Zeeshan Ayyub responds to controversy over Ranbir Kapoor's 'Animal', discusses filmmaking, violence and freedom of expression
Zeeshan Ayyub rose to fame after portraying an antagonist in 2011's 'No One Killed Jessica'. In a recent interview, he discussed concerns about
Sandeep Reddy Vanga
's movies encouraging violent themes following the 'Animal' debate and addressed issues like PR strategies, hate speech, and the duties of filmmakers.
Zeeshan Ayyub shares views on films propagating violence
Speaking to Bollywood Bubble, Zeeshan talked about whether it is fair for Sandeep Reddy Vanga's films to propagate violence and if such films should be made, Ayyub explained that it is a somewhat complicated question. He honestly expressed that simply saying yes or no would not change anything; it would only spark controversy and attract attention. He tried to clarify his perspective by saying that there is no ban on making such films, and people are free to create them.
However, his concern arises when the creators get angry at criticism. He further added that the way creators react reflects their personality. He said that he wants to show who he truly is, no matter what others say, even if it is about the worst things someone wants to make a film on. He gave an example of someone wanting to make a film on Hitler, which is generally accepted without controversy. Even if that person says Hitler was an amazing person, they still want to make the film.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Featuring Brigade Ebony™ at Brigade Showcase 2025 | Aug 8–10, Sheraton Grand, Brigade Gateway
Brigade Group
Learn More
Undo
Zeeshan Ayyub on freedom of expression and criticism
Ayyub continued by saying that now there is no one stopping you from making the film. The real issue arises when people start criticizing it harshly, saying things like the film is very bad or wrong, and even suggesting violent reactions, accusing you of supporting someone like Hitler. In such cases, you cannot play the victim. While you have the right to freedom of expression, so does everyone else.
The problem occurs only if the film is made with some hidden agenda, and in that situation, he disagrees.
Zeeshan Ayyub's personal experience with related films
The 'Tanu Weds Manu' actor said that he will talk openly because he has not watched 'Kabir Singh' but saw '
Arjun Reddy
'. He mentioned that he wasn't able to watch more than half of the film. Honestly, he enjoyed the first half in some aspects and thought it was quite good. However, midway through, he wondered why certain things were done, questioning the necessity of treating the character a certain way.
Since he already felt he was living that character, he decided to stop watching. For him, boasting about watching the film outside does not make sense.
Zeeshan Ayyub stresses society's role in minimizing film impact
The 'Sam Bahadur' actor added that the important thing is to educate society enough so that the film's impact on them is minimal in the first place. He also acknowledged that the question of whether such films should be made is valid.
However, he believes it is not just about current PR tactics that fuel discussions on anything that becomes big news. He clarified that he is not referring to just one director, as many people are involved and contributing to this issue.
Zeeshan Ayyub explains the line between freedom of speech and hate speech
Zeeshan said that if a film propagates hate, it cannot be justified as freedom of speech. He further explained that the concept of absolute freedom is very debatable.
Referring to Malcolm X, he mentioned that many may disagree with this view, but Malcolm X stated that if your speech demeans or threatens the basic existence, survival, community, or identity of others, then it is not freedom of expression but hate speech.
He emphasized the importance of being cautious about this. Films should be made with this in mind—if they cross into hate speech or deny others the right to survive, then it is indeed problematic.
Zeeshan Ayyub concludes on controversy and filmmaking responsibility
Concluding, the actor expressed that he hopes the audience understands where he is coming from. He mentioned that he deliberately stopped watching the film early on. Recently, he called out a specific person by name, who did not even realize the impact. He clarified that it is not just about this film— the director made the film on their own accord.
Whatever games, including PR strategies, happened caused distress to those involved, but the film became a blockbuster.
They earned money and moved on peacefully.
Zeeshan Ayyub on future controversies and societal resilience
The 'Chhalaang' actor added that the director will make another similar film, which will create more controversy and generate more earnings. Meanwhile, their lives continue comfortably, while people like him and the audience keep discussing it—this will not change anything except perhaps bring a few more viewers next time.
Therefore, gaining fame or name recognition through such means has no real significance.
The key idea, according to him, is that if a film is spreading hate speech, we must make our society capable enough to identify, understand, and prevent it from happening and also ensure that society is not affected by it. He emphasized that this is an important aspect.
