House adjourned for 10 mins amid protests over coal-handling cess
Speaker Ramesh Tawadkar adjourned the House for 10 minutes on Friday after opposition MLAs rushed to the well in protest of state govt's failure to collect green cess on coal-handling from Jindal and Adani.
The legislators vehemently declared that they did not want coal in Goa. Opposition leader Yuri Alemao alleged that the two companies handled double the amount of coal than the permissible limit, and that govt had failed to recover around Rs 4,000 crore from them. He also said that coal imports increased after the cessation of ore mining in 2012, and that even though everyone objected to coal-handling at the Mormugao port during subsequent public hearings, the activity was still recommended for environmental clearance (EC).
Alemao further said that the Goa State Pollution Control Board (GSPCB) had reduced coal-handling at the port by 25% based on a letter by former chief minister Manohar Parrikar, but it was reversed following Parrikar's death. He told the House that the environment department had written a letter calling for a decrease in coal-handling at the Mormugao port and that this letter was put in the public domain at a public hearing.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Is this legal? Access all TV channels without a subscription!
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
He asked whether the letter was ultimately sent to New Delhi to be included in the coastal zone management plan. While chief minster Pramod Sawant said it was, Alemao claimed it was never sent.
'My charge is that the EC was illegally granted as state govt hid the letter and did not send it to Centre,' the opposition leader said. Sawant responded that all the documents placed at the public hearing were sent to Delhi. Alemao also accused govt of allowing illegalities at the Mormugao port pertaining to coal-handling, but Sawant insisted that govt was not allowing any illegalities there and that coal was handled according to the limit.
Environment minister Aleixo Sequeira said the import and export of coal are monitored by the GSPCB, and agreed with the figures pointed out by Alemao. Sequeira said that the GSPCB had not given any permission to increase coal-handling at Mormugao port as there is no bypass road for its transportation. He promised that in the next assembly session, he would provide the correct coal-handling figures.
Alemao pointed out that Sawant claimed coal was handled as per the EC limit, but that the environment minister contradicted the chief minister. 'Jindal and Adani are handling double the amount of coal compared to the EC limit,' Alemao said. 'Jindal has not paid green cess since 2013, which amounts to Rs 3,000-4,000 crore, and it needs to be recovered. When will it be recovered?'
Sawant replied that govt had recovered green cess on coal-handling. His response didn't sit well with the opposition, prompting them to rush to the well of the House.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
23 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Amid Oppn protests, govt likely to push Parl agenda over extension of President's rule in Manipur this week
The government had listed a debate on the resolution in Rajya Sabha on Thursday and Friday last week but Opposition protest on Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls led to adjournment of the House without transacting any business.
India.com
23 minutes ago
- India.com
Poll Body Denies Chidambaram's BIG Voter List Claims, Says False Data Floating
New Delhi: Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram's attempt to link the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar with Tamil Nadu has been called 'absurd' by the Election Commission of India (EC), which today fact-checked his claims about potential mass deletions from the voter list. Earlier, Chidambaram posted on X that while 65 lakh voters in Bihar risk losing their voting rights, reports of adding 6.5 lakh voters in Tamil Nadu were 'alarming and patently illegal.' The EC rejected these allegations as "misleading," clarifying that the SIR has not yet been implemented in Tamil Nadu and accused the leader of spreading 'false figures' regarding the addition of 6.5 lakh voters there. 'It is therefore absurd to connect the SIR exercise in Bihar with Tamil Nadu. Such false statements about SIR should be avoided,' the commission stated. The statements made are Misleading and Baseless#ECIFactCheck Read in detail in the image attached — Election Commission of India (@ECISVEEP) August 3, 2025 Chidambaram had questioned the EC's reasoning behind classifying several lakh voters in Bihar as 'permanently migrated,' which led to their removal from the electoral rolls. He called this designation an insult to migrant workers and said it interfered with the electoral rights of Tamil Nadu voters. The Election Commission explained that under Article 19(1)(e) of the Constitution, all citizens have the right to reside and settle anywhere in India. It is the responsibility of voters to enroll themselves in the constituency where they currently reside and are eligible. For example, a person originally from Tamil Nadu but ordinarily residing in Delhi can be registered as a voter in Delhi. Similarly, someone originally from Bihar but living in Chennai can register there. Chidambaram's post followed the EC's announcement that over 65 lakh enumeration forms were excluded from Bihar's draft electoral rolls ahead of the upcoming assembly polls. This revision reduced the number of registered voters from approximately 7.9 crore to 7.24 crore. According to the EC, 22,34,501 registered voters were found to be deceased, around 36.28 lakh had permanently moved out of Bihar or were not found at their listed addresses, and 7.01 lakh were registered at multiple locations. The Congress leader's criticism came even as the EC reported that no political party filed any claims or objections regarding the draft electoral rolls published in Bihar on August 1. The draft publication has sparked controversy, with opposition parties like the RJD questioning the accuracy and transparency of the EC's data, particularly concerning the number of deceased voters. During the first phase of the SIR, voters received enumeration forms either from Booth Level Officers (BLOs) or Booth Level Agents (BLAs) nominated by political parties. Voters were to return these forms with their signatures and valid identification documents. Voters who believe their names were wrongly deleted can appeal to the relevant authorities by September 1 to seek rectification.
