Australia's first-ever rocket crashes after just 14 seconds of flight
Developed by Gilmour Space Technologies, the Eris rocket was designed to carry small satellites into orbit, marking a significant step for the nation's burgeoning space industry.
The launch, a test flight, took place from a spaceport near the town of Bowen in northern Queensland.
Videos circulated by Australian news outlets showed the 23-metre (75-foot) rocket successfully clearing the launch tower before appearing to hover briefly, then falling out of sight.
Plumes of smoke were subsequently observed rising from the site. Fortunately, no injuries were reported following the incident.
The company hailed the launch as a success in a statement posted to Facebook. A spokesperson said all four hybrid-propelled engines ignited and the maiden flight included 23 seconds of engine burn time and 14 seconds of flight.
Gilmour Space Technologies had planned previous launches of the rocket, in May and earlier this month, but called off those operations because of technical issues and bad weather.
CEO Adam Gilmour said in a statement he was pleased the rocket got off the launchpad.
'Of course I would have liked more flight time but happy with this,' he wrote on LinkedIn. Gilmour said in February that it was 'almost unheard of' for a private rocket company to successfully launch to orbit on its first attempt.
The firm had earlier said it would consider the launch a success if the rocket left the ground. The launch site infrastructure 'remained intact,' the statement said.
Mayor Ry Collins of the local Whitsunday Regional Council said the completed launch was a 'huge achievement' even though the vehicle didn't reach orbit.
'This is an important first step towards the giant leap of a future commercial space industry right here in our region,' he wrote on Facebook.
Gilmour Space Technologies has private funders and was awarded a 5 million Australian dollar ($3.2 million) grant this month from the country's federal government for the development of the Eris rocket.
It followed the firm's AU$52 million grant agreement with the government in 2023 to advance the development and commercialization of new space technologies in Australia.
The country has been the site of hundreds of suborbital vehicle launches but there have only been two successful launches to orbit from Australia before, according to the aerospace news platform NASASpaceFlight.
The maiden Eris test flight was the first orbital launch attempt from Australia in more than 50 years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
New ‘fundamentally different' airline to launch Australia flights in 2026
A new domestic airline hoping to challenge Qantas and Virgin in Australia is set to launch in 2026, according to the CEO. Koala Airlines said its model is fundamentally different from previous entrants into the market. The prospective airline follows the collapse of budget airline Bonza, which went into voluntary administration after just over a year of operation. 'We're not trying to be Qantas or Virgin – our model is fundamentally different, and that's why we've attracted the backing we have,' Koala's founding CEO Bill Astling told The Australian Financial Review. 'We've deliberately kept a low profile – not because we're stalling, but because we're building something with a long-term, sustainable foundation. We've learned from the past – both ours and the industry's – and we're taking a disciplined, strategic approach. 'We're on track to start operations late next year. But we're not in the business of giving our competitors a 12-month head start.' In 2019, Koala Airlines acquired Desert Air Safaris, an air tours and charter flights company that operated for over 50 years throughout Australia, Papua New Guinea and the Pacific Islands. The airline's website said: 'With a rich heritage to build on, our focus is clear: we aim to distinguish ourselves by our new initiatives and innovations that complement rather than compete with established norms.' However, Koala does not yet have a fleet of planes for the domestic aviation market and has not disclosed details of its flight paths. Bonza, which similarly marketed itself as a competitor to Qantas and Virgin, was the first budget airline to launch in Australia since 2007. It cited aircraft shortages and a lack of access to Sydney airport among the reasons for its collapse.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
US unveils wild plan to build nuke reactor on the MOON by 2030 in direct challenge to Russia and China in new space race
