
Dreeshen letter to Calgary mayor expresses 'concern' with city's approach to bike lanes
The on-again, off-again debate over bike lanes in Calgary has shifted back into gear, after a provincial cabinet minister penned a letter to Mayor Jyoti Gondek last week suggesting the city should hit the brakes on installing more of the divisive infrastructure.
Article content
Minister of Transportation and Economic Corridors Devin Dreeshen's June 27 letter to Gondek expressed 'concern' with the city's approach to constructing bike lanes at the expense of building road capacity for motor vehicles.
Article content
Article content
Article content
'As our urban populations continue to grow, we need to seriously consider on [sic] how to maintain adequate capacity for motor vehicle traffic flow for current and future traffic needs, not reducing capacity,' Dreeshen wrote to Gondek.
Article content
Article content
'We are concerned with the impact to our provincial road network and its connectivity to the municipal roads. We are also concerned with future bicycle lanes and other lane-removal initiatives where taxpayer dollars are used to shrink, rather than increase, road capacity for vehicles.'
Article content
Provincial roads in Calgary include Deerfoot Trail, the ring road (Stoney Trail/Tsuut'ina Trail and Highway 22X) and Highway 8 (Glenmore Trail).
The letter follows recent social media posts from Dreeshen panning bike lanes, and a call in April for the City of Edmonton to cancel a $96-million project to install cycling tracks along 30 blocks of 132nd Avenue N.
Article content
Article content
'As our cities grow, we must expand road capacity, not shrink it,' Dreeshen's office said in a Friday statement. 'Our priority is keeping people and goods moving safely and efficiently.'
Article content
Gondek responded to Dreeshen with a letter of her own on Thursday, suggesting the two should meet this summer to discuss Calgarians' transportation needs.
Article content
Traffic flow remains 'one of the top concerns I hear from Calgarians,' Gondek wrote in the letter, which did not suggest either opposition or support toward bike lanes.
Article content
'As the economic engine of the province and the fastest growing city in Canada, Calgary must find thoughtful ways to keep people moving – whether they're commuting to work, heading out for dinner, or shopping at local businesses,' she wrote.
Article content
'Let's work together to explore practical solutions that balance the needs of all road users and support Alberta's continued growth and mobility.'
Article content
Bicycle lanes have been hotly debated in Calgary for years, with opponents arguing they are underutilized by cyclists, unsafe and increase traffic congestion by reducing the number of car-dedicated lanes.
Article content
The discussion ramped up in 2015, when the city removed street parking or vehicular lanes in the core to install 6.5 kilometres of protected cycle tracks. The downtown cycling lanes, which were separated from the vehicular roadways by a protective barrier, were installed along 12th Avenue, 8th Avenue and 9th Avenue, as well as 5th Street.
Article content
Although the network was initially a $5.5-million pilot project, city council voted to make the lanes permanent the following year.
Article content
Council's support of bike lanes has only amplified since then. In 2023, city council approved $56 million to improve Calgary's Pathway and Bikeway Network, 'aiming to offer year-round, healthy, safe, accessible and affordable travel options,' according to a city webpage.
Article content
Article content
'As part of the Calgary Transportation Plan, we're committed to expanding this network over 60 years by filling gaps, adding features, and supporting various activities such as walking, cycling, and scootering,' the webpage states.
Article content
'With over 4,000 kilometres of pathways and bikeways mapped out for the future of travel in Calgary, these new enhancements and paths will foster vibrant, connected communities.'
