
FLOURISHING AFTER 50: My sister is 'treating herself' with our elderly mum's cash - and talking about selling the family home. How can I stop her?
Dear Vanessa,
I need help dealing with a really upsetting family situation.
My mum is in her late 80s and has dementia. A few years ago, she gave my sister power of attorney, which made sense at the time - she lived nearby and offered to help. About a year ago, she moved in with mum to take care of her, and ever since, things have become uncomfortable.
My sister has started using mum's money to buy things or 'treats' for herself - a new television, furniture, and other items she says are for her 'comfort while caring.' She's now talking about moving mum into a care home and selling mum's house to fund it.
I understand that aged care is expensive and that mum may need full-time support soon. But I'm worried things aren't being done the right way. My sister rarely communicates with me or our brother, and anytime I ask questions, she shuts me down and says she has the legal authority.
I want mum to be properly cared for, but I also want things to be fair. mum always said her house was to be split equally between the three of us, and now I'm worried we'll lose everything to care fees - or worse, that my sister is mismanaging things.
What is the right way to handle this? Can my sister really make all these decisions on her own? And are we going to lose our inheritance to aged care?
Karen.
Dear Karen,
First, thank you for writing. This is one of the most emotionally loaded financial situations anyone can face - when love, family, responsibility, and money all collide.
You're not alone in this. As our parents age and become vulnerable, families are often left to make big decisions with uneven information, old family dynamics at play, and sometimes, very little guidance. It's understandable that you want to protect your mum, but also ensure her wishes around inheritance are respected. That's not selfish. That's human.
Legally, a power of attorney (POA) allows someone to make decisions on behalf of another person when they're no longer able to. But that power comes with responsibilities - the most important being that all decisions must be made in the best interests of the person, not the attorney. Buying items for 'comfort' may fall into a grey area, but if there's a pattern of personal benefit, it's reasonable to question what's happening.
That doesn't mean your sister is doing anything illegal - but it does mean you have the right to ask for transparency. Being family doesn't remove the obligation to account for decisions made under POA.
You asked a really important question: will we lose our inheritance to aged care?
The truth is, aged care is expensive, and yes in many cases, the family home is sold to cover it. The aged care system takes into account a person's assets and income when determining fees. So depending on your mum's financial position, some or all of the home's value may be used to fund her care. But there are strategies to manage this process and potentially protect some of the estate - the key is getting expert advice early.
To explore this further, I spoke with an experienced financial adviser who specialises in aged care and estate planning.
They said: 'Families often wait until the last minute to deal with aged care, but the earlier you get advice, the more options you have - not just financially, but in keeping family relationships intact. A good plan can help ensure care is properly funded and also clarify what can reasonably be preserved for inheritance.'
They also added: 'Having power of attorney doesn't mean shutting out the rest of the family. The best outcomes happen when everyone is brought into the loop, especially siblings. If that's not happening, it's okay to speak up - and even seek independent mediation if needed.'
Karen, you're doing the right thing by asking questions. If you're not getting clear answers, you may want to request a formal update from your sister - or suggest that an independent third party help review decisions. It's also worth talking to a financial adviser with experience in aged care. They can help you understand your mum's funding options, what's legally permitted, and whether the current arrangement makes sense.
If you don't know where to start, I offer a free referral service to connect people with trusted advisers. You can find it here:
This is hard stuff. Emotions run high, and the stakes feel personal - because they are. But your voice matters. And it's okay to want fairness, clarity, and care - all at once.