THE US has unveiled plans to build a nuclear reactor on the moon as it seeks to get ahead of China and Russia in the new-age space race. The aim is to mark American territory on the lunar surface by creating a power hub that could supply energy for future missions. 5 5 5 5 Nasa chief Sean Duffy is set to announce plans to build the reactor by 2030. It comes just weeks after Russia inked a deal with China to build a nuclear power station on the moon as part of their shared lunar space base. The Ru ssian reactor will be used to power the sprawling International Lunar Research Station (ILRS), which is being jointly led with China, according to a new agreement signed by the two nations. A directive from Nasa says that such an American nuclear reactor on the moon will establish US 'keep-out' zones on the lunar surface. This is to further stop rivals like Moscow and Beijing from effectively colonising the Moon. It reads: "The first country to do so could potentially declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not the first. "[Nasa needs to] move quickly to support a future lunar economy [and] strengthen our national security in space." In 2022, Nasa launched a mission known as the Fission Surface Power Project, hoping to establish a source that could provide abundant and continuous power on the moon regardless of environmental conditions. The project is deemed crucial for supporting long-term human settlements on the lunar surface. It could also enable the exploration of deeper space destinations in the future. Watch China's bizarre new plans for lunar base race with egg habitation domes that can resist moonquakes The reactor is expected to generate light and power during the lunar nights when there is no sunshine on the surface, making solar panels ineffective. One lunar night is the equivalent of 14 nights on Earth. And it could also help light up the permanently shadowed parts of the moon to make further space explorations. Inside a nuclear reactor, atoms of certain elements - like uranium-235 - are split when struck by neutrons. This splitting releases energy in the form of heat and additional neutrons. The released neutrons can then strike other atoms, continuing the chain reaction. Reactors are designed to control this chain reaction, preventing it from becoming uncontrolled. A Nasa official told The Telegraph: 'If we are going to have a habitable system on the Moon then we have to bring power.' He said small reactors were already in use on submarines and aircraft carriers. 'They solve the problem,' he added. During the pilot project, Nasa specified that the reactor should stay under six metric tons and be able to produce 40-kilowatt of electrical power. But Mr Duffy has now directed the space agency to seek industry proposals for a minimum 100-kilowatt reactor to launch by 2030. Former Nasa boss Bill Nelson was outspoken about his fears for a sole Chinese presence on the Moon - which are unlikely to soften with Russia's added involvement. China's military presence in the South China Sea signals how the country might behave on the lunar surface, Nelson claimed, which would breach the 1967 Outer Space Treaty. China's military presence in the South China Sea signals how the country might behave on the lunar surface, Nelson claimed, which would breach the 1967 Outer Space Treaty. Race to the lunar south pole By Sayan Bose, Foreign News Reporter THE far side of the moon, dubbed the 'dark side', has now become the focal point of numerous space exploration programs. India, Russia, China and the US have all been engaged in space developments to study the far point of the moon. It is deemed to be not only a compelling place for future space explorations but also a suitable site for lunar outposts. Scientists believe it could be the most promising location for water-based ice, which will be key to future human habitation on the Moon. It is also one of the moon's most resource-dense areas. The permanently shadowed places on the Moon could contain ice and other minerals, which would be vital resources for future explorers. Scientists reckon there is an abundance of Helium-3 in so-called 'cold traps' littered across the south pole, which can help produce huge amounts of energy here on Earth. The mountain peaks near the pole - which are illuminated for longer periods - could be used to provide solar energy to an outpost. With an outpost on the Moon, scientists will be able to analyse water and other volatile samples dating to the formation of the Solar System. For China, the landing of the Chang'e-6 lunar probe is an important milestone that the country will leverage to expand its space presence on the far side of the moon. It will use the data collected by the space lander to allow Chinese astronauts to set foot on the moon by 2030. "We better watch out that they don't get to a place on the moon under the guise of scientific research," Nelson told Politico in a 2023 interview. "And it is not beyond the realm of possibility that they say, 'Keep out, we're here, this is our territory.'' China has agreed to share the ILRS with 17 countries, including Egypt, Venezuela, South Africa, Pakistan, Thailand and Azerbaijan. Beijing has been firm that its intentions for ILRS are to collect samples and carry out 'scientific exploration", despite Nasa's suspicions. ILRS will be a permanent, manned lunar base on the Moon's south pole. Slated to be bigger than Disneyland, with a radius of 3.7miles, it is intended to host a command centre, a communication hub, and scientific facilities, alongside a power station. The groundwork will be laid by China's 2028 Chang'e-8 mission, which will be the country's first time landing an astronaut on the Moon. CHINA'S THREATENING SPACE AMBITIONS Under dictator Xi's leadership, China has been brewing ambitious plans to become the leader of the global space rush. The country spent roughly £11.2billion on its space programme in 2023, according to Statista. While China was late to the first round of the space race, Beijing is investing heavily in becoming the second nation to put humans on the Moon by 2030. The Chinese-owned Tiangong space station was completed in late 