The greenback question
This has led to a recurring topic in recent conversations on currency, specifically whether or not to hedge U.S. dollar exposures. This isn't a moot point, as there are many different considerations beyond whether the CAD at 73 cents is going to 75 cents or back down to 70 cents.
]
Accurately forecasting where a currency is going to go next is rather challenging. Additionally, for a Canadian's portfolio, there are multiple other considerations when it comes to the question of hedging. USD exposure can have a portfolio diversification benefit, and there are many longer-term trends that should be considered. Below, we share our views on all these aspects and our current thoughts on currency hedging.
Portfolio diversification
For Canadian investors – who are most of our readers – the USD looks fantastic! The TSX and the Canadian dollar are risk-on assets; both are more sensitive than many others to trends in global economic growth. When growth improves and markets become more risk-on, Canadian equity and currency tend to win.
Conversely, when growth slows or recession risks rise, the TSX and CAD tend to fall while the USD rises. Even if you dislike policy coming from America, the USD remains a safe-haven currency. If markets go risk-off, money tends to flow back to America, bidding up the currency.
As a result, U.S. dollar exposure often acts as a ballast for Canadian investor portfolios, even more so than bonds. The following chart shows the correlation of various investment vehicles to the TSX. USD exposure carries a negative correlation. Additionally included in the chart is the beta, as this helps demonstrate the size of the relative moves, not just the direction. Again, USD stacks up very well as a diversification tool for Canadian portfolios.
These numbers look similar over longer periods as well. So, this could support not hedging, given the diversification benefits. But there are other considerations as well.
Long-term trends
It's very difficult to put a valuation or fair value on a currency exchange rate. Variations in economic activity and shorter-term interest rates certainly drive exchange rates over subsequent months or quarters. Much longer-term purchasing power parity does play a role, but you've got to look really long-term. If a currency is very cheap in one country compared to another, capital flows and trade will gradually reverse the spread (this happens more reliably with developed nations' currencies). The freer the flow of capital, the faster the process; the more restrictions, the slower it goes. But it is not fast either way.
Even after the recent rise in the CAD vs USD so far in 2025, we believe the CAD is still cheap or undervalued. But it has been for most of the past decade, as it was overvalued for the previous decade. These are very long and slow-moving cycles. Taking a really long view, the CAD was a dog during the '90s, the USD was a poor performing currency in the '00s, and then the CAD sucked again in the '10s to 2025 so far.
If it's a coin flip as to which currency performs better in the next five or ten years, we might say it is a well-loaded coin in favour of the CAD. But there are likely many moves in both directions during that period, some that align with the potential longer-term trend and some that are countertrend. We believe a long-term trend of a weaker USD and strong CAD might support hedging USD exposure.
Near-term factors
And then there's the rest of the factors, many factors, driving near-term volatility in exchange rates. The CAD has often been influenced by oil prices, but this relationship was stronger pre-2020 than it has been lately. Conversely, changes in short-term relative yields between Canada and the U.S. have become a larger determinant. A narrowing of the spread between two-year yields has supported the Canadian dollar rebound, as has the spike in oil prices as Middle East conflicts intensify.
Add cooling uncertainty on the path of tariffs, halving the quantity of short CAD futures contracts, and a minor 'anti' U.S. theme in markets, and we believe the CAD bounce has many supporting tailwinds.
These are all known knowns in the currency world, and likely reflected in the recent weakness in USD and strength in CAD, which rallied from below 70 cents to the current 73-cent level. So, in the near term, it really comes down to what happens next. If we get more clarity on tariffs, we could see more CAD strength. If we see economic data continue to decelerate, we could see USD strength. Or some other aspect could rise up to move exchange rates in a way that surprises everyone.
Final thoughts
So there you have it: no simple answer to this difficult question. From a portfolio construction perspective, we believe you shouldn't hedge just because you want that diversification benefit. From a likely long-term trend perspective, the USD could weaken, supporting hedging. Near-term factors are noisy.
We would only act on these factors when things move too far or too fast. At 73 cents, we are rather ambivalent; it's too high to get us excited about adding any USD currency hedges, but not high enough to entice us to remove any existing hedges.
In other words, a lot of words and charts just to say we are rather neutral.
Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments Inc. and portfolio manager of several Purpose funds, including Purpose Tactical Thematic Fund.
Notes and disclaimer
Content copyright © 2025 by Purpose Investments Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part by any means without prior written permission is prohibited. This article first appeared on the ' Market Ethos ' page of the Purpose Investments' website. Used with permission.
Charts are sourced from Bloomberg unless otherwise noted.
The content of this document is for informational purposes only, and is not being provided in the context of an offering of any securities described herein, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security. The information is not investment advice, nor is it tailored to the needs or circumstances of any investor. Information contained in this document is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as an offering memorandum, prospectus, advertisement or public offering of securities. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority has reviewed this document and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable, however, we cannot guarantee that it is complete or current at all times. The information provided is subject to change without notice.
Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements ('FLS') are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as 'may,' 'will,' 'should,' 'could,' 'expect,' 'anticipate,' intend,' 'plan,' 'believe,' 'estimate' or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are by their nature based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
14 minutes ago
- CTV News
Ottawa's downtown office vacancy rate at 15 per cent through the spring
Ottawa's office vacancy rate improved slightly in the spring, with a new report suggesting there is demand for mid to large-sized office space in the core and in Kanata. CBRE Canada's second-quarter Canada Office Figures report shows Ottawa's vacancy rate dropped from 12.7 per cent in the January-March period to 12.5 per cent in the April-June period. 'Uncertainty regarding the economic landscape continued to obfuscate occupier decision making, although demand still exists for mid to large-sized space, as observed in the core and in Kanata,' the report says. The vacancy rate in downtown Ottawa was 15 per cent in the second quarter, while the office vacancy rate in the suburbs was 10.5 per cent. Toronto's downtown vacancy rate was 18.5 per cent in the spring, while Montreal's downtown vacancy rate was 18.6 per cent. CBRE Canada says 'sizeable deals' were reported at 160 Elgin Street in the spring, with the Royal College of Physicians taking 62,000 sq. ft. of space and Telesat occupying 28,000 sq. ft. of space. According to the report, there was 'notable activity within the submarket' in the spring, including the sale of a full vacant building on Solandt Road to the Manitoba Metis Foundation for potential owner occupancy and Mitel sublisting 33,000 sq. ft. of space on Innovation Drive. CBRE Canada says industrial construction 'has hit a peak' in Ottawa, with Amazon starting construction on their third distribution facility. That will add a proposed 3.1 million sq. ft. to Ottawa's future industrial inventory. 'While trade negotiations have resulted in some short-term supply and increased uncertainty, many deals are still being completed or remain in the pipeline,' CBRE said. The industrial vacancy rate in Ottawa was 2.2 per cent in the spring.
CTV News
15 minutes ago
- CTV News
S&P/TSX composite down in late-morning trading, U.S. stock markets higher
A board above the trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange with stock symbols is shown in this image, Tuesday, July 1, 2025. (AP Photo/Richard Drew) TORONTO — Canada's main stock index was down in late-morning trading, weighed down by losses in the utility and technology sectors, while U.S. stock markets climbed higher. The S&P/TSX composite index was down 11.94 points at 26,845.17. In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 1.37 points at 44,496.31. The S&P 500 index was up 12.95 points at 6,210.96, while the Nasdaq composite was up 158.18 points at 20,361.07. The Canadian dollar traded for 73.34 cents US compared with 73.30 cents US on Monday. The August crude oil contract was up 50 cents US at US$65.95 per barrel. The August gold contract was up US$3.50 at US$3,353.30 an ounce. --- This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 2, 2025.
CTV News
15 minutes ago
- CTV News
‘Worst cuts in modern history': Report warns of cuts to public service for Liberals to meet campaign promise
The federal government's deficit has grown to $7.3 billion so far this fiscal year. The Confederation building on Parliament Hill is reflected in the windows of the Bank of Canada in Ottawa on Monday, May 6, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick The Liberal government's plan to find billions of dollars in operating efficiencies would require a 24 per cent cut in public service spending and 'devastate the federal government,' according to the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Prime Minister Mark Carney's campaign platform included savings from 'increased government efficiency,' with $6 billion in savings in 2026-27 and $13 billion a year in 2028-29. The government promised $130 billion in new measures during the election campaign, including cutting the lowest marginal tax rate from 15 per cent to 14 per cent, boosting defence spending and balancing the government's operating budget. A new report from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, written by economist David Macdonald, says $13 billion in savings will 'mostly be in personnel expenditures in non-defence departments,' amounting to a 24 per cent cut in government spending. 'If the prime minister follows through on his election promise, Canada's federal public service will undergo the worst spending cuts in modern history,' the report says. 'That will inevitably diminish the quality of public services.' The Liberal Party platform said the party was committed to 'capping, not cutting public service employment.' The platform promised a reduction in the use of external consultants and using Artificial Intelligence to enhance government productivity. Macdonald says Canada's pledge to boost defence spending to two per cent of GDP likely exempts the department from spending cuts, meaning spending reductions will need to come from the $89 billion in operating expenditures in other departments. Macdonald says cutting contracting out would result in $1.2 billion in savings, and 'almost of the cuts' to get $13 billion in savings will be on staffing expenditures. 'Cuts at this level wouldn't be 'capping hiring,' 'finding efficiencies using AI' or 'not replacing retiring workers.' For cuts this is deep, it would require across-the-board job losses and major service reductions,' says the report. 'In other words, if it proceeded it would represent a major disruption to federal public services and would rival the 18.9 per cent cut in operation expenditures of Paul Martin's 1995 budget as the most extreme budget slashing in Canadian history.' 'Cuts of this size, and restricted in these ways, are clearly not feasible.' In an interview on Newstalk 580 CFRA's The Morning Rush with Bill Carroll, Macdonald said the proposed spending reductions are 'likely far too big to be implemented without major impacts on services.' 'We often go through these cycles where government expands to fill a need. There were long waits at the Passport Office, you couldn't get anybody on the phone at Canada Revenue Agency – you go on a big hiring binge to fill the staff to try to fulfil these needs and now we're at the high point in the cycle where you may have actually enough staff to deal with the need and you say, 'We've got too much staff, let's cut this staff,'' Macdonald said. 'So, I think at this point we're at the high point of that cycle where you think, 'Oh, we can get efficiencies', and you cut a whole bunch of staff. And there is an impact on service, it may take a year or two to bubble up to the political level.' Macdonald says the report looks at the biggest item for savings in the Liberal platform Last month, the parliamentary budget officer said the government would need to cut the size of the federal public service to implement its campaign promises and 'respect its fiscal bottom line.' 'There were promises made during the campaign, but the real test comes in the implementation of these measures. In the campaign, the government promised to increase national defence spending, for example, $30 billion over a number of years, but it could choose to take a slightly different path, which would allow the government to post deficits that are aligned with its election pledges without cutting the public service,' Yves Giroux told CTV News Channel's Power Play. 'But it would require reducing the speed at which it implements its programs. If the government really wants to implement its program as outlined in the campaign and respect its fiscal bottom line that it also indicated in the campaign, it would mean reducing the size of the public service rather than just capping its growth.'