Choose you first,

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The ongoing fight to replace racist monuments in the US: ‘requires a lot of perseverance'
After nearly half a decade, Vinnie Bagwell, a self-taught sculptor-artist, is still waiting for the million dollars that the New York City department of cultural affairs promised for her to work on monument Victory Beyond Sims, after winning the artist competition to replace the monument of Dr J Marion Sims in 2020. 'It just requires a lot of diligence and perseverance,' she said to the Guardian. 'A lot of times, people don't realize how important and impactful art in public places is until they see it.' Sims was a 19th-century gynecologist known for experimenting on 12 enslaved and poor immigrant women without consent. City officials removed his monument in April 2018 after a unanimous vote by the Public Design Commission. Bagwell will be the first Black woman to have a memorial on Fifth Avenue. Bagwell began sculpting in 1993 and created the First Lady of Jazz in Yonkers, the first public artwork made by a contemporary African American woman commissioned by a municipality in the United States. Her 9ft (2.7-meter) monument is of a Black woman with 14ft wings, only the second Black Angel statue to be visible publicly in the US. The shape of Africa cut away from the woman's heart symbolizes the enslavement of 12 million people over hundreds of years. On her right side the braille will read 'My Soul looks back and wonders how I got over!' and on the left it will read 'Primum non nocere!' (First do no harm). To honor the suffering of Sims's victims, whose anguish brought advancement to the field of gynecology, there will be 12 women silhouetted on her back. A slave ship is also depicted on the back to illustrate the inhumanity of slavery. The names of the survivors we know will be emblazoned into the helm of the garment. Bagwell hopes that the monument, which will be across the street from the New York Academy of Medicine, will function as a vehicle of change for the community. 'Women are more under fire now than we were before. So many of us women have lost a lot of the right to control our bodies. New York is still safe, but [women in] Arkansas aren't,' she says. 'When you look at some of the things that this particular administration is talking about, they're talking about going backward; that is still something to be concerned about.' Bagwell's situation is not unique, with many other cities also stalling progress to replace Confederate statues and symbols. However, Vinnie has encountered many obstacles. First, a committee chose artist Simone Leigh as the winner, even though community members had voted for Bagwell. After a heated debate, the city ultimately reversed its decision. Then, the city attempted to cut $250,000 from its budget but failed. Bagwell has been waiting longer than the typical 90 days after signing her contract to receive the money. In a statement to the Guardian, the department stated its excitement about the project moving forward. 'New York City has taken bold steps in the effort to foster a collection of public artworks that better reflect who we are as a city, including this project – long called for by the local community – to commission a new monument for this site in East Harlem,' they note. 'This administration remains committed to fostering a diverse, vibrant public art collection that more fully represents the vast range of stories, experiences, and backgrounds that define New Yorkers. We're excited for the Victory project to move ahead.' On 23 June, the design commission voted unanimously to approve Bagwell's designs, and she can now begin work. Bagwell's situation reflects a broader failure to follow through on legislation and promises made following the 2020 racial justice protests, where Americans dismantled statues of Confederate soldiers that stood in their communities after the killing of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man. In 2021, Joe Biden passed legislation to replace the monument of Roger Taney, a pro-slavery chief justice who served on the court from 1836 until 1864, with one of Thurgood Marshall, the first African American supreme court justice, in the United States Capitol. The intended deadline for the building of the statute was December 2024, but that month, a source familiar with the matter said the joint committee on the library had only just signed off on a memorandum to begin the process. Now, a 2025 executive order signed by Donald Trump mandating that the secretary of the interior restore monuments removed in the last five years puts in jeopardy the already fragile progress made by past laws to diversify the public landscape in the US. Jamaican sculptor Basil Watson said that it's 'very possible' that more people are now in support of removing objects that help tell Black stories. 'It's the risk we take that is part of the struggle,' he said. Watson worked to replace a Confederate monument with a John Lewis memorial in Decatur, Georgia. 'It would be a tragedy if it were to be removed, but then we'll just have to do it again,' he said. 'The journey cannot be stopped.' In 2017, Trump tweeted: 'the beauty [Confederate monuments] that is being taken out of our cities, towns and parks will be greatly missed and never able to be comparably replaced!' This debate on the rise and fall of monuments dates back to the 1870s. In 1876, Frederick Douglass called into question the making of the Emancipation Memorial, built by artist Thomas Bell in Washington DC. The creation of the statute was funded using donations from recently freed people. While the city created the monument to honor emancipation, it depicted a white man holding out his hand over a chained kneeling Black man, a design Douglass found problematic. 'What I want to see before I die is a monument representing the Negro, not couched on his knees like a four-footed animal, but erect on his feet like a man,' he said. DC officials removed the statute in 2021, and advocates are still discussing its replacement. Nearly 150 years after Douglass's speech, only 10% of the top 50 national monuments are of Black and Indigenous people, according to an audit completed by the Monument Lab, a non-profit public art and history studio. 'The story of this continent is not reflected in our monument landscape in full,' said Paul Farber, the director and co-founder of the Monument Lab. 