logo
Why disposable vapes will vanish from stores this week

Why disposable vapes will vanish from stores this week

By Nik Dirga of RNZ
Explainer - Disposable vape fans will see their habit go up in smoke from Tuesday, as tough new vape rules kick in.
Here's what you need to know about changes to vape sales and advertising. What's being banned?
The distribution, manufacture, sale and supply of disposable vapes is being banned from Tuesday.
"We are getting rid of vapes that are most popular among young people, and that can only be positive," Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said in announcing the changes last year.
The 2023/24 NZ Health Survey found 10.5 percent of people aged 15 to 17 vaped daily.
However, pod-style vaping devices will still be sold. They contain pre-filled pods which are swapped out to refill the vape.
Also as of Tuesday, vaping devices, products and packaging can no longer be displayed at general retailers. Specialist vape stores must not display products in any way that makes them visible from outside their place of business - that includes advertising, display in online stores and in vending machines.
There are also many new restrictions on advertising to promote or encourage the use of vaping products, including to existing customers. The new raft of advertising restrictions mean businesses could face a $2000 infringement fine.
For instance, the government says it would violate the new regulations if a shop is advertising or posting about vaping products on social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter or Google business listings.
"From the 17th June we will no longer be able to show images of the products," one online vape retailer says on its website.
There's quite a lot of detail in the new advertising rules and a full breakdown can be found on Health New Zealand's website.
Also as of Tuesday, vaping specialist retailers can no longer use various promotional techniques such as giving away free vaping products, discounts, offering rewards, cash rebates or gifts for the purchase of vaping products, or offer lotteries or games to people who buy vaping products. Haven't there already been some restrictions on vapes?
Yes, as part of the series of changes to the Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products Act 1990 last year. The new changes are the second line of alterations which began coming into effect in December.
As of December, fines for selling to minors and publishing prohibited advertisements were increased, and new vape speciality stores were forbidden from opening within 100 metres of early childhood education centres. There were already location restrictions saying speciality vape stores had to be at least 300 metres from schools or marae.
In introducing the amendments to smoking regulations last year, Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said, "New Zealand was too slow to effectively regulate vaping, and youth vaping rates are too high".
"We have collectively agreed that, we have recognised that, and we know that we can do better. We have to stop young people from taking it up as a habit."
The ban on disposable vapes was put off for six months to allow retailers to prepare for the changes.
Jonathan Devery, chair of the Vaping Industry Association of New Zealand, said the group does support the disposable vapes ban, with a few caveats.
He said while VIANZ "supports the intent behind the policy - to reduce youth access and address the environmental impact of single-use products - the association is urging caution about the potential unintended consequences".
University of Otago public health professor Janet Hoek, a leading researcher into vaping, said whether or not the ban will make a difference will depend on enforcement and product innovation by the industry. Will people just switch from disposable vapes to refillable pods?
"I would expect [the ban] to reduce youth vaping given young people are very price sensitive," Hoek said. "However, if the industry responds, as I think it is likely to do, by introducing cheaper pod vapes, the impact will be much less limited than we might hope."
"They're not a straightforward replacement," Devery said. "There's a real risk that removing the most convenient smoking cessation option could drive consumers back to cigarettes."
Hoek said many manufacturers may look for loopholes they can exploit with bans.
"Disposable vapes are typically inexpensive [i.e., may cost less than $10 a device], so the vaping industry may respond by introducing new lower priced reusable vapes," Hoek said, saying she had seen pod starter kits - without pods, which cost extra - being advertised for under $10.
"We saw this behaviour among tobacco companies as they tried to undermine the impact of increased tobacco excise taxes [they 'shifted' the tax to higher priced brands, away from lower priced brands and introduced entirely new brands to create a new 'super value' partition within the market]."
Devery of VIANZ said it's possible some vape sales may just go underground.
"There are also serious concerns about enforcement," he said. "Early warnings from the UK, where a disposable vape ban came into effect on 1 June, suggest black market sales are likely to increase."
Hoek said there is a lot of concern that manufacturers may find ways around disposable bans - she pointed to 'Big Puff' high-capacity throwaway vapes that have drawn concern in the UK with their own disposables ban. What does this mean for the vaping industry?
"We have consistently called for a full ban on disposable vapes, rather than incremental technical fixes, and we welcome the environmental benefits it will bring," Devery said. "But the transition must be managed carefully to avoid driving consumers back to smoking or into unregulated markets."
The industry group feels that some of the advertising restrictions may ultimately harm consumers and make it harder for retailers to interact with them.
"Many retailers, especially online, have relied on clear product information and guidance to help adults make informed choices," Devery said. "New restrictions will limit what can be communicated, making it harder for consumers to understand available options or find support to switch."
"Retailers are still recovering from last year's rushed regulations that left them with unsellable stock and high compliance costs - from updating websites to in-store signage," he said.
Many retailers have discounted their products heavily before the bans take effect. But should more be done to control vaping?
Hoek said she thought the new measures would help cut youth vaping, but more strategy was needed.
"There are many omissions from the measures (e.g., the high concentration of vape stores in lower income communities; the location of vape stores right next to schools). I would favour a more proactive strategy that reduced the appeal, availability, addictiveness and affordability of vaping products."
One of the key complaints about disposable vapes have been the waste they generate, Devery said.
"Removing disposables will help cut vape-related e-waste by over 80 percent according to our industry estimates, but more must be done," he said. "VIANZ recommends expanded take-back schemes like VapeCycle, producer-responsibility regulations, and better consumer education on safe disposal."
"I would favour a 'polluter pays' model, where vape companies are responsible for the costs their products create," Hoek said.
"Vape companies have been given clear rules to follow, and yet some are already looking for loopholes," Asthma and Respiratory Foundation chief executive Letitia Harding said in a statement. Will this help New Zealand meet its Smokefree 2025 goals?
Back in 2011, New Zealand's government set the goal of a Smokefree New Zealand by 2025. There have been concerns that goal is falling short, with particular worries about Māori and Pasifika smoking rates.
Costello has maintained the government's changes will continue work toward the target.
"We do not want our young people vaping," Costello said in Parliament. "We do not want them taking up this habit. We do not want them to be nicotine addicted. We also don't want anybody taking up tobacco and smoking."
The current smokefree goal aims to have less than 5 percent of the population smoking by December, but the latest data reveals there are still about 300,000 daily smokers - 6.9 percent of adults - across the country.
"VIANZ urges the government to closely monitor the ban's impact on smoking rates, particularly among priority groups, and ensure regulations don't inadvertently harm those most vulnerable," Deverey said.
"Vaping regulation must be viewed in the context of the devastating harm caused by smoking, which kills two out of every three users."
"Strong rules and environmental responsibility are essential, but the broader goal must remain to reduce smoking and improve public health outcomes."
Hoek said it's important vaping retailers were brought along on that goal.
"People who sell vaping products should be able to help people switch successfully from smoking to vaping," she said.
"We also need to let people know that, once they have switched completely to vaping and no longer think there's a risk they would return to smoking, they should stop vaping.
"That latter message isn't [for obvious reasons] communicated by vaping companies or retailers."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Strip club forced to remove posts about women suing firm
Strip club forced to remove posts about women suing firm

