would partly replace the chief operating officer position and will be filled by Richard Thomasson.
Mr Thomasson said he wanted to focus on putting the "customer experience at the heart-beat of our strategy".
Ross Coppolo, managing director of the airport, said Mr Thomasson's "experience, knowledge and enthusiasm will be an asset".
Mr Thomasson has held senior airport roles for the last 18 years including at Cornwall Airport Newquay and Bristol Airport.
Mr Coppolo said: "This is a crucial role in which Richard will oversee day-to-day airport operations, uphold regulatory compliance and help to guide our long-term strategy, supporting our aims to grow connectivity and diversify the business."
Mr Thomasson said: "It was clear through the interview process that my vast previous aviation experience would be a great fit for this role.
"I cannot wait to get started working in partnership with the ports team and wider business partners."
More news stories for Guernsey
Listen to the latest news for Guernsey
Follow BBC Guernsey on X and Facebook and Instagram. Send your story ideas to channel.islands@bbc.co.uk.
Guernsey Ports
Port Soif car park closes for airport lights work
Airport website 'more inclusive' after upgrade
Airport spent £330k on overtime last year
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Alaska Airlines Grounded, Showing Fragility Of Flight Infrastructure
Alaska Airlines grounded its jets during a sudden systemwide halt in operations, highlighting ... More growing concerns over aviation cybersecurity and digital infrastructure resilience. Late Sunday, Alaska Airlines grounded all of its mainline aircraft due to what it described as a 'technology issue.' Operations halted at approximately 8 p.m. Pacific Time and resumed just before 11 p.m., but delays rippled into Monday morning, a peak travel period across U.S. airports. Horizon Air, Alaska Airlines' regional partner, was also affected. The timing, the scale and the abruptness of the incident set off alarm bells in the aviation and cybersecurity communities. Although the airline has since confirmed that the outage was not caused by a cyberattack, the incident still raised urgent questions about resilience in the face of digital disruption. The FBI issued a chilling warning in June that America's airlines are under active cyber threat. That warning now appears increasingly justified. The Alaska Airlines outage, while now confirmed as unrelated to malicious activity, initially bore the hallmarks of the kind of disruption federal agencies have been cautioning against. The Alaska Airlines technical problem was not an isolated glitch in airline, aviation and airport systems. It was the latest and most visible example of the growing digital fragility that now defines modern infrastructure. It may also be the clearest signal yet that the airline industry must be treated as critical infrastructure, not just in policy but in cybersecurity investment, threat modeling and coordinated response planning. The Cracks Are Widening This is not the first time Alaska Airlines has faced operational turbulence linked to technology. In April, a weight and balance software failure led to a full fleet grounding. In January 2024, a door plug detached mid-flight, exposing deep flaws in inspection protocols. And in August 2024, a major cyber incident at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Alaska's primary hub, triggered a temporary airport shutdown. Flights were delayed, baggage systems failed and communication networks were severely disrupted. The breach was later attributed to a foreign adversary targeting airport infrastructure, and although no lives were lost, the impact on travel, commerce and public confidence was significant. These incidents may differ in origin, but they reveal an industry with the same underlying vulnerability, and increasingly dependent on digital systems with limited resilience and redundancy. Airlines today are digital-first operations. Every flight dispatch, crew assignment, maintenance record and gate assignment depends on software. When that software fails or is compromised, the damage is not measured in lost productivity alone. It affects lives, safety and the stability of national infrastructure. Salt Typhoon And The Expanding Cyber Battlefield While Alaska Airlines has now confirmed that this particular disruption was not caused by a cyberattack, many in the cybersecurity community continue to watch closely. One name that had surfaced early in speculation was Salt Typhoon. Salt Typhoon is a Chinese state-sponsored threat actor linked to the Ministry of State Security. It has built a reputation for targeting telecom networks, government systems, and infrastructure operators across the United States and allied nations. In 2024, the group successfully infiltrated nine major American telecom providers, gaining access to surveillance routers, administrative credentials and internal metadata flows. Even more alarming was Salt Typhoon's breach of a U.S. Army National Guard unit. That intrusion began in March 2024 and remained undetected until December. The attackers quietly exfiltrated sensitive configuration files, administrator credentials, internal network diagrams and personnel rosters. According to federal briefings, the attackers had access to virtual private network appliances and domain controllers. That level of penetration enabled not just espionage, but the potential for real-world disruption of military readiness. The Department of Homeland Security responded with a chilling warning: all U.S. military units must now operate under the assumption that their networks are compromised. This is not theoretical. It is a national security posture shift. Salt Typhoon's specialty lies in stealth and persistence. Its tools are designed for long-term access, manipulation of edge infrastructure, and preparation for future sabotage. They do not need to launch a full-scale attack immediately. They simply need a foothold. And they are increasingly gaining those footholds in the same types of routers, VPNs and network layers that civilian airlines rely