2022, and has been permanently manned since then. China has doubled the number of satellites it has in orbit since 2019, according to the US Defence Intelligence Agency. Experts also fear that China's monster network of tracking satellites could snoop on Western military operations. Washington and Beijing currently have the most developed plans for securing separate permanent bases on the Moon, out of any other country in the world. And fears are China, if it succeeds in making a giant leap ahead of the US, could threaten aggression in space. A series of non-binding bilateral agreements called the Artemis Accords have been signed between the US and other nations to assure peace in space and on other planets. However, China has stayed out of the agreement, indicating a potential threat from the communist country. 5
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The new space race: How the US, China, and Russia are all vying to be the first to build a nuclear reactor on the MOON
In the years of the Cold War, the US and the Soviet Union tussled to prove their superiority by rushing to become the first nation to put a man on the moon. While America might have claimed that particular prize in 1969, a new and even more dramatic space race is only just beginning. This week, it was revealed that Sean Duffy, the new head of NASA, is preparing to install an American nuclear reactor on the moon before 2030. In a directive, first reported by Politico, Mr Duffy claims this would allow the US to declare a 'keep-out zone' on the lunar surface. This is seen as a necessary step towards protecting the landing site for a future American moon base, planned as part of the Artemis Programme. However, the US is far from being the only country to set its sights on our lunar satellite. In May, China and Russia signed a memorandum of cooperation to build their own nuclear reactor on the moon. But with Russia and China targeting 2036 as their completion date, the three superpowers are now locked in a head-to-head race to get there first. This comes as the US makes a rapid and unexpected shift towards prioritising human exploration in space. Despite slashing scientific missions and giving NASA the smallest budget since 1961, the agency has allocated more than $7 billion for lunar exploration. The Artemis programme, once feared to be a target for Donald Trump's cuts, is now scheduled to return a human presence to the moon by 2027. In the directive, Mr Duffy called for NASA to ' move quickly' in establishing a nuclear reactor on the moon in order to 'support a future lunar economy '. Mr Duffy, who is also US transport secretary, has asked NASA to place a reactor capable of producing at least 100 kilowatts on the moon by the end of the decade. That is enough energy to power 80 average American households and could provide the energy backbone for a permanent lunar base. NASA had previously planned to place a 40-kilowatt reactor on the moon in a similar timeframe, but it is not clear if they will be able to use the same designs. Mr Duffy will give NASA 30 days to appoint an official to oversee the operation and 60 days to issue a request seeking proposals from commercial companies for the project. Nuclear power is seen as key for establishing a lunar presence because it is plunged into complete, freezing darkness for two weeks every month. At the South Pole, where NASA is planning to establish its operations, the sun never rises high above the horizon and some craters are shrouded in permanent darkness. That makes it practically impossible for spacecraft or bases to survive on the moon using solar power and batteries alone. However, this sudden swing back to lunar exploration may be a product of increasing competition from other superpowers. Tellingly, Mr Duffy warned that 'the first country to do so could potentially declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first.' This is almost certainly a reference to Russia and China's recent plans to build a nuclear reactor on the moon, announced in May. That reactor would be used to power the International Lunar Research Station (ILRS), which should be completed by 2036 according to the latest plans. Roscosmos, the Russian space agency, wrote in a statement at the time: 'The station will conduct fundamental space research and test technology for long-term uncrewed operations of the ILRS, with the prospect of a human being's presence on the Moon.' The ILRS would be a permanent base located within 62 miles (100 km) of the moon's South Pole, involving the work of 17 countries, including Egypt, Pakistan, Venezuela, Thailand and South Africa. The groundwork will be laid by China's upcoming Chang'e-8 mission, which will be the nation's first attempted human moon landing. This means that the moon, and especially the south pole, is now becoming the target of a new international space race. Dr Mark Hilborne, a security studies expert from King's College London, told Daily Mail: 'The Moon is a place where nations will have competing interests. There will be parts of the moon that are more valuable than others and, therefore, could be particular points of competition. 'The Moon is valuable as a low-gravity staging base where future space developments can be built. Lunar materials, mined in situ, would be valuable in building elements that would further lunar exploration. 