Otago Daily Times

time14 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Strip club forced to remove posts about women suing firm

The owners of the Calendar Girls strip clubs have been forced to take down posts identifying dancers suing the firm. Seven women are currently pursuing an application in the Employment Court for a declaration of their employment status. A non-publication order was issued in May suppressing their identities after they raised concerns about their safety and damage to their reputations due to the stigma attached to the work they had been doing. One of the women has now returned to court alleging breaches of the order by Calendar Girls NZ Ltd, the company named as the defendant in their case. Chief Employment Court Judge Christina Inglis hastily scheduled a hearing this week to hear the woman. "I accorded urgency to the application given the nature of the alleged breaches and the concerns that had underpinned the making of the orders of non-publication in the first place," the judge said in a recent judgment. Lawyers get together The urgent hearing was set down for Thursday but was cancelled after lawyers for both sides got together and agreed non-publication orders should be respected. "The defendants confirm that they have removed all offending posts," Judge Inglis said. However, her judgment did not detail what was in the posts. The seven women are seeking a declaration that they were employees of Calendar Girls NZ Ltd under the Employment Relations Act 2000. Being an employee, rather than a contractor, gives entitlement to a wider range of legal protections, including minimum conditions, protection from discrimination, health and safety, and the ability to bargain collectively. In 2023, dancers from the Wellington Calendar Girls club attempted to bargain collectively after being offered a contract that they said was "manipulative". Nineteen were told to clear out their lockers and not to come back to work through a Facebook post after asking for changes to the way they were being paid. In seeking non-publication orders in the current case, filed in the Wellington Employment Court, the seven women raised several concerns about having their identities made public. Women in the clubs use a professional name while working there, and are instructed not to give their real names to customers. However, their case in the Employment Court has been taken using their real names. The women involved in the case feared publication of their identities would "severely impact" their employment and housing prospects, and their ability to travel. They said the stigma attached to their work at Calendar Girls had already led to judgments about their morality and respectability. The women are all young and fear damage to their reputations and the impact on their families. They also said they had safety concerns about former clients and members of the public. Dismissed from a government job One of the women is a member of a church and is worried about others in the congregation finding out. Others have had tenancy applications declined, and another woman said she was dismissed from a government agency when it became known she had worked in the sex industry. Judge Inglis has now made orders instructing Calendar Girls not to disclose the names, identifying particulars, or photographs of the seven women who have taken the case. She said this applied to "all forms of communication, including oral, written, electronic and any other medium". The substantive case has been set down to be heard in a five-day fixture in February 2026. Calendar Girls NZ Ltd is a Christchurch-based company which operates clubs in Christchurch, Auckland, Wellington and Queenstown. - Ric Stevens, Open Justice reporter