'The monuments we have tell a partial story. Adding a monument or the selective removal of a monument can have a profound effect for a city or town. If we don't respond to the erasures, the lies by design we will be doomed to repeat. Our audit also showed that 99.4% of monuments were not taken down in 2021 or 2022.' The Trump administration's influence has now rolled back even that little bit of progress. This year, Pete Hegseth rolled back the names of two military forts to their namesakes of confederate soldiers. Following pressure from Republicans, Washington DC's mayor, Muriel Bowser, also ordered the destruction of the Black Lives Matter plaza in front of the White House. Trump has proposed reviving his controversial National Garden of American Heroes, using money cut from the National Endowment for the Humanities, which ended hundreds of grants for libraries, museums and archives. The garden would include George Washington and Christopher Columbus statues alongside Martin Luther King Jr, Kobe Bryant and Whitney Houston. 'When you look at some of the things that this particular administration is talking about, they're talking about going backward,' Bagwell says. 'That is still something to be concerned about.' Nationally, Republicans have been mixed on the issue of inclusion in public spaces. A Kentucky state senator, Chris McDaniel, is still advocating for the replacement of a Confederate statue. In 2020, he pre-filed a bill that would replace Jefferson Davis in the Capitol Rotunda with Carl Brashear, the first African American US navy master diver born in Tonieville, Kentucky. 'His story is inspirational,' he says. 'That's what monuments are supposed to be about. It's supposed to be able to point to people and say: 'This is somebody you can look up to.'' McDaniel's bill to replace Davis in the Capitol is at a standstill as the Kentucky Capitol Arts Advisory Committee and other legislators must weigh in on who they believe deserves to be honored. Mississippi's Republican governor, Tate Reeves, has shown mixed messages about Confederate symbols in his state. During the 2020 election, almost 73% of people in Mississippi voted to remove the Confederate flag with a new state's flag. 'This is not a political moment to me but a solemn occasion to lead our Mississippi family to come together, to be reconciled and to move on,' Reeves said after the vote and before it was eventually replaced. In the same year, Reeves simultaneously opposed the removal of Confederate monuments. 'I reject the mobs tearing down statues of our history, north and south, Union and Confederate, founding fathers and veterans,' he says. 'I reject the chaos and lawlessness, and I am proud it has not happened in our state.' Bryan Stevenson, the founder of the Equal Justice Initiative who led the building of Legacy Sites in Montgomery, Alabama, a civil rights museum that works to reshape the racist narratives about African Americans in Alabama, explains Reeves's messaging. 'I think it's a struggle, a competing narrative, and sometimes they give away a little something by holding on to something that makes what they're giving away feel acceptable,' he tells the Guardian. Stevenson says it 'is about power, because most of the people who are kind of in control of these things [are] aligned, in my view, with this problematic history. We can't accept just what [they're] gonna give' us. Some artists who have worked to replace Confederate monuments with ones that honor Black history have succeeded and received praise despite government resistance. In Roanoke, Virginia, the city sculptor commissioned Lawrence Bechtel to replace a statue of Confederate general Robert E Lee with one of Henrietta Lacks. Lacks' cells, now called HeLa, were taken without her knowledge in 1951 and have now become vital to medical research; they have been used to develop polio and Covid-19 vaccines. It took about four years for the city to raise the money for the statue and a year from the contract being signed for Bechtel to build the monument. 'I had bought a veil to cover it over, and everyone was invited to come close as the veil was pulled off, and people just mobbed it. It was fantastic,' he says. 'It was just wonderful. It was very uplifting.' Bechtel said he has yet to receive a negative email. Watson, who built a monument of John Lewis to replace a memorial put in place by the United Daughters of the Confederacy, recalls the community's excitement about the monument before he even finished. 'The idea of putting up John Lewis in its place was quite exciting for the community, and since it has been up, I have had nothing but positive responses,' he says. Watson remains steadfast in his belief that the inclusivity of public art is crucial. 'I think we artists need to represent our community; we need to have our values represented in our environment,' he says. 'I think it's important that we do have art in our community that represents the truth, represents our values, represents our history, and points our way forward.' Stevenson, a civil rights lawyer, believes that reclaiming the narrative in public spaces can challenge the racist narratives embedded into some Americans' mindset. When he first started working in public art, there were 59 markers and monuments honoring the Confederacy in his state yet none paid tribute to Alabama's history of being the state with one of the largest slave populations, so he and his team worked to create plaques in public spaces that honored those who were enslaved. He refers to the process of reframing public conversation as narrative work, responding to the racist views long perpetuated by institutions. With the building and taking down of monuments, he suggests that we need a new framework to tell the full story of American history as a nation. 'I think we have to find a better way to help people in this country recognize that there's a place for people of African descent in this country and that our stories can't be denied any longer,' Stevenson says. Bagwell also emphasizes the importance of honoring African Americans' vital contributions to American society through public art. 'It's just stunning that we have made so much out of so little,' she says. 'The contributions we've made to this country are phenomenal, and they should be remembered because we are very much a part of what made America great in the first place.'


