Trump's actions at the UN represent a radical new realignment with Russia
First, the U.S. voted against a U.N. resolution that condemned Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The resolution, which called for Russia's withdrawal from Ukraine's internationally recognized borders, was backed by major European countries and Ukraine, and passed with the support of 93 U.N. member states. The U.S. was not among them. Instead, it voted in the same camp as nondemocratic Russian-aligned countries such as North Korea and Belarus, and against its allies across the Western world. (Notably, Israel joined the U.S. in its own precedent-breaking vote against the condemnation of Russia.)
Crucially, the Trump administration declined to take a softer, middle-ground position of abstaining from the vote. That's what some Russia-friendly countries such as China and Iran did, allowing those countries to avoid either endorsing interventionism or hurting their warm relationship with Russia. Abstention was also the move for a lot of countries across Latin America, Asia and Africa that have made clear that they have no desire to get involved on either side of the Russia-Ukraine war. But in voting against the resolution — after reportedly pressuring Ukraine to drop it — the U.S. flipped its position on the war upside-down and diplomatically absolved Russia for the brutal invasion of its neighbor.
After that vote, the U.S. presented its own resolution at the U.N. Security Council calling for a 'swift end to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine' — but omitted any critical mention of Russia. U.S. allies on the Security Council, such as the United Kingdom and France, tried to amend the language of the resolution to reflect who was to blame for the war, and attempted to delay a vote on the measure. But they failed in their efforts. Ultimately, the U.K. and France — and three other European countries — abstained from the vote, which was ultimately approved by the Security Council. 'No one wants peace more than Ukraine, but the terms of that peace matter,' U.K. Ambassador to the U.N. Barbara Woodward said afterward.Trump, usually eager to hold forth at length about the least consequential topics, has had little of substance to say about U.S. positioning at the U.N. 'I would rather not explain it now, but it's sort of self-evident I think,' he told reporters when asked about his administration's opposition to the resolution condemning Russia.
He's right: the vote speaks for itself. It says that Trump is not merely 'soft' on Russia — as he was sometimes during his first term, although often not nearly as much as Democrats thought he was — but rather that he now sees a decades-long adversary as a friend, or at least potential friend, of America. It says that the once airtight U.S.-European alliance is collapsing. It says that the U.S. is done with even pretending to care about sovereignty norms and human rights. And it says that the U.S. backs an every-man-for-himself ethos in a global order in which the strong rule the weak without apology or shame.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says 'not planning' fire Fed Chair Powell after reports suggest Powell ouster coming 'soon'
President Trump on Wednesday tempered reports from earlier in the day that suggested he planned imminently to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, the latest twist in the ongoing saga regarding Trump's displeasure with the central bank head. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office late Wednesday morning, Trump said he is "not planning" to fire Powell, though reiterated his view that rates should be lower and the Fed chair is doing a "terrible job." Trump's comments came just about an hour after a slew of reports suggested the president was inching closer to firing Powell. Bloomberg reported that the president was likely to remove Powell "soon," quoting a White House official, and CBS News reported that Trump indicated to lawmakers he would do so while polling House GOP members Tuesday night about whether he should go through with it. The New York Times reported that Trump even showed those lawmakers a draft of a Powell firing letter in the Oval Office Tuesday night. But Bloomberg and The New York Times also both noted in their reports that Trump has not made a final decision. Following Trump's comments on Wednesday, markets erased some of the losses suffered after the initial reports Trump would fire Powell in short order. Trump also said Wednesday he had not drafted a letter regarding Powell's firing. These signals of a possible firing come after Trump on Tuesday told reporters that Powell's handling of a $2.5 billion renovation of the Federal Reserve headquarters 'sort of is' a fireable offense. Any final move by the president to oust the Fed chair could lead to a legal war with Powell, who has argued he can't be removed by law. The president also appeared in his latest comments to narrow his choices to replace Powell. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is an "option," but not the top choice, 'because I like the job he is doing,' he said. The Washington Post and Bloomberg reported this week that National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett is rising as an early front-runner in the race to replace Powell, although former Fed governor Kevin Warsh is also under consideration. Fed governor Christopher Waller is another possibility. Bessent, though, is 'probably not that much of an option," Trump said Tuesday, citing what he views as his good performance as Treasury secretary. "He's a very soothing force." Trump has been hammering Powell for months over what Trump viewed as a refusal to ease monetary policy for political and personal reasons, referring to Powell publicly as 'dumb,' a numbskull,' a 'stubborn mule,' 'stupid,' a 'moron,' and a 'fool.' Trump nominated Powell for the Fed chair seat during his first administration, and his current term is scheduled to run until May of 2026. Read more: How much control does the president have over the Fed and interest rates? Trump's allies in recent weeks have used another tactic to turn up the pressure on Powell: They have invoked a $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's headquarters as a way to question the chair's management of the institution and whether he told Congress the truth about the project during testimony in June. Trump said Tuesday that "the one thing I wouldn't have guessed is he would be spending two and a half million dollars to build a little extension onto the Fed." When asked if it was a fireable offense, Trump said, "I think it sort of is, because if you look at his testimony ... he's not talking about the problem. It's a big problem." One House Republican, Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, posted on X Tuesday night: "Hearing Jerome Powell is getting fired! From a very serious source" and later added: "I'm 99% sure firing is imminent." CBS also reported that some members of the House Financial Services Committee, which acts as oversight for the Fed, were planning to meet with Powell on Wednesday night, and that some want to reinforce his independence. Top administration officials have sent mixed signals about how far Trump would go with Powell. Hassett said Sunday on ABC News's "This Week" that whether the president has the legal authority to fire Powell before his term is up next May "is being looked into" and that "certainly, if there's cause, he does." But Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Bloomberg Tuesday that the president "said numerous times he's not going to fire Jay Powell" and compared Trump's public pressure to former college basketball coach Bobby Knight "working the refs." "President Trump seems to prefer the Bobby Knight school," he said. Bessent also said Tuesday, "there's a formal process that's already starting" to find Powell's replacement. He also hopes Powell decides to leave the Fed board when his term as chair is up. His seat on the Fed Board of Governors is not up until 2028. Trump, too, has sent mixed signals in recent months about whether he would seek to remove Powell, musing about it publicly before assuring he wouldn't do it. Wall Street is paying close attention to the drama unfolding in Washington, D.C. JPMorgan Chase (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon said Tuesday that the independence of the Federal Reserve is "absolutely critical" and warned that "playing around with the Fed can often have adverse consequences." A firing by Trump could potentially open a new legal war with Powell, who has argued that his removal is 'not permitted by law.' The only language in law pertaining specifically to the removal of Fed board members can be found in Section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act. The law states that each member of the board shall hold office for 14 years "unless sooner removed for cause by the President." The statute doesn't have any language that specifically addresses the chair of the Board of Governors, nor does it detail what exactly constitutes "for cause." The term has been interpreted in legal rulings to mean "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance." But Powell and the Fed could still have the backing of the Supreme Court, which made it clear in a May decision it might protect the central bank even as it allowed Trump to fire the board members of two other independent agencies: the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board. The central bank, the court said, 'is a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity that follows in the distinct historical tradition of the First and Second Banks of the United States.' What Trump is trying to challenge is a 90-year-old Supreme Court precedent limiting the power of the president to dismiss independent agency board members except in cases of neglect or malfeasance. If that precedent eventually falls, a Powell firing may be easier to legally justify at the Fed. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US trade chief Greer says wants US trade deficit on downward path
