‘2006 Blast Acquittals Over Seal For RDX, Minor Details': Why SC Agreed To Hear Maharashtra's Plea
The Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday agreed to hear on Thursday the Maharashtra government 's appeal challenging the Bombay High Court (HC) judgment acquitting all 12 accused.
On July 11, 2006, seven blasts within a span of 11 minutes in the first-class compartments of Western Railway (WR) local trains left 189 dead and several injured. The MCOCA court in September 2015 convicted 12 of the 13 arrested in the case.
Kamal Ansari (now dead), Mohammad Faisal Ataur Rahman Shaikh, Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui, Naveed Hussain Khan and Asif Khan were sentenced to death, while Tanveer Ahmed Mohammed Ibrahim Ansari, Mohammed Majid Mohammed Shafi, Shaikh Mohammed Ali Alam Shaikh, Mohammed Sajid Margub Ansari, Muzammil Ataur Rahman Shaikh, Suhail Mehmood Shaikh and Zameer Ahmed Rehman Shaikh were sentenced to life imprisonment.
The Bombay High Court (HC) on Monday acquitted all 12 accused, saying the prosecution utterly failed to prove the case and it was 'hard to believe they committed the crime".
The Maharashtra government has appealed against the HC judgment on grounds that the recovery of RDX from an accused was disbelieved on a 'hyper-technical ground" that the seized explosives were not sealed with a lac seal.
Earlier in the day, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, on behalf of the state government, mentioned the plea before an apex court bench headed by Chief Justice B R Gavai and sought an urgent hearing. The court agreed to hear it on July 24.
The state government, in its appeal, has raised several serious objections to the high court's order of acquittal.
The plea has asserted that due procedural safeguards under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) were observed, including proper sanctioning by senior officers like prosecution witness (PW) no. 185 Anami Roy. It said the high court overlooked the validity of these approvals despite no substantial contradiction in the prosecution's evidence.
#WATCH | Mumbai: On Bombay High Court acquitting all 12 people in relation to 2006 Mumbai train bombings, Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis says, 'The verdict of the Bombay High Court is very shocking and we will challenge it in the Supreme Court." pic.twitter.com/N9aQJMvW9y — ANI (@ANI) July 21, 2025
Lac seal for RDX: What Maharashtra government said in plea
The plea has assailed the high court's rejection of the recovery of 500 grams of RDX from one of the accused on the ground that it lacked a lac seal. The plea has said that RDX, being highly inflammable, was not sealed for safety reasons and the recovery was duly sanctioned and documented.
'That, the Hon'ble High Court has disbelieved the recovery of 500 gms of RDX from Accused No. 1 on a hyper-technical ground that the RDX which was seized was not sealed with a lac seal. It will be pertinent to note that the same was not sealed with a lac seal because RDX is an inflammable substance.
'It is pertinent to note that the High Court records that the sanctioning authority for explosive substances has been examined by the prosecution. However, the Hon'ble High Court has not found any infirmities in the evidence of PW 26, who is the sanctioning authority under the Explosive Substances Act for seizure of RDX from Accused No. 1. Therefore, the High Court has erred in disbelieving the recovery of RDX from Accused No. 1," the plea has said.
Minute details in confession: What Maharashtra government said in plea
It has also disputed the high court's dismissal of the confession of an accused for lacking minute details, such as the date of arrival of the Pakistani co-conspirators in India, the description of the six Pakistanis and information like whether they had trained in terrorist camps. 'The entire confessional statement has been disbelieved which is an unacceptable conclusion," the plea has said, adding that omissions regarding the identities and origins of the Pakistani co-conspirators do not invalidate the overall confession.
The appeal also challenges the high court's disregard of the recovery of detonators and explosive granules from another accused, pointing out that these items cannot be easily procured or planted, and their evidentiary value should not have been dismissed over technicalities.
The petition says the high court failed to address the validity of the convictions under various provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and relevant provisions of the Explosive Substances Act.
It says the high court ignored key findings and legal interpretations from previous landmark judgments.
The plea addresses the defence's contention that the accused did not meet the definition of 'continuing unlawful activity" under the MCOCA due to earlier offences being punishable by less than three years.
top videos
View all
Citing Supreme Court precedents, the plea says the conspiracy and scale of the attack clearly fall under MCOCA provisions.