'If these could be built on the Moon, rather than sent from Earth, the cost would be far cheaper.' The big concern for the US, and presumably Russia and China, is that whatever country starts building on the moon first could effectively claim it as its own territory. Countries' dealings in space are governed by a set of rules called the Outer Space Treaty, which was first signed in 1967. What is required by the Outer Space Treaty? Space exploration shall be for the benefit of all countries. Outer space is not subject to claims of national sovereignty. States must follow international law in space. States must not put nuclear weapons or other WMDs in space. Astronauts should be treated as envoys of all humanity. States are responsible for national activities in space. States are liable for damage to other states space objects. States have jurisdiction over what they put in space. States should be guided by principles of cooperation. States should be able to observe launches. The UN and public should be informed about space activity. Stations and bases should be open to representatives of other states. Intergovernmental activities are also controlled by the treaty. The treaty is open to all states. The treaty can be amended. States may leave the treaty. Copies of this treaty shall be kept in governmental archives. Signatories to the treaty agree that space is 'not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.' This explicitly means that nations are not legally able to make territorial claims on celestial bodies like the moon. However, in practice, America has recently doubled down on a far more assertive version of the law by signing a series of rules called the Artemis Accords in 2020. Critically, the Artemis Accords also gives states the power to implement 'safety zones' - exclusive areas which members of other states will not be able to enter or use without permission from the owner. While the US insists that these boundaries will end 'when the relevant operation ceases', for a permanent colony, this would function almost exactly like the borders of a sovereign territory. These rules essentially create a principle that whoever gets to a part of the moon first gets to keep it for their own use. Dr Jill Stuart, an expert on space law from the London School of Economics, told Daily Mail: 'Countries could use a part of the lunar surface for a scientific base - without claiming long-term ownership of it - but must communicate to other users where that base is and be transparent about its purpose. 'Although this seems like a potentially "fair" way to allow for future activity on the moon, it also creates a "first mover advantage" in that those who can set up bases first have the right to claim a safety zone around it.' That idea may now be alarming to America as China shows rapid advancements in its spaceflight program that have put a human presence on the moon within reach. While these safety zones might be essential for a nuclear reactor, experts say this may lead to an increasingly risky space race. Dr Fabio Tronchetti, a space law expert from Northumbria University, told Daily Mail: 'It is evident that we are heading towards a space rush. 'The United States is attempting to act quickly and get to the Moon first, at least before China and Russia, so as to be able to unilaterally claim the right to set out the rules of the game.' This has the serious potential to spark conflict between the nations since China and Russia, having not signed the Artemis Accords, have no legal requirement to respect the US 'keep-out zones'. Dr Tronchetti says that international law 'does not recognise the possibility' of the US's claims, adding that the US is attempting to 'force its [China's] hand to set out rules favourable to its own interests'. How this conflict might play out on the lunar surface remains to be seen, but in the future, we might see the conflicts here on Earth extend out into space. WHO HAS BEEN TO THE MOON? In total 12 people have walked on the moon. 1 + 2. Apollo 11 - July 21, 1969 Neil Armstrong made history by becoming the first person to set foot on the lunar surface, before he he was followed by crewmate Edwin 'Buzz' Aldrin. 3 + 4. Apollo 12 - November 19 and 20, 1969 Pete Conrad and Alan Bean were the moon walkers on the Apollo 12 mission. The Apollo 12 crew experienced two lightning strikes just after their Saturn V rocket launched. 5 + 6. Apollo 14 - February 5, 1971 Alan Shepard and Edgar Mitchell were part of the Apollo 14 mission. They launched on January 31, 1971, and landed in the Fra Mauro region of the moon, the original destination for Apollo 13. 7 + 8. Apollo 15 - July 31, 1971 Dave Scott and James Irwin landed on the moon and stayed for three days, until August 2. 9 + 10. Apollo 16 - April 21, 1972 John Young and Charlie Duke were the next men to walk on the moon. When the crew reached lunar orbit, the mission almost had to be aborted because of a problem with the command and service module's main engine. 11 + 12. Apollo 17 - December 11, 1972 The final people to walk on the moon were Eugene (Gene) Cernan and Harrison (Jack) Schmitt. Before he left the moon, Cernan scratched the initials of his daughter Tracy into the lunar regolith. Since the moon does not experience weather conditions like wind or rain to erode anything away, her initials should stay there for a very long time.
