Defining ‘Antisemitism' Is the Subject of Bitter Debate
There's no consensus about what, precisely, constitutes antisemitism.
University administrators and federal officials alike have considered one contentious definition that has gained traction in recent years, put forward by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.
The definition itself is not the source of controversy. It states that antisemitism is a 'certain perception of Jews that may be expressed as hatred' toward them. But the alliance also includes with the definition a series of examples that alarm many supporters of free expression.
They include holding Israel to a 'double standard' and claiming Israel's existence is a 'racist endeavor.' Supporters of the Palestinian cause say those examples conflate antisemitism with anti-Zionism and are intended to protect Israel from criticism.
Supporters of the alliance's definition say that it helps press colleges to stop tolerating behavior against Jews that would be unacceptable if it were directed at racial minority groups or L.G.B.T.Q. students.
Debates over how to define antisemitism have intensified on college campuses since the Hamas attack on Israel in 2023 and Israel's ensuing war in Gaza. The definition has been invoked in debates over whether to cancel controversial speakers, events and panels on the ground that they are antisemitic.
Donald Trump campaigned on punishing universities that did not do enough to curb antisemitism. His administration has threatened significant amounts of funding to institutions like Harvard, saying they did not do enough to keep Jewish students safe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Curses as White House Faith Office Lunch Takes Bizarre Turn
Things got a bit awkward during the White House Faith Office luncheon on Monday. Not only did President Donald Trump curse in front of faith leaders—calling Biden-era indictments against him 'bulls--t'—he raged that he he had been investigated more than the gangster Al Capone, bragged he has 'always made money,' and incorrectly claimed gas prices are the lowest they have been in 50 years. Those topics did not appear to be part of Trump's prepared remarks. As he addressed assembled religious business leaders from the podium, he looked down occasionally at his speech but went off on tangents as he worked his way through the text. 'I've ended the radical left war on faith, and we're once again protecting religious freedom instead of destroying it, and God is once again welcomed back into our public square,' Trump said, clearly part of his prepared remarks. Trump, 79, compared himself to Capone moments later. He characterized the notorious gangster, believed to have murdered over 200 people, as 'great.' 'I was under investigation more than the late, great, Alphonse Capone,' Trump said. 'Think of it. Al Capone would kill people for dinner. If he left the room and he didn't like him, he'd have him shot, killed, buried under a building someplace, as part of the foundation of a building. They're all over the place, and I said I had more time under investigation than the legendary Alphonse Capone, or probably anybody else.' Trump then misremembered that he had been indicted four times in 2023, not five. 'The one thing I did that was very helpful, I was indicted five times. Indicted, that wasn't a word that was in—my father's looking down, my mother's looking down, that my son's not supposed to be indicted,' he said. 'I think I got indicted five times, impeached two times. All bulls--t, right? Terrible stuff.' The luncheon crowd, comprising 60 CEOs and business leaders who donate to faith-aligned charities, did not appear to mind the president's meandering, as they clapped and cheered throughout his speech as he rambled. 'Gas prices have reached the lowest level in five decades,' Trump remarked at one point. 'Actually, it's going to be, we're going to see some really good numbers where, you know, drill, baby drill, drill, baby drill. I've got to make sure that people can afford to produce the gas. ... 'But the gas has gotten to the lowest level in decades, and you're seeing $1.99 $1.98. I saw $1.95 at certain states, not California, because every time it goes down, they add taxes onto it,' Trump rambled. 'All they do is they keep adding taxes. Terrible governor, doesn't know what he's doing. He may be, he may be a candidate, but if you, if you go by success, you can't have him be a candidate.' Fox News reported that the White House luncheon is the 'first event of its kind.' The White House Faith Office was created by executive order in February. Trump grew up in a Reformed Church but rarely attends services as an adult. He has made a habit of name-dropping God since entering politics a decade ago, and he won the presidency in 2016 off the backs of Evangelical voters who later became his MAGA base.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UN investigates 875 Palestinian deaths near Gaza aid hubs
The United Nations is investigating the deaths of 875 Palestinians near aid distribution sites in Gaza, with reports linking the fatalities to controversial US and Israeli-backed aid hubs.
Forbes
13 minutes ago
- Forbes
Is Patriarchy Corporate America's Costliest Blind Spot? This Expert Weighs In
Close-up photo of Dr. Tubbs holding book 'Erased.' Research suggests that companies with diverse leadership teams produce over 19% higher innovation revenue compared to non-diverse teams, yet global and U.S. averages for women in senior leadership roles float between 28% and 34% in recent years. After approximately $8 billion spent annually on diversity training, the numbers haven't budged, and Dr. Anna Malaika Tubbs believes that this is not a coincidence. The Cambridge-educated anthropologist and bestselling author of The Three Mothers argues in her latest work, Erased, that patriarchy isn't a relic of the past or a women's issue but a business crisis disguised as progress. 'The things that we have lost as a result of a desire to protect American patriarchy have not been by mistake but have been intentional. The erasure of mothers in my first book was not an accident but rather a deliberate omission,' Tubbs said. 'Many historians and scholars felt it necessary to exclude women from their accounts of men's lives. When we understand it that way, rather than as something that just happens naturally over time, we're more aware of what we're up against in terms of the desire to maintain a social order and to erase anything that proves we can choose other options.' This same pattern of deliberate exclusion didn't end with history books but seeped into corporate culture, eventually making its way into boardrooms and performance reviews and strategic planning sessions. Tubbs also rejects the idea that patriarchy is outdated and, instead, presents it as a part of a larger, more insidious system. Think about the last board meeting where a woman's concerns about market risk got dismissed as 'overthinking,' or when relationship-building skills got labeled 'soft' while aggressive negotiation tactics were called 'strategic.' These aren't isolated but collectively form symptoms of what Tubbs calls 'American patriarchy,' a term she uses to distinguish the specific system that emerged from the founding fathers' post-Revolutionary War anxiety about maintaining control. According to Tubbs, modern patriarchy is not a personal failing but a structural problem. 'If we think about it as a system rather than a person's fault, we realize how all of us have been hurt by it,' she said. This framing avoids the defensive posturing that typically derails diversity conversations in corporate settings, and instead of finger-pointing, it redirects attention toward structural barriers, those that constrain organizational potential. Applying Tubbs' framework to corporate settings reveals how patriarchy becomes self-sabotaging at the institutional level. When companies fail to recognize and address patterns of exclusion, they perpetuate cycles that limit their potential for growth, scaling, and adaptation. The cost of this can be far-reaching and is only reinforced because other unlikely groups contribute to it. 'Patriarchs are not only men,' Tubbs emphasizes. 'There are many women, people of color and immigrants who are protecting this social order.' Patriarchy is not a new topic of conversation, especially not in corporate conversations, but Tubbs pushes for something that goes beyond simple recognition. She's asking executives to look at their last five major product failures and ask themselves if a more diverse leadership team would have seen the blind spots coming. 'We cannot build a nation where women have power over men because that's not what I'm advocating for, but instead a nation where we each have power vested in us,' Tubbs said. For business, this vision translates into cultures where different voices and perspectives aren't just tolerated but actively pursued as competitive and valuable, as opposed to being yet another diversity metric. 'We have to be completely aware at all times that we cannot be neutral, because our American systems are not neutral,' Tubbs said. The observation cuts through corporate rhetoric and exposes how being neutral itself can become a form of complicity. The companies that get this right will tap into market opportunities that their competitors miss. For some companies, the biggest threat to innovation isn't in Silicon Valley but the unchecked bias around their boardroom table.
