logo
How Ukraine can cope with the US pause on crucial battlefield weapons

How Ukraine can cope with the US pause on crucial battlefield weapons

Time of India2 days ago
The U.S. pause in weapons shipments to Ukraine coincides with intensified Russian attacks, creating vulnerabilities in Ukrainian cities due to the shortage of Patriot air defense missiles. While Ukraine is scaling up its domestic defense production, particularly in drones and artillery shells, European countries are increasing their military aid to compensate for the U.S. pause.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The decision by the United States to pause some weapons shipments to Ukraine has come at a tough time for Kyiv: Russia's bigger army is making a concerted push on parts of the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line and is intensifying long-range drone and missile attacks that increasingly hammer civilians in Ukrainian cities.Washington has been Ukraine's biggest military backer since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of its neighbor on Feb. 24, 2022. But the Trump administration has been disengaging from the war, and no end to the fighting is in sight, despite recent direct peace talks.Here's a look at Ukraine's options following the U.S. pause of some arms deliveries:Specific weapons needed from U.S. Amid recurring concerns in Kyiv about how much military support its allies can supply and how quickly, Ukraine has raced to build up its domestic defense industry.The country's output has gradually grown, especially in the production of more and increasingly sophisticated drones, but Ukraine needs to speedily scale up production.Crucially, some high-tech U.S. weapons are irreplaceable. They include Patriot air defense missiles , which are needed to fend off Russia's frequent ballistic missile attacks, but which cost $4 million each. That vital system is included in the pause, and many cities in Ukraine, including Kyiv, could become increasingly vulnerable.A senior Ukrainian official said Thursday that Patriot systems are "critically necessary" for Ukraine, but U.S.-made HIMARS precision-guided missiles, also paused, are in less urgent need as other countries produce similar assets."Other countries that have these (Patriot) systems can only transfer them with U.S. approval. The real question now is how far the United States is willing to go in its reluctance to support Ukraine," he told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because of sensitivity of the subject.The official said that Patriot missiles exist in sufficient numbers globally, and he said that accessing them requires political resolve."There are enough missiles out there," he said, without providing evidence.He also stated that Ukraine has already scaled up its domestic production of 155 mm artillery shells, which were once critically short, and is now capable of producing more than is currently contracted. "Supplies from abroad have also become more available than before," he said.Backup plan Amid at times fraught relations with U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been enlisting greater European help for his country's arms manufacturing plans.European countries don't have the production levels, military stockpiles or the technology to pick up all the slack left by the U.S. pause, but Zelenskyy is recruiting their help for ambitious joint investment projects.Draft legislation to help Ukrainian defense manufacturers scale up and modernize production, including building new facilities at home and abroad, will be put to a vote in the Ukrainian parliament later this month, Defense Minister Rustem Umerov announced this week.Zelenskyy said last month that major investments will go to the production of drones and artillery shells."The volume of support this year is the largest since the start of the full-scale war," he said about commitments from foreign countries.Under Trump, there have been no new announcements of U.S. military or weapons aid to Ukraine. Between March and April, the United States allocated no new help at all, according to Germany's Kiel Institute, which tracks such support.For the first time since June 2022, four months after Russia's full-scale invasion, European countries have surpassed the U.S. in total military aid, totaling 72 billion euros ($85 billion) compared with 65 billion euros ($77 billion) from the U.S., the institute said last month.Big battlefield problem Without Patriot missiles, as well as the AIM-7 Sparrow air-to-air missile and shorter-range Stinger missiles that are also included in the pause, Ukrainian cities likely will take a bashing as more Russian missiles pierce air defenses.On the front line, Ukrainian troops haven't recently voiced complaints about ammunition shortages, as they have in the past. They have always said that during the war, they have never had as much ammunition to as their disposal as Russian forces.The army faces a different problem: It's desperately short-handed. It's turning to drones to compensate for its manpower shortage, and analysts say the front isn't about to collapse.Asked about the timing of the U.S. pause, the Ukrainian official emphasized the need for stable, reliable supply lines."This is war - and in war, steady deliveries are always crucial," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hamas Says It's Ready to ‘Immediately' Enter Ceasefire Talks
Hamas Says It's Ready to ‘Immediately' Enter Ceasefire Talks

