Sassa cracks down on recepients flagged for not disclosing income
The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) is cracking down on beneficiaries suspected of having alternative sources of income that were not disclosed to the agency.
Sassa in May said that about 210 000 people have been identified through credit bureau checks.
Warning
The agency stated that it was acting in accordance with the Social Assistance Act, which requires beneficiaries to declare all sources of income when applying for a grant and to report any changes after the grant has been approved.
'Failure to comply with these requirements constitutes a violation of the Act and may result in corrective action,' Sassa said.
Grant suspension
Now, in an effort to ensure that the right grant is paid to the right person, Sassa said these targeted beneficiaries are expected to present themselves at a Sassa local office where their eligibility will be reviewed to ascertain whether they remain eligible for the social grant that they initially applied for.
'Beneficiaries who fail to comply with this process risk having their grants suspended. Continued non-compliance may lead to the permanent lapsing of their grants'.
ALSO READ: Sassa grants: Here are the July payment dates and amounts
Review
Sassa said it has undertaken a review of its database and grant administration processes to root out fraud and ensure that assistance reaches those who are eligible.
'These reviews are specifically focused on individuals who appear to be active in the labour market and whose incomes are close to or exceed the means threshold; particularly where such income was not disclosed at the time of application or where changes in circumstances were not reported thereafter.'
Amended payment schedule
Sassa's national spokesperson, Paseka Letsatsi, also stressed that no grant have been suspended yet.
'Sassa has only amended the payment schedule for those beneficiaries who have been requested to come in for a review. From previous reviews, Sassa has become aware that most clients do not maintain their contact details with Sassa, and as a result, often don't get notifications that the Agency issues.
'While it is a legislative obligation for all beneficiaries to ensure that their contact details are always up to date and would have little recourse should their grant be suspended due to failure to respond to a notification issued by Sassa', Letsatsi said.
ALSO READ: More than 200 000 will experience Sassa grant delays — here's why
Letsatsi said the agency has issued an additional payment date, specifically for recipients placed on review, as a means to further communicate with clients that there is a need for them to contact Sassa.
'Should no contact be made after two months, as per legislative requirements, only then will these beneficiaries' grants be suspended.
'During the time of suspension, the beneficiary has one month to approach Sassa should they believe they still qualify. After this period, the grant will be permanently cancelled and depending on their circumstances, a fraud investigation opened', said Letsatsi.
Disclosure
Sassa has encouraged all beneficiaries to disclose any alternative sources of income and to report any additional bank accounts not previously declared.
'Furthermore, beneficiaries still using the green bar-coded ID book are urged to replace it with the smart ID card, due to the increased risk of fraud associated with the older ID format.
'Sassa reiterates its zero-tolerance stance on fraud and should there be evidence of any officials colluding with beneficiaries to defraud the system, immediate disciplinary and legal action will be taken to safeguard the integrity of the agency and prevent financial losses,' the agency said.
Meanwhile, with half the year over, Sassa on Monday announced its July payment schedule, which will be welcomed by beneficiaries.
Payments are expected to be made in phases over three days to avoid overcrowding at pay points and ATMs.
More than 18 million people rely on grants from Sassa.
ALSO READ: Ten of 11 accused in Sassa R260 million fraud case granted bail
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Cosatu, BBC slam Elon Musk's R2 billion investment plan to avoid BEE
Cosatu has slammed Minister Solly Malatsi's attempt to bypass South Africa's 30% local ownership law, purportedly for Elon Musk's Starlink. Image: AP Photo/Francois Mori The Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) has expressed concerns over the proposed policy direction on equity equivalent investment programmes (EEIPs) in the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) sector. Communications and Digital Technologies minister Solly Malatsi gazetted a policy direction on the role of EEIPs in the ICT sector, aiming to provide policy certainty and attract investment. The policy direction allows companies to meet empowerment obligations through alternatives to 30% ownership, such as investing in local suppliers, enterprise development, and job creation according to Malatsi. However, Cosatu spokesperson Matthew Parks, said the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) Act provides two options for investors that include a 30% shareholder option or an equity equivalent option. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The trade federation giant believes that the BBBEE Act is inclusive and provides accommodating options for all investors and not only for the wealthy. The federation is concerned that the proposed policy direction might allow companies like Starlink to bypass BBBEE requirements. "It's critical that Starlink, like all other investors, comply with the BBBEE Act, whether it is the shareholder or equity equivalent option," Parks emphasised. The BBBEE Act requires companies to offer 30% shareholding opportunities to historically disadvantaged individuals or offer equity equivalents, such as supporting local manufacturers, creating jobs, upgrading worker skills, or investing in local communities. Parks cited examples of companies like IBM and Microsoft that have utilised the equity equivalent option. Cosatu argues that exempting one company from BBBEE requirements would be unfair. "It would not be sustainable to exempt one company as this would be unfair to other companies and undermine the law," Parks said. Cosatu proposes that the government ensures BBBEE reaches those who most need empowerment, namely workers and working-class communities. The federation advocates for worker empowerment through Employee Shareholder Ownership Programmes and support for locally produced goods. The Black Business Council's (BBC) spokesperson Masedi Sesele also shut down the idea saying it would be 'bending of legislation' to accommodate an individual or company. 