Timeline of Iran's nuclear programme
Iran's more than half a century-old nuclear programme has been at the heart of regional and international tensions, shaping global diplomacy and fuelling sanctions.
Following Israel's early Friday attack on Iran's nuclear and military facilities, tensions have surged across the Middle East.
Here is a timeline tracing key developments in Iran's nuclear programme over the years.
1957:
The United States and Iran, then ruled by Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who was brought to power by a 1953 CIA coup against the country's democratically-elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, sign an agreement on civil nuclear cooperation.
1967:
The United States provides Iran with the Tehran Research Reactor (TRR), a 5-megawatt nuclear reactor along with weapon-grade 93 % enriched uranium fuel.
1968:
Iran signs the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) which, when ratified two years later, permits
1970:
The Iranian parliament ratifies the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT).
1974:
Shah Reza Pahlavi establishes the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) and announces plans to generate about 23,000 megawatts of energy over 20 years, including the construction of 23 nuclear power plants and the development of a full nuclear fuel cycle.
1984:
The US Department of State adds Iran to its list of state sponsors of terrorism, effectively imposing sweeping sanctions on Tehran.
1987:
Iran acquires technical schematics for building a P-1 centrifuge from the Abdul Qadeer Khan network.
1992:
Congress passes the Iran-Iraq Arms Nonproliferation Act of 1992, which prohibits the transfer of controlled goods or technology that might contribute 'knowingly and materially' to Iran's proliferation of advanced conventional weapons.
1996:
The US Congress passes the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act, also known as the Iran Sanctions Act, that penalizes foreign and US investment exceeding $20 million in Iran's energy sector in one year.
2002:
The National Council of Resistance on Iran, the political wing of the terrorist organization Mujahideen-e Khalq (MeK), holds a press conference and declares Iran has built nuclear facilities near Natanz and Arak.
2003:
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) ordered Iran to suspend uranium enrichment and allow broader inspections. Iran agreed by the October 31 deadline, pledging to halt enrichment and ratify a protocol granting expanded IAEA access.
2004:
After the IAEA rebuked Iran for lack of cooperation, Iran briefly resumed enrichment activities. It later agreed to suspend them again under the Paris Agreement with France, Germany, and the UK, avoiding referral to the UN Security Council.
2005:
Iran resumed uranium hexafluoride production at its Isfahan facility, prompting France, Germany, and the UK to end negotiations. On September 24, the IAEA passed a resolution finding Iran in noncompliance with its safeguards agreement, setting the stage for possible UN Security Council referral.
2006:
Iran enriched uranium for the first time and rejected a P5+1 proposal to halt the program. The UN Security Council responded with Resolutions 1696 and 1737, making suspension legally binding and imposing sanctions for Iran's noncompliance.
2007:
A US National Intelligence Estimate stated with high confidence that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and likely had not resumed it by mid-2007, though it could be capable of producing weapons-grade uranium between 2010 and 2015.
2009:
Iran launched its first satellite, heightening concerns over its ballistic missile capabilities. That April, the Obama administration shifted US policy by announcing full participation in P5+1 talks with Iran without preconditions. Then the US, UK, and France revealed that Iran had secretly built a second uranium-enrichment facility at Fordow, near Qom, a fact Iran only disclosed to the IAEA after learning it had been discovered. On October 1, Iran and the P5+1 agreed in principle to a US-proposed, IAEA-backed fuel swap for the Tehran Research Reactor, but Iran later sought to alter the deal amid domestic opposition.
2010:
Iran began enriching uranium to 20%, citing the Tehran Research Reactor as the purpose. In response, the UN Security Council, US congress and EU passed a broad package of trade and financial sanctions.
2011:
US intelligence assessed that Iran had not decided to build nuclear weapons but was preserving the option by advancing its capabilities. Iran announced plans to triple its 20% uranium enrichment using advanced centrifuges and move production to the Fordow facility. Meanwhile, the IAEA released a report outlining suspected nuclear weapons-related activities Iran pursued before 2004.
2012:
The EU agreed to ban Iranian oil imports and related insurance starting July 1, increasing pressure on Iran. The IAEA and Iran began discussions on suspected military aspects of Iran's nuclear program, while Iran and the P5+1 held 'positive' talks in Istanbul, agreeing to continue negotiations. The IAEA reported Iran had increased 20 % uranium enrichment beyond TRR needs and was expanding centrifuge installations at Fordow and Natanz.
2013:
Hassan Rouhani, a former nuclear negotiator, was elected president of Iran and pledged greater transparency while maintaining the country's nuclear program. In a historic development, President Obama called Rouhani—the highest US-Iran contact since 1979, expressing hope for a comprehensive resolution despite major challenges.
