Coal company lobbying Alberta government for lenient definition of open pit mine
In December, Alberta's United Conservative Party government announced it will permit coal mining and exploration in previously off-limits areas along the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains, but said the policy framework developed through its
Coal Industry Modernization Initiative
(CIMI) would ban new open pit mines and mountaintop removal coal mining.
Westmoreland Mining LLC, which owns and operates the 20,660-hectare Coal Valley Mine in the foothills near Edson, Alta., is lobbying Alberta Energy and Minerals and the province's energy regulator on 'CIMI and possible definitions of open pit mining,' according to
lobbying records
filed on Feb. 10.
'The intention is to maintain the definition to fit [the company's] current Coal Valley activities as well as new development of resources in the same area to ensure those activities can continue under the new rules,' Westmoreland said in the filing.
Westmoreland did not respond to multiple requests for comment by the time of publication.
Though the terms open pit and mountaintop removal may evoke clear images of sprawling quarries and flattened peaks, the legal definitions are more ambiguous, making implementation and enforcement of the proposed ban 'problematic,' said Brenda Heelan Powell, staff counsel at the Environmental Law Centre.
'If you say there's no mountaintop removal or there's no open pit mines, but don't have a clear, coherent definition of what you mean by those things, and don't set out really clear boundaries on what those things are, then it's very difficult to know whether or not your prohibition is being ignored or not,' Powell said.
The
Coal Conservation Act
governs development of coal resources in Alberta, and guides everything from project approval and mineral transport to pollution control and environmental conservation. Powell noted the distinction in the act between an 'open pit' mine, which would be prohibited under CIMI, and a 'strip mine', which would be permitted, comes down to terrain rather than mining practice or project size.
'I think there may be sort of general conceptions of what these things mean, and it might not be where the legal definitions ultimately land,' she said.
The act defines an open pit mine as a mine 'worked by removal of overlying strata and subsequent excavation of exposed coal in terrain that is not flat or substantially flat,' and a strip mine as one 'worked by removal of overlying strata and subsequent excavation of exposed coal in flat or substantially flat terrain.' The act gives no definition of mountaintop removal mining.
'There might be this idea that if you ban open pit mining, that means there's not going to be the same level of surface disturbance, because that'll move everything underground. But I don't think that's technically correct with the definitions we have today,' Powell said.
The final decision on whether or not a regulation applies to a project is made by the Alberta Energy Regulator.
Powell also said she is concerned the government is
only consulting
with industry stakeholders in the final stages of developing its new coal rules rather than a broader public consultation.
Nigel Bankes, an emeritus professor of law at the University of Calgary, said he has followed the coal file closely over the last four years, but didn't really become aware of these 'definitional issues' until the CIMI announcements in December and January.
'Perhaps that itself is significant in terms of the government's efforts to manage the debate,' Bankes said.
'I think that the new definitional debate also speaks to a significant divide that we see between the provincial government, which is trying to accommodate foreign coal interests, and the coalition of interests opposed to coal. The latter group just wants a commitment to no new coal, in whatever form. For this coalition of interests the definitions are an irrelevant distraction from the main issue.'
A spokesperson for Energy and Minerals Minister Brian Jean's office said in a statement Alberta's government is 'engaging with industry on the Coal Industry Modernization Initiative and these meetings are ongoing.
'Through our coal mining modernization, we are banning new open pit mines in the foothills and Rockies, and prohibiting mountaintop removal mining, all while prioritizing the protection of our waterways and environment.'
Proposed coal policy changes and updated legislation are expected to be finalized by the end of 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
25 minutes ago
Federal Reserve says building renovation complies with law, defends costs
WASHINGTON -- Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Thursday said the agency's renovation of two of its buildings is in compliance with plans approved by a local commission, disputing a White House suggestion that they may have violated the law by deviating from those plans. The letter is the lastest salvo in an escalating battle between the Federal Reserve, an independent agency charged with fighting inflation and seeking maximum employment, and the Trump administration. President Donald Trump has for months criticized Powell and the Fed for not lowering its key interest rate, which the president says would boost borrowing and accelerate the economy. Powell has said he wants to see how the economy responds to Trump's sweeping tariffs, which could raise inflation and slow growth, before making any moves. Trump has even threatened to fire Powell, though he has since backed away and said Wednesday it was 'highly unlikely' that he would take the unprecedented step of doing so. Firing the Fed chair could cause chaos in the financial markets. Several executives of Wall Street banks have said this week that the Fed's independence from day-to-day politics is crucial. Still, the Trump administration has seized on ballooning costs for the Fed's renovation of two century-old buildings to argue that Powell has mismanaged the project. The president can't fire the Fed chair because of a policy disagreement, but he could do so 'for cause,' which is widely seen as some kind of malfeasance or neglect. Last week, the president's top budget adviser, Russell Vought, wrote Powell a letter that said Trump is 'extremely troubled' by Powell's management of the project, which has risen in cost to about $2.5 billion, up from the Fed's initial estimate of $1.9 billion. Vought's letter also noted that Powell, in testimony before the Senate last month, said that the Fed removed some amenities that critics called ostentatious from its plans. Those plans had been approved by the National Capital Planning Commission in 2021. Vought said in his letter that if the renovation plans had changed, they were no longer 'in compliance with the approved plan" and may violate the National Capital Planning Act. Powell responded Thursday that since the Fed's plans were approved by the NCPC in September 2021, it has made only 'a small number of design changes to scale back or eliminate certain elements' and added that the changes weren't significant enough to 'warrant... further review.' 