logo
The Funniest Part of Alison Bechdel's Work

The Funniest Part of Alison Bechdel's Work

The Atlantic23-05-2025
This is an edition of the Books Briefing, our editors' weekly guide to the best in books. Sign up for it here.
Dykes to Watch Out For, the long-running lesbian comic strip that launched Alison Bechdel's career, is full of kitchen-table drama and dry humor, but its title is also more literal than those elements might suggest. Watch out, strip after strip said: Here comes Mo, the main character and author-avatar, spinning her way onto the page like a flustered Tasmanian devil of '90s-lefty anxiety. Look out for Mo, going hoarse over the rise of Pat Buchanan or chiding her circle for not thinking enough about genocide in Bosnia. There's Mo, nose in a newspaper, ignoring her friends' new baby to stress about the latest mainstream co-optation of radical activism.
This might sound like a drag, but it's actually one of the funniest running bits in Bechdel's work. For decades, the author has allowed herself—or her stand-in self—to be loudly annoying, and often wrong, on the page. When Mo's a bummer, her friends snap back at her; when she talks or worries her way out of an opportunity to get laid, they poke fun at her. Mo is frequently uptight about other people's choices (to take Prozac, for instance, or to transition), but her diatribes usually end with her being dressed down or hurting someone she cares about. I've always been charmed by how much Bechdel is willing to let Mo be both her double and the butt of her joke. In her new book, Spent, Bechdel blurs the writer-character line even further, Hanna Rosin writes this week, and the result is even more gratifying.
First, here are four new stories from The Atlantic 's books desk:
Spent is not a memoir, but neither is it wholly fictional. Instead, it's a graphic novel about a character named Alison Bechdel, who looks just like Alison Bechdel, the book's author—and also an older Mo. Novel-Alison, like real Alison, lives in Vermont with her partner, Holly, and has made a lot of unexpected money off a television adaptation of her memoir. (Bechdel's memoir Fun Home was adapted into a Tony Award–winning musical.) Alison and Holly's closest friends in Vermont are old standbys from DTWOF: Sparrow, Stuart, and their child, J.R.; Ginger; and Lois, who all live in a group house. They're busy with their own various crises and hookups, while Alison finds that more money means more problems. 'There's no avoiding it. She is complicit to the craw with the capitalist crisis,' a box of omniscient narration says in one panel. Alison, sitting at her desk doing her taxes, says aloud: 'Someone should write a book about this.'
Spent is that book. Bechdel the author is 'astute enough to know that famous people lamenting the burdens of fame are insufferable,' Rosin writes. So here, 'she's created an Alison whose dilemma parodies contemporary celebrity culture, while also parodying herself, the author.' And, thank goodness, it's still funny. Alison keeps putting her foot in her mouth on social issues, especially in front of the radical recent college dropout J.R. and their companion, Badger. The young adults—furious with the world for going about business as usual during a 21st-century 'polycrisis' (the name of a podcast they host)—resemble in many ways a younger Mo. Meanwhile, Alison wonders where her fighting spirit has gone, growing concerned that luxury and age have dulled her into complacency.
