Upanishadic neti neti and hegelian dialectic
Upanishadic neti, neti, not this, not that, and Hegel's dialectic, while distinct, share a common thread: the use of negation and movement to arrive at a deeper understanding of reality. Though Hegel's dialectic focuses on developing concepts through thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, neti, neti is a process that enables an inquirer to arrive at the ineffable nature of Brahmn, Ultimate Reality.
Hegel's dialectic is a method of philosophical inquiry positing that reality progresses through a dynamic interplay of opposing forces: a thesis, a proposition or idea; its antithesis, a counterproposition; synthesis, a new proposition that reconciles the two. Brihadaranyaka Upanishad employs neti, neti to describe the nature of Brahmn, the ultimate reality. While there are dissimilarities between Hegelian dialectic and Upanishadic neti, neti , both systems are unanimous on one count: rejection of absolutist ideas.
Nothing can be called the ultimate truth because even the socalled truth is never the universal truth – neti, neti. What perpetually eludes us is the Ultimate Truth. According to Nyaya Shastra, there are only subjective truths and relative realities.
Spiritual quest must never stop. It should go on and on. 'Tujhe paa lene mein woh betaab kaifiyat kahan/Zindagi woh hai jo teri justajoo mein kat gayee.' In other words, it's always better to travel than to arrive. Hegel believed that to negate is a man's intellectual fate. Both Hegel and Upanishads must be understood and appreciated in today's context of obstinacy, to use Foucault's phrase, when every religion insists that it's the only chosen path and every belief system calls itself the best and flawless.
Both Hegel and Upanishads believe in transcendence of ideas and existing truths. Marcel Proust believed there was no end to spiralling ascendancy of quality. It's like perfection. You can only strive for it, but you can never become perfect. One, therefore, needs to keep improving and evolving till the last breath. To be an absolutist is to close all doors to Truth. Religions and their moral codes are periodic and relative truths. So, when we insist that what we know is the absolute truth, it blocks further inquiry and exploration into the nature of reality and different ways people experience Ultimate Reality.
As veils lift, more profound mysteries, echoing ongoing nature of spiritual and intellectual exploration, are revealed to those who continue to inquire. As we peel away layers of ignorance or illusion, we will find that journey of understanding and knowledge is an ongoing process. Hegelian dialectics and Upanishadic wisdom emphasise that true understanding is not a destination but a continuous journey. Once we understand Hegelian dialectic and imbibe the spirit of Upanishads , we can expand the scope of our knowledge and understanding. It'll also mellow us, inculcate universal empathy and enhance our ability to engage in dialogue. For some, it may facilitate satori.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
09-07-2025
- Time of India
The Always-Free Self: A Vedantic Reflection
The Illusion of Bondage Have you ever felt stuck in life, as if trapped by circumstances or your own limitations? Vedanta , the ancient philosophy of the Upanishads, offers a startling perspective: our innermost essence is never truly bound. Vedantic sages teach that the soul (Atman), our true Self, is ever free and pure. The feeling of bondage is attributed not to our real nature, but to an illusion born of ignorance, called Maya. Maya is the cosmic illusion that makes the one reality appear as many, causing the eternal Self to seem confined to a body and mind. Think of a mirror. If the face in the mirror looks upset, you know the real you standing in front of it is not actually upset. A mirror's image cannot affect the person it reflects. Yet we often let the events in life's mirror define us. We forget that our true Self remains untouched, just as the real person remains separate from their reflection. Another analogy is a magnet and iron filings. A magnet can make nearby iron filings dance and move, without ever moving itself. In the same way, our Atman remains steady and unmoving while the material world (including our bodies and thoughts) moves and changes according to natural laws. We mistakenly identify with those movements — thinking 'I am hurt' or 'I am trapped.' In reality, the core of our being stays untouched and whole, like the magnet never bound by the motions of the iron filings. Understanding the True Self Vedanta famously declares: 'Brahman is real; the world is mithya (an appearance).' Brahman is infinite, unchanging consciousness – the absolute reality. Our Atman (soul) is one with Brahman. The world we perceive has only a relative reality (mithya). It exists for practical purposes, but not as an independent or permanent truth. It's transient, like a dream or a movie: it feels real while it lasts, but it doesn't affect the underlying reality. As a movie's fire doesn't burn the screen, the dramas of life do not scorch the Atman. Even our everyday experience hints at this truth. For example, in deep, dreamless sleep we have no problems or thoughts – only a peaceful nothingness. Yet when we wake, we say 'I slept peacefully,' implying that some part of us was present to appreciate that peace. Vedanta points out that our core awareness persists even when mind and world are absent. The same awareness quietly underlies our waking and dream states, witnessing all the changes. That silent witness is our real identity. One who fully realizes 'I am that awareness, not the body or mind' is known as a jivanmukta – liberated while alive. Such a person still goes about daily life, but with an inner lightness and detachment. Knowing the world is a transient play of forms, they remain calm and compassionate through life's ups and downs. From Ignorance to Insight If our Self is always free, why don't we feel it? Vedanta answers that we are under the spell of ignorance (avidya). We habitually identify with the body, mind, and social roles, forgetting our spiritual essence. This mistaken identity is deep-rooted, but it can be corrected through right understanding and self-awareness . Vedanta suggests two complementary approaches for this inner journey. First, we use jnana (knowledge through inquiry) to question our assumptions and remind ourselves of the truth. Simply asking, 'Who am I