on every day. The fact that Salt Typhoon has demonstrated the ability to compromise military networks for nearly a year without detection should raise serious questions about the aviation sector's preparedness. Because in today's threat landscape, the line between military and civilian infrastructure is thinner than ever. Airlines Critical Infrastructure Soft Targets The Alaska Airlines incident was confirmed not to be a cyberattack, but the conditions remain absolutely ripe for one. Commercial aviation checks every box for high-value critical infrastructure and yet remains one of the most exposed Alaska Airlines incident may not ultimately be confirmed as a cyberattack. But the conditions are absolutely ripe for one. Commercial aviation checks every box for high-value critical infrastructure and yet remains one of the most exposed sectors. To make matters worse, support from the federal government is diminishing. Recent cuts at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency have left fewer resources to assist or intervene. That pushes more responsibility onto private carriers without the tools or funding to keep pace. Airlines are essential. They are everywhere. And they are underprepared. Unless aviation is treated like the critical infrastructure it is, the next outage may not be a warning. It may be a wake-up call too late. Responsibility Is Shifting To Private Sector As federal cybersecurity resources tighten, the private sector must step forward. Airlines, airports, maintenance providers and travel technology companies must now act as if they are on the front lines of national defense. Because they are. We are entering a new era where IT outages can serve as camouflage for cyberattacks. Where a grounded fleet may be the canary in the coal mine. And where securing our skies will require more than airport screenings and reinforced cockpit doors. This situation is not unprecedented. The defense industrial base has already faced similar vulnerabilities. In response, the Department of Defense created the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, to establish a scalable and certifiable framework for cybersecurity across contractors. Airlines would benefit from adopting a similar model. CMMC principles offer a structured path forward: Cybersecurity in aviation can no longer be viewed as optional. A single weak link in the chain is all it takes to compromise a fleet. The only path forward is a unified industry-wide commitment to resilience, accountability and protection. A Wake-Up Call At Thirty Thousand Feet The Alaska Airlines outage is not just another IT incident. It is a warning. A fragile digital backbone. A growing global threat. A clear sign of unpreparedness across one of the nation's most essential industries. It is time to formally designate airlines as critical infrastructure. It is time to implement cybersecurity frameworks like CMMC across the aviation ecosystem. And it is time to invest in the tools, talent and systems required to protect not just networks but lives.
Business Upturn
3 hours ago
- Business Upturn
JA Mining Launches Enhanced Cloud Miners Platform for Daily Earnings on XRP and BTC
London, United Kingdom, July 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — JA Mining, a UK-registered cloud mining platform, has officially launched a new feature enabling users to earn daily returns through cloud miners based on major cryptocurrencies like XRP and Bitcoin. The upgrade reflects the company's commitment to making digital asset participation simple, efficient, and globally accessible. With momentum shifting toward structured digital asset investments, platforms offering daily returns and price-based upside are gaining attention. Among them, JA Mining, a global cloud mining service provider, is emerging as a preferred choice for investors seeking stable, low-risk crypto income. JA Mining supports investments in major cryptocurrencies such as XRP, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin, while all contracts are denominated in USD for transparency and predictability. Users earn fixed daily returns based on the selected contract terms, and at the end of the term, they may benefit additionally if the value of their deposited assets appreciates. Mining Contract Examples (Updated July 2025) LTC Classic Miner – $200 | 2 Days | $7/day → Total: $14 DOGE Innovative Miner – $2,420 | 3 Days | $86.88/day → Total: $260.63 DOGE Quality Choice – $12,500 | 3 Days | $535/day → Total: $1,605 BTC Intelligent Innovation – $55,600 | 2 Days | $4,770/day → Total: $9,540.96 BTC Efficient & Excellent – $258,000 | 5 Days | $24,664.80/day → Total: $123,324 For more plans, please visit the official website: These earnings are automatically distributed on a daily basis via smart contract settlements. The system does not require hardware or technical skills from the user, making cloud mining with daily earnings accessible to a broader investor base. JA Mining has positioned itself at the intersection of compliance, automation, and accessibility. The platform operates internationally, integrating energy-efficient mining infrastructure and user-friendly dashboards that enable real-time earnings tracking. Investments can be made through web or mobile interfaces using XRP or other supported cryptocurrencies. 'JA Mining's model of combining fixed returns with potential asset appreciation aligns with the market's growing preference for balanced and structured crypto exposure,' the company stated in an official release. 'As institutional and retail interest in XRP and other digital assets grows, demand for simplified and transparent yield models will continue to rise.' JA Mining's approach reflects a broader industry shift: away from high-volatility speculation, and toward regulated, algorithmic income strategies that prioritize user stability. Start now, no need to wait: click to download the APP and register to get $100 to start 0 cost mining Media Contact: JA Mining [email protected] Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Who Builds Boeing's Jet Engines, And Are They The Same As Airbus Uses?