When Sparrow suggests that the kids cool it, Bechdel isn't mocking their idealism. And she's not suggesting that Alison's become a coldhearted reactionary—just that she has more to manage, and perhaps more to lose, than she did years before. After all, in DTWOF, Mo's all-consuming neuroticism prevented her from living a fulfilling life, driving away friends and lovers. As in previous books, Bechdel seems to hint that a middle path is the only way forward: Giving in to mega-corporations and nihilistically welcoming climate apocalypse, she suggests, is an abdication of our responsibilities to one another. But her characters have to learn, again and again, that sticking to your principles doesn't have to mean ruining every meal shared with your loved ones.
What Is Alison Bechdel's Secret?
By Hanna Rosin
The cartoonist has spent a lifetime worrying. In a new graphic novel, she finds something like solace.
Read the full article.
What to Read
Moderation, by Elaine Castillo
Girlie Delmundo—not her real name; she adopted it for her high-stress job—is a content moderator at a massive tech firm. Her work involves filtering through a carousel of online horrors so crushing that there are typically three or four suicide attempts among her co-workers each year. Girlie, however, is sardonic and no-nonsense by nature: She's an eldest daughter shaped by the 2008 recession, when her immigrant family lost everything. The job can't break her. But her life transforms when she gets a cushy position as an elite moderator for a virtual-reality firm. Suddenly, Girlie is enjoying perks such as regular VR therapy sessions, in which she experiences rare moments of bliss—swimming through cool water, touching the bark of a tree. The new gig is great, at least for a while. (All may not be as it seems there.) Her new boss, William, also happens to be a total stud, and his presence transforms Castillo's flinty satire of the tech industry into a sultry romance novel. As we watch Girlie's defenses melt, the book shows a woman slowly surrendering to human experiences that can't be controlled. — Valerie Trapp
Out Next Week
📚 Autocorrect, by Etgar Keret
📚 When It All Burns, by Jordan Thomas
📚 The South, by Tash Aw
Your Weekend Read
The World That 'Wages for Housework' Wanted
By Lily Meyer
But creating social conditions that are conducive to motherhood doesn't have to be part of a reactionary agenda. Indeed, one of the feminist movement's most radical and idealistic intellectual branches, a 1970s campaign called Wages for Housework, advocated for policies that, if ever implemented, genuinely might set off a baby boom. Its central goal was straightforward: government pay for anybody who does the currently unremunerated labor of caring for their own home and family. On top of that, the movement envisioned communal social structures and facilities including high-quality public laundromats and day cares that would get women out of their homes and give them their own time, such that paying them to do housework wouldn't consign them to a life without anything else.
* Lead image: Excerpted from the book Spent, provided courtesy of Mariner Books, an imprint of HarperCollins Publishers. © 2025 by Alison Bechdel. Reprinted by permission.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Adults Have Always Wondered If the Kids Are Alright
Adults Have Always Wondered If the Kids Are Alright

