Posts criticising Australian migration policy misuse decade-old picture
"Half of all recent refugees in Australia are on welfare and 44% can't speak English," reads a headline emblazoned on an image of women in burqas published on Facebook by The Noticer -- an online news site that Australian-based ABC News says "promotes white supremacist ideologies" (archived link).
The post has been shared over 2,500 times since its publication on July 4, 2025.
It links to an article highlighting statistics the government released in late June about various types of permanent migrants who moved to Australia between 2012 and 2021. Among those surveyed are those classified as "humanitarian migrants", more commonly known as refugees and asylum seekers (archived link).
According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, 44 percent of humanitarian migrants who were in the country for less than five years do not speak English very well, though the survey noted that proficiency "was higher for permanent migrants who had lived in Australia for longer".
The image also spread on Facebook, X and Instagram by users criticising Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his Labor government's migration policies.
Some social media users appeared to think the women in burqas were in Australia.
One commented: "Their country has a rule that women's heads must be fully covered at all times, and usually their bodies too. Why aren't they told that that rule does not apply here and the law states that your face and head must be fully visible when entering any businesses?"
Another user said: "Just look around the shops or your neighbourhood, these in Islamic and Indian garments walking and enjoying the streets whilst you are on the way to work. Yes, we are carrying them so wake up!"
But the photo has been cropped and shared in a misleading context.
A reverse image search found a larger photo on the Flickr page for The Institute for Money, Technology & Financial Inclusion (IMTFI), which is part of University of California Irvine School of Social Sciences (archived here and here).
That picture reveals more clues that the women were not in Australia, as it shows the faces of the people around them and their attire, as well as a red shelter being held up with wooden poles.
The Peace Research Institute Oslo published the same photo credited to researcher Jan Chipchase (archived link).
He told AFP that he took it "a long time ago" in Afghanistan, and confirmed IMTFI's Flickr page information, which dated it as being shot on August 22, 2010.
"That would be correct. I did a project for the IMTFI at that point," he said in an email on July 11.
Since their return to power in Afghanistan in 2021, the Taliban have imposed an ultra-strict vision of Islamic law, modelled on their previous rule from 1996 to 2001. Women are required to have their bodies and faces covered (archived link).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
7 minutes ago
- Newsweek
EB-5 Visas, Gold Card Face Potential Surge in Demand: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. With the future of birthright citizenship under threat, immigration experts say any move to curtail the long-standing constitutional principle could lead to an increase in demand for legal residency programs like the EB-5 visa and President Donald Trump's proposed gold card visa. Why It Matters Birthright citizenship, grounded in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, currently grants automatic citizenship to anyone born on American soil, regardless of parental immigration status. This doctrine, known as jus soli, has long made the U.S. a hub for so-called "birth tourism," where foreign nationals enter the country, often on tourist visas, with the intent of giving birth, thereby securing American citizenship for their child. What To Know A person holds a smartphone displaying the website for registering interest in the new gold card visa on June 12, 2025, in Shanghai, China. U.S. A person holds a smartphone displaying the website for registering interest in the new gold card visa on June 12, 2025, in Shanghai, China. U.S. VCG via AP However, with rising political momentum among the Trump administration to limit or eliminate this right for children of undocumented parents, industry leaders say wealthy international families will look for new legal avenues to secure their children's future in the U.S. The constitutional guarantee of citizenship for anyone born on U.S. soil originates from the 14th Amendment and was upheld by the Supreme Court in the pivotal 1898 case United States v. Wong Kim Ark. In this decision, the Court determined that a man born in San Francisco to Chinese parents was entitled to U.S. citizenship, setting a lasting precedent that has shaped immigration law ever since. The Constitution states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Ali Jahangiri, head of the EB5 Lending Alliance, told Newsweek, "Removing or restricting birthright citizenship would close a loophole used by many foreign nationals and shift demand toward investment-based and merit-based immigration pathways like EB-5 and Gold Cards, which