2014:
Implementation of the Joint Plan of Action began, with the IAEA confirming Iran's compliance, including halting 20 % uranium enrichment, diluting part of its enriched stockpile, and pausing work at the Arak reactor. The IAEA also initiated more frequent inspections. Despite this, Foreign Minister Zarif reiterated Iran's commitment to achieving a comprehensive deal ensuring the peaceful nature of its nuclear program.
2015:
The IAEA confirmed Iran's compliance with the interim nuclear deal, including expanded access to key nuclear facilities. Iran's Supreme Leader and parliament approved the deal, and the IAEA Board of Governors ended its investigation into Iran's past weaponization activities by terminating previous resolutions.
2016:
The IAEA verified Iran's compliance with the nuclear deal, triggering sanctions relief under UNSC Resolution 2231.Obama hailed the JCPOA as a step toward global security; Rouhani said Iran's nuclear rights were recognised. Despite compliance, Iran tested ballistic missiles and the US extended the Iran Sanctions Act for 10 years.
2017:
Defense Secretary Mattis backed the JCPOA, saying the US must honour its commitments despite flaws. Iran received Airbus jets, but missile tests led to new US non-nuclear sanctions. Trump waived nuclear sanctions but decertified Iran's compliance and demanded tougher legislation.
2018:
The US, under President Donald Trump, breached the JCPOA in May, unilterally withdrawing from the treaty and reimposing sweeping sanctions on Iran despite opposition from other signees of the pact.
Iran opened a new centrifuge facility but stayed within JCPOA limits. Israel accused Iran of hiding nuclear material, urging IAEA inspections.
2019:
Iran said it would exceed uranium enrichment caps and limits under the JCPOA. The US accused Iran of Gulf tanker attacks and the Saudi Aramco strike, which Iran denied.
2020:
The US killed General Soleimani; Iran abandoned JCPOA limits on enrichment and centrifuges. Sanctions waivers for nuclear cooperation projects were revoked by Washington. Satellite imagery showed mysterious new construction at the Fordow enrichment site.
2021:
Iran's parliament passed the Strategic Action Law, halting the Additional Protocol and resuming 20% uranium enrichment, effectively abandoning JCPOA commitments. Indirect talks with the US began in March but paused after Ebrahim Raisi's election in June.
In April, Iran began enriching uranium to 60%, heightening international concern.
By August, a draft deal was rejected by Khamenei despite reported US concessions, including lifting sanctions on Iranian leaders.
2022:
Talks between Iran and the US, led by Ali Bagheri Kani and Robert Malley, ended without agreement. Amid a violent crackdown on nationwide protests in Iran, Washington declared it was no longer pursuing nuclear diplomacy with Tehran.
2025:
Nuclear talks resumed between Iran and the US under President Trump, despite earlier condemnation from Khamenei. Tensions escalated in May and June as Trump warned of possible military conflict and Iran's uranium stockpile hit 408.6 kg at 60% purity.
The IAEA passed a resolution raising the threat of UN referral, prompting a sharp response from Iran. As talks were set for Sunday in Oman, the US evacuated non-essential staff, citing Israeli strike preparations.
Israel attacked Iran on June 13, under the pretext of blocking Tehran's nuclear weapon ambitions, despite Tehran's long-standing insistence that its nuclear programme is purely for civilian purposes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
13 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Ship attacked in Red Sea near Yemen, likely by Houthis, say officials
Houthi fighters near red sea as a cargo vessel is in the background. PHOTO: AFP Listen to article A ship came under attack in the Red Sea off the southwest coast of Yemen on Sunday, a British maritime agency and a security firm said, in an assault that one of them said bore the hallmarks of the Houthi group. Maritime security sources said the vessel, which they identified as the Liberian-flagged, Greek-owned bulk carrier Magic Seas, had taken on water after being hit by sea drones. The ship was first targeted by gunfire and self-propelled grenades launched from eight small boats, with armed security on the ship returning fire, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) and British maritime security firm Ambrey said in advisories. Ambrey said in a separate advisory that the ship was later attacked by four Unmanned Surface Vehicles. Read more: US, Israel bomb Yemen "Two of the USVs impacted the port side of the vessel, damaging the vessel's cargo," Ambrey added. UKMTO said the attack resulted in a fire onboard and that the incident was ongoing. There were no reports of injuries among the crew, a source at maritime security company Diaplous said. The vessel's operator was not immediately available for comment. No one immediately claimed responsibility for the attack, but Ambrey assessed the vessel "to meet the established Houthi target profile". It was the first such incident reported by the agencies in the area since mid-April. Tensions in the Middle East remain high over the war in Gaza and after the 12-day Israel-Iran war and airstrikes by the United States on Iranian nuclear sites in June. Sunday's attack occurred 51 nautical miles southwest of Yemen's port city of Hodeidah, the UKMTO and Ambrey said. Also read: Israel attacks secret Houthi meeting site in Yemen Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis launched more than 100 attacks targeting shipping from November 2023, saying they were acting in solidarity with Palestinians over Israel's war with Hamas. During that period, the group sank two ships, seized another and killed at least four seafarers in an offensive that disrupted global shipping, forcing firms to reroute, prompting the US to intensify attacks on the group this year. In May, President Donald Trump announced the U.S. would stop bombing the Houthis in Yemen, saying that the group had agreed to stop interrupting important shipping lanes in the Middle East. Under the agreement, neither the US nor the Houthis would target the other, including US ships in the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab Strait, Oman said in a statement at the time. Later in June, Yemen's Houthis threatened to target US ships in the Red Sea if Washington became involved in Israeli attacks on Iran. They have not specified whether they will follow through on their threat after the US attacked Iranian nuclear facilities last month.