Atlantic

time3 hours ago

  • Atlantic

Adults Have Always Wondered If the Kids Are Alright

This is an edition of Time-Travel Thursdays, a journey through The Atlantic 's archives to contextualize the present. Sign up here. The writers of The Atlantic have a long history of fretting about the youths. Take one 1925 article, which began with a call for reason: a promise to judge fairly whether modern young adults were truly as delinquent as everyone seemed to be saying. 'They are under suspicion on the counts of, briefly, dancing, drinking, kissing, motoring alone and often at night ('alone' means two together),' the author, identified only as 'A Professor,' declared. 'In the case of girls, dress is included, or rather, going about with legs and arms bared.' Of the drinking charge, young people seemed to be absolved. Certainly they were imbibing, but less than their elders—and they'd developed new etiquette to keep things under control. ('A really nice girl may drink cocktails in public,' the writer explained, 'but not whiskey and soda.') On the other counts, unfortunately, the Professor didn't let them off so easily: 'Legs are no more interesting than noses' when young ladies wear skirts this short. 'The sad truth is that the human frame has ceased to be romantic.' Oh, and this new generation, in addition to diluting sex appeal, reportedly lacked intellectual curiosity. Also emotion: 'There seems no doubt that these young things feel less, on the whole, and do more, than once did we.' That was just one story in a whole canon of writing, published here and elsewhere, that has professed concern for young people—but with an undercurrent of condescension, even disdain. In a 1975 classic of the genre, the conservative journalist Midge Decter described the young hippies around her as coddled to the point of incompetence, having used the idea of a countercultural movement to get away with doing nothing much at all. 'Heaped with largesse both of the pocketbook and of the spirit,' she wrote, 'the children yet cannot find themselves.' All those writers who peer at the youths, squinting through their binoculars and scribbling in their notepads, make up an embarrassing lineage. Recently, I've been wondering if I'm part of it. I write fairly often about Gen Z, sometimes worriedly —but I'm a Millennial. I didn't have iPads around when I was a child; I wasn't scrolling on Instagram in middle school. I'd already graduated college and made new friends in a new city when the pandemic hit. I'm still examining contemporary young adulthood from the inside, I've told myself. But a few days ago, I turned 30. Technically, I'm in a new life phase now: ' established adulthood.' Where's the line between ogling and empathizing? And how do you describe trends—which are broad by definition—without using too broad a brush? The young people of the 1970s arguably were, on the whole, more interested in challenging norms than their parent's generation had been; that seems worth documenting. Any dysfunction that came along with that may have been worth noting too. (Joan Didion clearly thought so.) Likewise, the Professor wasn't wrong that social mores were transforming with each successive generation. Legs were becoming more like noses, and that's the honest truth. The task, I think, is to write with humility and nuance—to cast young adults not as hopefully lost or uniquely brilliant and heroic, but just as people, dealing with the particular challenges and opportunities of their day. In 1972, The Atlantic published a letter from a father who jokingly wondered how the youths described in the papers could possibly be the same species as his children. 'Not long ago the president of Yale University said in the press that when the young are silent it means they are feeling 'a monumental scorn' for political hypocrisy,' he wrote. 'When my son, Willard, Jr., is silent, I am never sure what it means, but I believe that he has his mind considerably on sexual matters and on methods of developing the flexor muscles of his upper arms.' Readers have always been able to tell the difference between real curiosity and zoological scrutinizing. They know when a stereotype rings hollow. Just rifle through the five pages of responses to Decter's story, which The Atlantic published with headlines such as 'Sentimental Kitsch,' 'Hideous Clichés,' and—my personal favorite—'Boring and Irrelevant.' One reader told Decter, with bite, not to worry so much about those wild children who weren't settling down in their jobs and houses like good boys and girls. 'Rest assured,' he wrote, 'my generation will be like hers—led by the silent, nervous superachievers, intent on their material goal, lacking the time to question the madness of their method.' The characterization is cutting. But that letter also raises another good point: Young people are not immune to oversimplifying, either. They'll eventually get old enough to write about their elders, and to include their own sweeping generalizations and nuggets of truth. 'I wonder what will be written in 1995 about our children. I get the feeling we will make the same mistakes,' another reader wrote to Decter. 'For isn't that the American way?'

How to watch 'Mix Tape' online from anywhere
How to watch 'Mix Tape' online from anywhere