'Legislation is there for all to comply with, no exception. Otherwise, the country will become lawless…The BBBEE legislation together with the Codes of Good Practice prescribes that any company wanting to do business in South Africa should implement all the elements of the BBBEE codes being ownership, management control, skills development, enterprise and supplier development, and socio-economic development. We don't know how the rumoured R2 billion is going to implement those important elements. 'Anyone who wants to invest in any country must comply with the ownership legislation of that country. This is happening worldwide and is not unique to SA. So BBBEE regulations should never be exempt. Black people, who constitute 97% of the population and own only 3% of the economy, can't continue to be sidelined in the name of foreign investments,' said Sesele. Malatsi through his spokesperson Kwena Moloto said that the policy direction sought to provide the 'much-needed' policy certainty to attract investment into the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) sector, and specifically with regards to licensing for broadcasters, internet service providers, mobile networks, or fixed and mobile networks. Communications and Digital Technologies Minister Solly Malatsi defends ICT policy, denies special treatment for Starlink, and stresses the need to align sector regulations with transformation laws through equity equivalent investment options. Image: X/IOLGraphics Moloto, on Thursday, saidthat Starlink was not the only company being considered. Starlink, owned by Elon Musk, reportedly plans to launch its services in South Africa ahead of the G20 conference. However, the company intends to bypass the BBBEE law and its 30% ownership requirement, preferring instead to go the Equity Equivalent Investment Programme route where they have offered to invest R2 billion. Political parties such as the EFF, the African Transformation Movement (ATM) and the uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) have been opposed to the proposed changes, citing concerns about Starlink's compliance with BBBEE laws. Political analyst Professor Sipho Seepe criticised the government and president Cyril Ramaphosa for 'forging ahead' with allowing Starlink to operate in South Africa, saying it would set the wrong precedent.. 'The imbroglio regarding Starlink is further proof that South Africa is up for sale under the Ramaphosa administration. This is what you should expect when you have a prepaid presidency. 'Every penny given to support his presidential candidacy was a future investment to ensure that the South African government would succumb to business demands…The very fact that the Ramaphosa regime is willing to suspend legislation and regulations for pieces of silver is not only shameful but also points to a lack of conviction and commitment by the ANC to the demands of Starlink would set the wrong precedent and open the floodgates by like-minded business people,' Seepe said.
The Citizen
8 hours ago
- The Citizen
Illegal land grabs prompt a rethink of the Pie Act
A piece of legislation introduced in the post-apartheid years to prevent eviction abuses is now being weaponised against property owners. There's righteous indignation about the impact of the Expropriation Act's enfeeblement of property rights in SA, but far more damaging is the Prevention of Illegal Eviction Act from and Unlawful Occupation of Land (Pie) Act, initially introduced in 1998 to prevent the kind of eviction abuses so prevalent under apartheid. That same legislation has been weaponised against property owners, including the state, by making it difficult, sometimes impossible, to evict unlawful occupiers. Eviction proceedings can drag on for years and cost hundreds of thousands of rands, often leaving property owners with steep rehabilitation expenses. Many simply give up. In some instances, illegal occupiers have been in place for more than a decade with the blessing of the courts. The Joburg High Court in January 2024 refused to evict illegal occupiers in the inner-city area of Doornfontein despite evidence that the buildings were a fire hazard. The court ruled there was no imminent danger to the properties, nor was the City of Joburg able to offer the occupants alternative accommodation, as required under the Pie Act. The illegal occupiers have been in the buildings since 2001, successfully resisting eviction attempts which commenced in 2011. The above court decision came just months after a fire at the five-storey Usindiso building in Marshalltown, Joburg, killed 77 people. A few months before that, a fire broke out in the Florence Nightingale building in Hillbrow, killing two children who had been locked up in a room with no means of escape. ALSO READ: 90 families in Madibeng face imminent eviction In both these cases, criminals had hijacked the buildings and rented out rooms to some of the city's most desperate people. They are the pawns in a high-octane tussle between property owners and criminal gangs who have learned to game the Pie Act, often egged on by political agitators keen to grab attention whenever the cameras are around. Property associations have for years criticised the Pie Act for its perverse consequences, saying it protects criminals who sell other people's land and makes evictions extremely difficult, if not impossible. Municipalities struggling to provide basic water and lights can simply not contend with the demands of the Pie Act by providing alternative accommodation to illegal occupiers. The City of Joburg suspended its obligations to provide temporary emergency accommodation to illegal occupiers during the Covid lockdowns. It has just 11 temporary emergency accommodation facilities, all of which are full, with a need for a further 1 500 beds. It will take years and massive budget allocations, which the city does not have, just to provide these extra beds. ALSO READ: 'Illegal occupation': Standerton residents turn to ConCourt to stop evictions Tygerberg Raceway story A recent documentary, The Tygerberg Raceway story, explains how criminals took advantage of the Covid shutdowns to incite a mass land invasion of the Tygerberg Raceway, knowing that the police were overstretched and the courts were in lockdown. Just this year, police and correctional officers were