Mint

time14 minutes ago

  • Mint

Hamas Says It's Ready to ‘Immediately' Enter Ceasefire Talks

Hamas said it is ready to 'immediately' start negotiations with Israel on a proposal by US President Donald Trump for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza. A deal on the framework would see Hamas return half of the 50 hostages it still holds and pursue mediated talks with Israel to end the war. The proposal, accepted by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, will be one of the major topics during his visit to Washington where he will meet with Trump on Monday. 'The Hamas movement has completed its internal consultations and discussions with Palestinian factions and forces regarding the latest proposal put forward by the mediators,' the group said in a statement. 'The movement has submitted its response to the brothers mediators, characterized by a positive spirit.' An agreement would pause, if not end, a war between Iran-backed Hamas and Israel that's raged since October 2023, killing tens of thousands of Palestinians, devastating Gaza and destabilizing the wider Middle East. Trump said late Friday that 'there could be a Gaza deal next week,' and he was 'very optimistic but it changes day to day.' While Netanyahu's government weeks ago agreed to the US proposal, Washington and the other main mediators — Qatar and Egypt — couldn't get the sides to overcome key sticking points. Hamas had said any ceasefire must end the war and also refused Israel's demands to disarm and remove itself from power in Gaza. Israel has intensified military operations even as it agreed to talks. The army ordered tens of thousands of people to leave the outskirts of Gaza City since Tuesday and stepped up air strikes and incursions in the northern city, leading to an increase in the number of fatalities. With assistance from Dan Williams. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Big, beautiful bill: US pulls back on solar, wind, EVs as China races ahead
Big, beautiful bill: US pulls back on solar, wind, EVs as China races ahead

Indian Express

time15 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Big, beautiful bill: US pulls back on solar, wind, EVs as China races ahead

US President Donald Trump has signed the Congress-approved 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Act (OBBBA), which marks a sharp break from his predecessor Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that drove billions into clean energy investments – from solar and wind to electric vehicles (EVs). Instead, the OBBBA accelerates the phaseout of federal incentives for these clean technologies, slashes royalty rates for domestic fossil fuel drilling, and expands oil and gas leasing through new provisions. The US House of Representatives passed the bill on July 3 without altering the Senate-approved version received earlier this week. While the final text modestly tones down the House's more aggressive cuts in support for hydrogen production and batteries, it still rolls back key benefits for solar and wind energy, as well as for both commercial and passenger EVs. Experts warn the legislation could drive up household energy bills over the next decade, slow the deployment of clean technologies on the US power grid, and – most importantly – cement China's dominance in the global clean energy race. The provisions of the OBBBA legislation signed by Trump are likely to push household energy bills by 2-7 per cent – an increase of $95-250 – in 2035, according to the New York-headquartered Rhodium Group. 'Most of this increase is driven by fewer electric vehicles on the road, leading to higher motor gasoline consumption and prices,' the think tank said in a note on July 2. Prior to the OBBBA, provisions under the IRA provided tax credits for purchase of new commercial and passenger EVs through 2032. Now, the benefits will end on September 30 later this year. To be eligible for clean electricity tax credits, wind and solar projects will now have to come online by the end of 2027. While the Senate also considered a new excise tax on upcoming wind and solar facilities with inadequate domestic content, the provision was removed from the final draft. 'Given that we expect far fewer EVs on the road and a meaningful reduction in clean energy deployment on the grid, there are also still considerable questions around the viability of new clean energy manufacturing in the US… lower levels of domestic demand for batteries, solar panels, wind turbines, and electric vehicles could threaten the economic case for a number of manufacturing facilities that have been announced or, in some cases, that are already operating,' Rhodium said. As expected, the oil and gas industry – long a key backer of Trump's presidential campaigns – welcomed the OBBBA's push to expand fossil fuel production. But critics argue that US shale remains costlier than renewables, and that leaning on fossil fuels to meet rising electricity demand is both economically and practically unviable. In a statement on the legislation, David Widawsky, director of the World Resources Institute (WRI), US, said, 'Fossil fuels alone won't meet the skyrocketing energy demand from manufacturing, AI, electrification, and increasingly frequent and intense heat waves that prompt more AC usage. But America can create a more flexible, agile, and resilient power system with renewables and grid upgrades. Clean energy sources are better positioned to come online quickly to meet growing electricity needs and spur economic growth.' The final OBBBA text, while broadly scaling back clean energy support, is still less severe than the House version originally sent to the Senate. It gives clean hydrogen projects until end-2027 to qualify for tax credits – two years more than earlier proposed – and retains incentives for carbon capture, nuclear power, and clean fuels. Energy storage systems tied to solar or wind can also access full investment benefits through 2032, avoiding a sharper phaseout of benefits. Across the Pacific, China has ramped up thermal power to meet rising industrial demand – but a steady pivot to clean technologies remains central to its energy strategy. For instance, in 2024, while it started construction to add around 100 GW of coal power capacity, it added a whopping 420 GW of solar and wind. In comparison, the US added less than 55 GW in 2024, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). Moreover, Rhodium estimates that China's push to electrify its vehicle fleet, particularly in trucking, is already displacing around 1 million barrels of oil per day – roughly equivalent to Oman's daily output. The perceived American retreat from solar, wind, and EVs will further strengthen Chinese dominance in these sectors.

