
O&G players worldwide cutting costs amid triple-threat
PETALING JAYA : The oil and gas industry, once stable and resistant to change, is now under intense pressure to rethink how it operates. Shifting global demand, ongoing political conflicts and volatile commodity markets are forcing the sector to adapt like never before.
Recently, major international corporations such as Shell, BP and Chevron have undertaken comprehensive operational restructuring, including significant workforce reductions.
Investment strategies are being reshaped by the triple-threat of rising operational expenses, tougher environmental regulations, and the substantial cost of adopting advanced technologies—resulting in significant adjustments to workforce size and structure.
Out-of-commission oil fields
Operating costs have risen, especially in upstream exploration and production. With the easier- to-reach resources fast depleting, oil companies must now tap into the more difficult reserves like sour gas and deepwater projects, which require higher investment.
As a result, oil companies have begun re-evaluating their corporate investment plans, with a projected 6% decline in upstream oil investment projected in 2025—the first year-on-year reduction since 2020.
Oil companies are struggling as drilling costs rise and price forecasts weaken. Active rigs are drilling at significantly lower levels slowing upstream activity. With oil prices hovering around US$63 per barrel, shrinking profit margins are forcing firms to delay or cancel projects.
Earlier this year, ConocoPhillips exited its joint-venture with Petronas in the US$3.3 billion (RM13.7 billion) Salam-Patawali deepwater oil and gas project, first discovered in 2018. The company has also announced plans to shrink its global workforce by end-2025.
They are also reportedly eyeing the sale of assets in the Permian Basin worth over US$1 billion (RM4.2 billion).
They are not the only ones.
US-based Chevron plans to cut 15% to 20% of its global workforce, potentially impacting 6,000 to 8,000 employees, over the next year. Meanwhile, ExxonMobil will release nearly 400 workers in 2026 following its merger with Pioneer Natural Resources.
BP, based in the UK, is in the midst of plans to eliminate 4,700 jobs and 3,000 contractor positions by 2026 as part of a US$2 billion cost-cutting drive.
In the UK's North Sea, Spain's Repsol is also looking to shrink its workforce through field decommissioning, potentially impacting 2,000 jobs.
These layoffs reflect a broader industry trend of adapting to economic uncertainties, declining output from maturing fields, and the increasing focus on cost optimisation and energy transition.
Impact of green regulations
Adherence to environmental compliance is also becoming increasingly capital-intensive.
More stringent global regulations concerning carbon emissions, flaring and methane management are obliging companies to allocate significant investment toward monitoring systems, equipment upgrades and cleaner processes.
This includes a growing focus on Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) projects, which are projected to experience a tenfold increase in investment by 2027.
Non-compliance with these evolving environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria pose significant business risks, such as limited access to funding and reputational damage. To manage these rising obligations, many entities are streamlining their workforces in high-carbon divisions.
Heavy upfront costs
Companies are investing more in advanced technologies like automation, artificial intelligence (AI) for data analysis and compliance, and monitoring systems powered by the Internet of Things (IoT) to improve efficiency and meet regulatory demands.
While these technological upgrades may yield long-term cost reductions, their implementation necessitates substantial upfront capital expenditure, such as modernising rigs with automation capabilities or deploying sophisticated AI-driven monitoring systems.
Widespread adoption of AI alone could potentially lead to cost savings ranging from 10% to 20% by 2025.
This shift toward technology-driven models is streamlining operations, replacing traditional roles with automated solutions, and consolidating functions to boost productivity and financial stability—rather than simply expanding existing setups.
Prominent industry participants such as Exxon and Chevron are focussing production growth in more efficient regions like the Permian basin, leveraging consolidation and technology-driven improvements to manage costs amid declining upstream investment.
Petronas, for its part, is focusing on innovation, sustainability and human capital development to support Malaysia's net-zero journey.This commitment involves not only accelerating investments in renewable energy and advanced low-carbon technologies, but also cultivating a forward-thinking workforce equipped to tackle the dynamic challenges of the global energy landscape.
By nurturing talent, fostering a collaborative culture, and prioritising digital transformation, Petronas aims to drive meaningful progress towards environmental goals while securing long-term business growth. Enhanced partnerships, research initiatives, and community engagement will be central to this strategy, positioning the company as a leader in sustainable energy and responsible corporate stewardship for Malaysia's future.
Where do we go from here?
The overarching imperative is clear: oil and gas companies are re-conceptualising business practices to better navigate current cost pressures and align with future energy demands.
Strategic actions are already evident at major international corporations like BP, Shell and Chevron. These are not merely reactive measures to short-term market changes, but critical strategic decisions made to ensure that the energy industry remains future-ready.
This trajectory implies a reduction in traditional employment opportunities within the short term. However, that is on account of the evolution of industry operations, not a disappearance of energy demand.
