Starmer to discuss ‘global problem' of illegal migration with German Chancellor
'The networks of these criminal gangs stretch across countless countries and legal systems, showing no respect for our borders,' he added.
'We'll go further to tackle this shared issue together.'
According to the Home Office, 353 people crossed the English Channel by small boat on Friday, just a day after the Prime Minister signed a deal with French President Emmanuel Macron aimed at deterring migrants from making the perilous journey.
This was down from the 573 people who crossed on Thursday, the first time any such journeys were made in a week.
More crossings were witnessed on Saturday, but the full figures are yet to be published.
A group of people thought to be migrants are brought in to the Border Force compound in Dover, Kent, from a Border Force vessel (Gareth Fuller/PA)
Border force vessels and the RNLI were called out on both Thursday and Friday to reports of multiple boats crossing the channel, the Coastguard said.
A statement from the Coastguard said: 'HM Coastguard has been co-ordinating a response to multiple incidents involving small boats in the Channel on 10 and 11 July.
'UK Border Force and RNLI vessels have been sent as part of this response.'
Under the terms of the deal agreed by the Prime Minister and Mr Macron, the UK will be able to send migrants back to France for the first time in exchange for asylum seekers with links to Britain.
The so-called one in, one out deal is due to begin in weeks on a pilot basis, but needs final legal verification from the EU.
A group of people thought to be migrants are brought in to Dover, Kent (Gareth Fuller/PA)
Downing Street has indicated ministers expect the EU to support the arrangement, amid concerns among some European governments that migrants who have travelled to Britain could end up back on their territory.
No details have been given about how many people will be covered by the pilot, but French officials had indicated it could initially be limited to about 50 a week, a small fraction of the weekly average this year of 782.
Sir Keir wrote: 'This is what serious, practical solutions to global problems look like.
'We will do our duty as a compassionate country, accepting genuine asylum seekers who respect our rules and our way of life. That is fair.
'But people who try to make the crossing illegally will soon find themselves back where they started. That is a real deterrent.'
At least 21,000 people have already made the journey since January, putting 2025 on course to be a record year for crossings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
32 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
PM wants fewer jobless foreign nationals on benefits as first-time data released
The number has risen by almost a fifth (17%) in a year, from 514,961 in May 2024 to 604,914 in May this year. The figures, published by the Department for Work and Pensions on Tuesday, show the number of British and Irish nationals not in work and claiming universal credit (UC) has also risen over the same 12-month period. There were 4.3 million people in the Common Travel Area category – made up of people who live or work in the UK without any immigration restrictions – on UC in May. This rose from 3.5 million in May last year and was almost double the 2.8 million such claimants in May 2022, which is the earliest month for which data is available. In total there were 7.9 million people on UC – a payment to help with living costs and available for people on low incomes or those who are out of work or cannot work – in June. The vast majority – 6.6 million or (83.6%) – were British and Irish nationals and those who live or work in the UK without any immigration restrictions. Just over a third (34% or 2.7 million) of all those on UC were in work as of May. The figures showed that the total number of UC claimants who are refugees, have EU settled status, arrived under a humanitarian route or have either limited or indefinite leave to remain in the UK has risen year-on-year, from 1.1 million in June 2024 to 1.2 million last month. The numbers in these categories on UC and out of work have also risen steadily over the past three years, with the Conservatives saying they have a 'clear, common-sense position' that the benefit 'should be reserved for UK citizens only'. The Government said it had 'inherited a broken welfare system and spiralling, unsustainable benefits bill' and was working on reforms including tightening rules on who can claim. The Prime Minister's spokesman said they will double the amount of time it takes to apply for settled status from five years to 10, limiting eligibility for the benefit. Asked whether Sir Keir wants to see the number of foreign nationals claiming benefits while unemployed reduced, his official spokesman said: 'Absolutely, we both want to see the overall numbers of immigration reduced and we've set out plans for that through the Immigration White Paper. 'Within that, we also want to see people making a contribution to the UK, and that's why in the White Paper we set out that we will be doubling the amount of time it takes to apply for settled status. 