American aerospace giant Boeing has taken a bit of tarnish of late. A pair of deadly crashes and other lesser malfunctions have sullied the reputations of the latest iterations of the brand's 737 Max aircraft, but those concerns don't extend to the jets' powerful engines. Boeing is responsible for building the 737's iconic flat-bottomed nacelles, or casings, which house the engines. However, the turbofan powerplants themselves are farmed out to various global manufacturers. The world's largest producer of jet engines, including for Boeing, is a joint venture called CFM. The two entities behind CFM are General Electric and the French manufacturer Safran. As part of its 39% global market share, CFM's fuel-efficient Leading Edge Aviation Propulsion (LEAP) engines power every one of Boeing's 737 Max aircraft. Coincidentally, engines from this brand can also be found on some Airbus A320 jets, a competitor to the 737 that's assembled largely in Europe. Of course, Boeing doesn't just build the 737. Other commercial Boeing jets include the venerable widebody 777 and the high-tech 787 Dreamliner, both of which are staples of long-haul or high-capacity routes, such as between the United States and Europe. And the engines there are made by others. Read more: Nobody Does Land Yachts Like Cadillac, And These Are Five Of The Best Ones Rolls-Royce Doesn't Only Build Cars Before Rolls-Royce started selling bougie land yachts, it was known for its airplane engines. For example, its Merlin engine was a force to be reckoned with in fighter planes during World War II. Over 120 years since its inception, Rolls-Royce is still in the aeronautical sector with a 12% market share. In particular, its products can be found in many long-haul widebody jets. Rolls' Trent 1000 powers some Boeing 787 Dreamliner jets, and Rolls says the plane is 25% more fuel-efficient than its predecessor, the Boeing 767. Rolls-Royce engines also propel some examples of the widebody Boeing 777, the fuel-guzzling double-decker 747, and what remains of the largest single-aisle jet ever, the Boeing 757. Like CFM, Rolls-Royce prefers to diversity its clientele and happily accepts engine purchases from Airbus, too — for example, the Airbus A330 and A350 long-haul jets. Next up is General Electric, which also has a fairly small — about 14% — share of worldwide jet engine manufacturing. That's understandable, since most of its involvement in aerospace is via the CFM joint venture with Safran. Alone, GE turbofan engines appear on both Boeing and Airbus products in small quantities. Especially the Boeing double-aisle widebodies. An American Company Hit Big With EU's Airbus (But Sells To Boeing, Too) Finally, we come to Pratt & Whitney, a veritable institution in American aviation since 1917. When it's not building engines for fighter jets or cruise missiles, P&W captures about 35% of the market for commercial jet engines. That includes a presence at some level in nearly all Boeing products, excepting newer models like the 737 Max and 787 Dreamliner. P&W sells to Airbus, too. Notably, its engines are the only ones used in the new-ish A220 narrow-body jet, a feather in the company's cap to be sure. So there you have it. Boeing uses four sources to procure jet engines for its planes: CFM, General Electric, Pratt & Whitney, and Rolls-Royce. And not a single one of those companies has a problem crossing the aisle to sell to rival manufacturer Airbus. Clearly, some passengers prefer one aircraft brand or another — for example, avoiding airlines with the largest Boeing fleets following an awful 2024 for the brand. However, under the engine nacelles, there's little difference to be had between the two aircraft giants. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