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Iran struck five Israeli military bases during 12-day war: report
The radar-based findings suggest that six Iranian missiles reached targets in Israel's north, south, and centre, contradicting public claims of minimal damage to military infrastructure. PHOTO: REUTERS Iranian missiles appear to have directly hit five Israeli military facilities during the recent 12-day war, according to radar data seen by The Telegraph. The strikes have not been made public by the Israeli authorities and cannot be reported from within the country because of strict military censorship laws. They will further complicate the battle of words between the enemies, with both sides attempting to claim absolute victory. The new data were shared with The Telegraph by US academics at Oregon State University, who specialise in using satellite radar data to detect bomb damage in war zones. It suggests five previously unreported military facilities were hit by six Iranian missiles in the north, south and centre of Israel, including a major air base, an intelligence gathering centre and a logistics base. Approached by The Telegraph on Friday, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said it would not comment on missile interception rates or damage to its bases. "What we can say is that all relevant units maintained functional continuity throughout the operation," said a spokesman. The strikes on the military facilities are in addition to 36 others known to have pierced Israeli air-defence systems, causing significant damage to residential and industrial infrastructure. Despite the considerable damage to residential property across the country, only 28 Israelis died – a testament to the country's sophisticated alert system and the disciplined use of bomb shelters and safe rooms by the population. Analysis by The Telegraph suggests that while the vast majority of Iranian missiles were intercepted, the proportion that got through grew steadily in the first eight days of the 12-day war. The reasons for this, say experts, are not clear but may include the rationing of a limited stock of interceptor missiles on the Israeli side and improved firing tactics and the possible use of more sophisticated missiles by Iran. Although the Iron Dome is Israel's best-known air-defence system, it is actually designed to protect against short-range projectiles such as mortars and is only one part of the "layered" air-defence system the country uses. In the middle tier stands the David's Sling air-defence system, which is optimised for intercepting drones and missiles with ranges up to 300km. At the top is the Arrow system, which engages long-range ballistic missiles before they re-enter the atmosphere. Importantly, the Israeli systems were backed up throughout the 12-day war by two US ground-based THAAD missile-defence systems and ship-based interceptors launched from US assets in the Red Sea. The US is estimated to have launched at least 36 THAAD interceptors during the war at a cost of some $12 million a time. In Israel, a densely packed small country of just 9.7 million people, the piercing of the country's famed missile-defence systems has come as a shock, with the authorities having to issue notices warning that they were "not hermetic". The 15,000 made homeless are especially conspicuous as they have been distributed to hotel accommodation throughout the country and the restriction of residential sites has been reported freely. But there has also been growing suspicion within the country that military targets were hit. Raviv Drucker of Channel 13, one of the country's best-known journalists, said last week: "There were a lot of [Iranian] missile hits in IDF bases, in strategic sites that we still don't report about to this day... It created a situation where people don't realise how precise the Iranians were and how much damage they caused in many places". Corey Scher, a researcher at Oregon State University, said his unit was working on a fuller assessment of missile damage in both Israel and Iran, and would publish its findings in around two weeks. He said the radar system data that they used to assess damage measured changes in the built environment to detect blasts and that absolute confirmation of hits would necessitate either on-the-ground reporting at the military sites concerned or satellite pictures. The Telegraph's data analysis shows the combined US and Israeli defence systems performed well overall, but were letting through around 16 per cent of missiles by day seven of the war. This broadly accords with an earlier IDF estimate for the defence system that put the success rate at "87 per cent". In Iran, Islamic Republic officials and state media are using footage of missiles penetrating Israeli air defences in an attempt to convince domestic audiences they won the war. There are cartoons mocking the Iron Dome in Iranian media with revolutionary songs playing over videos of missiles hitting Israeli cities. Iranian