Explained: What Is The Patriot Missile System And How It Is Helping Ukraine
On Sunday, US President Donald Trump said the US would send an undisclosed number of Patriots to Ukraine, and that the European Union would pay for them.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has asked for more defensive capabilities, among them Patriot systems and missiles, to fend off daily missile and drone attacks from Russia.
Here is some key information about the Patriot:
What Is The Patriot System?
The Patriot, short for Phased Array Tracking Radar for Intercept on Target, is a mobile surface-to-air missile defence system developed by Raytheon Technologies.
It is considered one of the most advanced air defence systems in the US arsenal and has been in service since the 1980s.
A typical battery includes radar and control systems, a power unit, launchers, and support vehicles. The system can intercept aircraft, tactical ballistic missiles and cruise missiles, depending on the interceptor used.
How Does The Patriot Work?
The system has different capabilities depending on the type of interceptor used.
The earlier PAC-2 interceptor uses a blast-fragmentation warhead that detonates in the vicinity of a target, while the PAC-3 family of missiles uses more accurate technology that hits the target directly.
It is not clear what kind of Patriot systems have been donated to Ukraine, but it is likely that Kyiv has at least some of the newer PAC-3 CRI interceptors.
The system's radar has a range of over 150 km (93 miles), the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) said in 2015.
Although the Patriot was not originally designed to intercept hypersonic weapons and Raytheon has not yet confirmed if it is able to do so, in May 2023 the US confirmed Ukraine had used it to shoot down a Russian Kinzhal missile, which Moscow claims is hypersonic.
Since January 2015, the Patriot has intercepted more than 150 ballistic missiles in combat operations, Raytheon says on its website.
How Widely Is It Used?
Raytheon has built and delivered over 240 Patriot fire units, according to its website.
These have been shipped to 19 countries, according to Raytheon, including the US, Germany, Poland, Ukraine, Japan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
In January, Axios reported the US had transferred about 90 Patriot interceptors from Israel to Ukraine.
How Much Does It Cost?
A newly produced single Patriot battery costs over $1 billion, including $400 million for the system and $690 million for the missiles in a battery, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Patriot interceptors are estimated at around $4 million per missile, CSIS says.
Why Does Ukraine Want More Patriots?
Kyiv has consistently asked Western allies for more air defences to protect critical infrastructure and civilian areas from frequent Russian missile and drone attacks.
While effective at intercepting missiles and aircraft, Patriots are a costly way to shoot down low-budget drones.
Still, Ukrainian officials say they are essential to defending key targets from Russia's escalating long-range attacks.
Russia says it sees the Patriots as a direct escalation. Foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in May that supplying more systems to Ukraine would delay the chances of peace.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
18 minutes ago
- NDTV
In US Trade Deal Race, India Seeks Lower Tariff Than Indonesia: Report
Indian officials are hoping to secure a trade deal with US President Donald Trump at a lower tariff rate than he'd agreed with Indonesia as New Delhi races to meet an August 1 deadline. Trump said Tuesday the US will impose a tariff rate of 19% on imports from Indonesia, down from a threatened 32%, and will be able to ship American goods to the country tariff-free. The US president later told reporters that the India deal would be "along that same line" and "we're going to have access into India." On Wednesday, he again said the US was "very close" to a deal with India. India is seeking more favourable rates than Indonesia and the 20% tariff Trump has said he'll impose on Vietnam, officials in New Delhi said, asking not to be identified because the discussions are private. The US and India are working toward a deal that would reduce proposed tariffs to below 20%, Bloomberg News previously reported, with a negotiating team currently in Washington to advance the talks. New Delhi is hoping for a tariff that would give it a competitive advantage against its peers in the region, officials said. India believes the US doesn't view it as a transhipment hub like Vietnam and other Southeast Asian nations, and negotiations so far suggest India's tariff rate would be better than those countries, one of the people said. The Ministry of Commerce and Industry didn't immediately respond to an email seeking further comment. GLOBAL INSIGHT: Delhi's Trade Math in Talks with Trump Soumya Kanti Ghosh, chief economist of State Bank of India, and a member of the prime minister's Economic Advisory Council, said the negotiating team would be hoping to bring the tariff down to below 10%. "And in the bargain, the US will expect significant concessions for its goods when they decide to enter India," he said. While India is unwilling to open up the agricultural and dairy sectors, it may give concessions in non-agricultural sectors, he said. India has already proposed to reduce tariffs on American industrial goods to zero if the US does the same. New Delhi has also offered greater market access to some American farm products, and has also raised the possibility of buying more Boeing Co. planes. Aside from Indonesia, Trump has also announced trade deals with the UK and Vietnam, and a truce with China. Trump said Jakarta had agreed to purchase $15 billion in US energy and $4.5 billion worth of agricultural products along with Boeing planes. The latest development shows that tariff rates are gravitating toward 15%-20%, a range that Trump himself has indicated as his preferred level, said Brian Tan, Barclays Plc's economist in Singapore. The tariff letters sent to trading partners so far are likely a negotiating tactic to bring governments back to the table with better offers for the US, he said, "allowing the Trump administration to secure superior 'deals'." Malaysia's trade minister said he's waiting to see the details of the Indonesia agreement and the country is still in negotiations with the US on its own tariffs, The Star reported. "Most importantly, we must ensure that this is a negotiation beneficial to both countries," Tengku Zafrul, minister of investment, trade and industry, was quoted by the newspaper as saying. "It must be win-win."
Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
Young girl's one-night stand with foreign gamer ‘harms national dignity'; 21-year-old faces expulsion from university
A Chinese student surnamed Li may be expelled from her university for having casual sex with a 37-year-old Ukrainian gamer. The matter has become a topic of national debate in China. The Dalian Polytechnic University says her actions harmed 'national dignity'. It now plans to expel her. Danylo Teslenko, also known as 'Zeus', posted private photos and videos of them online after he had a one-night stand with the 21-year-old. Allegedly, he also called Li an 'easy girl', according to the South China Morning Post. According to local media, Li had a boyfriend when she was involved with Teslenko. Teslenko reported has a child from his marriage. His fans leaked the footage and revealed Li's full identity, including her name and family details. Some men also contacted the university asking for her to be punished. What the university did next shocked many. The university shared her full name and alleged that she chose to "socialise with foreigners improperly and undermine national dignity and the school's reputation', SCMP reported. They also claimed she had damaged the school's name. Many people online believe the university's reaction is too harsh. They believe Li's privacy and rights were not respected. Many people online said the punishment was unfair and that her private life should not concern the school. Meanwhile, the gamer has said that he regrets sharing the videos. At the same time, he has denied allegations like being married or calling Chinese girls 'easy'. Some believe his Russian words were misunderstood. Li can appeal the university's decision by September 7. However, she has not taken any action yet. According to a lawyer who spoke to Fengmian News, the school has no legal reason to expel her. The rules for student expulsion don't match her case. Other lawyers also said she should get legal help. Many believe the case shows bias against women. They have raised questions about privacy and gender equality in universities. Many social media users feel the punishment is too harsh and unfair. They think her privacy was not respected. In similar cases involving men, names were often hidden, and punishments were lighter. One user pointed out that 'Uncle Red'. The news of Uncle Red became viral in China. The 38-year-old Chinese man named Jiao was earlier arrested. He became infamous online for pretending to be a woman, having sex with men, secretly filming them and sharing the videos. According to others, Li is the real victim. 'She is the biggest victim in this case. The Ukrainian man posted her face without her consent. The men witch-hunted her. Her school further hurt her by expelling her and publishing her name. They all owe her an apology,' SCMP quoted one social media user as saying.
Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
Daunted by geopolitics, trade war, US companies in China report record-low new investment plans
Washington, American companies in China are reporting record-low new investment plans for this year and declining confidence in their profitability, with uncertainty in US-China relations and President Donald Trump's tariffs their top concerns, according to a new survey. The companies are also challenged by China's slowing economy, where weak domestic demand and overcapacity in local industries are eroding profitability for the Americans. 'Businesses in China are less profitable now than they were years ago, but risks, including reputational risk, regulatory risk, and political risk, are increasing,' said Sean Stein, the president of the US-China Business Council, a Washington-based group that represents American companies doing business in China, including major multinationals. The survey, conducted between March and May and drawing from 130 member companies, was released Wednesday. It came as the two countries clash over tariffs and non-tariff measures, including export controls on critical products such as rare-earth magnets and advanced computer chips. Following high-level talks in Geneva and London, US and Chinese officials agreed to pull back from sky-high tariffs and restrictions on exports, but uncertainty persists as the two sides are yet to hammer out a more permanent trade deal. Kyle Sullivan, vice president of business advisory services at the USCBC, said more than half of the companies in the survey indicated they do not have new investment plans in China 'at all' this year. "That's a record high,' Sullivan said, noting that it is 'a new development that we have not observed in previous surveys'. Around 40% of companies reported negative effects from US export control measures, with many experiencing lost sales, severed customer relationships, and reputational damage from being unreliable suppliers, according to the survey. Citing national security, the US government has banned exports to China of high-tech products, such as the most advanced chips, which could help boost China's military capabilities. Stein argued that export controls must be very carefully targeted, because businesses from Europe or Japan, or local businesses in China would immediately fill the void left by American companies. Silicon Valley chipmaker Nvidia won approval from the Trump administration to resume sales to China of its advanced H20 chips used to develop artificial intelligence, its CEO Jensen Huang announced on Monday, though the company's most powerful chips remain under US export control rules. While 82% of US companies reported profits in 2024, fewer than half are optimistic about the future in China, reflecting concerns over tariffs, deflation, and policy uncertainty, according to the survey. Also, a record high number of American businesses plan to relocate their business operations outside of China, Sullivan said, as 27% of the members indicated so, up from 19% the year before. In a departure from past surveys, concerns over China's regulatory environment, including risks of intellectual property misuse and lack of market access, didn't make it to the top five concerns this year. That's likely a first, and not for a good reason, Stein said. 'It is not because things got dramatically better on the Chinese side, but the new challenges, often coming from the US, are now posing as much of a challenge,' Stein said. Almost all the American companies said they cannot remain globally competitive without their Chinese operations. A survey from the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China in May found that European companies were cutting costs and scaling back investment plans in China as its economy slows and fierce competition drives down prices. SCY SCY This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