'That actually means that typically you can only access universal credit after you've lived here currently for five years, and we're doubling that to a starting point of 10 years, so that will obviously reduce those numbers.' The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said it had published the statistics 'following a public commitment to investigate and develop breakdowns of the UC caseload by the immigration status of foreign nationals in receipt of UC'. People with EU Settlement Scheme settled status who have a right to reside in the UK were the second largest group on UC, accounting for 9.7% (770,379), while 2.7% (211,090) of the total had indefinite leave to remain in the UK. Refugees accounted for 1.5% (118,749) of people on UC, while 0.7% (54,156) were people who had come by safe and legal humanitarian routes including under the Ukraine and Afghan resettlement schemes. A total of 75,267 people, making up 1% of the total on UC, had limited leave to remain in the UK, covering those with temporary immigration status. The rest – some 65,346 people – were either no longer receiving UC payments or had no immigration status recorded on digital systems, the DWP said. People can access UC only if they have an immigration status that provides recourse to public funds. Those with no recourse to public funds (NRPF) cannot claim most benefits, tax credits or housing assistance that are paid by the state. Asylum seekers do not have access to UC as they have NRPF but those granted refugee status – deemed to have been forced to flee their country because of a well-founded fear of persecution, war or violence – can claim the benefit. While refugees on UC had the lowest rate of employment at 22%, the department said those who have only recently been granted refugee status cannot be in employment at that point as asylum seekers are not permitted to work. Independent MP Rupert Lowe, an ex-member of Reform UK, had welcomed the pledge to publish the data, describing it as a 'huge win' for those who had 'relentlessly pushed for this'. He described the numbers as 'absolute insanity', posting on X: 'We cannot afford it. The country is BROKE.' Shadow home secretary Chris Philp branded the figures 'staggering' and claimed they are 'clear proof that the Labour government has lost control of our welfare system'. He said: 'Under Kemi Badenoch, we've set out a clear, common-sense position. Universal credit should be reserved for UK citizens only. This is about fairness, responsibility and protecting support for those who've contributed to this country.' But the Government said the proportion of UC payments 'to foreign nationals has already fallen since last July'. While the numbers of claimants who are refugees, have EU settled status, arrived under a humanitarian route or have either limited or indefinite leave to remain in the UK have risen year-on-year, the proportion has fallen. These categories account for 15.6% of the total UC claimants in June, down from 16.5% a year earlier when the Conservatives were still in government. The number of British and Irish nationals and those who live or work in the UK without any immigration restrictions – covering those in the Common Travel Area (CTA) – rose by almost a million from 5.6 million in June last year to 6.6 million last month. The proportion also rose slightly from 82.5% to 83.6%.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Europeans are still wary of Trump's promises to Ukraine despite apparent U-turn on Putin
President Donald Trump's increasing turn against his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin has inspired hopes in U kraine and among its supporters that he is starting to believe what they've been telling him all along: Moscow is the antagonist and the only way to stop it is with cash and military equipment. But while Monday's apparent U-turn was dramatic, other Ukraine supporters, former officials and other foreign policy experts are wary at least and deeply skeptical at worst. 'The question that Europeans and Ukrainians are asking,' according to Ivo Daalder, former United States ambassador to NATO, is 'how real is this change? And how lasting is this change? And what does it really mean in terms of American policy toward the region?' 'This is the second time that the Trump administration has moved the goal posts,' having briefly cut off aid to Ukraine in February, he said. 'So there are a lot of questions here.' Trump has previously lavished praise on Putin while scorning Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. But on Monday in the Oval Office, sitting next to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, he said he was 'very unhappy' with the Kremlin and that the United States would sell 'top-of-the-line weapons' to NATO allies — including the much-demanded Patriot missiles — so that they can be used in Ukraine. Alongside that, if Putin does not agree to a peace deal in 50 days, Trump said, he will slap 100% tariffs on any country that buys Russian goods. That lag time has been criticized across Europe, with officials and experts asking why Trump is giving additional time to an autocrat who has hardly wavered in his desire to subjugate Ukraine. The anxiety is fueled further by the widespread perception in Europe and elsewhere that Trump is a president who makes decisions on a whim and is prone to changing them. Trump himself hinted at this propensity to change his mind quickly. He recalled going home one night and telling first lady Melania Trump, ''I spoke to Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.'' To which she responded, ''Oh, really, another city was just hit'' in Ukraine by Russia's missiles. The exact details of Trump's new direction are as yet unclear. He said that the shopping list included Patriot missiles, the state-of-the-art American defensive system that Ukraine says it desperately needs to fend off Russia's nearly nightly aerial assaults. European NATO allies were going to buy 'billions of dollars worth of military equipment' from the U.S. 