India finalises ₹5,000 crore incentive scheme for rare earths mineral production
The sops under the proposed scheme will be offered through a reverse auction process, the official said. The decision to offer incentives for rare earths comes after an internal ministerial review flagged the need for diversification in the wake of acute dependence on Chinese imports.
"Fresh steps are being taken to boost domestic availability of critical minerals," he said, adding that at least five large domestic companies had informally expressed keenness to produce these in consultations with the government.
China has a near monopoly of the world's supply of rare earth magnets and has curbs on exports. These critical minerals needed in the manufacture of rare earth magnets are crucial for making cars, electric vehicles (EVs) and the renewable energy infrastructure. Industry, particularly the automobile industry, has flagged the detrimental impact of the Chinese curbs and sought government intervention. Beijing in April made a special export licences mandatory for export of seven rare earth elements and related magnets.
India's EV and wind turbine makers are the largest demand centres for rare earth elements, cornering over half the entire 4010 metric tonne domestic demand in 2025. Overall demand is expected to more than double to 8220 metric tonnes by 2030.
Besides, the government is also planning an amendment to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act to support the critical mineral mission. Besides regulatory tweaks, the Centre is also expecting commercially viable domestic production of rare earth permanent magnets in small quantities later this year.
The ministry of science and technology had sanctioned funding for
Midwest Advanced Materials Private Ltd
, Hyderabad.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
25 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Centre shows fake 'Supreme Court of Karnataka' account in HC against X
: Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta on Friday highlighted the dangers of unchecked online activity by revealing to the Karnataka High Court that a fake, yet verified, X (formerly Twitter) account was successfully created in the name of the "Supreme Court of Karnataka." Appearing for the Centre in its ongoing face-off with social media giant X Corp, Mehta presented the account as evidence of how easily digital platforms can be misused to mislead the public. "We created this account. It is verified. I can now post anything, and lakhs would believe that the Supreme Court of Karnataka has said it," Mehta argued, underscoring the anonymity and lack of accountability that currently exists online. The dramatic reveal came during a hearing on X Corp's petition challenging takedown orders issued by government officials under Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act. X Corp contends that only the procedure under Section 69A of the Act, read with the IT Rules, allows for content blocking orders. Mehta reiterated the Centre's longstanding concern--first raised in the landmark Shreya Singhal case--that internet users act as their own publisher, printer, and broadcaster, making regulatory oversight complex but necessary. He insisted that the fake account was never used to post content and was created solely to demonstrate how such impersonation can occur within minutes. Senior Advocate KG Raghavan, representing X Corp, objected strongly to the tactic, arguing that such material cannot be introduced across the bar without being formally placed on record. "You cannot pass this off to the Court without scrutiny or context," he said. Justice M Nagaprasanna, who is presiding over the matter, acknowledged Raghavan's concern but clarified that the example was presented only illustratively and would not affect the merits of X's case. "Their point is that creation of such fake accounts is far too easy," he observed. The judge also drew parallels with concerns raised in the Proton Mail case, where anonymous emails containing morphed and pornographic images were sent en masse. "The problem of anonymity remains," he noted. Raghavan, while conceding that such misuse exists, reminded the court that the offline world--particularly the press--has had its own lapses in the past. He cited a 2002 case where the High Court had initiated contempt proceedings over false media reporting. Later in the hearing, Raghavan informed the court that the fake account in question had been taken down by X. Pressing the Centre's argument further, Tushar Mehta said many instances of online harm fall into a regulatory grey area--not qualifying for blocking under Section 69A, yet still posing grave risks. "We have created an AI-generated video where Your Lordship appears to speak against the nation. It's unlawful, but it doesn't fit any category under Section 69A," he told the court. Justice Nagaprasanna responded, "That is an unlawful AI-generated act." Mehta explained that the legal framework includes both severe and minimal interventions, and advocated for cautious, proportionate responses in certain cases. "Don't block or jail them immediately. Just caution them," he said, to which the judge agreed--but added, "Still, it remains unlawful." The SG argued that platforms like X cannot shield themselves using Section 79's safe harbour provisions when they fail to meet the conditions of sub-sections (2) and (3). "If a citizen comes to court, the intermediary must defend its conduct. They may succeed, but they must face scrutiny," he said. The matter is scheduled to continue on July 25.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
25 minutes ago
- Business Standard
No Sarfaesi protection for tenants without proof of tenancy before mortgage