caught selling other people's land in Fort Jackson near East London at R50 000 a plot. Farmers across the country have had to beef up security to prevent fallow land turning into an overnight settlement. All of this comes at a cost which is difficult to quantify. The better-run municipalities have security units dedicated to snuffing out illegal shack developments the moment they appear. A delay of a day or two allows the occupants to invoke tenant rights under the Pie Act. Then you are in for a drawn-out court battle at a considerable cost, with no guarantee of a successful eviction. Moneyweb previously reported on SA's best-run municipality, Midvaal, which has outsourced the patrolling of its municipal areas to the Red Ants. Criminals have attempted to infiltrate and occupy land, but these attempts have been successfully defended. Other municipalities with sufficient resources have been forced to adopt similar defensive measures. ALSO READ: Mogale landowners push council to use its eviction by-law against land invasions An amendment on its way? The Democratic Alliance (DA) has proposed an amendment to the Pie Act that would criminalise the incitement and organisation of unlawful occupations, even where no payment is received or solicited. This will combat instances where land grabs are orchestrated to further political agendas. Under the proposed amendments, courts will be required to consider the financial means of the illegal occupiers. They must specify the duration for which alternative accommodation or land must be provided in line with available resources. This, says the DA, will end municipalities' indefinite obligation to provide alternative housing. It should also expedite the eviction process. The Referendum Party in the Western Cape has taken a different approach to the same problem by proposing a Provincial Prevention of Illegal Evictions Bill, restricted to the Western Cape, which will draw a clear legal distinction between persons who took up residence legally and those who did so illegally. 'It would allow local and provincial government and private landowners to remove persons from their property where those persons have not at any point had permission or the legal authority to occupy that land,' says the party's website. ALSO READ: Eviction looms for long-time Emalahleni informal settlement residents Constitutional rights The courts have extended Constitutional rights not to be arbitrarily evicted from your lawful home to include those who have no such legal rights to your property. This proposed bill would clarify the definition of a home as a structure occupied by someone with the landowner's permission. If not, the illegal occupier can be removed without a court order and without the municipality having to provide alternative accommodation. The Department of Human Settlements appears to support some of the DA's proposed reforms and has committed to a full review of the existing act with a view to a department-led amendment bill by March 2026. If it succeeds, that would be a milestone in restoring at least some property rights in SA. Comments Greg Vermaak of law firm VMW Inc, which deals with numerous cases of illegal occupation: 'Pie is largely procedural, so an amendment to the act is unlikely to have much impact. If I'm a landowner and people grab land belonging to me, the state allows this to happen because there's nowhere to rehouse the illegal occupants, and that's a conscious decision. I now believe it's deliberate. It's a usurpation of land which the state could but won't fix.' This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
The Citizen
10 hours ago
- The Citizen
Sassa payments delayed due to review process
Several Pietermaritzburg residents were unable to collect their South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) grants on Wednesday due to a review process targeting beneficiaries suspected of having undisclosed income. According to an article published by The Witness, Sassa said payments have not been suspended, but reviews are being conducted to ensure that only eligible individuals receive grants. When The Witness visited payout points yesterday, some beneficiaries said they were advised to wait before checking their accounts. 'I have received my payout as my details are correct. We are shocked that there are people among us who are dishonest and getting extra money, while we are in need,' said one beneficiary, who asked not to be named. Lower Northdale Ward Councillor Rooksana Ahmed sent out a notice informing beneficiaries that they should check again with their respective banks the following day, due to the review. In a statement, Sassa said it is reviewing the eligibility of targeted beneficiaries who may have other income sources not disclosed at the time of their application. 'These targeted beneficiaries are expected to present themselves at a Sassa local office where their eligibility will be reviewed. Those who fail to comply may face suspension of their grants. Continued non-compliance may result in permanent cancellation,' the agency said. Sassa emphasised that beneficiaries are legally required to fully disclose all income sources during the application process and report any changes in financial circumstances thereafter. Sassa national spokesperson Paseka Letsatsi said failure to comply with these rules is a violation of the Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004 and may lead to corrective action. 'Sassa has undertaken a review of its database and processes to root out fraud and ensure grants go to eligible recipients. Reviews are focused on those active in the labour market, especially where income exceeds the means threshold and was not declared,' said Letsatsi. He added that no grants have been suspended at this stage. 'Only the payment schedule has been amended for those asked to undergo the review.' Letsatsi said Sassa is concerned that many clients do not update their contact details, which causes missed notifications. A second payment date has been issued for those under review, but if no contact is made within two months, the grant will be suspended. Beneficiaries will then have one month to respond before the grant is permanently cancelled. A fraud investigation may follow. Sassa urged all beneficiaries to declare any additional income or bank accounts and to replace green ID books with smart ID cards due to the risk of fraud. For more information, contact Sassa on 0800 60 1011 or email [email protected]. Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
