Israel agrees to discuss ending Gaza war in Doha negotiations
Israel has, for the first time, agreed to formally consider ending the war in Gaza as part of ongoing negotiations in Doha, Haaretz reported on Sunday.
A political source involved in the talks told Haaretz that Israeli negotiators are now engaging with a broader proposal linking a long-term ceasefire to the release of hostages, security assurances, and post-war governance arrangements in Gaza.
'This deal is extremely complex,' the source explained. 'It's not just about hostages or prisoners—it's about ending the war. Everything is interconnected.'
The proposed framework reportedly includes a 60-day window to negotiate a permanent ceasefire and the release of 10 surviving Israeli hostages. Additional issues would be addressed during the truce period.
According to Haaretz, the Israeli delegation arrived in Doha with expanded authority to explore compromises, although still bound by core security constraints. Israeli media reported that the talks remain active and that a higher-level delegation may soon be sent to accelerate progress.
Meanwhile, Yedioth Ahronoth reported that US envoy Steve Witkoff is expected in Doha later this week, potentially joined by Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, Mossad Director David Barnea, National Security Council chief Tzachi Hanegbi, and the acting head of Shin Bet.
Despite the diplomatic push, Israeli forces continued their military campaign in Gaza. Palestinian outlets, citing medical sources, reported 15 deaths since dawn, including nine civilians killed while waiting for humanitarian aid.
Since the war began on October 7, 2023, Gaza's Health Ministry has documented at least 58,765 deaths and 140,485 injuries. Among them, 891 were killed and 5,754 wounded while trying to access food aid.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
27 minutes ago
- Shafaq News
25 nations demand Gaza ceasefire: Israeli war must end now
Shafaq News – Brussels Twenty-five foreign ministers and a senior EU official, in a rare joint statement on Monday, called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, condemning the escalating humanitarian crisis. 'The war in Gaza must end now,' read the declaration, endorsed by top diplomats from Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. The ministers decried the rising civilian death toll and the collapse of essential services in Gaza, warning that Israel's restricted aid flow and lethal attacks on civilians seeking food and water 'fuel instability and strip Gazans of their dignity.' Citing over 800 Palestinian deaths while attempting to access aid, the group condemned Israel's blockade as a clear breach of international law, urging immediate, unrestricted access for UN agencies and humanitarian organizations. They rejected proposals to transfer civilians into so-called 'humanitarian cities,' denouncing such plans as both unlawful and inhumane, while warning that ongoing settlement expansion, including the E1 project, would destroy the viability of a future Palestinian state and dismantle the possibility of a two-state solution. Calling for the unconditional release of hostages taken by Hamas since October 7, 2023, the ministers backed mediation by the United States, Qatar, and Egypt, emphasizing that only a negotiated ceasefire can end the hostages' ordeal and unlock a political resolution.
Shafaq News
27 minutes ago
- Shafaq News
Syria's Druze flashpoint reawakens Lebanon's strategic dilemmas
Shafaq News The eruption of violence in Syria's Druze-majority province of Suwayda has sent political tremors across Lebanon, reigniting long-dormant fears about sectarian volatility, external manipulation, and the fragility of communal identity in a region shaped by unresolved conflicts. As the clashes involved Druze fighters, Bedouin tribal groups, Syrian government forces, and Israeli forces escalated into a deadly confrontation—leaving over 900 dead and drawing in Syrian security forces and Israeli airstrikes—Lebanon's Druze community has entered a moment of acute strategic reflection. Druze Identity Under Pressure The Druze, a small but historically significant religious minority in the Middle East, have long maintained a delicate equilibrium in Syria, Lebanon, and Israel. In Lebanon, the community—concentrated in the Chouf, Aley, and parts of Mount Lebanon—has played a pivotal role in the country's political life, most notably through the legacy of Kamal Jumblatt and his son, Walid Jumblatt. While the Lebanese Druze have traditionally exercised caution in regional entanglements, the crisis in Suwayda is testing that posture. Images of civilian casualties and calls for self-defense have stirred communal solidarity, but also sharpened internal divides, particularly over how to respond to the Israeli military strikes targeting Syrian positions under the pretext of protecting Druze civilians. Inside Syria, this issue has become a major fault line. Sheikh Hikmat al-Hijri, a leading Druze spiritual figure in Suwayda, has openly called for international protection and appeared to welcome Israeli military pressure on Syrian government forces. This stance, however, has not gone unchallenged. In Lebanon, the response has been far more unified—and uncompromising. All major Druze leaders, including Walid Jumblatt, Talal Arslan, and Sheikh al-Aql Sami Abi Al-Muna, have categorically rejected any