Can you choose to believe something, just like that?
But is that how belief works – can you simply choose to believe?
People can, of course, choose to read certain sources, spend time with certain groups, or reflect on a certain matter – all of which influence their beliefs. But all of these choices involve evidence of some kind. We often choose which evidence to expose ourselves to, but the evidence itself seems to be in the driver's seat in causing beliefs.
For much of the past 2,000 years, philosophers would have been perfectly comfortable with the software developer's claim that belief is a matter of choice. A long line of distinguished thinkers – from the Stoic philosopher Epictetus and Saint Augustine of Hippo to French rationalist René Descartes and early feminist Mary Astell have held that people can exercise at least some control over their beliefs.
Over the past half-century, however, 'doxastic voluntarism' – the idea that belief is under the control of the will – has been widely rejected. Most current philosophers don't think people can immediately believe something 'just like that,' simply because they want to. What beliefs someone ends up having are determined by the people and environments they are exposed to – from beliefs about a deity to beliefs about the solar system.
As a philosophy professor myself, I've dedicated years of reflection to this issue. I've come to think both camps get something right.
Some philosophers think that the nature of belief itself ensures that people cannot just choose what to believe.
They argue that beliefs have a 'truth-aim' built into them: that is, beliefs characteristically represent reality. And sadly, reality often does not obey our wishes and desires; we cannot just decide to think reality is a certain way.
No matter how much I may want to be 6 feet, 8 inches tall, reality will faithfully imprint it upon my consciousness that I am 5'11" every time I glance in the mirror or make an appearance on the basketball court. Were I to resolve to believe that I am 6'8", I would quickly find that such resolutions are wholly ineffective.
Or consider another example. If belief were truly voluntary, I would gladly relinquish my belief that climate change is afoot – imagine how less worried I'd be. But I cannot. The evidence, along with the widespread agreement among scientific authorities, has indelibly impressed upon my mind that climate change is part of reality.
Regardless of whether I want to believe or not believe, bare desire isn't enough to make it happen. Beliefs seem largely outside of our direct control.
But if that's true, some rather alarming consequences seem to follow. It seems we had better stop blaming people for their beliefs, no matter how far-fetched.
Suppose I believe a dangerous falsehood: that Bill Gates used the COVID-19 vaccine to implant microchips in people, or that climate change is a hoax, or that the Holocaust is an elaborate fabrication. If belief is involuntary, it looks as though I am innocent of any wrongdoing. These beliefs just happened to me, so to speak. If beliefs are not voluntary, then they seem the spontaneous result of my being exposed to certain influences and ideas – including, in this case, conspiracy theory chat forums.
Now, people can choose what influences they allow into their lives – to some extent. I can decide where to gather information about climate trends: a chat forum, the mainstream media, or the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. I can decide how much to reflect on what such sources tell me, along with their motivations. Almost all contemporary philosophers think that people can exert this type of voluntary control over their beliefs.
But does that mean I am responsible for the beliefs I arrive at? Not necessarily.
After all, which sources we decide to consult, and how we evaluate them, can also be shaped by our preexisting beliefs. I am not going to trust the U.N. climate panel's latest report if, say, I believe it is a part of a global conspiracy to curtail free markets – especially not if I had many similar beliefs drummed into me since childhood.
It gets difficult to see how individuals could have any meaningful freedom over their beliefs, or any meaningful responsibility.
Research has led me to think that things are a bit less grim – and a bit less black and white.
Philosopher Elizabeth Jackson and I recently carried out a study, not yet published, involving more than 300 participants. We gave them brief summaries of several scenarios where it was unclear whether an individual had committed a crime.
The evidence was ambiguous, but we asked participants whether they could choose to believe the individual was innocent 'just like that,' without having to gather evidence or think critically. Many people in the study said that they could do exactly this.
It's possible they were mistaken. Still, several recent studies at the intersection of philosophy and psychology suggest people can control some of their beliefs, especially in situations where the evidence is ambiguous.
And that describes many of the most important propositions people are forced to consider, from politics and careers to romance: Who is the best candidate? Which path should I pursue? Is she the one?