'The project is proceeding in accordance with the plan that the NCPC approved,' Powell wrote. The changes were intended 'to simplify construction and reduce the likelihood of further delays and cost increases,' Powell said in his letter. Powell also defended the cost of the renovation: 'Both buildings were in need of significant structural repairs,' including 'the removal of asbestos and lead contamination,' as well as the 'complete replacement of antiquated systems such as electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation and air conditioning, as well as fire detection and suppression systems,' he wrote.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal Reserve says building renovation complies with law, defends costs
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Thursday said the agency's renovation of two of its buildings is in compliance with plans approved by a local commission, disputing a White House suggestion that they may have violated the law by deviating from those plans. The letter is the lastest salvo in an escalating battle between the Federal Reserve, an independent agency charged with fighting inflation and seeking maximum employment, and the Trump administration. President Donald Trump has for months criticized Powell and the Fed for not lowering its key interest rate, which the president says would boost borrowing and accelerate the economy. Powell has said he wants to see how the economy responds to Trump's sweeping tariffs, which could raise inflation and slow growth, before making any moves. Trump has even threatened to fire Powell, though he has since backed away and said Wednesday it was 'highly unlikely' that he would take the unprecedented step of doing so. Firing the Fed chair could cause chaos in the financial markets. Several executives of Wall Street banks have said this week that the Fed's independence from day-to-day politics is crucial. Still, the Trump administration has seized on ballooning costs for the Fed's renovation of two century-old buildings to argue that Powell has mismanaged the project. The president can't fire the Fed chair because of a policy disagreement, but he could do so 'for cause,' which is widely seen as some kind of malfeasance or neglect. Last week, the president's top budget adviser, Russell Vought, wrote Powell a letter that said Trump is 'extremely troubled' by Powell's management of the project, which has risen in cost to about $2.5 billion, up from the Fed's initial estimate of $1.9 billion. Vought's letter also noted that Powell, in testimony before the Senate last month, said that the Fed removed some amenities that critics called ostentatious from its plans. Those plans had been approved by the National Capital Planning Commission in 2021. Vought said in his letter that if the renovation plans had changed, they were no longer 'in compliance with the approved plan" and may violate the National Capital Planning Act. Powell responded Thursday that since the Fed's plans were approved by the NCPC in September 2021, it has made only 'a small number of design changes to scale back or eliminate certain elements' and added that the changes weren't significant enough to 'warrant... further review.' 'The project is proceeding in accordance with the plan that the NCPC approved,' Powell wrote. The changes were intended 'to simplify construction and reduce the likelihood of further delays and cost increases,' Powell said in his letter. Powell also defended the cost of the renovation: 'Both buildings were in need of significant structural repairs,' including 'the removal of asbestos and lead contamination,' as well as the 'complete replacement of antiquated systems such as electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation and air conditioning, as well as fire detection and suppression systems,' he wrote.
3 hours ago
Federal Reserve's Waller says central bank should cut rates at next meeting
WASHINGTON -- A top Federal Reserve official said late Thursday that the central bank should cut its key interest rate later this month, carving out a different view than that of Chair Jerome Powell, who has been harshly criticized by the White House for delaying rate cuts. Christopher Waller, a member of the Fed's governing board, said in a speech in New York City that the economy is showing signs of weakening, with consumer spending slowing and job gains cooling. The Fed should reduce borrowing costs to shore up spending and growth before the job market weakens further, Waller said. 'The economy is still growing, but its momentum has slowed significantly,' he said, adding that the slowdown threatens the Fed's goal of maximum employment. At the same time, President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs are likely to only lift inflation temporarily and aren't a reason to postpone rate cuts, Waller said. 'Tariffs have boosted, and will continue to boost, inflation a bit above the (Fed's) 2% objective this year,' Waller said, but policymakers should 'look through tariff effects and focus on underlying inflation,' which he said is nearing the 2% goal. Waller has been mentioned as a potential replacement for Powell when the current chair's term expires in May 2026, or perhaps earlier if Trump takes the unprecedented step of firing Powell. Trump has threatened to fire Powell this year but on Wednesday said it was 'highly unlikely' he would take such a step. For his part, Powell has said the Fed wants to see the impact of the duties on prices and the economy before making any moves. Waller, a Trump appointee, has previously said that he would support a rate cut in July. Michelle Bowman, also a Trump appointee, has also spoken in favor of a cut. Minutes to the Fed's June 17-18 meeting said that only 'a couple' of the 19 members of the central bank's interest-rate setting committee supported a cut in July. Other participants — the minutes didn't say how many — said that the Fed should keep rates unchanged this year, since inflation remains above 2%. Consumer prices rose 2.7% in June from a year ago, the fastest pace in four months. Other potential replacements for Powell have also publicly expressed support for cutting rates soon, including Kevin Warsh, a former member of the Fed's board who stepped down in 2011. Warsh, currently a fellow at the Hoover Institution, said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' earlier this week that he supported rate cuts. 'The president's right to be frustrated with Jay Powell and the Federal Reserve,' Warsh said.