The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that tenants cannot invoke protection under the Sarfaesi Act unless they can establish that their tenancy existed before the property was mortgaged. This decision, reported by LiveLaw, marks a significant clarification in the legal landscape governing the conflict between tenancy rights and the enforcement powers of lenders. This ruling came in a case where PNB Housing Finance took over a property after the borrower defaulted. A man claimed he'd been living there since 1987, but failed to prove his claim of occupancy before the mortgage was created. An earlier Calcutta High Court verdict had restored possession of the home to the man. A bench comprising Justices PS Narasimha and Joymalya Bagchi reversed the High Court's decision after PNB Housing Finance contested its ruling. Background of the case The respondent in the case claimed he had been residing in the disputed property since 1987, based on an unregistered five-year lease. However, the property later came under the ownership of a borrower who mortgaged it to PNB Housing in 2017. When the borrower defaulted on the loan, the lender invoked its rights under Section 13(4) of the Sarfaesi Act, 2002, taking possession of the property—first symbolically, then physically. The respondent challenged the possession move, citing protections under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, and the High Court initially sided with him. But the apex court took a different view. What's the Sarfaesi Act? The Sarfaesi Act (short for Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest) is a law from 2002 that helps banks and financial institutions recover loans quickly and reduce bad debts (known as non-performing assets or NPAs). The lender doesn't need to go to court to do this. They can auction or sell the property to recover the unpaid loan. The Act also supports the restructuring of distressed loans and allows banks to bundle and sell bad loans (called securitisation) to asset reconstruction companies. SC reaffirms 2019 precedent on tenant obligations The bench referred to the precedent set in Bajarang Shyamsunder Agarwal v Central Bank of India (2019), which made it clear that a tenant must furnish documentary evidence such as rent receipts, utility or property tax bills to claim protection under tenancy laws when a property is subject to mortgage. The court also said that verbal agreements or unregistered leases do not offer long-term protection, especially after the bank issues a notice under the Sarfaesi Act.
India.com
25 minutes ago
- India.com
India's Tyre Sector Poised To Clock 8% Revenue Growth In FY26: Report
Mumbai: India's tyre sector will see steady revenue growth of 7-8 per cent during the current financial year, driven by replacement demand that accounts for half of annual sales, even as offtake by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) will likely be subdued and exports steady, according to a Crisil Ratings report released on Friday. Rising premiumisation is expected to give a slight leg-up to realisations. However, escalating trade tensions and the risk of dumping by Chinese producers diverting inventories because of US tariffs could pose challenges, the report states. Operating profitability is likely to remain steady at 13-13.5 per cent, supported by stable input costs and healthy capacity utilisation. This, along with strong accruals, lean balance sheets and calibrated capital spending, should help sustain the sector's stable credit outlook, according to the report. The report is based on an analysis of India's top six tyre makers, catering to all vehicle segments and accounting for 85 per cent of the sector's approximately Rs one lakh crore revenue. Domestic demand remains the mainstay, propelling around 75 per cent of total volume, with exports making up the rest. Crisil Ratings senior director Anuj Sethi said, 'Volume growth is seen at 5-6 per cent this fiscal, mirroring last fiscal. The replacement segment, accounting for around 50 per cent of volume, is set to grow 6-7 per cent on the back of a large vehicle base, strong freight movement and rural recovery. OEM volume (25 per cent) will likely rise 3-4 per cent, supported by steady two-wheeler and tractor sales, and modest growth in passenger vehicles and commercial vehicles. Export volume (25 per cent) is expected to grow 4-5 per cent, supported by demand from Europe, Africa and Latin America.' The export momentum, however, comes with risks. The US, accounting for around 17 per cent of India's tyre export volume last fiscal, and 4-5 per cent of overall industry volume, has imposed reciprocal tariffs on several Indian goods, potentially eroding price competitiveness. And steep US tariffs limit China's access to that market, raising the risk of excess supply being diverted into price-sensitive markets such as India, the report further states. To curb cheap imports, India imposes anti-dumping and countervailing duties, including a 17.57 per cent levy, on large truck and bus radials from China. However, a broader influx of low-cost tyres across other segments could pressure domestic realisations without timely safeguards. Besides, stiff competition in the replacement market will keep operating profitability rangebound at 13.0-13.5 per cent this fiscal. With nearly half of the raw material imported, the sector is exposed to global prices and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. In fiscal 2025, natural rubber prices surged 8-10 per cent owing to supply disruptions, and prices of crude-linked inputs such as synthetic rubber and carbon black rose 10-12 per cent. This led to margin erosion by around 300 basis points, given the limited cost pass-through in the OEM and replacement segments.
