Iowa House votes to ban eminent domain for CO2 pipelines
The Iowa House approved a bill Wednesday that would stop pipelines carrying liquified carbon dioxide from using eminent domain.
Six other bills related to carbon sequestration pipelines, eminent domain and the Iowa Utilities Commission were combined into one bill, which also advanced.
The bills were directed at an ongoing fight between landowners and the Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline, which would stretch more than 1,000 miles in Iowa connecting to biofuel refineries and transporting the sequestered carbon dioxide to underground storage in North Dakota.
House File 943 is similar to a law recently passed in South Dakota, another state crossed by the pipeline's proposed route.
Summit recently asked South Dakota regulators to pause proceedings on its pipeline permit due to the new law.
South Dakota governor signs eminent domain ban on carbon pipelines
The Iowa bill would take effect in May and apply to any eminent domain filings made on or after that date.
Rep. Bobby Kaufmann, R-Wilton, said businesses should 'expect the unexpected' if they plan to use eminent domain in Iowa.
'Expect that we're going to make changes when eminent domain is involved, and expect that we're going to make changes in favor of landowners,' Kaufmann said.
Pipeline opponents advocated for the bill March 18 during a rally at the Capitol and again on Monday at a press conference with a group of Republican lawmakers opposed to the pipeline project.
The bill passed 82-12.
Iowa Renewable Fuels Association Executive Director Monte Shaw said in a press release the decision by the House was 'hardly surprising, but it is still disappointing.'
'IRFA members have been saying for three years that (carbon capture and sequestration) is the most important tool available to grow ethanol demand into new markets both here at home and around the world,' Shaw said in the statement.
Shaw said he believes 'cooler heads will prevail in the Senate' and said the opposition to the project has been led by a 'small, though loud, minority.'
'IRFA calls on the Iowa Senate to stand with the majority of impacted landowners, farmers, ethanol producers, and Iowa's economic future to ensure the state has the tools it needs to meet the brewing economic disaster in the heartland,' Shaw said.
House File 639 would increase the insurance requirements for liquid hazardous pipeline operators.
The five amendments to the bill would also update the definition of a common carrier, require IUC commissioners to be present at all hearings, expand who is allowed to intervene in an IUC docket, limit the pipeline permits to one term not longer than 25 years and stop the IUC from imposing sanctions on intervenors.
These were all bills that had already advanced from House committees, but Rep. Steven Holt combined into HF 639.
Holt, R-Denison, said with all of the amendments, the bill should be called the 'no eminent domain for private gain' bill.
The bill passed 85-10.
A spokesperson for Summit said the company has signed easements with more than 1,320 Iowa landowners and has 'adjusted the route based on feedback from stakeholders and regulatory agencies.'
'Regulatory certainty is crucial for maintaining Iowa's competitive edge in business, fostering long-term opportunities for farmers, ethanol producers, and rural communities,' the spokesperson said in a statement.
Some representatives voiced concern because of historic opposition in the Senate.
Rep. Brian Meyer spoke in support of the bills but said he wondered if lawmakers were 'wasting our time here today.'
'We've done this now several years in a row, and the Senate has not acted,' Meyer, D-Des Moines, said. 'As far as I can tell, they have not even tried to negotiate … Do something. Do something about this important issue.'
Rep. Charley Thomson, R-Charles City, said he appreciated the concerns about the Senate on the issue and said he believes the House will 'do the right thing without regard for what others may do.'
Holt said the issue is not partisan and that in both the House and the Senate, the two parties disagree with one another on the issue. He disagreed with a claim that he and other lawmakers fighting for the issue are doing so performatively.
'We're doing it because it's the right thing to do,' Holt said. 'And regardless of whether the Senate is going to pass it or not, we're going to fight for it here because it's the right thing to do.'
Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: info@iowacapitaldispatch.com.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
39 minutes ago
- New York Post
Biden says he's working on memoir and ‘getting calls' from European leaders asking him to ‘get engaged' post-presidency
Former President Joe Biden revealed Wednesday that he's writing a memoir and has been fielding calls from world leaders urging him to 'get engaged' since leaving the White House. Biden, 82, was asked about his post-presidency activities during a Q&A session at the Society for Human Resource Management's (SHRM) convention in San Diego, where he delivered a keynote speech. 'Well, you know … it sounds strange … the problem is there is not a lot of time,' Biden responded, in what would be a rambling, nearly 10-minute-long answer. Biden said he's been spending time doing 'research' for an upcoming memoir about his one term as commander in chief. AFP via Getty Images 'Every president is expected to write a memoir,' he continued, noting that 'most take between 3 and 6 years to get it done' but his publisher wanted what would be his third memoir done by 'March of this year.' The former president said the new book will focus on only his four years as commander in chief, which he said made the task a bit easier. 'So, I'm working like hell with a publisher to write another 500-page book … I've been doing a lot of that, a lot of research,' Biden told SHRM CEO Johnny C. Taylor Jr. The former president then bemoaned that 'many of the things I worked so damn hard [on] that I thought I changed in the county are changing so rapidly,' in apparent reference to President Trump's rollback of several Biden-era policies. Biden went on to take credit for expanding NATO, arguing the transatlantic alliance was 'in shambles' when he took office, and said he 'took on' Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The former president claimed he's still fielding calls from US allies. 'And I'm getting calls – I'm not going to go into them, I can't – from a number of European leaders asking me to get engaged,' Biden said, before noting, 'I'm not, because things are different.' 'So, I'm doing that,' the former president said, as he began to think about what else he's been up to since Jan. 20, promoting the moderator to interject, 'World peace? That's nice to do in retirement.' 'All kidding aside, how can you just walk away?' Biden said in his defense. 'You don't see me out there publicly doing a lot of this.' Biden claims that several European leaders have asked him to 'get engaged' since leaving the White House. AFP via Getty Images The ex-president also claimed he's been 'dealing with a lot of Democrat and Republican colleagues calling me … wanting to talk and bounce things off of me.' The Wall Street Journal recently reported that Biden, who was diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer in May, has been traveling from his home in Delaware to Washington, DC, roughly once a week for meetings. 'I'm also laying rubber with my 67 Corvette on my driveway,' Biden joked, referring to his prized antique muscle car. Biden, who was forced to bow out of the 2024 presidential race last July following a Democratic Party revolt over his disastrous performance in his only debate against Trump, also indicated that he's been spending time communicating with his family. 'Every single day, I contact every single one of my grandchildren,' Biden, who as president repeatedly failed to acknowledge the existence of the granddaughter his son, Hunter, fathered out-of-wedlock, claimed.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
GOP holdouts stall Trump agenda into the night, with outcome uncertain
The GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' hit a wall late Wednesday night when a group of hardline conservatives and moderate Republicans combined forces to stall the sprawling package. Lawmakers returned to the House chamber at 9:30 p.m. — after an hours-long delay — to hold a procedural vote that would open up debate on the megabill and tee up a vote on final passage. The effort, however, stopped in its tracks after three hardline conservatives — Reps. Keith Self (R-Texas), Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.) and Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.) — voted against the rule, along with centrist Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.). Nine other Republicans declined to vote altogether, denying Republican leaders the majority needed to open debate on the megabill. With all Democrats opposing the package, the vote remained stuck at 207-216 for a time, before Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.) voted to support the measure shortly after 11 p.m. That momentum in favor of the bill was quickly negated, however, when Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who voted against the megabill in the House last month, switched his vote on the rule from 'yes' to 'no,' setting GOP leaders back some more. As of just before midnight, the vote stood at 207-217, with five GOP 'no' votes and eight Republicans not yet having voted. Those eight were: Reps. Josh Brecheen (R-Okla.), Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), Eric Burlison (R-Mo.), Michael Cloud (R-Texas), Andy Harris (R-Md.), Bob Onder (R-Mo.), Scott Perry (R-Pa.) and Chip Roy (R-Texas) had not yet voted as of 11:45 p.m. The impasse has forced Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) into a game of chicken, with leaders vowing to hold the vote open indefinitely in an effort to force the holdouts into a change of heart. 'I'll keep it open as long as it takes to make sure we've got everybody here and accounted for and all the questions answered,' Johnson told Fox News's Sean Hannity just before 11 p.m. 'I made that commitment to my members.' 'This is part of the process,' he added. 