'and that's going to be quickly distributed to the battlefield' in Ukraine, he added. The Patriot missiles could arrive in Ukraine 'very soon — within days, actually,' expedited by European nations giving their existing weapons to Ukraine and replacing them with the new systems delivered by the U.S., he said. 'This is really big,' said Rutte, a man who often heaps praise on Trump. 'It will mean that Ukraine can get its hands on really massive numbers of military equipment, both for air defense, but also missiles, ammunition, etc.' He added, 'if I'm Ukraine, I think this is really great news.' Zelenskyy, who has clashed several times with Trump and his team, posted on X thanking the president 'for the willingness to support Ukraine and to continue working together to stop the killings and establish a lasting and just peace.' Other endorsements came with caveats. The U.S. has 'realized that Russia does not really want peace, so in order to have peace, we need to support Ukraine and we need to put the pressure on Russia,' Kaja Kallas, the European Union's foreign policy chief, told reporters in Brussels on Tuesday. However she suggested that waiting almost two months to impose tariffs was too long: 'Fifty days is a very long time if we see that they are killing innocent civilians every day.' That's a view also held by Yuriy Boyechko, CEO and founder of Hope for Ukraine, a nonprofit organization based in Portland, Oregon, that supports Ukrainian refugees in the U.S. 'This is way too long,' he said . 'Unless significant pressure is applied on Putin and the Russian economy immediately, more innocent civilians will die.' Russian officials mixed grave condemnation with mockery. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov called Trump's statements 'very serious' because it was 'addressed personally to President Putin.' Whereas former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev called it a 'theatrical ultimatum' about which 'Russia didn't care.' A senior Kremlin official told NBC News that Putin may not rush to respond. 'We need to analyze the situation,' he said. 'It might take some time.' Ultimately, the optimism of Ukraine's supporters will be dictated by what's actually in Trump's weapons deal — and whether he sticks with his renewed direction of thinking on the conflict. 'We need to be a bit cautious as to whether this is a sea change in Trump's opinion or if it's just another part of a whiplash effect as he veers backwards and forwards,' Matthew Savill, , director of military sciences at London's Royal United Services Institute think tank, told NBC News' British partner, Sky News. 'His overriding goal is to get credit for ending the fighting.'
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Joey Barton to pay more than £200,000 of Jeremy Vine legal costs in libel battle
Vine sued Barton for libel and harassment over several online posts, including one in which he falsely called the BBC Radio 2 presenter a 'big bike nonce' and a 'pedo defender' on X, formerly Twitter. The pair settled the claim last year after Barton posted two apologies on the same social media platform and paid a total of £110,000 in damages to Vine, as well as his legal costs. In an agreed statement read out at the High Court in October last year, barrister Gervase de Wilde, for Vine, said that the broadcaster 'was deeply alarmed, distressed and upset' by Barton's actions, which included a 'persistent and highly damaging campaign of defamation, harassment and misuse of private information'. On Tuesday, a specialist costs court heard that Barton had agreed to pay £160,000 of Vine's costs from the main legal action. Costs Judge Colum Leonard also ordered Barton to pay a further £43,172.30 arising from the negotiation of the £160,000 figure, meaning he will pay a total of £203,172.30 of Vine's costs following the legal action. Lawyers for Vine told the High Court in May last year that Barton's posts amounted to a 'calculated and sustained attack'. Barton – who played for teams including Manchester City, Newcastle United, Rangers, and French side Marseille during his career – also began using '#bikenonce' on X, which led to it trending on the platform. After Mrs Justice Steyn ruled that some of the posts could defame Vine, Barton apologised to the journalist in June last year, stating that the allegations he made were 'untrue'. He said that he would pay Vine £75,000 in damages, but solicitors for Vine later said Barton would pay a further £35,000 as part of a 'separate settlement' for claims published after legal action began. Mr De Wilde told the October hearing that Barton made four undertakings as part of the settlement, including not to harass Vine or encourage others to do so. Vine said following that hearing that Barton 'needs to find himself a different hobby'. The hearing on Tuesday was told that Barton agreed to pay £160,000 of Vine's legal costs earlier this month, and that Vine was claiming around £60,000 in costs for negotiating that figure. Suzanne Holmes, for Barton, said this was 'excessive' and 'disproportionate', and should be reduced. Kevin Latham, representing Vine, said Barton had 'repeatedly failed to engage in proper negotiation' throughout proceedings and 'has to bear the consequences of that approach'. Neither Barton nor Vine attended the hearing in London.