With PTI Inputs
About the Author
News Desk
The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk d...Read More
tags :
2006 Mumbai Train Blasts 2006 Mumbai Train Bomb Blast Bombay High Court Devendra Fadnavis supreme court
view comments
Location :
Mumbai, India, India
First Published:
July 23, 2025, 13:20 IST
News cities '2006 Blast Acquittals Over Seal For RDX, Minor Details': Why SC Agreed To Hear Maharashtra's Plea
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
2008 Malegaon blast: All seven accused acquitted including ex BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya and Lt Col Prasad Purohit
Mumbai: The special National Investigation Agency (NIA) here acquitted all the seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case today including ex BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya and Lt Col Prasad Purohit The blast, which occurred on September 29, 2008, at around 9:25 pm in Malegaon, Maharashtra, resulted in six fatalities and injured over 79 people. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category healthcare Data Science MCA Leadership Operations Management PGDM Degree Data Analytics Others MBA Design Thinking Project Management Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Technology others Product Management Public Policy CXO Finance Cybersecurity Digital Marketing Data Science Management Skills you'll gain: Duration: 11 Months IIM Lucknow CERT-IIML Healthcare Management India Starts on undefined Get Details The case was initially investigated by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), which attributed the blast to the Hindu right-wing outfit Abhinav Bharat. The ATS filed a chargesheet against 11 accused and three wanted individuals under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Unsold Container Homes in Zamboanga Del Norte - Prices You Won't Believe! Shipping Container Homes | Search Ads Search Now Undo In 2011, the case was transferred to the NIA, which registered an offence against 14 accused under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and MCOCA. During the investigation, the NIA identified discrepancies in the evidence submitted by the ATS, raising questions about its reliability. The NIA subsequently filed a supplementary chargesheet in 2016 against ten individuals, including Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit and Major Ramesh Upadhyaya, under the UAPA, Indian Penal Code, and Explosives Substances Act. Notably, Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and three others were dropped from the list of accused for want of evidence. Live Events The trial involved the examination of 323 prosecution witnesses and eight defence witnesses, as well as the consideration of over 10,800 exhibits and 400 seized articles. Approximately 40 witnesses turned hostile during the proceedings.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
2008 Malegaon blast case: Special NIA court acquits all seven accused, including Pragya Thakur, Lt. Col. Purohit
Seventeen years after the blast, a special NIA court in Mumbai has acquitted all the seven accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit, in the 2008 Malegaon blast case. Special Judge A.K. Lahoti delivered the verdict. The NIA court, in its judgment, said that the prosecution 'failed to prove the case' and that the accused 'deserved the benefit of doubt'. The judge further observed that the prosecution could not prove that the bike on which the bomb was allegedly strapped, belonged to Pragya Thakur. On September 29, 2008, a bomb exploded in Malegaon, Nashik district, killing 10 and injuring over 100 people. A case was filed by the Azad Nagar police station, but later re-registered by the Anti Terrorism Squad (ATS) in November 2008 and charges under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) were applied. In January 2009, the ATS filed its first chargesheet followed it with a supplementary chargesheet in April 2011. However, in April 2011, the Ministry of Home Affairs suo motu directed the NIA to take up further investigation of the case. In May 2016, the NIA had filed its second supplementary chargesheet and dropped MCOCA charges against former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur, Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit, retired Major Ramesh Upadhyay, Sameer Kulkarni, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Dwivedi and Sudhakar Chaturvedi. In December 2017, Special Judge S.D. Tekale dropped MCOCA charges and charged them under Sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act, the Explosive Substances Act and the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. All the accused are currently on bail.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
HC asks if Centre can order cuts in Udaipur Files
NEW DELHI: Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the Centre whether it had the authority to pass the order directing six cuts in the film 'Udaipur Files—Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder' while exercising its revisional powers. 'You have to exercise the powers within the four corners of the statute. You can't go beyond that,' a bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela said. The court raised the issue after being informed that the Centre, using its revisional powers under the Cinematograph Act, recommended six cuts and a disclaimer for the film. Although the movie has been recertified, the certificate hasn't been issued to the producers, as the matter is still pending in the high court. The HC was hearing a plea by Mohammed Javed, one of the accused in the murder case, objecting to the release of the film.