What really fuels Putin's war: Not oil or weapons, but Russia's grip on global nuclear business
What really fuels Putin's war: Not oil or weapons, but Russia's grip on global nuclear business

First Post

time19 minutes ago

  • First Post

What really fuels Putin's war: Not oil or weapons, but Russia's grip on global nuclear business

While the world has been focusing on the Iranian nuclear programme, another country has been flourishing in nuclear technology and the production of enriched uranium. read more While the world has been focusing on the Iranian nuclear programme, another country has been flourishing in nuclear technology and the production of enriched uranium. While the matters are still under control and the enriched uranium is far less explosive than the situation in Tehran, it still can be concerning for the global world order. Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly used nuclear threats to try to deter Western support for Ukraine since the 2022 invasion, warning of dire consequences if Western countries intervene militarily. While many in the West consider it a bluff, Russia's nuclear capabilities paint a different story. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It is pertinent to note that the civilian nuclear industry can be broadly divided into two main markets: 1) Building nuclear power stations or reactors. 2) The production and supply of enriched-uranium fuel. It is believed that whoever dominates these export markets gains not just geopolitical heft and economic and soft power, but also influence over the policing of nuclear proliferation and safety standards. According to the figures released by the World Nuclear Association, in both cases, it is Russia that is dominating the market. Rosatom, the country's state-owned nuclear firm, has about 65 per cent of the global export market for nuclear reactors in power stations. Meanwhile, Moscow controls 44 per cent of the world's uranium-enrichment capacity. Money comes from friends and foes alike According to a report published by The Economist, Rosatom, Russia's state nuclear corporation, is involved in the construction of about 20 reactors abroad. Out of these, 17 are built outside Russia, with active projects in countries like Turkey, Egypt, India, and Bangladesh. The buyers also include countries that are critical of Putin. For example, the continent of Europe continues to remain dependent on Russian technology and nuclear fuel, despite Western efforts to reduce reliance. Money also comes from foes like the United States of America. In 2023, the US bought roughly a quarter of its enriched uranium from Russia, while the Ukraine war was still ongoing. Russia's nuclear exports have become its key source of revenue and international influence. Nations tend to see Russia as an alternative to Western suppliers or China, which are much more limited and would take years to scale up. Amid sanctions, World Bank data suggested that in 2023, Russia earned about $2.7bn from exporting enriched uranium—mostly to America and the EU, and another $1.1bn from exporting reactors and components, such as the fuel assemblies that hold the enriched uranium. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rosatom itself noted that its foreign operations generated revenue of more than $16bn in 2023, including more than $7bn from building new power plants, many of them funded by Russian state-backed loans. This figure has been rising since Russia invaded Ukraine. Why it matters Through customer reliance on Russian fuel or nuclear technology, Russia gains diplomatic leverage. For instance, in May, the European Commission pledged to release plans the following month to introduce taxes or levies on Russian enriched uranium. However, the plan received heavy resistance from Slovakia and Hungary, which both have Russian-designed reactors, as they complained that the European plan would lead to higher prices. Similarly, Turkey's 2010 deal with Rosatom to build and operate four nuclear reactors in the country deepened its ties to Russia. Many saw it as a reason why Ankara decided to buy S-400 aircraft missile batteries from Russia as well. Meanwhile, in Bangladesh, Rosatom is building two reactors that will add about 10 per cent to the country's generating capacity. This will put Bangladesh alongside the likes of Hungary and Slovakia, which are assessed to have a 'high' dependence on Russian-built or -operated nuclear power plants. In light of this, Western governments are taking a two-pronged strategy when it comes to dealing with Russian dominance. The first involves reducing their reliance on enriched uranium, fuel assemblies and other services provided by Rosatom. The second is to try more vigorously to compete with Russia in selling reactors. In 2023, the US, the UK, Canada, France and Japan formed the 'Sapporo Five' group to collaborate on at least $4.2bn-worth of investments in new enrichment. Hence, it will be interesting to see whether this group will be able to beat the Russian dominance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store