How Kiwi billionaire Peter Thiel bankrolled Hulk Hogan's lawsuit that bankrupted controversial US media company
How Kiwi billionaire Peter Thiel bankrolled Hulk Hogan's lawsuit that bankrupted controversial US media company

NZ Herald

time3 days ago

  • NZ Herald

How Kiwi billionaire Peter Thiel bankrolled Hulk Hogan's lawsuit that bankrupted controversial US media company

His lawsuit against the controversial blog was secretly backed by Thiel, an early investor in Facebook as well as New Zealand's high-flying tech stock Xero, who was years earlier outed as being gay by Gawker. In 2007, Gawker published an article targeting the billionaire with the headline: 'Peter Thiel is totally gay, people'. 'Thiel, who is now open about his sexual orientation, once described the Gawker-owned site Valleywag as, 'the Silicon Valley equivalent of Al Qaeda',' the New York Times later wrote. Hogan was awarded US$140 million ($232.2m) in damages in June 2016, which saw Gawker file for bankruptcy months later. Hogan eventually reached a US$31m ($51.4m) settlement with Gawker Media. Thiel, now 57, told the New York Times in 2016 he funded Hogan as a means of going to battle with Gawker in response to their stories, saying he believed many of their targets were defenceless and unable to fight back. 'Gawker, the defendant, built its business on humiliating people for sport,' he said in a statement. 'They routinely relied on an assumption that victims would be too intimidated or disgusted to even attempt redress for clear wrongs. Freedom of the press does not mean freedom to publish sex tapes without consent. I don't think anybody but Gawker would argue otherwise.' Boella v. Gawker was the subject of a Netflix documentary, Nobody Speak: Trials of the Free Press in 2017 and a 2018 book by Ryan Holiday, Conspiracy: Peter Thiel, Hulk Hogan, Gawker, and the Anatomy of Intrigue. Thiel was born in Germany but moved to America when he was only a year old. He became a New Zealand citizen in 2011. 'I am happy to say categorically that I have found no other country that aligns more with my view of the future than New Zealand,' Thiel wrote. His citizenship became a minor national scandal in 2017 when the Ombudsman revealed that the billionaire had only spent 12 days in the country, less than 1% of the usual criteria. Benjamin Plummer is an Auckland-based reporter for the New Zealand Herald who covers sport and breaking news. He has worked for the Herald since 2022.

Attention goes offshore as New Zealand sharemarket steady
Attention goes offshore as New Zealand sharemarket steady

NZ Herald

time3 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Attention goes offshore as New Zealand sharemarket steady

Appointed chief executive in April 2017, Peterson had helped guide the market operator to new heights, with NZX's operating earnings having increased from $28.6m to $48.5m during his tenure. In trade news, the United States and Japan reached a deal that included lowering President Donald Trump's tariffs on Japan's crucial car sector. The US lowered tariffs on some Japanese goods to 15%, down from the threatened 25%. In return, Japan pledged to invest US$550 billion in the US, Trump said on social media. Devon Funds Management head of retail Greg Smith said markets would be watching Trump's visit to the US Federal Reserve with interest, considering it's the first time in nearly two decades a sitting president has made the visit. 'It's more pressure for [Federal Reserve chairman] Jerome Powell. Markets have been aware of that, but then they've dismissed it as Trump has said he's got no plans to fire him,' Smith said. As for the earning season in the US, Google parent Alphabet reported quarterly profits that topped expectations, while Elon Musk's Tesla saw its revenue fall 12% – the sharpest decline in at least a decade. 'They're still copping a lot of competition from companies with more affordable EVs, then you've got the effect of boycotts on Tesla. It's been a pretty bad performance this year. 'Maybe there might be a bit more focus from Elon Musk.' Looking back home, Smith said Google's performance in cloud and data centre technologies could benefit Infratil, which operates as a landlord for some data centres in New Zealand. Infratil's share price rose 2c or 0.18% to $11.19 after 582,097 shares traded hands to the value of $6,533,194.59. Elsewhere, Air New Zealand rose half a cent or 0.86% to 58.5c on high volume, with 1,981,843 shares trading hands. Ebos Group also rallied 98c or 2.46% after $5,658,363.95 worth of shares were traded, lifting its price to $40.76. International markets Wall Street stocks advanced on Wednesday with the Dow logging strong gains and the S&P 500 closing at a record for the third time in a row. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 1.1% to 45,010.29 while the broad-based S&P 500 Index bounced 0.8% to 6358.91. The tech-focused Nasdaq Composite Index climbed 0.6% to 21,020.02. The gains came after Trump announced on Tuesday that Washington had reached tariff agreements with Japan and the Philippines, and as officials signalled optimism in trade talks with the European Union. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz voiced optimism that EU and United States negotiators are making progress in talks to resolve a transatlantic trade row. Several EU diplomats also said the bloc was examining a US proposal involving a baseline tariff of 15% and sectoral carve-outs still to be decided. – Additional reporting AFP Tom Raynel is a multimedia business journalist for the Herald, covering small business, retail and tourism.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store