By David Lawder and Andrea Shalal (Reuters) -U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on Wednesday that his trade policy goal was to put the $1.2 trillion U.S. trade deficit on a downward path and to stem the loss of U.S. advanced manufacturing capacity. Greer, in remarks to a reindustrialization summit in Detroit, said that President Donald Trump's expanded tariff program was already bearing fruit in terms of spurring new industrial investments in the U.S. This includes $4 billion from General Motors to move some production to the U.S. from Mexico, new steel and pharmaceutical plants, Greer said, adding that Trump was encouraging countries to move production to the U.S. to avoid his tariffs. Greer said in most substantial policy address since taking office in late February, that the U.S. industrial decline was due to long-running trade liberalization efforts by both Democratic and Republican administrations, including allowing China to join the World Trade Organization. The 2024 U.S. trade deficit of $1.2 trillion was "a state of affairs that is as unsustainable as it is unacceptable," Greer said. "It almost sounds like Monopoly money." To help remedy this, he said Trump's tariff policies called for a universal tariff rate of 10% on all countries, with higher rates for the most "problematic" ones, including China, which has the highest tariff rate of 55%. "Of course, the president signaled a willingness to negotiate with countries if they want to have an alternative relation with us and really join us in re industrializing. And countries have been responsive," Greer said. Trump himself drafted the recent letters that he has set to a number of countries informing them of tariff rates for their imports absent trade deals, Greer said. "He had a line in there that says there will be no tariff if you decide to build or manufacture product within the United States," Greer said. Greer also said that he also wanted to increase the manufacturing share of U.S. GDP and increase the median household income in the U.S. While tariffs were an important tool in this, there are others, including the recent enactment of a massive tax cut and spending bill that includes investments in energy, tax breaks for research and development and immediate expensing of capital investments against tax liabilities. As the top U.S. trade lawyer, Greer said, "my job is to clear the playing field of all the pitfalls, the obstacles, all the unfairness that has hindered U.S. re-industrialization." Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hassett grabs pole position in race to be Trump's new Fed Chair
(Bloomberg) — Kevin Hassett, one of President Donald Trump's longest-serving economic aides, is the early frontrunner to replace Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve chief next year, according to people familiar with the process. Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, and Kevin Warsh are the top two contenders in an Apprentice-like contest run by Trump out of the White House. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is advising on selection — but could get the job himself if others fail to impress — while Fed governor Christopher Waller remains the dark horse, said people familiar with the deliberations. Trump has raised the succession stakes by routinely blasting Powell for keeping interest rates too high, and saying he'll pick a Fed chair who wants to cut them. It's left investors worried that the central bank's autonomy from political pressure — key to its ability to fight inflation and support the dollar — is in growing danger. Hassett has echoed Trump's Fed critique. In a Fox Business interview this month he noted that the central bank is an independent agency. But he said that by cutting rates before last year's presidential election — and then keeping them on hold more recently, citing inflation risk from tariffs – it deserved the president's barbs. 'I think that that raises the specter that they're not being non-partisan, they're not being independent,' Hassett said. 'There to Serve' Once seen as a measured right-leaning economist, aligned with politicians like Mitt Romney, Hassett has been in the Trump orbit for close to a decade now. He's approached the National Economic Council job very differently from predecessors like Gary Cohn, who sought to damp down the president's impulses on tariffs – and didn't last long. Hassett has gone full MAGA instead – amplifying Trump's instincts on trade, taxes, inflation or the Fed, in myriad TV appearances. That's what it takes in Trumpworld, according to Stephen Myrow, who runs Beacon Policy Advisers, a Washington research firm. 'Anyone who has survived this long under Trump, they're not coming in with an ideology that they want to advance,' Myrow said. 'They're not there to serve a school of monetary thought. They're there to serve Trump.' What remains to be seen is how that service ethos applies to the next Fed chair – a job that's supposed to be walled off from administration priorities. It's a multi-trillion-dollar question. Economists say autonomous central banks are better at taming inflation, so a Fed chief seen as acquiescent to the White House could trigger a slump in Treasury markets. Trump's threats to fire Powell have added to financial jitters set off by his trade war. The president has taken the opposite tack, arguing that excessive Fed rates add hundreds of billions a year to America's debt service costs. 