'We are tying up some loose ends. We had a Senate bill that was sent over that was modified from the House version. We liked the House version better, no surprise about that, and we had reached a very delicate balance on it, so it's taken a little while to go through the changes and to have everybody fully process that and figure out what that means for them and their districts.' The Speaker said he spoke to three of the GOP 'no' votes, calling some of their positions a 'placeholder.' 'I've spoken to 'three of the four, I'm trying to find the fourth one,' Johnson said. 'But a couple of those are still waiting for some of those questions to be answered, and they're just sort of putting placeholders on the board and I think they're open for conversation. Everybody's here in good faith, everybody wants to get to yes, everybody wants to deliver this agenda for the people and we're gonna give them every opportunity to do that.' The logjam did not come as a complete surprise. Shortly before leaders called the procedural vote, a handful of hardline conservatives announced that they would not vote on the effort if top lawmakers called the referendum on Wednesday, contending that they needed more time to receive clarity about the policy details of the package — and (perhaps) ease their qualms and win their votes. Johnson, however, tried to call their bluff, convening the vote despite the threats. Some Republicans, including Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), relented on their initial opposition, supporting the procedural vote after hours of bashing the bill throughout the day on Wednesday. 'We got clarification of what's going to be enforced,' Norman told reporters. 'We got clarification on how the IRAs are going to be dealt with. We got clarification on the tax cuts. And still we'll be meeting tomorrow on the specifics of it. But no, I feel comfortable with this.' It is unclear what leaders will do next. As the clock approached midnight, lawmakers of both parties were milling around the chamber even as the vote tally remained frozen. Johnson said Trump offered Wednesday night to call the remaining holdouts to try and get them on board. 'He has been, in fact, he called me most recently about an hour ago and said who else needs to have a discussion, I'm ready to get on the phone. And I said, 'Mr. President, you've done your job and we'll do ours here,'' Johnson told Hannity.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
MAGA world figures take aim at GOP holdouts
Mike Johnson is staring down the legislative challenge of his career. As soon as this morning, the speaker will attempt to ram the Senate-passed megabill through the House as dozens of Republicans threaten to vote it down. The detractors come from across the Republican conference after the Senate sent over a bill with deeper Medicaid cuts, steeper deficit hikes and less onerous clean-energy provisions than expected. And he's gunning to deliver by President Donald Trump's self-imposed July 4 deadline, as severe thunderstorms in Washington threaten full attendance. 'We'll see. I've got to play the cards that are dealt to me,' Johnson said Tuesday, after admitting he was 'not happy' with the Senate's changes to the bill. 'And we're working through that. … But we remain optimistic we're going to land it at this point.' Johnson has 24 to 48 hours to persuade reluctant fiscal hawks and Medicaid moderates to swallow the Senate's bill. He spent Monday on calls with concerned lawmakers and caucuses, scrambling to figure out how to pass it this week without making changes to the bill. (John Thune and Johnson have been in contact through much of the process but did not speak in the hours leading up to the Senate vote, the majority leader told POLITICO.) But the Senate bill will be tough to sell. House Freedom Caucus members like Reps. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) blasted the Senate's bill Tuesday for adding to the deficit and softening clean energy tax credits. Roy and Norman both voted against the bill in the Rules Committee overnight. House moderates are worried about the steep cuts to Medicaid, which Johnson has privately said could cost Republicans the House in 2026. Sen. Thom Tillis' (R-N.C.) speech torching the Senate's Medicaid provisions for similar reasons shook many vulnerable Republicans. And a substantial cross section of the two groups of holdouts would rather take time to rework the package and send it back to the Senate, instead of jamming the Senate version through the House under a self-imposed deadline. Norman said the House should go back to the original bill, leave town and come back when Senate Republicans are 'serious.' Some signs of progress for Johnson: Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.) appeared more likely to support the bill Tuesday night after previously refusing a deal on a state and local tax deduction. Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.), previously a strong no on the bill over the Medicaid provider tax, told POLITICO a local provider tax tweak in the wraparound amendment for New Jersey and other states has him feeling better about the bill. But it would still be a gamble for Johnson to put it on the House floor: Many Republicans think the bill would fail without additional changes. However, the speaker has previously succeeded in putting bills on the floor without the votes — and relying on Trump to pressure holdouts to fold. What else we're watching: — Weather problems could delay House vote: Over 200 flights into Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport were either canceled or delayed Tuesday amid thunderstorms in Washington, according to the flight-tracking service FlightAware. Johnson said Tuesday night that the travel issues could push back the House vote on the GOP megabill, which is expected as early as Wednesday. — More reconciliation packages: As the House looks to pass the current reconciliation package without further tweaks, Johnson is suggesting there could be future opportunities for lawmakers to get their priorities into party-line packages. In an interview on Fox News on Tuesday night, Johnson said the House will plan to do two more reconciliation bills during this session of Congress, which ends in 2026. Jordain Carney, Meredith Lee Hill and Benjamin Guggenheim contributed to this report.