Zeeshan Ayyub highlights the debate sparked by 'Animal'
'Animal' generated widespread debate due to its intense portrayal of violence, the reinforcement of toxic masculinity, and its representation of female characters. Despite doing well commercially, the film faced harsh backlash for seemingly endorsing damaging behaviors and unhealthy relationship dynamics. This controversy also sparked an important conversation about the balance between creative freedom, the ethical duties of filmmakers, and the broader societal impact of movies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Yeh Rishta's Rahul Sharma on the power of long-running TV dramas; says ‘Infinite shows let you prove your worth'
Rahul Sharma , currently seen as Anshuman in Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai, opens up about the changing landscape of Indian television and how the format of a show shapes an actor's journey. 'Limited series may be the future, but infinite shows give you space to prove your talent,' Rahul shares. While acknowledging the growing popularity of short-format content, he feels these shows often don't allow actors the time to shine. 'Limited series are not always given the recognition they deserve. People don't easily notice your talent in short formats because they're not seen as hits unless they run for years.' Rahul believes that infinite shows, despite their challenges, offer greater scope for character development and audience connection. 'With longer-running shows, you have time to explore different shades, build audience attachment, and prove your place in the industry,' he explains. However, he's not dismissive of short-form storytelling. Reflecting on his own experience, Rahul adds, 'I've worked in both, like in Kaal Bhairav. Limited series can be impactful too, especially for thrillers or romance when done in seasons. They're tighter and more focused.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why So Many Texas Drivers Are Switching Insurance After Seeing This Policy Auto Pro Get Quote Undo He also points out the unpredictability of TV today. 'You just can't predict how long a show will run anymore. What starts off as an infinite show might wrap up in a few months,' he says, emphasizing the need for flexibility and strong writing. Despite the rise of OTT, Rahul is confident about television's staying power. 'TV dramas still connect with families. If the story is engaging and relatable, people will watch,' he concludes. His perspective offers a grounded look at the evolving formats while reaffirming faith in the enduring power of television.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'It's never the fairy tale': Gisele Bündchen slams Tom Brady for being an absent father, claims she raised the kids alone
Gisele Bündchen offered a glimpse into her marriage with Tom Brady in 2022, revealing the challenges of balancing family life (Getty Images) Even in the world of supermodels and football legends, fairy tales aren't always what they seem. Back in 2022, Gisele Bündchen gave fans an unfiltered look into her marriage with NFL star Tom Brady, revealing how challenging it was to raise a family while her husband stayed laser-focused on football. Gisele Bündchen called it a partnership — but not always an equal one In a candid interview with British Vogue for its June 2022 issue, Gisele admitted, 'His focus is on his career, mine is mostly on the kids. It's never the fairy tale people want to believe it is. It takes work to be really in sync with someone, especially after you have kids.' That comment sent waves through fans who had long idolized the seemingly perfect couple. Despite the challenges, Gisele emphasized the strength of their partnership. 'I'm very grateful that he lets me take the reins when it comes to our family,' she said. 'He trusts my decisions.' The couple, who tied the knot in 2009, have two children together — Benjamin and Vivian — and Gisele helped raise Brady's son Jack, from his previous relationship with Bridget Moynahan. Tom Brady acknowledged the sacrifices Gisele Bündchen made for their family Brady, known for his unparalleled dedication to the game, didn't shy away from crediting Gisele for holding down the fort. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World During an episode of his Let's Go! podcast, he said, 'She hasn't worked much in the last ten, twelve years while raising our family and committing to a life in Boston and then moving to Florida. That's an issue.' The sentiment was mutual. When Brady briefly retired in early 2022, Gisele wrote on Instagram, 'What a ride @tombrady! So many memories! When I met you over 15 years ago, I didn't know the first thing about football… There is nothing you can't achieve. I have always been here for you.' Also Read: 'Gisele is a bit hot-headed': Insiders blow the lid off Tom Brady and Gisele Bündchen's toxic marriage This throwback moment continues to remind fans that even power couples face real-life struggles — and sometimes, love requires more than just adoration; it demands balance. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Unhi logon ne ‘kachra' bola tha': Suneel Darshan reveals Akshay Kumar was once ridiculed by top filmmakers after 14 flops
Suneel Darshan and Akshay Kumar collaborated on seven films, including Jaanwar, Ek Rishtaa, Andaaz, Talaash, and Dosti: Friends Forever. While they delivered multiple hits together, their last project was in 2005, after which the actor-filmmaker duo never worked together again. Now, as Darshan promotes his upcoming film Andaaz 2, he got candid about the "vulnerable" Akshay he first cast, and the humiliations the actor endured after a string of flops. Darshan remembered the time he signed Akshay for Jaanwar, saying the actor was at his lowest, coming off 13–14 back-to-back flops. 'He had stopped getting movies. Even the good ones weren't coming to him, and the bad ones were drying up too,' the director recalled in an interview with Bollywood Bubble. 'People tend to push you down even harder when you're already failing.' Interestingly, Jaanwar was originally written for Sunny Deol , who dropped out. Darshan then considered Ajay Devgn , but when Akshay reached out, destiny took over. 'He was this gorgeous, humble Punjabi boy. He had the discipline, the looks, but one big problem—he was not saleable,' Darshan admitted. 'Making a big-budget film with someone the trade didn't trust was a huge risk.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like She Was Everyone's Dream Girl In 90's, This Is Her Now The Latest Article Undo The risk, however, paid off. Jaanwar became a turning point in Akshay's career. 'Hera Pheri 3' CONFIRMED! Akshay Kumar Says 'We Are Back Together' But before that success came what the director calls an 'ugly phase' in the industry. 'There were times when people would misbehave—even on the streets. When actors fall, it can be traumatic. People who once praised you start laughing at you,' Darshan said. 'Not saying Akshay had his nose in the air, but fame does that to many.' Darshan also opened up about Akshay's difficult equation with the industry during those years. 'He told me once, 'I won't name them, but some of the biggest filmmakers used to ridicule me. They'd call me kachra behind my back,'' Darshan revealed, adding that Akshay didn't want to take names out of concern for the director's future. The filmmaker says he stood by Akshay when most others didn't—and eventually watched him rise again. 'It gave me a lot of joy when Akshay went on to work with all those same people… but on his terms. That felt like my victory too.' On a more emotional note, Darshan recalled the bond they shared. 'For seven years, this was his second home. He operated from my office when he wasn't shooting. That kind of connection doesn't happen often,' he said. 'Dosti, our last film together, reflected that very bond.'
