logo
White South African ‘refugees'? The jokes write themselves

White South African ‘refugees'? The jokes write themselves

The Guardian21-05-2025
Hello and welcome to The Long Wave. On Wednesday, the South African president, Cyril Ramaphosa, will visit Donald Trump in the White House. I spoke to Jonathan Jansen, a professor of education in Stellenbosch, about the tense backdrop to the trip, and the reaction in South Africa to Trump granting white farmers refugee rights in the US.
Since the early days of his presidency, Donald Trump has made white farmers in South Africa one of his pet projects. It is an obsession that dates to his first term, where he amplified allegations by some Afrikaners that they are victims of 'mass killings' and suffer from violence and discrimination by vengeful Black South Africans. There is nothing to support this claim. And yet, in March, Trump expelled the South African ambassador to the US, cut off aid and extended an invitation for political asylum to white farmers, even as the US all but halts all refugee admissions to the country. The first of those white South African 'refugees' arrived in the US two weeks ago.
The source of this odd fixation is those around Trump, who 'doesn't have a sense of the world outside the United States' Jansen tells me, adding: 'To know about South Africa, let alone its politics, [the president] must have whisperers,' who are telling him that there is a 'white genocide'. Jansen suspects one of those is the South African-born Elon Musk, who has 'a grievance against the country'.
A defiant South African government
Jansen believes South Africa's hard line against Israel has fuelled animosity in Washington. Taking the Israeli government to the international court of justice 'is not cool in the world of Trump'. I suggest a provocative factor may also have been how uncompromising and measured the South African government has been on the issue of white farmers when goaded by Trump. 'This is true,' Jansen says. 'Ramaphosa, with all his faults – and they are many – is a man of restraint.'
Earlier this year, the South African government said it would not engage in 'counterproductive megaphone diplomacy' after social media posts by Trump alleged that Pretoria was seizing land from white farmers. South Africa passed a law in 2024 that states land 'expropriation may not be exercised unless the expropriating authority has without success attempted to reach an agreement with the owner or holder of a right in property for the acquisition thereof on reasonable terms'. Decades after the dismantling of apartheid, white people make up 7% of the South African population and own at least half of the land.
Small but stubborn residues of white supremacy
Despite the media focus on the issue, Jansen calls for some perspective. He says that some white South Africans who claim racial discrimination are a small group of people who nurse an inflated sense of resentment because they still cannot accept that apartheid is over. 'There are grievances with a Black government, which is very hard for some of my white brothers and sisters to accept, even after 30 years.'
Jansen says if one is to consider violent crime, 'more Black people die than white people, even as a proportion of the population. Make no mistake, these are white supremacists who are drawn to a white supremacist. Their capacity for reflection is not very high.' Jansen predicts the promise of life in the US will quickly sour. 'I'll make a bet with you that many of them will be back here in no time.'
'South Africans regard it as a joke'
Sign up to The Long Wave
Nesrine Malik and Jason Okundaye deliver your weekly dose of Black life and culture from around the world
after newsletter promotion
I ask him about the view from South Africa, and how the beliefs of those who claim white discrimination resonate. 'South Africans, Black and white, regard it as a joke. It's a huge joke here.' Does it not touch a nerve in a country that has such a heavy legacy of racism? 'Not really,' Jansen says. 'I did a straw poll on my X account, and the majority said: 'Ignore the bastards'. Forty-nine people took Trump up on his offer to find asylum in the US. 'It's not like a million people. It's a handful, many of whom are not actually farmers, taking advantage of a white racist calling them home. 'Don't pay attention to them.' That is the major response.'
But there is still a bitter irony to the whole affair, Jansen observes. If these were Black people, the apartheid government would have given them a one-way ticket to leave and not ever return. 'We don't do that. The very people who were repressing us under apartheid are using the freedom of a new democracy to be able to do things that were unthinkable, even as white people, under the apartheid government.'
'A slap in the face'
Despite the understanding in South Africa that the issue of white discrimination is a political stunt, Jansen notes the galling hypocrisy of it all, considering the effort that Black South Africans made to ensure peace after apartheid. 'What riles is that you're giving attention to people who for 350 years were oppressing us. My argument is: don't get into a tizzy. But I also regard it quite seriously as a slap in the face for Black South Africans.'
The narrative that Black people now hold power over whites is a fiction that obscures the enduring suffering of apartheid. 'Nothing has really changed for Black South Africans apart from the right to vote,' Jansen says. 'Many still live in shacks. They still suffer food insecurity. They still have the highest rates of unemployment. We made these enormous concessions during the negotiations to avert a war under Mandela. Whites here would be treated, as they always were, as fellow citizens as opposed to colonisers. And then, on top of all of that, [there was] a truth and reconciliation commission during which people got away with murder – literally.'
On a personal level, Jansen says he will not hide the fact that he feels hurt. But there is comfort in the fact that 'among ordinary Black South Africans, they don't think this is worth spending time on … and the overwhelming majority of white South Africans really just want to make this country work. One sees this moment for what it is. There is another reality out there.'
To receive the complete version of The Long Wave in your inbox every Wednesday, please subscribe here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump's radio blunder: President appears to admit his name is in Epstein files
Donald Trump's radio blunder: President appears to admit his name is in Epstein files

Daily Mirror

time11 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Donald Trump's radio blunder: President appears to admit his name is in Epstein files