officials say that the main way Israel's air defences were pierced was by using missiles and drones at the same time to confuse defence systems. Fast missiles mixed with slower drones confused the defences and made them split their attention, officials claim. "The main goal of firing [suicide drones] at Israel is always to keep their systems busy," one Iranian official told The Telegraph. "Many don't even get through – they're intercepted – but they still cause confusion." Maj Gen Ali Fazli, the IRGC's deputy commander-in-chief, appeared on state TV on Thursday night, claiming implausibly that Iran was "in the best defensive position in the 47-year history of the Islamic Revolution – never before have we been at such a level in terms of military readiness, operational cohesion, and fighter morale". This despite Israel's proven ability to strike at will over the entire country and the substantial damage caused to the country's military leadership and nuclear programme. Nevertheless, it is likely that a large part of Iran's ballistic missile arsenal remains untouched. Even by Israeli estimates, only half of its launchers were destroyed in the 12-day conflict and substantial stocks of missiles remain. "Iran had about 400 launchers, and we destroyed more than 200 of them, which caused a bottleneck in their missile operations," an Israeli military official said on Thursday They added: "We assessed that Iran had approximately 2,000 to 2,500 ballistic missiles at the beginning of this conflict. However, they were rapidly moving toward a mass-production strategy, which could see their missile stockpile grow to 8,000 or even 20,000 missiles in the next few years." Maj Gen Fazli claimed that underground "cities" of missiles remained untouched in Iran. "We have not yet opened the doors of even one of our missile cities," he claimed on Thursday. "We assess that so far only about 25 to 30 per cent of existing missile capability has been used and, at the same time, the production cycle is powerfully supporting this operational capacity."
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Bombers and a 'beautiful bill'
A B-2 Spirit and two F-35 aircraft take part in a flyover at the White House in Washington., while US President Donald Trump holds up his signed signature bill of tax breaks and spending cuts on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington. Photo AFP/Reuters US President Donald Trump signed his flagship tax and spending bill into law Friday, capping a grandiose White House Independence Day ceremony featuring a stealth bomber fly-by. "America is winning, winning, winning like never before," Trump said before signing the so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill" while flanked by Republican lawmakers who helped push it through Congress. Trump also played down criticism by Democrats that the unpopular legislation will slash social welfare programs, saying: "You won't even notice it." With First Lady Melania Trump at his side, Trump watched from the White House balcony as two B-2 bombers — the same type that recently struck Iranian nuclear sites — roared overhead, accompanied by F-35 and F-22 fighter jets. The 79-year-old's victory lap came a day after Republicans fell into line and passed the sprawling mega-bill, allowing him to sign it as he had hoped on the Fourth of July holiday. The bill honors many of Trump's campaign promises: extending tax cuts from his first term, boosting military spending and providing massive new funding for Trump's migrant deportation drive. The legislation's signing caps two weeks of significant wins for Trump that have seen him tighten his grip on power and his party alike. The successes include the recent Iran-Israel ceasefire that was sealed after what he called the "flawless" US air strikes on Iran. Pilots who carried out the bombing on Iran were among those invited to the White House event, which included a picnic for military families on the South Lawn. "The last two weeks, there has never been anything like it, as far as winning," said Trump. Trump had however forced through the tax bill despite deep misgivings in the Republican Party that it would balloon the national debt. The legislation is expected to pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the US deficit. It squeezed past a final vote in the House of Representatives 218-214 after Republican Speaker Mike Johnson worked through the night to corral the final group of dissenters. Trump thanked Johnson at the White House event, saying: "What a job." Trump's billionaire former ally Elon Musk was among the most vocal critics, and he has pledged to set up a new political party to oppose Republicans who backed the bill. Democrats and many voters have meanwhile expressed concerns that the "big beatuiful bill" will gut health and welfare support. The bill will force through the largest cuts to the Medicaid health insurance program for low-income Americans since its 1960s launch, while also shrinking federal food assistance programs. Up to 17 million people could lose their insurance coverage under the bill, according to some estimates. Scores of rural hospitals are expected to close as a result. But Trump played down the concerns. "They've developed a standard line, and we can't let them get away with it. 'Oh, it's dangerous. Oh, everybody's going to die.' It's actually just the opposite," said Trump. Democrats hope public opposition to the bill will help them flip the House in the 2026 midterm election, pointing to data showing that it represents a huge redistribution of wealth from the poorest Americans to the richest. People attending the Fourth of July parade in Washington on Saturday had mixed feelings. "Yesterday was a horrible day, today is the best part of America," said Elisabeth Hubir, 70.
