
Researchers warn of 'quiet crisis' facing NHS Scotland
They cite a complex combination of factors, including a lack of ring-fenced funding to train and support clinical researchers, inequalities that lead to challenges for female and minority researchers, competitive disadvantages compared to English institutions, and extensive time commitments required to complete training and enter the profession.
Despite the challenges, the authors highlight the important contributions of Scotland's clinical researchers and what is potentially at risk of the trend of decline continues.
"In economic terms, investment in medical research pays dividends—every £1 spent returns around £1.25 annually to the wider economy.
"Scotland has long punched above its weight in this field. From pioneering bowel cancer screening programmes using the faecal immunochemical test (FIT), now central to early detection efforts worldwide, to the EAVE-II platform, which was instrumental in understanding vaccine effectiveness during COVID-19, our clinical academics have delivered innovations with national and global impact."
Prof Rory McCrimmon, one of the authors of the letter and Dean of the School of Medicine at the University of Dundee, explained how these types of contributions are at risk of becoming increasingly scarce.
He said that there are more academics over the age of 55 than under the age of 35. Clinical researchers now make up just 3% of the overall workforce, and only 0.6% of primary care workers are clinical researchers.
Prof Rory McCrimmon has argued that clinical researchers need more practical and financial support in order to continue performing their life-saving work. (Image: University of Dundee)
He added that the shrinking supply of clinical academics, combined with the baked-in challenges in the field, is adding immense stress on researchers.
"It is undoubtedly harder to do out-of-programme research at the PhD or MD level, because obtaining funding for that is challenging.
"Students leave university now with a larger amount of debt, and it takes a long time. It takes maybe ten to fifteen years to become a consultant. If you add a further three to five years of research on top of that, that's an incredibly long time to become a clinical academic.
"I think it is also perceived to be really, really hard, because you are moving into a very competitive world."
Read more:
Prof Lorna Marson, Dean of Clinical Medicine at Edinburgh and a contributor to the open letter, said that clinical researchers have a significant impact on their patients and communities, in addition to their broader contributions to the economy and the field.
"Research-active hospitals have better outcomes for their patients in terms of morbidity and mortality.
"Also, engaging in clinical trials gives patients the opportunity to get expensive drugs for no cost.
"There are many significant added values to being a patient in a research hospital, so we need to support that as much as we can."
Prof Lorna Marson has said that barriers to people looking to break into clinical research should not distract from the passion that these academics have for their profession. (Image: University of Edinburgh)
Prof Marson added that the decline in the number of clinical academics was not due to a lack of ambition in the profession and that better general support for researchers could make the career more feasible for many hopefuls.
'It's extraordinary that there are still a good number of people who want to do this. I think that demonstrates the huge commitment that people are bringing to this field, and therefore, we have to support them and help them if it's what they want to do.
'But it is exceptionally difficult for women who also want to have time out to have a family, or those who have caring responsibilities and wish to prolong their training.
'Using women as an example, we need to look for ways to support them not only to have time out to have families, but to undertake their research and continue in clinical academia. That is where we see the biggest drop-off, and it is not because they don't passionately want to stay.
'They just can't see a way through it.'
All of this is against a backdrop of extreme competition for funding. Prof Ian McInnes CBE, co-author of the letter and Vice Principal and Head of College, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences at the University of Glasgow, called it a 'sadness' that young researchers are facing barriers to the profession at a time when there are many new opportunities on the horizon.
'Increasingly, academicians of the future will be data scientists. They'll be computing scientists. They'll be business scientists with MBAs and organisational design specialists.
'One of the ambitions I have for Scotland is that we actually become a model for an incredibly diverse community of academic clinicians with expertise in so many different areas.'
Due to the interconnectedness of the UK higher education sector, Scottish researchers and institutions are in direct competition with their English counterparts.
But different structures and priorities mean they are not always on an even playing field, Prof McInnes explained.
In England, for example, the time of clinical academics is often divided evenly between clinical work and research. However, in Scotland, the divide is closer to 80% clinical and 20% research time.
'That 80% grows arms and legs, because clinical medicine is busier, clinical surgery is busier, clinical psychiatry is busier. So we're at a substantial disadvantage in Scotland compared to England.'
There are also significant financial awards available only in England, which can further limit opportunities for Scottish researchers.
Despite this, Prof McInnes was clear that the situation is not a case of finding fault. The different structures north and south of the border represent different strategies and priorities.
The Scottish Government is currently pursuing health innovation projects through its Accelerated National Innovation Adoption (ANIA) Pathway, which focuses on developing and implementing new health technologies across NHS Scotland. The programme recently committed £6 million to a project helping people with type 2 Diabetes, stroke patients and babies born with a rare genetic condition.
In the end, Prof McInnes said he and his colleagues are making a call to find collaborative solutions to a common problem and preserve what he called 'fabulous careers.'
'Clinical academics enrich and embellish the quality of clinical care, and they do that by being part of that community.
'There is very good evidence that just being in a clinical trial leads to better long-term outcomes for most chronic conditions. Even if you just get a placebo, you become a beneficiary of an ecosystem that seeks the best option, not the most convenient option.
