Israel dispatches team to Qatar for ceasefire talks, kills 78 in Gaza
Netanyahu's office said the team would travel to the Qatari capital, Doha, on Sunday after the Israeli leader instructed negotiators 'to accept the invitation for close talks'.
But the statement said that 'the changes Hamas is requesting to make to the Qatari proposal were delivered to us last night and are unacceptable to Israel'.
It did not elaborate on what changes were being requested.
The announcement came after Hamas said on Friday that it had provided a 'positive' response to a United States-brokered proposal that would involve a 60-day truce in Gaza, renewing hopes of a possible end to Israel's deadly assault on the Palestinian enclave.
At least 57,338 Palestinians have been killed in Israel's war on Gaza, which began in October 2023, while at least 135,957 others have been wounded. Israeli attacks have laid waste to Gaza, spurring a dire humanitarian crisis and left the territory on the brink of famine.
Hamas has insisted that any ceasefire agreement must include guarantees that Israel will permanently end its war on Gaza.
The Palestinian group said on Friday that it was 'fully prepared, with all seriousness, to immediately enter a new round of negotiations on the mechanism for implementing' the latest ceasefire framework.
Hamas's requests
Al Jazeera's Hamdah Salhut, reporting from Amman in Jordan, explained that Hamas has made requests for three core amendments to the proposal.
'They wanted the talks for ending the war to continue if there was a pause in the fighting, if that 60 days was over,' she said.
The Palestinian group also wants humanitarian aid to be delivered to Gaza through United Nations-led international mechanisms instead of the US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).
More than 700 Palestinians have been killed and thousands wounded while seeking aid at GHF sites since the foundation began operating in the Strip in late May.
'The third [request] was about where Israeli forces could be in the Gaza Strip as part of this deal,' Salhut added.
The announcement from Netanyahu's office came as families and supporters of Israeli captives rallied in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and Haifa, demanding a deal to secure the return of their loved ones. Some 50 of the 200 people taken captive during the Hamas-led attacks of October 7, 2023 remain in Gaza. Israel believes some 27 of them are dead.
The families have accused Netanyahu, who is on trial on corruption charges, of blocking attempts to reach a deal for his personal gain.
Salhut explained that the captives' families have accused the Israeli prime minister of 'prioritising politics' over the lives of their loved ones.
'His current right-wing allies – the reason why Netanyahu is in power – don't want a deal,' she said, adding that US President Donald Trump has also been pushing for an agreement between Israel and Hamas.
Trump will host Netanyahu for talks at the White House in Washington, DC, on Monday.
'Path of surrender'
Earlier on Saturday, Israel's far-right national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, a key member of Netanyahu's governing coalition, called on the Israeli prime minister to 'abandon the path of surrender'.
In a post on X, Ben-Gvir wrote that any ceasefire deal that would include Israel's withdrawal from 'conquered territories', the release of Palestinian prisoners, or the 'revitalisation of Hamas with humanitarian aid' would constitute a 'reward for terrorism'.
'The only way to achieve victory and securely return our hostages is through the complete conquest of the Strip, a total cessation of 'humanitarian' aid, and the encouragement to emigration,' he said.
'I call on the prime minister to abandon the path of surrender and return to the path of victory.'
Omer Bartov, an Israeli-American scholar of Holocaust and genocide studies at Brown University, told Al Jazeera that he believes Netanyahu 'does not want to end the war in Gaza'.
If Netanyahu stops fighting, it could lead to the fall of his government, so 'what he's doing now is hedging his bets', Bartov said.
'What he's trying to negotiate is something that feels really cynical – both from the point of view of the war that is constantly happening in Gaza, and from the point of view of the families of the hostages,' he said.
He said this is because the ceasefire proposal only provides for the return of 10 Israeli captives held by Hamas, 'out of presumably 20 who are still alive'.
'That will make it possible for [Netanyahu] at a certain point to say: 'Hamas has not met all the conditions and, therefore, we have to resume the fighting',' said Bartov. 'And Hamas will have to accept that.'
'People are dying just trying to get food'
In Gaza, meanwhile, Israel's relentless bombardment continued, with soldiers bombing a United Nations-run school and a residential building in Gaza City, killing at least nine people.
Zahwa Salmi, who survived the attack on al-Shafi school in Gaza City, told Al Jazeera the bombing happened early in the morning while displaced families were sleeping.
'At around 2:15am [23:15 GMT], we heard the sound of something devastating explode in the hall,' she recounted.
'People were shouting: 'There is no god but Allah! Help us, someone!' But then we no longer heard any sound from them.'
The victims of Israeli attacks also included nine people, including three children, who were shot dead near the GHF aid distribution point in southern Rafah.