Tom's Guide

time2 days ago

  • Tom's Guide

How to watch 'Mix Tape' online from anywhere

Daniel and Alison meet as teenagers in Sheffield, South Yorkshire in 1989 and fall in love as teenagers he sends her a "Mix Tape", hence the name of this four part Irish-Australian drama which critics are calling a 'sweet, intense romance'. Here's how to watch "Mix Tape" online from anywhere with a VPN — and potentially for free. "Mix Tape" is already available on Binge in Australia. It arrives in the U.K. and U.S. later this year.• Australia – Binge 7-day free trial• U.S. — Date TBC• U.K. — Summer 2025 on BBC iPlayer • Watch anywhere — try NordVPN 100% risk free And so it plays out, over four episodes, between Sheffield (where Daniel has remained as a music journalist) and Sydney (home to best-selling novelist) Alison. When social media provides the means to a reconnect, it becomes instantly apparent that something is still very much alive in the relationship. Both are married to other people (and have children), however. Ah. While two people who are meant to be (or were they?) wrestle with the situation we get slick flashbacks and flash forwards and, of course, a brilliant soundtrack. One quibble, please can we have some legislation to stop "Love will Tear Us Apart" being included in every other film or TV series? It just about escapes here given the title and crux of the show but it's ubiquity is killing its importance. Read on to find out how to watch "Mix Tape" (2025) online, on TV and from anywhere. TV drama "Mix Tape" premiered on Binge in Australia on Thursday, June 12. It is still available to stream. Abroad? Don't panic you can tune in back home on your usual domestic streaming platform by using a VPN such as NordVPN. Thanks to the wonders of a VPN (Virtual Private Network), "Mix Tape" should be available no matter where they are. The app allows your devices to appear to be back in your home country regardless of where in the world you find yourself. Our favorite is NordVPN. There's a good reason you've heard of NordVPN. We specialize in testing and reviewing VPN services and NordVPN is the one we rate best. It's outstanding at unblocking streaming services, it's fast and it has top-level security features too. With over 7,000 servers, across 110+ countries, and at a great price too, it's easy to recommend. Get over 70% off with this NordVPN deal Using a VPN is incredibly simple. 1. Install the VPN of your choice. As we've said, NordVPN is our favorite. 2. Choose the location you wish to connect to in the VPN app. For instance, if you're away from Australia and want to view Binge, you'd select Australia. from the list. 3. Sit back and watch the show. Head to Binge to watch "Mix Tape" online and on-demand now. You can watch a 2021 film called "Mixtape" but not, as yet, this 2025 four-part Irish-Australian drama. There is no release date for the latter (and far superior) production. If that changes you'll read it here first. However, if you are a Brit in the States for work or on vacation you will be able to catch the show by using a VPN such as NordVPN, choosing U.K. from the list and selecting BBC iPlayer. If you live in the U.K. then you can catch "Mix Tape" when it arrives on BBC Two this summer (2025). It will also be available to stream on BBC iPlayer. You'll find out the release date here first. You don't have to miss it if you an Aussie exiled abroad because you can unblock Binge and watch all four parts now with a VPN. We recommend NordVPN. As with the U.S., "Mix Tape" has no release date in the Great White North as yet (and it's not the same "Mixtape" on Netflix). However, if you are an Aussie in Canada for work or on vacation you can catch the show on your own domestic streaming platform by using a VPN such as NordVPN. Episode 01: In Sheffield in 1989, teenagers Daniel and Alison meet at a house party and bond over their shared love for music. The relationship they forge that night follows them forever. Episode 02: Daniel and Alison's relationship deepens through mixtapes, but Alison hides a secret. Years later, Daniel revisits her, wondering if she's still the same woman. Episode 03: In 1989, Alison's home life goes from bad to worse as she takes on caring for Peter. In 2015, Daniel struggles with Alison's revelations of what occurred during their relationship twenty years ago. Episode 04: In 1989, Daniel is left reeling and heartbroken due to Alison's sudden disappearance. In 2015, a surprise betrayal takes Daniel by surprise, but he has to fight for what he loves. It is. The acclaimed novel of the same name was written by Jane Sanderson and published in 2020. You can buy Mix Tape on Amazon (Kindle, audio book, hardcover and paperback). Lots – including Wimbledon, "The Settlers", "Strike: Ink Black Heart", "Gavin & Stacey Christmas Special", "Call The Midwife", "Doctor Who: Joy to the World", "Strictly Come Dancing", "Outnumbered" and plenty more. We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.