provide more secure, legal, and long-term immigration solutions for wealthy families looking to secure a future for their children in the U.S." The EB5 program, which grants green cards to foreign nationals who invest a minimum of $800,000 in a U.S. business that creates at least 10 jobs, offers a direct path to permanent residency for the investor, their spouse, and children under 21. With birthright citizenship at risk, legal immigration channels for wealthy immigrants could become more viable. In February, the president proposed a gold card program that would offer U.S. residency to individuals who invest $5 million in the country. A key aspect of the proposed "Trump Card" visa is its territorial taxation model, which would tax recipients only on income earned within the United States—exempting them from U.S. taxes on their worldwide income. The program would target high-net-worth individuals, offering long-term legal residency in exchange for significant economic contributions to the U.S. "If the U.S. were to introduce a program like this, families who would have considered birth tourism might instead pursue a gold card for legal residency and a longer-term path to citizenship," Jahangiri said. However, not everyone is sold on the idea of a gold card, warning that it may face significant political and practical hurdles. "There does not appear to be broad or coordinated support within Congress for the program, even among Republicans, due to concerns relating to the viability of the program and its optics," Morgan Bailey, a partner at Mayer Brown and former senior official at the Department of Homeland Security, told Newsweek. "For example, many other countries that have implemented similar wealth-based immigration programs have ultimately rolled them back due to concerns relating to national security, money laundering, and limited long-term economic benefits, as well as criticism that citizenship or permanent residency could be purchased," she added. Meanwhile, a judge in New Hampshire on Thursday blocked Trump's order ending birthright citizenship for children born to undocumented immigrants from taking effect across the United States, using a class action ruling just weeks after the Supreme Court limited nationwide injunctions in Trump v. CASA without resolving the underlying constitutional question. What People Are Saying Ali Jahangiri, head of the EB5 Lending Alliance, told Newsweek: "If such changes were implemented, it would eliminate or greatly reduce the incentive for birth tourism as a path to U.S. citizenship for the next generation. This shift would likely drive increased interest in formal, legal immigration channels that provide clearer and more secure pathways to citizenship or permanent residency." Morgan Bailey, a partner at Mayer Brown and former senior official at the Department of Homeland Security, told Newsweek: "If the Trump Gold Card were to be implemented before the 2026 midterm elections, several key steps would need to take place. In the absence of Congressional backing, the Administration would likely attempt to roll out the program via executive action or regulatory rulemaking. While these pathways could raise legal questions, it is important to understand that such a program could move forward quickly. Under this Administration, we have already seen extraordinary policy shifts implemented, sometimes with legal risks, but also with considerable political impact such as the attempt to end birthright citizenship, the termination of certain country specific programs such as Temporary Protected Status and humanitarian parole programs, and the reshaping of various internal immigration procedures that would have previously been considered politically implausible." What Happens Next While any formal rollback of birthright citizenship will continue to face legal and political hurdles, the mere discussion of its removal is already prompting experts to prepare for a new wave of interest from wealthy individuals seeking secure and lawful alternatives.
Bloomberg
7 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Japan's Market Milestones After Tariffs Cuts, Ishiba's Exit Buzz
Japanese markets went into hyperdrive on Wednesday after US President Donald Trump announced lower tariffs on imports from Japan and after reports — later denied by Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba — that he planned to resign. Here are some of Wednesday's most notable moves:
Bloomberg
7 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Outlines Emerge of a Trump-Engineered New Trade Landscape
The details may still be unclear, but US President Donald Trump's latest tariff deals with Japan and the Philippines are providing a sketch of the new trade landscape in Asia. Trump on Tuesday announced a deal with Japan that sets tariffs on the nation's imports at 15%, including for autos — by far the biggest component of the trade deficit between the countries. A separate agreement with the Philippines set a 19% rate, the same level as Indonesia agreed and a percentage point below Vietnam's 20% baseline level, signaling that the bulk of Southeast Asia is likely to get similar deals.