Al Jazeera's Hani Mahmoud, reporting from Gaza City, said survivors of the attack at the GHF site recounted being afraid to pick up the dead because they were afraid of being shot as well.
'The number of Palestinians killed while trying to get food has now crossed 700. This is happening in a place where enforced dehydration and starvation is widespread. People are going hungry. They ration what little they have. Many families are not eating. Mothers are skipping meals to make sure their children have enough,' he said.
'This also reveals another side of the GHF. Whatever they are doing is hardly relief. It's largely performative – there is nothing genuinely humanitarian about it. They are crowding desperate people into dangerous conditions with zero safety and zero transparency.'
The World Food Programme's (WFP) deputy executive director, Charles Skau, who made his fourth visit to Gaza since Israel's war began on Tuesday and Wednesday, said the situation in the enclave is the worst he has ever seen.
'It's hard to find words to describe the level of desperation I have witnessed. People are dying just trying to get food,' he said in a statement.
Skau reiterated his call for an end to the hostilities.
'A ceasefire is urgently needed,' he wrote. 'During the previous ceasefire, we showed what was possible: delivering more than 8,000 trucks of food in only 42 days. We can do it again, but we need all routes and entry points to open, and we need safety in order to be able to reach the most vulnerable.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Iran demands accountability for Israel and US after ‘war of aggression'
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has warned that if Israel is not held accountable for its attack on Iran, 'the whole region and beyond will suffer'. 'The US-Israeli attacks on our nuclear facilities were in stark violation of NPT [the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty] and the UNSC Resolution 2231 that has endorsed Iran's peaceful nuclear programme in 2015 by consensus,' Araghchi said in a speech at the BRICS summit in Brazil, cited by state-run Press TV. 'The US's subsequent involvement in this aggression by targeting Iran's peaceful nuclear installations has left no doubt as to the full complicity of the American government in Israel's war of aggression against Iran.' Iran won the support of fellow BRICS+ nations meeting in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday, with the bloc condemning the recent Israeli and US air strikes that hit military, nuclear and other targets. The 11-nation grouping said the attacks 'constitute a violation of international law'. 'We condemn the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025,' leaders said in a summit statement, without naming the United States or Israel. 'We further express serious concern over deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities,' the bloc added. The declaration is a diplomatic victory for Tehran, which has received limited regional or global support after a 12-day bombing campaign by the Israeli military that culminated in US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities at Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan. Israel launched the surprise attack on Iran's military, nuclear, and civilian sites on June 13, killing at least 935 people. The Iranian Health Ministry said 5,332 people were wounded. Tehran launched retaliatory missile and drone strikes on Israel, killing at least 29 people and wounding more than 3,400, according to figures released by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The fighting ended with a US-sponsored ceasefire that took effect on June 24 and continues to hold.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Israel now faces adversaries that it cannot defeat
Since October 7, 2023, the war of images has eclipsed the war of weapons. From Gaza's pulverised hospitals and starving infants to mass graves and desperate fathers digging through rubble, every pixel captured on a smartphone strikes deeper than a missile. These raw, unfiltered, and undeniable images have a far greater impact than any press conference or official speech. And for the first time in its history, Israel cannot delete them or drown them in propaganda. The horrifying images of the Israeli army massacring people at aid distribution locations prompted newspaper Haaretz's Gideon Levy to write on June 29: 'Is Israel perpetrating genocide in Gaza? […] The testimonies and images emerging from Gaza don't leave room for many questions.' Even staunchly pro-Israel commentator and New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman no longer buys into the Israeli narrative. In a May 9 op-ed, addressed to US President Donald Trump, he declared: 'This Israeli government is not our ally,' clarifying that it is 'behaving in ways that threaten hard-core US interests in the region'. Once, Israel's narrative was protected by the gates of editorial rooms and the gravity of Western guilt. But the smartphone shattered those gates. What we see now is no longer what Israel tells us — it's what Gaza shows us. The platforms carrying these images — TikTok, WhatsApp, Instagram, X — don't prioritise context; they prioritise virality. While older generations might look away, younger ones are glued to the stream of suffering, absorbed by every pixel, every siren, every moment of destruction. The global public is agitated, and this works against the Israeli interest. Israel is no longer just at war with its neighbours; it is at war with the lens itself. The psychological toll of this visual war is reverberating deep inside Israeli society. For decades, Israelis were conditioned to see themselves as global narrators of trauma, not subjects of international scrutiny. But now, with videos of Israeli bombardment, flattened Gaza neighbourhoods, and emaciated children flooding every platform, many Israelis are grappling with a growing ethical predicament. There is unease, even