So, it looks like we have some reason to think people are able to directly control their beliefs, after all. And if the evidence for God is similarly ambiguous, perhaps my software developer was right that he could decide to believe.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Mark Boespflug, Fort Lewis College
Read more:
What is love? A philosopher explains it's not a choice or a feeling − it's a practice
Lincoln called for divided Americans to heed their 'better angels,' and politicians have invoked him ever since in crises − but for Abe, it was more than words
Stoicism and spirituality: A philosopher explains how more Americans' search for meaning is turning them toward the classics
Mark Boespflug receives funding from the John Templeton Foundation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Woman Reunites with Brother She Never Knew Existed After Nearly 80-Year Separation: 'I Still Can't Believe He Found Me'
Melanie Griffin's long-lost older brother spent years searching for her — now, they're still looking forward to meeting in person for the first timeNEED TO KNOW After nearly 80 years, long-lost sister siblings Marian Griffin and Donald Hefke have found each other Separated shortly after Marian's birth, both siblings were adopted by different families — and while Hefke spent years looking for her younger sister, she didn't know she had an older brother until 2024 "I thought it was a scam," she said of first learning the newsAfter nearly 80 years apart, a woman has reconnected with the brother she never knew she had. Shortly after Marian Griffin was born in 1945, she was placed in foster care and then adopted by a Lutheran minister and his family, she told ABC News. It wasn't until July 2024 that Griffin learned that she had an older brother, Donald Hefke, who was still alive and had been searching for her for most of his life. "I thought it was a scam," Griffin, now 80, told the outlet of the life-altering news she learned from Hefke's daughter, Denise Baker, who has also spent decades trying to find her long-lost relative. Hefke is a year older than Griffin, but they were both babies when they were placed into foster care in 1946. Their biological mother suffered from post traumatic stress disorder following Griffin's birth, and was institutionalized, while their biological father was unable to care for them, according to ABC News. Another sibling, their brother Ernest, was born deaf and has since died. Hefke, now 81, was raised by a foster family until he joined the U.S. Air Force. In 1963, wanting to learn more about his biological family, he requested information from the foster care agency and learned that he had a sister named Marian, according to the outlet. But his attempts to connect with his younger sister were thwarted by her adoptive parents, who hid his letters, according to ABC News. "Our kids could have grown up together, instead we were separated because my parents would not tell me that my brother wrote to me and was looking for me," Griffin told the outlet. Baker later continued her father's investigative work, searching for two decades for her missing aunt — but it wasn't until she discovered a family connection online, which had been uploaded by Griffin's son, that she found the person she was looking for. "I still can't believe he found me," Griffin said. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Once Griffin confirmed the connection was real, she spoke with Hefke on the phone. "He says.. 'Mariane, Mariane is that you? Oh my goodness, I've been looking for you Mariane!' " she recalled in an interview with ABC affiliate KRCR-TV. "He couldn't even stop saying my name." While Hefke can't travel from his home in Florida because of his health, Baker visited Griffin in California in his stead, according to ABC News. Now, Griffin plans on making a trip to see her long-lost sibling. "Oh my gosh it would be wonderful even for a few days," she told KRCR. "We have 80 years to catch up on." Read the original article on People
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Whale Dies After Colliding with Boat, Pushing Passenger into New Jersey Bay: ‘Oh My God ... Man Overboard!'
Nearby boaters encouraged the vessel to 'shut the motor off' after it nearly capsizedNEED TO KNOW A whale is dead after colliding with a boat in New Jersey The Marine Mammal Stranding Center announced that a boat collided with a 20-foot-long Minke whale in Barnegat Bay, resulting in a passenger to go overboard, on Aug. 2 "I don't know how they even got where the whale was because it was so shallow,' the center's director saidA whale has died after colliding with a boat in a New Jersey bay this weekend, resulting in a passenger to be thrown overboard. On Saturday, Aug. 2, around 2:45 p.m. local time, the New Jersey State Police Marine Unit contacted the Marine Mammal Stranding Center (MMSC) — a center dedicated to the rescue and rehabilitation of animals — to report a whale located in Barnegat Bay. Around 3:40 p.m., a nearby boater reported that a boat "struck the whale," which caused the boat to nearly capsize as a passenger went overboard, per the MMSC. Footage from the collision, shared by shows the moment the boat nearly flipped when coming into contact with the whale. A passenger wearing a blue shirt and sun hat could be seen falling off the back right of the motorized vessel as witnesses on a nearby boat yelled to the fellow boaters and encouraged them to "shut the motor off." "Oh my God, they're going over," one witness could be heard saying as the boat tipped, dumping one person into the bay. "Oooh, man overboard!" The passenger soon resurfaced from the water, as the whale began to swim away from the scene — continually splashing its tail above the water while seemingly in distress. Kim Mancini, who took the footage, told that the whale initially went under her boat before colliding with the other. TowBoatUS Barnegat Light shared additional footage of the scene on social media. The center responded to the scene after connecting with the U.S. Coast Guard, State Marine Police and Sea Tow. First responders with Sea Tow then reported that the whale — later identified as a roughly 20-foot-long Minke whale — had died, according to the MMSC. 'We know the whale has died. We're not really sure why, but we're going to find that out,' center director Shelia Dean told On Facebook, the MMSC wrote that it confirmed with officials at a nearby state park that they can tow the animal to the park for a necropsy — an animal's post-mortem examination — on Monday morning, due to "availability of heavy equipment and the upcoming tide cycle." Sea Tow will assist. The center will continue to update locals on the operation, while boaters are encouraged to keep a distance of around 150 feet away from the whale carcass for the time being. Referring to the footage, Dean said the whale appeared to be in shallow water and was "surrounded" by boats as one got "very" close. "I don't know how they even got where the whale was because it was so shallow,' Dean said, adding that the whale was possibly cut by the boat and that those nearby should not have approached it. 'If the whale approaches you, you shut your engines off and just lay dead in the water until the whale swims away,' Dean said. 'You should never approach a whale.' Read the original article on People
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
20-foot whale dies after being hit by a boat in NJ: Officials
NEW JERSEY (PIX11) – A boat hit a whale in Barnegat Bay Saturday afternoon, sending one of its passengers overboard, according to the Marine Mammal Stranding Center. The incident happened around 3:40 p.m., when a vessel struck a 20-foot minke whale, according to the center. The boat almost capsized and the whale died, officials said. More Local News The whale was found on a sandbar outside the channel. The whale will be moved on Monday and the Marine Mammal Stranding Center will conduct a necropsy to determine how it died. 'Boaters should be advised to use caution in the area north of Double Creek Channel in Barnegat Bay and to keep a minimum of 150 feet away from the whale carcass for your safety,' representatives of the center said in a post to Facebook. A video posted to social media seemingly shows the incident, as a whale struggles near the back of the boat and a person falls off the back of the boat. Onlookers can be heard yelling 'shut the motor off' and 'man overboard' before the whale struggles to swim off. Emily Rahhal is a digital reporter who has covered New York City since 2023 after reporting in Los Angeles for years. She joined PIX11 in 2024. See more of her work here and follow her on Twitter here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