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Notes from a nursing home: ‘We don't speak of sadness here'
I sit in my room in this nursing home near Sydney, a box of four walls that holds all I now call my own. Two suitcases could carry it: a few clothes, some worn books, a scattering of trinkets. The thought strikes me as both stark and oddly freeing. Not long ago my world was vast, a house with rooms I rarely entered, a garden that sprawled beyond need, two cars idling in the driveway, one barely driven. Now it's gone. The house, the cars, the cartons overflowing in the garage, all sold, given away or abandoned. A heart attack and dwindling funds brought me here two and a half years ago. Family ties, thin as they are, keep me from moving anywhere away from here. I don't resent it. I've seen the world, jungles, deserts, cities that glittered under foreign skies. That hunger is sated. This is a different journey, one of stillness, of finding meaning in what remains. The nursing home is no idyll, no glossy promise of golden years. It's a place of routine, of quiet necessity. Mornings begin with carers, gentle, hurried women who tidy my bed, adjust pillows, offer a smile before moving on. Tea and toast settle as I sit by the window. The air carries the clean sting of antiseptic, mingling with the chatter of birds outside. There's peace in these moments, before the home stirs fully awake. The staff do their work well, though they're stretched thin. They check on us, ask after our aches, offer kind words that linger like a faint warmth. Activities fill the day, card games, a singalong. I join when I feel like it, which is less often than I might. The choice is mine, and that's enough. The front doors creak as relatives arrive, their faces a mix of cheer and strain. Some hide tears, we all pretend not to see. We don't speak of sadness here. It's a silent agreement, a way to keep the days bearable. Sign up for a weekly email featuring our best reads The residents are a varied lot. Some are old, their bodies bent by years. Others are younger, broken by minds that betray them. A woman down the hall clutches a photograph, her son a rare visitor, his life too crowded for her. She speaks of him with no anger, only a flat resignation. A man, his eyes dim with addiction's toll, mutters of a sister who never calls. I listen, nod, share a story of my own. We understand each other here, bound by the shared weight of being left behind. This place is a mirror, reflecting a truth we'd rather not face. Families, once close, find it easier to place their own in these clean, quiet rooms. It's not cruelty, not always. Caring for the old, the broken, the lost-it, demands time, patience, a surrender most cannot afford. So they sign papers, appoint guardians and let the system take over. The nursing home becomes a vault, sealing away what disrupts the orderly march of life. Out of sight, out of mind. Yet I wonder if, in the quiet of their nights, those families feel the shadow of what they've set aside. Sign up to Five Great Reads Each week our editors select five of the most interesting, entertaining and thoughtful reads published by Guardian Australia and our international colleagues. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Saturday morning after newsletter promotion I walk the corridors, dim and smelling of antiseptic and something less tangible – forgotten promises, perhaps. Residents sit, staring at walls or televisions that drone with voices no one heeds. Many wrestle with dementia, their thoughts scattering like ash. Others bear scars of choices or chance, their lives eroded to this point. A few, changed by illness or time, became strangers to those who loved them. To care for such people is hard, unglamorous work. Easier to let them fade into these walls. Yet there's life here too. I find it in small things: a book that holds my attention, sunlight warming my room, a laugh shared over a memory. The community binds us. We talk of old days, of children grown distant, of the world beyond these walls. There's comfort in that, a kind of strength. The local shops are my horizon now but I don't mind. I've seen enough of the world to know its pleasures are fleeting. Here I have my memories, these people, this quiet. The day stretches before me, simple and unhurried, the sun climbing higher, the air still fresh. There's no need to rush, no call to chase what's gone. This is my life now, pared to its bones, and it's enough. The light shifts on the wall, and I breathe it in. It's a good day. Better than most. Andrew McKean is a writer and a resident of an aged care facility in New South Wales, Australia


Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Eir sues BT for £67m over Northern Ireland contract dispute
Act now to keep your subscription We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.