News18
31 minutes ago
- News18
‘Not My Father's Money': Will Maharashtra Minister's Remark After Cash Bag Row Prove Costly For Him?
Shinde Sena leader Sanjay Shirsat's remark comes days after CM Fadnavis, in a cabinet meeting, issued a strict warning to all ministers, saying 'nonsense' won't be tolerated Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde) leader and Maharashtra's Minister for Social Justice Sanjay Shirsat is once again in the middle of a political storm. Just weeks after a video went viral showing him smoking next to a bag allegedly filled with cash, Shirsat has now stirred fresh controversy with another careless statement — this time while addressing a public function in Akola. Speaking at the inauguration of a Social Justice Bhavan, Shirsat made an off-the-cuff remark that has not gone down well with political circles. 'Ask for Rs 5, Rs 10 or Rs 15 crore — I'll approve it immediately. It's government money, not my father's," he said, triggering fresh outrage over the tone and attitude of public representatives handling public funds. This latest statement is likely to test Fadnavis' patience. While the CM has been trying to steer the government clear of needless controversies, repeated incidents like these — especially from the same minister — are causing political embarrassment. Sources suggest that Fadnavis is not pleased, and action may be on the cards if Shirsat doesn't fall in line. Interestingly, in the same speech, Shirsat also advised NCP MLA Amol Mitkari to speak cautiously. 'You give good TRP to the media, but don't talk too much. Otherwise, you'll be in the same situation as me," he said — almost joking about his own previous run-ins with the media. The comment reflects both a lack of remorse and a misplaced confidence that such controversies will blow over without consequence. What's worrying party leaders, however, is the pattern — Shirsat's previous video already put him in a tight spot, with his party leadership reportedly expressing disapproval in private. Now, with this fresh controversy, murmurs within the Mahayuti alliance have started again. Shirsat's refusal to tone down his words despite clear instructions has also reignited public debate over how ministers treat taxpayers' money. Opposition parties are already sharpening their attack, questioning whether the BJP-Sena-led alliance is serious about governance or simply brushing aside such irresponsible behaviour. As public pressure builds, all eyes are now on the Chief Minister. Will he act against Sanjay Shirsat this time, or will this too be let go as 'just another slip of tongue"? मा. शिरसाठ साहेब, पैसा तुमच्या घरचा नसला तरी निवडणुकीच्यावेळी ज्यांना तुम्ही #मायबाप म्हणता त्या 'माय' आणि 'बाप' जनतेचा तर आहे ना! या पैशाचा उपयोग करणारे तुम्ही फक्त तात्पुरते विश्वस्त आहात. त्यामुळं सरकारचा पैसा आपल्या घरचा नाही म्हणून कशीही उधळपट्टी करण्याचा किंवा 'बॅगा… — Rohit Pawar (@RRPSpeaks) August 3, 2025 Opposition reacts Shiv Sena UBT leader Aditya Thackeray on microblogging website X had posted video of Minister Sanjay Shirsat and tagged CMO Maharashtra and wished him 'happy friendship day". He further wrote, 'Due to compulsion of alliance Dharma, Minister who was caught playing cards on mobile was given Sports department. Now will this minister get Finance department?" NCP(SP) MLA Rohit Pawar also posted same video of Shirsat and slammed him for the language and tone which he had used. 'Minister Shirsath, even if the money doesn't come from your personal household, it certainly belongs to the common people of the state whom you call #MyLord during election time! You being minister in the state govt who has given responsibility utilize this money is merely temporary trustees. Therefore, no one has the right to recklessly squander government funds or 'fill their bags' just because it's not their personal money." First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
