logo
Hegseth orders consolidation and transformation of the Army

Hegseth orders consolidation and transformation of the Army

Yahoo03-05-2025
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth ordered the Army to restructure itself in order to create a 'leaner' force. An April 30 memo, titled 'Army Transformation and Acquisition Reform,' calls for sweeping changes to the service, including consolidating commands, canceling several programs and putting more resources into utilizing and countering drones.
Some of the measures outlined, such as the expansion of drones and counter-drone systems into maneuver units and increased electronic warfare capabilities, draw on programs already underway. Others expand on wider military goals, including positioning the Army in the Indo-Pacific region to counter China.
'To build a leaner, more lethal force, the Army must transform at an accelerated pace by divesting outdated, redundant, and inefficient programs, as well as restructuring headquarters and acquisition systems,' the memo says.
The secretary's memo lays out several goals the Army must meet in the name of 'future warfare.' Those include expanding manufacturing capabilities, fielding new long-range missiles by 2027 and achieving 'electronic air-littoral dominance by 2027,' predominantly through expanding the use of uncrewed aerial systems or drones.
Some of the most significant structural changes called for include a proposed merger of U.S. Army North and U.S. Army South into a single headquarters rather than two separate force commands. Separately, the memo calls for consolidating Army Futures Command, which focuses on developing new technologies and tactics for soldiers, and Training and Doctrine Command, into a single four-star command. That will be based out of Texas, Army Chief of Staff Randy George said in a separate statement. Overall, Hegseth calls for the closure or consolidation of what he called 'redundant headquarters' and a reduction in the number of generals in the Army in the name of streamlining command chains.
A major part of the Army overhaul is the use of drones in the field. Soldiers in several units are already testing different types of uncrewed aerial systems for reconnaissance and offensive purposes, using lessons learned from the applicability of uncrewed aerial systems in the war between Ukraine and Russia. As part of that, every Army division will field drones in some capacity by the end of 2026, Hegseth directs.
The memo goes on to call for an expansion of counter-UAS measures as well. Specifically it demands that the Army find more affordable tools for that mission, with those elements integrated into maneuver platoons by 2026, and into maneuver companies by 2027.
The integration of more drone capabilities also comes as Hegseth orders a scaling down in other Army features, specifically the number of crewed attack helicopter formations. To augment those reductions, Hegseth also demands the addition of drone swarms that can serve in support of Army aircraft.
Another major part of the proposal calls for giving the Army the 'right to repair.' Essentially, that would let the U.S. Army fix its own equipment. Currently, the military has the original manufacturer or other contractors conduct maintenance or heavy repairs on its tools and weapons. That can lead to high costs, often from having to transport the gear and machinery to other locations. The right to repair movement has often focused on civilian consumers, but the memo on the Army outlines how it could help military efficiency.
The secretary's memo calls for the Army to 'identify and propose contract modifications for right to repair provisions where intellectual property constraints limit the Army's ability to conduct maintenance.'
Beyond the technical integration and components laid out by the directive, the secretary's memo also calls for shifts in manufacturing, acquisition and logistics. Key among the strategic deployments to the Pacific with planting stocks of ammunition and other equipment in locations in the region. In order to help build up those supplies, it also calls for growing American industrial capabilities to avoid running low on munitions and other equipment. The Army has already been working on that, in light of the war in Ukraine, but the directive calls for the industrial base to reach its 'full operational capability' by 2028.
Another proposed merger calls for combining units within Army Material Command, with the goal of creating a more streamlined sustainment system, as well as expanding the use of 3D printing by units in the field, to help meet immediate needs.
Marine in top enlisted spot leaving the Pentagon after just 2 years
Army sergeant found guilty in spree of barracks break-ins and attempted murder
End of the 'yeet': the standing power throw is out as new Army fitness test goes 'sex-neutral' for combat jobs
Good luck figuring out the Air Force's algorithm for shaving waivers
Army cuts athletic trainers from fitness teams, with medics to take up slack
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India Clears $12.3 Billion of Defense Purchases After Clash
India Clears $12.3 Billion of Defense Purchases After Clash

Bloomberg

time2 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

India Clears $12.3 Billion of Defense Purchases After Clash

India approved $12.3 billion of defense purchases a month after its military confrontation with neighboring Pakistan. The Defence Acquisition Council cleared 10 proposals, according to a government statement. These include armored recovery vehicles, surface-to-air missiles, electronic warfare systems, and a tri-services inventory management system. The navy will also acquire moored mines, mine countermeasure vessels, submersible autonomous vessels, and super rapid gun mounts.

