Cannabis seeds, leaves not ganja: Andhra Pradesh High Court weeds out confusion
The case was based on the arrest of the petitioners under provisions of the Act for allegedly being in possession of over 1.5 kilograms of what was reported as ganja. Upon examination of the material seized, the petitioners' counsel argued that the substance consisted only of seeds and leaves, and not of the prohibited flowering or fruiting parts. The counsel further relied on previous judgments that clarified the definition of ganja under the law.The court concurred with the argument and said that there was no material on record to show that the seized substance contained flowering or fruiting tops. In such a scenario, the seizure did not attract the penal provisions of the Act. Accordingly, the High Court granted bail to the petitioners.advertisementThe judgment is expected to have implications for law enforcement practices and could potentially impact pending cases where the seizure consists solely of cannabis seeds or leaves without the flowering components.The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, provides the legal framework for controlling and regulating operations relating to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in India. Section 2(iii)(b) of the Act defines ganja specifically as 'the flowering or fruiting tops of the cannabis plant (excluding the seeds and leaves when not accompanied by the tops).'Justice Reddy's ruling reinforces this distinction and reiterates the legislative intent to criminalise only the possession and trade of the intoxicating parts of the plant. - EndsMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Andhra Pradesh
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
27 minutes ago
- India Gazette
Punjab: Woman, son booked for allegedly selling wartime airstrip using forged papers
Ferozepur (Punjab) [India], July 3 (ANI): In a startling case of land fraud reported from Punjab's Ferozepur by a whistleblower, a woman and her son allegedly sold off a World War II-era airstrip used by the Indian Air Force in 1997. The case pertains to the fraudulent sale of the land of the historic Advance Landing Ground (ALG) of the IAF in Fattu Wala village here. The airstrip, used during the 1962, 1965, and 1971 wars, was allegedly sold by Usha Ansal and her son Naveen Chand Ansal of Dumani Wala village, currently residing in the national capital Delhi. The mother-son duo has been booked for fraudulently selling Indian Air Force land in Punjab's Fattu Wala village using forged documents, police said. The land, which had been historically used during major wars, was sold in 1997. A complaint was filed by the complainant Nishan Singh, who is a retired kanungo, years ago, but no action was taken. In 2021, the officials at Halwara Air Force Station in Punjab sought an inquiry from the Deputy Commissioner of Ferozepur, but still no solution was found. Following this, Nishan Singh filed an appeal in the Punjab and Haryana High Court. A case was finally registered against them at the Kulgarhi Police Station. Senior Superintendent of Police Bhupinder Singh said, 'This action has been taken on the basis of the complaint of retired Kanungo Nishan Singh that was investigated by Inspector Jagandeep Kaur (Vigilance Bureau).' The investigation revealed that the accused, in connivance with some low-level officials of the Revenue Department, sold the IAF land to private individuals in 1997 using forged documents. His lawyer said that the original owner of the land, Madan Mohan Lal, had died in 1991. The sale deal was finalised in 1997, in which the names of Mukhtiar Singh, Jagir Singh, Surjit Kaur, Manjit Kaur, Dara Singh, Ramesh Kant and Rakesh Kant were included. The most important thing was that the land was never transferred to them. Following a Court direction, the Deputy Commissioner had submitted a three-page report stating that the land was still in the possession of the IAF as per the revenue records of 1958-59. However, Nishan Singh was not satisfied with this report and filed another petition alleging that several important facts were deliberately hidden and the land was transferred to private individuals with the connivance of some officials. Following an investigation by the district administration in May 2025, the portion of land that was allegedly transferred to private individuals was handed back to the Ministry of Defence. 'It was found that the real owner had left for Delhi before 1947. The officers here prepared fake records and sold this land in 1997. Our revenue officers kept covering up this matter and kept taking huge bribes,' said Nishan Singh. He said the truth came to the fore when the High Court intervened and entrusted the probe to the Vigilance Director. The report filed on June 20 led to the registration of the case. It was found that the land belonged to the IAF and had been purchased by the British administration in 1945 for the Second World War. (ANI)
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
2007 Hyderabad blast convict produced before Mangaluru court
Mangaluru: Mohammed Akbar Ismail Chowdhary, one of the convicts in the 2007 twin bomb blasts in Hyderabad and the 2008 Mumbai serial blasts, was produced before a Mangaluru court on Monday in connection with a separate case registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Explosives Act at Ullal police station. Chowdhary, currently lodged in Cherlapally Central Jail in Telangana, was brought to the Third JMFC Court in Mangaluru by Ullal police on a body warrant and in the presence of Telangana police. The judge adjourned the case to July 23, allowing time for legal representation. The accused was subsequently taken back to Telangana. Chowdhary and co-accused Anique Shafique Syed have already been sentenced to death by a Hyderabad metropolitan court for their role in the 2007 bombings. A third accused, Mohammed Tareeq Anjum, was sentenced to life imprisonment. All three were alleged members of the banned Indian Mujahideen outfit. Chowdhary, originally from Mithanagar in Kondhwa Khurd, Pune, had links to terrorist operations in Mumbai, Pune, Hyderabad, and Mangaluru. He reportedly operated through Yasin Bhatkal and Iqbal Bhatkal, key figures in the Indian Mujahideen network. According to police sources, Chowdhary was active in the Chembugudde-Mukkacheri area of Ullal, and explosives used in the Hyderabad blasts are suspected to have been sourced from there.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Phone-tapping violates right to privacy: Madras Court observes, ‘Can only be used for…'
Phone-tapping is violation of the fundamental right to privacy unless it is justified by a procedure established by law, Madras High Court observed on Wednesday Citing Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, Justice N Anand Venkatesh states that the law permits phone-tapping in cases of a public emergency or in the interest of public safety but it should not be misused to to cover regular criminal investigations. Court observed, as qouted by Bar and Bench, "The right to privacy is now an integral part of the right to life and personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of The Constitution of India. Telephone tapping constitutes a violation of the right to privacy unless justified by a procedure established by law." 'Section 5(2) of the Act authorizes interception of telephones on the occurrence of a public emergency or in the interests of public words of Section 5(2) of the Act cannot be strained to include detection of ordinary crime' The Court was hearing a plea challenging a 2011 order issued by the Union Ministry of Home Affairs authorising the CBI to tap the mobile phone of the petitioner P Kishore, who was then the Managing Director of Everonn Education Limited. The order was linked to a CBI investigation based on an FIR filed in August 2011, which named Kishore as one of the accused. FIR said, an IRS officer named Andasu Ravinder, who was working as an Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, allegedly asked Kishore for a ₹ 50 lakh bribe to help his company avoid paying taxes. The bribe was allegedly to be routed through Uttam Bohra, a friend of Ravinder. Based on the tip-off, the CBI caught Ravinder and Bohra near Ravinder's home with ₹ 50 lakh which they couldn't explain. Kishore later challenged the phone-tapping order saying it violated his right to privacy. The Centre and CBI, however, argued that interception was necessary to prevent and investigate corruption. The Court dismissed this argument, saying that interpreting the law so broadly would weaken the constitutional right to privacy. "In fact, the use of Section 5(2) of the Act to detect the commission of ordinary crimes de-hors the requirement of public emergency or in the interests of public safety appears to be clearly misconceived." 'Where phone tapping has been found necessary to tackle crimes, such a power has been expressly conferred as for example in certain special statutes like the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999. Section 14 of the said Act authorizes interception of wire, electronic or oral communication for the purposes of investigating into organised crime. The words of Section 5(2) of the Act cannot be strained to include detection of ordinary crime' (With inputs from Bar and Bench)