Israeli involvement in Syria. Jumblatt, the most popular Druze leader in the country, while calling for dialogue between Suwayda's leadership and Damascus, warned that foreign protection schemes are historically proven traps, designed more to divide than to defend. Abi Al-Muna echoed this position, emphasizing that the protection of Druze lives cannot come at the cost of enabling regional actors to manipulate the crisis for their own ends. A Familiar Mirror: Lebanon's Own Fragility Analysts across Beirut view Suwayda not as an isolated eruption, but as a compressed replay of Lebanon's own unresolved dilemmas—sectarian fragmentation, parallel armed power centers, and the ever-present risk of foreign patronage displacing national sovereignty. The Lebanese state, already weakened by economic collapse and political paralysis, has no room for spillover violence. Yet its proximity to the crisis—and its deep communal ties to the region—makes disengagement nearly impossible. Security officials have also expressed concern over unverified reports suggesting cross-border Druze mobilization. Though no formal Lebanese involvement has been confirmed, the specter of transnational militia movements reawakens fears of regional proxy conflict, this time framed through sectarian solidarity. Internal Fractures, Regional Games The crisis has also revealed internal fault lines within Lebanon's Druze community. While Jumblatt and Arslan have maintained a message of restraint and national unity, Wiam Wahhab, leader of the Arab Tawhid Party, has taken a far more provocative stance. In a series of fiery statements, Wahhab called for the arming of Druze factions across the region and even announced the creation of a militia under the name 'Army of Tawhid.' He issued direct threats to Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa and demanded the withdrawal of pro-government forces from Suwayda, all while appealing to Druze communities in Syria, Lebanon, and beyond to rise in armed resistance. Wahhab's rhetoric has drawn sharp criticism from across Lebanon's political spectrum. His open flirtation with the idea of Israeli air cover and his attempts to direct Suwayda's internal conflict from his base in Mount Lebanon were seen by many Druze leaders as reckless and dangerous. Sheikh Abi Al-Muna reiterated that such calls for armed escalation only endanger the broader community and risk aligning the Druze with agendas fundamentally at odds with their national interests. Talal Arslan welcomed the ceasefire in Suwayda, calling it a necessary first step to prevent further bloodshed and sectarian polarization. In a statement, he urged Syrians—Druze and non-Druze alike—to reject division and pursue dialogue over confrontation, reaffirming Syria's territorial unity and warning against the ruinous consequences of civil fragmentation. Proxy Contests and Strategic Depth At a regional level, Israel's reported aim to establish a buffer zone in southern Syria—from Suwayda to Quneitra and Daraa—is viewed in Lebanon as a strategic effort to undercut both the Syrian state and Iran's allies, particularly Hezbollah. By framing its intervention as a humanitarian mission to 'protect the Druze,' Israel is attempting to recalibrate its military presence along the Golan Heights, potentially weakening Hezbollah's logistical depth across the Lebanese-Syrian border. Hezbollah, denouncing the Israeli intervention in Syria, is widely believed to be reassessing its strategic posture in light of these developments. Any shift in control over Suwayda—and especially the emergence of Israeli-aligned Druze militias—could pose a long-term threat to Hezbollah's regional corridor. While the US-brokered ceasefire has momentarily stemmed the violence, the structural conditions that led to the Suwayda crisis remain dangerously intact—fragmented sovereignty, proliferation of militias, and unresolved grievances. For Lebanon, the threat is less about military spillover and more about political contagion: a reactivation of sectarian logic that could unravel what remains of its delicate communal balance.
Shafaq News
44 minutes ago
- Shafaq News
PYKS: Suwayda violence highlights need for dialogue
Shafaq News – Qamishli On Monday, The Yekiti Kurdistan Party – Syria (PYKS) held the Syrian transitional government accountable for the clashes in Suwayda, accusing it of relying on "repression and exclusion" instead of diplomacy. In a statement, the party raised alarm over what it called 'sectarian massacres ' and widespread destruction of public and private property, warning that such violence threatens civil peace and deepens the suffering of Syrians. Condemning the use of force against peaceful demands by members of the Druze community, PYKS asserted that durable solutions require a serious national dialogue inclusive of all Syrian groups. While welcoming the fragile ceasefire declared on Sunday, which saw the redeployment of internal security forces and the withdrawal of tribal fighters, PYKS urged the formation of an independent investigative committee with international oversight to ensure accountability. A founding member of the Kurdish National Council (KNC), PYKS advocates for federalism and constitutionally recognized Kurdish autonomy within a unified, democratic Syria—offering a clear alternative to the Democratic Union Party's (PYD) model of decentralized 'democratic confederalism' in the northeast.