really? Am I just this changing body-mind, or the unchanging observer of all experiences?' can crack the illusion. Second, we engage in meditation and devotional practices that calm and purify the mind. With a clear understanding and a quiet mind, the clouds of ignorance start to part. The light of the true Self, which was always present, shines through like the sun emerging from behind clouds. Living Free in the World Realizing that we were never truly bound doesn't mean we withdraw from life – it means we engage with life from a new perspective. A person who knows their spiritual reality lives with a sense of lightness and play. They perform their work and face challenges but inwardly they remain untouched by fear or anxiety, knowing nothing in the world can diminish the wholeness of the Self. Even short of full realization, reflecting on this perspective can bring relief. We start to see ourselves and others not as mere bodies or titles, but as expressions of one consciousness. This shift naturally fosters compassion, patience, and fearlessness. Ultimately, Vedanta offers a liberating truth: the freedom we seek outside is already within us. We can live in the world fully without being entangled by it – playing our roles joyfully while resting in the inner peace of our true Self. Authors: Shambo Samrat Samajdar and Shashank R Joshi
Economic Times
18-06-2025
- Economic Times
Knowing to being
Lao Tzu said, 'He who knows others is wise; he who knows himself is enlightened.' True spiritual growth does not come from gathering information but from deepening self-awareness. Vedas and Upanishads also urge us to move beyond intellectual understanding toward direct, inner experience. They do not ask for blind acceptance but encourage us to question, explore and realise the truth for ourselves. The Brihadaranyak Upanishad affirms, 'Atma va are drastavyah srotavyo mantavyo nididhyasitavyah' - the Self must be seen, heard, reflected upon and meditated upon. This layered approach guides us from outer knowledge to inner realisation. Philosophers and sages have shared their wisdom through their own first-person experiences. Ramana Maharshi echoed this approach through self-inquiry, gently asking, 'Who am I?' In this context, meditation is not merely silence or stillness but a mirror that helps us see ourselves. The Bhagwad Gita reminds us, 'One must elevate oneself by one's mind, for the mind can be the friend or the enemy of the self.' This inner journey is ours to undertake. No one else can do it for us. Questions arise not from doubt but from insight. What once felt like borrowed knowledge transforms into personal wisdom. At the core of this transformation lies a simple yet profound truth: consciousness is a fundamental source where all wisdom already exists. Through sincere reflection and contemplation, this awareness reveals what has been within.
Time of India
17-06-2025
- Time of India
Miracles Are Beyond Causality And Human Knowledge
Miracle, also known as 'chamatkar', is a complex phenomenon beyond human understanding in relation to causality and human knowledge . In philosophy and theology, it is often debated and generally understood as an event that defies natural laws or exceeds known powers of nature. The survival of lone passenger, Vishwash Kumar Ramesh , in the recent Air India plane tragedy that took 241 lives, is a miracle. The survivor revealed, "I opened my eyes, unfastened seat belt, escaped through a small space on my left and walked up to an know how I survived?" A 10-minute delay due to a traffic jam made Bhoomi Chauhan miss the flight from Ahmedabad to London. She believed that the delay and missed flight were due to divine intervention and considers her survival a miracle. Such tales defy or interrupt the standard chain of cause and effect that one typically expects in such a catastrophic event. It is a moment when the ordinary flow of events diverges and cannot be explained by physical factors or statistical probability. The incident compels one to ask a much deeper question: Is a miracle something entirely unknown and beyond the perception of the human mind? by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo The human mind, conditioned by habit, empirical observation, and specific situations, typically interprets events within a framework of cause and effect. However, the causal framework does not account for such an anomaly in catastrophic events where a lone survivor has emerged unscathed against all odds. Lone survivors: Juliane Koepcke (Dec 24, 1971), Vesna Vulovic (Jan 26, 1972), Cecelia Cichan (Aug 16, 1987), Bahia Bakari (June 30, 2009), Ruben Van Assouw (May 12, 2010), and now Vishwash Kumar Ramesh (June 12, 2025), underline limits of human knowledge and understanding pointing towards a hidden depth of reality yet to be fully comprehended by humans. Philosophers have different perspectives. For example, Spinoza insists that nature operates according to eternal universal laws, a deterministic system. To him, 'miracle' would violate these natural laws, which is impossible because God and nature are the same - Deus sive Natura. David Hume is sceptical and views ' miracles ' as improbable, irrational or unknowable. However, Thomas Aquinas and Leibniz have different perspectives and view 'miracle' as a purposeful intervention by a higher principle, a manifestation of God's will. This point is in accordance with traditional Hinduism, which views the universe not as a closed, mechanical system but as an expression of Brahmn, the ultimate reality. Naturally, the will of this Supreme principle can interrupt ordinary causality to produce what we call a chamatkar - an improbable event. Therefore, surviving a serious accident is a blessing in the ordinary sense. Such phenomena consider the possibility of hidden causal orders, subtler than physical laws, which govern extraordinary events. The survival of the lone individual against all odds may be a manifestation of these hidden resonates that the ordinary world we experience is only a surface phenomenon, a visible ripple, while the true depth of reality lies in a more unified whole. Miracles, therefore, are not violations of nature but revelations of their greater potential than the physical, measurable world. Here, the Supreme principle can interrupt ordinary causality to produce a wonder beyond human knowledge and causal explanations. Authored by: Vijay Hashia Why Arjun Was Chosen: The Untold Secret of Bhagavad Gita Chapter 4, Verse 3