Industry experts expect jobs to re-emerge in greener fields, including CCUS-management projects, within the next two to three years, once cost savings are realised.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Malay Mail
35 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Anwar: Corruption not just moral failure but threatens economy, deters investment, harms national harmony
PUTRAJAYA, July 15 — The fight against corruption is not only a moral imperative, but also a driver of strong, inclusive, and sustainable economic development, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Speaking at the Malaysia International Conference on Governance and Integrity 2025 here today, the Prime Minister emphasised that corruption in all its insidious forms poses a serious threat to economic progress and national harmony. cost 'It inflates the cost of doing business, distorts fair competition, stifles innovation, and deters both domestic and foreign investment. 'Corruption diverts public funds from essential sectors such as critical infrastructure, quality education, and accessible healthcare,' he said. Anwar said corruption creates an uneven playing field, disadvantages ethical businesses and hindering the equitable distribution of economic benefits. Furthermore, it often leads to short-sighted decisions that exploit the country's national resources without regard for future generations, he said. — Bernama MORE TO COME

Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Liew: Malaysia's neutral trade stance misused to dodge tariffs, skirt sanction
KUALA LUMPUR, July 15 — Malaysia's policy of neutrality in global trade has been misinterpreted by some exporters and exploited as a base to evade tariffs and circumvent sanctions, Deputy Investment, Trade and Industry Minister Liew Chin Tong said today. In his keynote address at the Skrine seminar on 'Staying Ahead of the Curve: Legal Appetite for Sanctions and Tariffs Risks' here today, Liew said the government is taking steps to strengthen enforcement and tighten oversight over certain imports and exports to prevent such misuse and uphold Malaysia's credibility in global trade. 'Tariffs are not simply about raising the price of imported goods. Their effects and consequences are more than that. They disrupt supply chains by creating second-order effects. 'For instance, goods that were originally destined for the US market are now being redirected and flooding other markets, including ours. This creates serious challenges as the influx of imports could undermine our local producers,' he said. He said the current era of hyperglobalisation, which has promoted efficiency above all else, has ended, replaced by an era that prioritises security and resilience. As a result, both the government and the private sector must rethink their long-term trade strategies to exist and adapt to this changing global landscape, Liew added. 'Trade should no longer be seen as an end in itself, but as a means to achieve a broader purpose,' he said, adding that the old trade model, where Malaysia and other ASEAN members compete to manufacture as cheaply as possible and export to the US, is no longer sustainable. Liew noted that Malaysia must pursue market diversification by expanding ties with emerging markets in Central Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America. At the same time, he urged ASEAN member states to move away from internal competition and instead work collectively to build an integrated regional supply chain and a vibrant consumer base of their own. 'ASEAN is already the fifth-largest economy in the world, with a population of over 680 million people. 'A stronger and more integrated ASEAN, with a strong middle class, will not only encourage major powers to engage with us as a single bloc but may also attract other emerging economies to trade, invest and grow alongside us,' he said. He also emphasised the importance of legal preparedness in navigating today's complex trading landscape. 'The law can certainly serve two purposes: to advance and to defend our national interests. Hence, in navigating this ever-evolving global trading system, the law must be part of the equation. 'What has kept the world in check for so long, even with its imperfections, is the existence of international legal norms that hold states accountable and provide a framework for the peaceful settlement of disputes,' he said. Liew said as Malaysia charts its course through this changing global economy, the government and the private sector must work together to strengthen legal knowledge and enhance the ability to navigate complex legal and regulatory challenges. — Bernama


Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Govt, minister fail to quash ex-KL Tower operator's suit
The High Court ruled that there are issues arising from a supplementary agreement signed in 2022 between Hydroshoppe and the government for the lease of KL Tower which must go to trial. KUALA LUMPUR : The High Court has rejected the government's bid to strike out a lawsuit filed by KL Tower's former operator over the award of the tower's concession to another company. Justice Roz Mawar Rozain held that Hydroshoppe Sdn Bhd and Menara KL Sdn Bhd's claim against the government and communications minister Fahmi Fadzil, named a co-defendant, must proceed to trial. 'There are triable issues regarding the 2022 agreement,' she added. However the court struck out Hydroshoppe's claim against the new operators, LSH Service Master Sdn Bhd, LSH Best Builders Sdn Bhd, and Service Master (M) Sdn Bhd. Roz Mawar held that Hydroshoppe had failed to properly identify its cause of action against the three entities, rendering the suit defective. She also ordered Hydroshoppe to pay them RM20,000 in costs. The court fixed the suit against the government and Fahmi for case management on Nov 3. In March, Hydroshoppe and Menara KL filed the suit claiming that the government's award of the concession to the LSH group was in breach of contract. They asked the court to declare the award of the KL Tower concession to LSH Service Master void and unlawful. They are seeking an estimated RM1 billion in damages. Lawyer Vinayak Sri Ram appeared for Hydroshoppe while senior federal counsel Ahmad Hanir Hambaly appeared for the government and lawyer Malik Imtiaz Sarwar represented LSH Service Master.