'Being a clinical academic is an incredibly enriching profession, and part of our concern is that the focus on funding and crisis in the NHS obscures the fantastically brilliant career that is available.'
Health Secretary Neil Gray said clinical research is "vital" for both the NHS and the economy.
'The need and case for this plan and its actions is timely – in recent years, the sector has suffered from the impact of Brexit and from UK Government immigration policies which have stemmed the flow of international talent into research programmes.
'We continue to provide over £.1.1billion to universities each year, including over £368million for research and innovation. Our Chief Scientist Office also continues to provide various funding opportunities for clinical research, working closely with our academic community to deliver clinical trials, develop new research and fast-track new innovations and technologies which benefit Scottish patients.
'However, we recognise the challenges and opportunities highlighted in the recent MRC report and we will continue to collaborate closely with universities, the NHS and industry to maximise opportunities for clinical academics here in Scotland.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
41 minutes ago
- Metro
Anne Nolan, 74, emotional about 'sisters who didn't survive'
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Anne Nolan has spoken about losing her late sisters as she opens up about becoming cancer-free. Appearing on Good Morning Britain on Monday morning, Anne shared the exciting news that she is officially cancer-free after being diagnosed with breast cancer for the second time in 2020. The former singer from The Nolans told Ed Balls and Charlotte Hawkins that after hearing the good news, she immediately thought of her sisters who had died. Linda Nolan died in January at the age of 65, and Bernie Nolan died in 2013 at the age of 52, both from breast cancer. 'It's been very traumatic. When I received the letter a few weeks ago, I picked it up, and it said NHS, and I thought, 'Oh I don't want to know, I'm not sure if I want to know if it's bad news'. 'And I put it aside for about ten minutes, and after a while, my logical brain kicked in and said, 'You have to find out, you need to know. 'I opened it and it was all good news, and I had a bit of a weep at the beginning. I feel lucky, blessed, relieved, and then emotional thinking about my sisters having gone through the same thing but not surviving.' She then spoke about her own cancer journey, which has been going on for five years. 'I rang the bell five years ago after I finished my chemo, but then you have another five years before you're actually told that the cancer is no, it hasn't come back. 'Yeah, I had a mammogram every year for five years, and the last one was in May this year. But I did think about Linda at the time and Bernie as well. Bernie is like Bernie has been gone now about 12 years. She added that she's sure Linda is looking down on her, thinking 'thank goodness.' She reflected that although she and Linda had been diagnosed with cancer around the same time, Linda did not survive the ordeal. 'Linda received her diagnosis about a week after me, actually, and we went through it together during Covid.' She then reminisced on this time together: 'Linda and I were there to support each other. We had our chemo together. She was the one who called us the chemo sisters. She was always in a good mood, always happy and kept me going because I had, I had a bad time during my chemo, and it was great to have her support. 'And then when her cancer spread, she didn't survive.' This interview comes after the star announced the news publicly just a few days ago. On social media, she shared a long message with fans: 'Now, five years later, I'm overjoyed to share that my latest results show I am cancer free.' In an interview with The Mirror, she shared that she immediately thought of her sisters who had died from cancer. More Trending 'Although I was absolutely thrilled, I did think about them,' she said. 'I didn't feel guilty because it's nothing to do with me but I did feel sad that they weren't as lucky as I was. It's an emotional thing for me to think about them not surviving and then I did survive. But that's just the luck of the draw.' She added that she now is ready to seize life and 'grab everything with both hands.' 'When you've had a life-threatening disease and you've lost two sisters then it brings it all to the forefront,' she said. 'It makes you value life. You grab everything with both hands. Whenever I'm asked to do something, I say yes straight away. When you come through it and you're at the other end and you think, well I didn't die and I'm alive and I'm gonna live every day.' Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. View More » MORE: I had a Commodore Amiga as a kid and this is not the gaming future I imagined – Reader's Feature MORE: Legendary TV star 'helps police arrest real-life criminal' MORE: Lego Game Boy is so accurate even the advert is the same


Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
'I thought snoring was a blocked nose - it was sign of skull-eroding disease'
Claire Barbery, 51, began snoring at night after experiencing a continuous blockage in one side of her nose - and almost cancelled her hospital appointment A mum who started snoring in her sleep after developing a blocked nose was stunned to discover her single symptom was actually a sign of rare cancer. Claire Barbery, 51, almost cancelled the hospital appointment that led to her diagnosis because she didn't want to "waste the time" of the NHS. She began experiencing a persistent blockage in one side of her nose but initially put it down to the effects of regular Covid testing while working in a care home. Claire also started snoring in her sleep for the first time and decided to get medical help after using a steroid spray without any improvement in January 2023. She was referred to an ENT specialist and following scans and a biopsy, doctors broke the devastating news that she had olfactory neuroblastoma – a rare cancer that develops in the upper part of the nasal cavity. The 5cm tumour had already started eroding bone at the base of her skull and she underwent complex surgery to have it removed at Birmingham's