among centrists, that these visceral images are eroding Israel's moral high ground. For the first time, public discourse in Israeli society includes fear of the mirror: what the world now sees and what Israelis are forced to confront. Internationally, the effect has been even more destabilising for Israel's diplomatic standing. Longstanding allies, once unconditionally supportive, now face growing domestic pressure from citizens who are not consuming official statements but TikTok's live streams and Instagram's image feed. Lawmakers in Europe and North America are openly questioning arms shipments, trade deals, and diplomatic cover, not because of the briefings they have on Israeli war crimes but because their inboxes are flooded with screenshots of scattered body parts and starving children. The battlefield has expanded into parliaments, campuses, city councils, and editorial rooms. This is the backlash of a war Israel cannot win with brute force. To regain control of the narrative, Israeli officials have pressured social media platforms to curb content they dislike. Yet even Israel's most sophisticated public diplomacy efforts are struggling to keep pace with the virality of raw documentation. Behind closed doors, the Israeli military is no longer merely worried about public relations; it is concerned about prosecution. The Israeli army has admonished soldiers for taking selfies and filming themselves demolishing Palestinian homes, warning that such material is now being harvested as evidence by international human rights organisations. Footage and images from social media have already been used by activists to target Israeli servicemen abroad. In a number of cases, Israeli citizens have had to flee countries they were visiting due to war crimes complaints filed against them. In the age of smartphones, the occupation is no longer just visible — it's indictable. In the past, Israel fought wars that it could explain. Now, it fights a battle it can only react to — often too belatedly and too clumsily. The smartphone captures what the missile conceals. Social media disseminates information that official briefings attempt to suppress. The haunting images, digitally preserved, ensure that we never forget any devastating atrocity, or act of brutality. Images of conflict do not just convey information; they can also redefine our perceptions and influence our political positions. The powerful 'Napalm Girl' photo that captured the aftermath of an attack by the US-allied South Vietnamese army on civilians during the Vietnam War had a profound impact on American society. It helped create a significant shift in public opinion regarding the war, accelerating the decision of the US government to end it. Today, in Gaza, the stream of powerful images does not stop. Despite Israel's best efforts, the global opinion is overwhelmingly against its genocidal war. Smartphones have completely changed the nature of conflict by putting a camera in the hands of every witness. In this new era, Israel struggles to defeat the relentless, unfiltered visual record of its crimes that calls for justice. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Brazil's leader Lula condemns Gaza ‘genocide' at BRICS
Brazil's president says the world must act to stop what he describes as an Israeli 'genocide' in Gaza as leaders from 11 emerging BRICS nations gathered in Rio de Janeiro. 'We cannot remain indifferent to the genocide carried out by Israel in Gaza, the indiscriminate killing of innocent civilians and the use of hunger as a weapon of war,' President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told leaders from China, India and other nations on Sunday. His comments came as Gaza truce talks between Israel and Hamas resumed in Doha and as pressure mounted to end the 21-month war, which began with Hamas's October 7, 2023, attacks in southern Israel. Lula said 'absolutely nothing could justify the terrorist actions' of Hamas on that day, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly Israeli civilians. But he also offered fierce criticism of Israel's subsequent actions. Israel's military campaign has killed at least 57,418 people in Gaza, also mostly civilians. BRICS countries have been in disagreement over how strongly to denounce Israel's bombing of Iran and its actions in Gaza. 'Autonomy in check once again' Leaders in Rio called for reform of traditional Western institutions while presenting BRICS as a defender of multilateral diplomacy in an increasingly fractured world. With forums such as the G7 and G20 groups of major economies hamstrung by divisions and the disruptive America First approach of United States President Donald Trump, expansion of BRICS has opened new space for diplomatic coordination. In his opening remarks, Lula drew a parallel with the Cold War's Non-Aligned Movement, a group of developing nations that resisted formally joining either side of a polarised global order. 'BRICS is the heir to the Non-Aligned Movement,' Lula told leaders. 'With multilateralism under attack, our autonomy is in check once again.' BRICS nations now represent more than half the world's population and 40 percent of its economic output. Leaders from Brazil, Russia, India and China gathered for the its first summit in 2009. The bloc later added South Africa and last year included Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as members. This is the first summit of leaders to include Indonesia. Some leaders were missing from this year's summit, however. Chinese President Xi Jinping chose to send his prime minister in his place. Russian President Vladimir Putin is attending online because of a warrant issued for his arrest by the International Criminal Court. Still, several heads of state were gathering for discussions at Rio's Museum of Modern Art on Sunday and Monday, including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. More than 30 nations have expressed interest in participating in BRICS, either as full members or partners.