'Most Qualified Individuals' The process of choosing Powell is officially under way, Bessent told Bloomberg TV on Tuesday. Along with the Treasury chief, the narrow circle of aides involved include White House chief-of-staff Susie Wiles – who's advised on Trump's key hiring decisions, and is steeped in the politics of trying to ensure the US economy is thriving by next year's midterm election. Trump allies say the president is deeply engaged in the choice. One adviser predicted the interview process would move quickly, since the president tends to act once he gets an idea in his head. Hassett has been telling people both inside and outside the administration that he very much wants the job — though he plays it coy when asked on TV. Hassett did not respond to requests for comment. Trump, asked by reporters on Tuesday if Bessent is the No. 1 contender to lead the Fed said that he is 'an option' and complimented the Treasury secretary for 'the job he's doing.' 'With Joe Biden's inflation crisis firmly past us, President Trump has been clear about the need for the Federal Reserve's monetary policy to complement the administration's pro-growth agenda,' said White House spokesman Kush Desai. 'He will continue to nominate the most qualified individuals who can best serve the American people.' As NEC chief, Hassett benefits from daily proximity to the president, with an office in the West Wing. Warsh by contrast, spends much of his time shuttling between the Hoover Institution in California and New York City. Trump interviewed Warsh — a former Fed governor — for the chair role in 2017, but opted for Powell instead because he thought Warsh's views were too hawkish and he looked too young for the job. Hassett served as the head of the Council of Economic Advisers during Trump's first term. His earlier career includes stints as a Fed economist and at the American Enterprise Institute, where he was director of research. Hassett is known as an expert on tax, and has written widely on the topic. But perhaps his most notorious book was 'Dow 36,000,' predicting a surge in the US stock market, which was published shortly before the dotcom bubble burst. The Dow eventually hit the level predicted in his title more than two decades later. 'Very Confusing' During Trump's years in exile in Florida between his first and second terms, Hassett – who was doing some work for Jared Kushner's investment fund Affinity Partners at the time — also frequently got together with Trump to talk through economic ideas. Both men share a similar approach to the world and a tendency to store up grievances based on perceived slights, said one longtime friend of Hassett. Trump has been voicing grievances with Powell almost ever since naming him to the top Fed job. Complaints have escalated into open anger during Trump's second term, when he nicknamed Powell 'Too Late' and often resorted to harsher insults. Powell's Fed has kept interest rates unchanged this year, after lowering them by a percentage point over the last few months of 2024. US central bankers say there's no rush to cut further, pointing to solid growth and a healthy job market, and arguing that they need time to see whether tariffs will boost inflation, like most economists expect. So far, consumer prices haven't seen much of a tariff jump – though there were signs in the June numbers, published on Tuesday, that companies are beginning to pass on trade-related costs. That's reinforced expectations that the Fed will stand pat again at its next rates meeting on July 29-30. Markets still expect a couple of cuts by year-end. Echoing Trump's 'too late' jibe, Hassett accused the Fed in his Fox interview of 'falling behind the curve' compared to what other central banks are doing. In another interview with Fox Business on Wednesday, Hassett suggested the Fed had strayed from the 'normal correlation' between policy rates in the US and in Europe, arguing that provided more evidence the US central bank was too slow in cutting. He's also joined other Trump aides and Republican lawmakers in voicing alarm about the rising costs of the Fed's headquarter renovations – which has become the president's latest stick to beat Powell with. One goal may be to pressure Powell to leave the Fed board when his tenure as chair ends in May next year — rather than staying on in the role of governor, where his term extends into 2028. The administration's argument is essentially that Trump's Fed pick — whether it's Hassett or someone else — needs a clear run at the job. 'Traditionally, the Fed chair also steps down as a governor,' Bessent told Bloomberg TV on Tuesday. 'There's been a lot of talk of a shadow Fed chair causing confusion in advance of his or her nomination. And I can tell you, I think it'd be very confusing for the market for a former Fed chair to stay on also.' —With assistance from Charlie Zuza. (Updates with additional Hasset comments in 27th paragraph.) ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