Article content
Current projects include developing pathway and bikeway routes in Ward 9, including Marlborough Park, Albert Park Radisson Heights, Penbrooke Meadows, Forest Heights, Forest Lawn, Dover, Southview and Erin Woods; and in Ward 5, including Falconridge, Castleridge, Taradale, Saddle Ridge and Martindale.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Edmonton Journal
a day ago
- Edmonton Journal
Opinion: Transportation minister needs to stay in his lane
Article content Transportation Minister Devin Dreeshen recently wrote to the mayors of both Edmonton and Calgary with 'concerns' about bike lanes. His first letter to Edmonton called for the cancellation of the 132nd Avenue project, but the letter to Calgary was more vague, stating 'we need to seriously consider on how to maintain adequate capacity for motor vehicle traffic flow for current and future traffic needs, not reducing capacity.' Article content Article content If Dreeshen is concerned about the movement of traffic through the city, he should support more transportation options, not fewer. Traffic doesn't just include cars, it includes people who walk, take transit and, yes, ride bikes. Article content Calgary city council has, in fact, been too hesitant in building cycling infrastructure. It has allowed the downtown cycle track to slowly crumble year after year, never making permanent what was built in the pilot project phase. This would be unacceptable if it were a road built for cars. Article content Much of the pathways end abruptly and large swaths of the city, including some of Calgary's lowest-income neighbourhoods, have little to no cycling infrastructure at all. Article content Buying and maintaining a car is a huge financial burden and one that should be optional. Thanks to inflation, people are forced to pay more of their income into their vehicles. If Dreeshen's concern is making life easier for Albertans, he'd make it so we wouldn't need to. Article content Article content Adding more car traffic lanes in cities with limited space isn't going to solve traffic problems. If anything, it forces everything to spread out, which in turn forces us all into cars. It's a vicious cycle that we have been doing for decades, and stretches both municipal and personal budgets. Article content I know Dreeshen supports transportation options. He made it legal to drive golf carts on roads in his home riding last year. So why does he want to constrain options in Alberta's cities? Article content The research is abundant — giving people options to get around not only reduces traffic congestion, but improves quality of life. Article content Additionally, being able to experience the city around you in a way that is impossible to do in a car also feels pretty dang good. Since the initial build out of the downtown cycle track, other factors have induced a boom in people riding for transportation. Bike shops saw a boom during pandemic restrictions, and Calgary streets that were converted to active transportation were well used.


Calgary Herald
2 days ago
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: Transportation minister needs to stay in his lane
Transportation Minister Devin Dreeshen recently wrote to the mayors of both Edmonton and Calgary with 'concerns' about bike lanes. His first letter to Edmonton called for the cancellation of the 132nd Avenue project, but the letter to Calgary was more vague, stating 'we need to seriously consider on how to maintain adequate capacity for motor vehicle traffic flow for current and future traffic needs, not reducing capacity.' Article content Article content If Dreeshen is concerned about the movement of traffic through the city, he should support more transportation options, not fewer. Traffic doesn't just include cars, it includes people who walk, take transit and, yes, ride bikes. Article content Article content Calgary city council has, in fact, been too hesitant in building cycling infrastructure. It has allowed the downtown cycle track to slowly crumble year after year, never making permanent what was built in the pilot project phase. This would be unacceptable if it were a road built for cars. Article content Much of the pathways end abruptly and large swaths of the city, including some of Calgary's lowest-income neighbourhoods, have little to no cycling infrastructure at all. Buying and maintaining a car is a huge financial burden and one that should be optional. Thanks to inflation, people are forced to pay more of their income into their vehicles. If Dreeshen's concern is making life easier for Albertans, he'd make it so we wouldn't need to. Article content Article content Adding more car traffic lanes in cities with limited space isn't going to solve traffic problems. If anything, it forces everything to spread out, which in turn forces us all into cars. It's a vicious cycle that we have been doing for decades, and stretches both municipal and personal budgets. Article content I know Dreeshen supports transportation options. He made it legal to drive golf carts on roads in his home riding last year. So why does he want to constrain options in Alberta's cities? Article content The research is abundant — giving people options to get around not only reduces traffic congestion, but improves quality of life. Article content Additionally, being able to experience the city around you in a way that is impossible to do in a car also feels pretty dang good. Since the initial build out of the downtown cycle track, other factors have induced a boom in people riding for transportation. Bike shops saw a boom during pandemic restrictions, and Calgary streets that were converted to active transportation were well used.


CBC
6 days ago
- CBC
What does it mean to be Albertan?
Nearly five million people live in Alberta, but is there a consensus on what it means to be a resident of this province? And where does the conversation around separatism fit into our identity? The CBC's Elise Stolte hit the sidewalks in Calgary to ask people.