Toni Morrison's Definition of a Legacy
Toni Morrison's Definition of a Legacy

Atlantic

time6 days ago

  • Atlantic

Toni Morrison's Definition of a Legacy

This is an edition of the Books Briefing, our editors' weekly guide to the best in books. Sign up for it here. In 2012, I visited the home of Toni Morrison, who was then 81, to discuss, among other things, her legacy. Morrison's Nobel Prize sat on her kitchen island. She had just published her penultimate novel, Home, and she was quietly but unabashedly engaged in making sure her work would be read as widely as possible. She recalled for me a recent visit to the University of Michigan, where 'my books were taught in classes in law, feminist studies, Black studies. Every place but the English department.' Even as a Nobel laureate, she worried that her work would be confined to courses on identity, shelved in a side room of the American literary pantheon. At the time, I found her efforts difficult to square with her lifelong insistence that she was ' writing for b lack people ' and no one else. Now, almost six years after her death, it makes more sense to me, especially after reading the essay that my colleague Clint Smith wrote about Toni at Random, a new book that tracks Morrison's parallel career as a book editor. First, here are five new stories from The Atlantic 's books section: The real reason men should read fiction ' Fools for Love,' a short story by Helen Schulman The perils of 'design thinking' Americans are tired of choice. The cure for guilty memories In the 1970s, before Morrison was world-famous for her fiction, she worked at Random House, publishing writers who were uncompromising in their vision and advocacy for Black people—but she also had to appeal to a mass audience. This wasn't easy; she was a rare Black editor in a publishing industry that was mostly run by white people for white people. 'A salesman at a conference once told Morrison, 'We can't sell books on both sides of the street,'' Smith writes: 'There was an audience of white readers and, maybe, an audience of Black readers, he meant, but those literary worlds didn't merge.' Yet Morrison didn't believe Black writers had to cater to white audiences. They, too, could create 'something that everybody loves,' she said. Morrison's writers were not middle-of-the-road types: They included Angela Davis, Huey P. Newton, Gayl Jones, and Muhammad Ali. But she protected their integrity while raising them to the highest standards, putting the same level of rigor into editing them that she brought to her own novels. She interrogated gauzy concepts and clarified ideas. She made their work unimpeachable. And she resisted efforts to make their memoirs more relatable. (After one reader asked for more 'humanness,' she wrote to her boss that that was 'a word white people use when they want to alter an 'uppity' or 'fearless'' Black person.) She believed that a book didn't have to be written for the broadest possible audience to be widely read. In one interview with The Guardian, while explaining her insistence on writing for a Black audience, she noted that Leo Tolstoy hadn't written his classic novels for her, 'a 14-year-old coloured girl from Lorain, Ohio.' Nonetheless, she recognized his brilliance, and white readers could recognize hers. In her way, Morrison was offering a definition of a legacy: That a work reaches beyond not just the writer's lifespan, but her intended audience as well. In both her writing and her editing, Morrison was recording the experiences of Black Americans without looking over her shoulder at white readers or critics. She revealed that there was a market for Black literature on both sides of the street—but she also left an even more important mark. She succeeded, in the long term, not by carefully calibrating the work or by selling the 'humanness' of her characters and her writers, but by putting humanity plainly on the page, where it would outlast her and her critics alike. How Toni Morrison Changed Publishing By Clint Smith At night, she worked on her novels. By day, as an editor at Random House, she championed a new generation of writers. What to Read Sex and the City, by Candace Bushnell Before they became the show of the same name, Bushnell's columns in the pink pages of The New York Observer documented, with light fictionalizations, the sex and social lives of New York's ambitious and powerful—and her own, though she frequently disguised her run-ins as the affairs of her 'friend,' the character Carrie Bradshaw. In this volume of collected Observer columns, most of them focused on Carrie, Bushnell reveals herself to be a sage of power and social capital, an expert on relationships and how they can be used to build careers, accumulate social clout, and stomp on feelings. For anyone with a sense of ambition, whether you're moving somewhere new or settling down where you already are, her work is both an entertaining read and an instruction manual for how even the most casual acquaintanceships can transform your life. Cultivating them intentionally, Bushnell implicitly argues, can turn even the biggest metropolis into a small town where your next opportunity (or at the very least a good party) is just a conversation or two away. — Xochitl Gonzalez Out Next Week 📚 I Want to Burn This Place Down, by Maris Kreizman 📚 Oddbody, by Rose Keating 📚 Angelica: For Love of Country in a Time of Revolution, by Molly Beer Your Weekend Read The Blockbuster That Captured a Growing American Rift By Tyler Austin Harper In a cramped, $50-a-month room above a New Jersey furnace-supply company, Peter Benchley set to work on what he once said, half-jokingly, might be 'a Ulysses for the 1970s.' A novel resulted from these efforts, one Benchley considered titling The Edge of Gloom or Infinite Evil before deciding on the less dramatic but more fitting Jaws. Its plot is exquisite in its simplicity. A shark menaces Amity, a fictional, gentrifying East Coast fishing village. Chaos ensues: People are eaten. Working-class residents battle with an upper-class outsider regarding the best way to kill the shark. The fish eventually dies in an orgy of blood. And the political sympathies of the novel are clear—it sides with the townspeople, and against the arrogant, credentialed expert who tries to solve Amity's shark problem.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store