Queen Elizabeth Hospital. Claire, from Newquay, Cornwall, is now urging others to seek medical advice for persistent symptoms, no matter how trivial they may seem. She said: "I very nearly cancelled that appointment because I didn't want to be wasting NHS time. There's nothing wrong, I thought. But looking back, that decision could have cost me my life. "I started snoring, which I'd never done before. I was waking myself up, breathing through my mouth rather than my nose. Even then, I nearly cancelled my hospital appointment. I didn't want to waste anyone's time I just left it and thought it was something to do with having had COVID the month before." Claire has now teamed up with UK charity Get A-Head Charitable Trust to boost awareness of World Head and Neck Cancer Day. She added: "If you know your body, then you've got to push. If there's something wrong, don't ignore it." The operation in January last year was carried out by consultant surgeon Shahz Ahmed, who specialises in skull base procedures. It was captured as part of the Channel 5 documentary 'Surgeons: A Matter of Life or Death'. Mr Ahmed said: "Claire had a very rare form of cancer that needed to be removed. Untreated, it could have metastasized and spread into the neck and the rest of the body. It had already gone through the skull base into the base of the brain and if left, it would have become harder and harder to treat." The intricate operation involved extracting the tumour, along with Claire's olfactory bulbs – meaning she has permanently lost her sense of smell – and rebuilding the area between her nose and brain. Mr Ahmed added: "The key worries were operating between the left and the right eye. The main blood supply to the brain is in very close proximity so the risk of seizures, stroke, injury to the brain and loss of life, were all very real. Thankfully, the surgery was a huge success and Claire suffered no complications." After her operation, Claire endured six weeks of chemotherapy and radiotherapy and is now regularly reviewed by her medical team. She's slowly getting back to work and since her treatment ended, she's been enjoying holidays with her husband Gary and spending more time with her daughters Lowenna, 27, and Keizha, 25.


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Phrenology and IQ tests: the far-right revival of discredited race science
Phrenology was long ago added to the junk heap of discredited theories. But in the 200 years since the Edinburgh Phrenological Society turned this pseudoscientific method to study the skulls of black Africans, Indians and white Europeans, scientific racism has continued to re-emerge in different guises. In the 19th century, as scientists were intent on classifying the natural world into taxonomic categories, some of Edinburgh's most celebrated intellectuals argued that different human races were so distinct that they ought to be considered separate species. The University of Edinburgh report on its legacy of links to slavery and colonialism notes that non-white populations were invariably depicted as inherently inferior, offering a convenient justification for colonialism. As this view became untenable, scientific racism shifted into the domain of eugenics in the 20th century. Francis Galton, the English statistician who coined the term, argued for social measures aimed at 'improving the stock'. Edinburgh's then chancellor, the former Conservative prime minister Arthur Balfour, was a prominent supporter and became honorary vice-chair of the British Eugenics Education Society in 1913. In the US, eugenics inspired forced sterilisation programmes, which disproportionately targeted African American women and, in Nazi Germany, was the ideological backdrop to the Holocaust. The advent of modern genetics and human population data has shattered the idea that there are biologically distinct groups, or that humans that can be neatly categorised based on skin colour or external appearance. Genetic variation between populations is continuous and does not align with social, historical and cultural constructs of race. Race, as a genetic concept, does not exist. Yet, says Angela Saini, author of a book on the return of race science, 'people don't stop believing falsehoods just because the evidence suggests they are wrong'. As IQ testing became the metric of choice for those seeking to draw conclusions about racial differences – often based on biased or fraudulent datasets – old, discredited arguments resurfaced. The Bell Curve, a 1994 bestseller, argued that IQ was heritable and unequally distributed across racial groups. At the University of Edinburgh, students boycotted the lectures of Christopher Brand, a psychology professor, in which he claimed a genetic basis for white intellectual superiority. After he repeated these arguments in his 1996 book, The g Factor (and stoked further controversy by defending paedophilia), Brand was eventually dismissed, while his book was withdrawn and pulped. With the recent rise in ethnic nationalism and the far right globally, a resurgence of interest is under way into theories of racial exceptionalism. Last year, the Guardian revealed that an international network of 'race science' activists, backed by secret funding from a US tech entrepreneur, had been seeking to influence public debate. Discredited ideas on race, genetics and IQ have become staple topics of far-right online discourse. 'The ideas have absolutely not changed at all,' says Prof Rebecca Sear, an anthropologist at Brunel University of London and president of the European Human Behaviour and Evolution Association. 'If you can provide a measurement – IQ, skull size – that helps give racism a respectable gloss.' Just like phrenology, Sear says, a lot of contemporary scientific racism is simply 'shockingly bad science'. But when communicated in the form of a graph or chart – whether in a 19th-century lecture theatre or on social media today – pseudoscience and credible science can look similar. 'I would love to see a world in which people stop turning to biology to explain socioeconomic and cultural differences, in which nobody is judged by their racial classification,' says Saini. 'But the University of Edinburgh report is a reminder of how even seemingly smart, educated people can come to believe ridiculous things.'