When half the nation steps forward: Women's contributions to security
When half the nation steps forward: Women's contributions to security

Chicago Tribune

time4 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

When half the nation steps forward: Women's contributions to security

As the Army faces a potential 7% reduction in combat strength in only two years, women are proving to be the solution. With an unprecedented 18% increase in enlistment rates compared to just 8% for men, women's leadership brings to bear an expanded pool of talent that fortifies long-term military readiness and provides strategic value to military and peace operations globally. Recruitment offices once dominated by male applicants now see a steady stream of women signing contracts. Nearly 10,000 women joined active duty in 2024 alone, propping up a service that missed male recruitment targets by 25%. This shift is not incidental. As traditional male eligibility pools shrink, military strategists openly admit women now represent the most viable recruitment demographic, a reality underscored by their overrepresentation in education and skill-based qualifications critical for modern warfare. While women comprise 17 percent of armed forces personnel, senior leadership remains overwhelmingly male, creating a 'glass ceiling' that undermines retention. Recruitment wins mask a devastating leak in the pipeline. A 2020 report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that women exit military service 28% faster than men, with sexual violence and institutional distrust driving the exodus. Reports from the Department of Defense's Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office between 2016 and 2021 also revealed that 1 in 4 assault survivors takes concrete steps to leave the military entirely, while 60% of servicewomen doubt their safety will be prioritized. These numbers highlight a troubling paradox: while military organizations depend on women to serve, they continue to face challenges in earning their trust and ensuring they feel safe enough to remain. The Navy's newly launched Women's Initiatives Team indicates growing awareness within military leadership of this issue and aims to reverse it by fostering a more enabling environment, spreading awareness, and influencing policy changes to increase the recruitment and retention of servicewomen throughout the Navy. It will meet on a periodic basis to build community, develop best practices and discuss relevant issues, leading to opportunities for barrier removal by Navy leadership. However, real change requires dismantling decades of entrenched culture. Childcare limitations, uneven promotion pathways and the daily grind of proving competence in male-dominated spaces further strain retention. The conversation on recruitment and retention cannot ignore the importance of policy frameworks like the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda, championed by organizations such as Our Secure Future (OSF). By leveraging insights from UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1325 and Women, Peace and Security National Action Plans, OSF has demonstrated how incorporating women's perspectives enhances operational effectiveness. Implementing UNSCR 1325 and WPS National Action Plans is essential not only for advancing women's participation and leadership, but also for enhancing the operational effectiveness of military organizations. Local cultural understanding and organizational diversity are critical and such implementation equips forces to navigate the complex challenges of stabilization more effectively. Policy frameworks laid the groundwork, but it's on the frontlines where the value of women can be proven. In Afghanistan, for example, Marine Corps Task Force Lioness deployed female teams to conduct culturally sensitive searches, disrupting insurgent tactics that exploited gender norms to hide weapons and operatives. Army Cultural Support Teams later formalized this approach, enabling access to local populations closed off to male soldiers. Special Operations Command took notice, embedding women with Green Berets and Rangers for high-stakes missions. The United Nations rightly underscores the critical importance of integrating female soldiers and their perspectives into peace operations, particularly where military and civilian responsibilities intersect. As noted in an Inclusive Security report on implementing UNSCR 1325 for military effectiveness, female personnel play a vital role in addressing the specific needs of women and girls, such as supporting the demobilization and reintegration of female ex-combatants. They are also uniquely positioned to interview survivors of gender-based violence, mentor female cadets in military and police academies, and engage with women in communities where cultural norms restrict interaction with men. Beyond these functional roles, female soldiers also serve as powerful role models, encouraging local women and girls to claim their rights and participate in peacebuilding efforts. Though these contributions may not align with traditional notions of military combat power, they are increasingly indispensable in the multifaceted operations that define modern peacekeeping and military operations. Ukraine's defense against Russia offers the latest validation. Its military recruited 70,000 women as snipers, tank commanders and medevac pilots, who now anchor frontline units. Yet even there, cultural resistance persists. Reports indicate that male commanders often marginalize female soldiers, wasting critical skills in a war of survival. Research stresses that modern conflicts demand this duality: women securing villages by day and mentoring cadets by night, blending combat rigor with community trust-building. As OSF emphasizes, failing to harness this full spectrum doesn't just disadvantage women, it undermines mission success. The data leaves no ambiguity. Women will enlist, lead and fight when given the chance. But until militaries address the affliction of sexual violence and institutional bias, they'll keep losing their best recruits to preventable failures.

European defence stocks tick up on NATO spending pledge
European defence stocks tick up on NATO spending pledge

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

European defence stocks tick up on NATO spending pledge

(Reuters) -Shares in European defence firms edged up on Thursday after NATO leaders on Wednesday backed the increase in defence spending demanded by U.S. President Donald Trump. As of 0814 GMT, German contractor Rheinmetall and Italy's Fincantieri, which on Thursday said it received an order worth 700 million euros ($820.89 million), were the top gainers, up between 3% and 6%. A broader European defence index, which this year has rallied 49% on the back of a changed stance towards the sector in Europe, was up 1.3%. Countries on Wednesday pledged to spend 3.5% of GDP on core defence and 1.5% on broader defence-related measures, a jump worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year from the current goal of 2% of GDP. However, J.P. Morgan analysts say that the market is lukewarm to the targets, which are to be achieved over the next 10 years. "The European defense companies we cover and the European defense investors we speak with do not believe that most European countries will be able to spend 3.5% of GDP on core defense in the next 5-10 years," they wrote in a note to clients. Tom Guinchard, equity research analyst at Pareto Securities said the focus for defence companies would be Northern Europe, Germany and the Baltics, which are most likely to reach the targets. "Already last week, we saw Spain get the exception," said Guinchard. "France will have difficulties leveraging up to 3.5% of GDP and most of the southern countries are going to be quite hesitant." ($1 = 0.8527 euros)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store