The US President, who has been at the centre of controversy surrounding the Epstein files, appeared to admit his name is mentioned in the contentious documents but insisted it was 'faked' by the Democrats Donald Trump appears to have acknowledged his presence in the Epstein Files, as the furore over their handling continues to rage. ‌ During a phone-in with "Just the News" on Real America's Voice, the US President alleged that Democrats had concocted information and slipped his name into papers linked to the disgraced Jeffrey Epstein whilst they were in office, reports ABC. ‌ Trump's comments came after being quizzed about whether he wanted prosecutors to probe claims of political witch-hunts. This comes after the Wall Street Journal reported on what was described as a "creepy" birthday card allegedly sent from Trump to Epstein. ‌ He declared: "Well, I think it's in the case of Epstein, they've already looked at it, and they are looking at it, and I think all they have to do is put out anything credible." Trump went on to voice his doubts: "But you know, that was run by the Biden administration for four years. I can imagine what they put into files, just like they did with the others. I mean, the Steele dossier was a total fake, right? It took two years to figure that out for the people, and all of the things that you mentioned were fake.", reports the Mirror US, reports the Express. ‌ He continued: "So I would imagine if they were run by Chris Wray and they were run by Comey, and because it was actually even before that administration, they've been running these files, and so much of the things that we found were fake with me." Trump appears to acknowledge his name was in the Epstein files, but he maintained Democrats fabricated it. Despite his claims that they "put" things in the files, numerous documents referencing Trump have long been publicly available. Bowing to pressure from certain wings within his Republican Party, his team on Friday petitioned a federal court to unveil sealed records concerning Jeffrey Epstein's case, hoping to calm a political firestorm. ‌ Nevertheless, even with the potential disclosure of these records, it remains questionable whether this will appease those furious over apparent lack of openness regarding the evidence against the wealthy financier. The administration continues to face criticism for not releasing additional records it possesses. House Republicans are set to vote next week on a resolution crafted to address GOP demands for greater transparency on the Epstein affair. The resolution calls upon the Justice Department to make records public, though it carries no legal force. "The House Republicans are for transparency, and they're looking for a way to say that they agree with the White House," announced House Speaker Mike Johnson on Thursday. "We agree with the president. Everything he said about that, all the credible evidence should come out." The Democrats, supported by nine Republicans, have advanced their own bill that would compel the Justice Department to reveal more details about the case.

Ex-officer sentenced to nearly three years for role in Breonna Taylor's killing
Ex-officer sentenced to nearly three years for role in Breonna Taylor's killing

The Guardian

time31 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Ex-officer sentenced to nearly three years for role in Breonna Taylor's killing

A federal judge on Monday sentenced an ex-Kentucky police officer to nearly three years in prison for using excessive force during the 2020 deadly raid on Breonna Taylor's home, declining a justice department recommendation that he be given no prison time. Brett Hankison, who fired 10 shots during the raid but didn't hit anyone, was the only officer on the scene charged in the Black woman's death. He is the first person sentenced to prison in the case that rocked the city of Louisville and spawned weeks of street protests over police brutality five years ago. Last week, the justice department recommended a one-day jail sentence and supervised release in Hankison's case. In a sentencing memorandum, assistant attorney general for civil rights Harmeet K Dhillon and senior counsel Robert J Keenan said Hankison had suffered psychological stress from the legal battle. The US district judge Rebecca Grady Jennings sentenced Hankison at a hearing Monday afternoon. She said that no prison time 'is not appropriate' for Hankison and said she was 'startled' that there weren't more people injured in the raid. Hankison will serve 33 months in prison as well as three years of supervised probation. Although Hankison did not hit anyone, he shot into Taylor's bedroom window, through blinds and a blackout curtain, and a neighboring apartment, where a couple with a five-year-old child lived. He was found guilty in November 2024 of one count of civil rights abuse and faced a maximum sentence of life in prison. In May, Donald Trump's justice department canceled work on an agreement to enter into a consent decree with the city of Louisville. The agreement would have given the justice department authority to supervise Louisville's efforts to overhaul its police training and use-of-force policies. In September 2020, six months after her death, Taylor's family received a $12m wrongful death settlement from the city of Louisville. Her family's civil rights attorney, Ben Crump, told the Associated Press on Monday that he hoped Hankison would get more time but 'we are grateful that he is at least going to prison and has to think for those three years about Breonna Taylor and that her life mattered'.

Hunter Biden suggests Joe Biden's disastrous debate was due to Ambien
Hunter Biden suggests Joe Biden's disastrous debate was due to Ambien

Reuters

time39 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Hunter Biden suggests Joe Biden's disastrous debate was due to Ambien

WASHINGTON, July 21 (Reuters) - Former President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, said his father's disastrous debate performance against President Donald Trump that led to the Democrat stepping aside as presidential candidate was the result of him taking Ambien due to his travel. "And I'll tell you what, I know exactly what happened in that debate. He (Joe Biden) flew around the world, basically the mileage he could have flown around the world three times. He's 81 years old. He's tired as shit," the former president's son said in an interview released, opens new tab on Monday with YouTube creator Andrew Callaghan. "They give him Ambien to be able to sleep. He gets up on the stage and he looks like he's a deer in the headlights," Hunter Biden added. Ambien is a medication used for short-term treatment of sleeping problems. Joe Biden's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment late on Monday. The former president prepared at Camp David with his aides for several days for the debate. Prior to being at Camp David, the Democrat took two European trips and was on the U.S. West Coast for a fundraiser. The former president's debate performance against then-Republican presidential candidate Trump, in which the Democrat regularly struggled to finish his thoughts, triggered a backlash against Biden's candidacy for the 2024 elections. Less than a month after that June 27, 2024, debate, Biden stepped aside as presidential candidate after having trailed Trump in the polls. Former Vice President Kamala Harris then became the candidate for the Democrats and went on to lose to Trump in the November elections. In the days after the debate, the former president blamed his debate performance on jet lag after two overseas trips earlier that month. In the interview released on Monday, Hunter Biden also expressed frustration with Democratic voices, strategists and lawmakers who abandoned his father's candidacy following the debate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store